请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Anthony Gregorc
释义

  1. Career

  2. Mind Styles Model and Gregorc Style Delineator

     Supporting evidence  Review of Gregorc's study  Studies by others  Reliability  Construct validity  Supporting evidence, learning style models generally 

  3. Major works

  4. See also

  5. Footnotes

  6. References

{{Infobox scientist
| name = Anthony F. Gregorc
| image =
| birth_date =
| birth_place =
| death_date =
| death_place =
| nationality = American
| field = Phenomenology
| work_institution = Gregorc Associates Inc.[1]
| alma_mater = Miami University (Ohio), Kent State University (Ohio).
| doctoral_advisor =
| influences =
| influenced =
| known_for = Mind Styles Model
}}

Anthony F. Gregorc is best known for his theory of a

Mind Styles Model and its associated

Style Delineator.[2]

Career

Gregorc obtained a B.S. degree from Miami University and an M.S. degree and a Ph.D. degree from Kent State University. He has taught mathematics and biology and has been principal of a laboratory school for gifted youth. He was an associate professor of education administration at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and associate professor of curriculum and instruction at the University of Connecticut.[1] He is president of Gregorc Associates, Inc., in Columbia, Connecticut.

Mind Styles Model and Gregorc Style Delineator

The Gregorc Style Delineator is a self-scoring written instrument

that elicits responses to a set of 40 specific

words.[3]

Scoring the responses will give values for a model with two axes: a

"perceptual space duality," concrete vs. abstract, and

an "ordering duality," sequential vs.

random[4]

The resulting quadrants are the "styles":

  • Concrete Sequential
  • Concrete Random
  • Abstract Sequential
  • Abstract Random

Descriptions of the characteristics of these styles can be found in the

materials available from Gregorc Associates.

A similarly structured (two-axis, four-style) learning style model

with rather different axes and interpretation can be seen in the

Kolb LSI.

Supporting evidence

The design, conduct, and results of Gregorc's original testing of the

validity of his instrument and model are presented in his

Development, Technical, and Administration Manual,[5]

self-published and sold by Gregorc Associates. Some peer review has since

appeared in conventional channels:

With the exception of Joniak and Isakson (1988) and O'Brien (1990), the only

other psychometric analysis of the GSD has been limited to Gregorc's (1979)

initial assessments made during the instrument's early development in which

Gregorc interviewed several hundred participants. He compared the agreement of

GSD scores with an untested self-assessment scale to establish the instrument's

face validity for each individual (i.e., the instrument's results versus an

individual's subjective agreement that their learning style profile tends to

fit them). The correlations of the instrument's general results and the

subjectively rated agreement attributes were reported to be between .55 and

.76. This problematic method was adopted again in a subsequent comparative

analysis by the author (Gregorc, 1982c) and also yielded what Gregorc

considered positive results--29% strongly agreeing, 57% agreeing, 14% unsure,

and none

disagreeing.[6]

Review of Gregorc's study

Timothy Sewall, in a comparison of four learning style assessments

(Gregorc's, Myers Briggs, Kolb LSI, and an LSI by

Canfield) by review of their published supporting studies (i.e., without

new experimental work) concluded of Gregorc's design, "the most appropriate

use of this instrument would be to provide an example of how not to

construct [an] assessment tool."[7]

Studies by others

Reio and Wiswell (2006) report on their own independent study and

on those done earlier by O'Brien (1990) and Joniak and Isakson

(1988).[8]

Reliability

Internal consistency or reliability concerns

whether evidence can show that an instrument is repeatably measuring something

(which may be, but is "not necessarily what it is supposed to be

measuring"[9]).

Gregorc (1982c) reported test-retest correlation coefficients of .85 to .88

(measured twice with intervals ranging from 6 hours to 8 weeks) and alpha

coefficients of .89 to .93 on all four scales. In this study, the

Cronbach's alpha coefficients on all scales or channels ranged from .54 to

.68 (CS = .64, CR = .68, AR = .58, AS = .54). This study's alpha coefficients

are consistent with those reported by O'Brien (1990) and Joniak and Isakson

(1988), which ranged from .51 to .64 and .23 to .66, respectively, on all

scales.[10]

For internal consistency reliability estimates, although an alpha level of .70

can be considered "adequate," for the purposes of this study we considered a

stricter alpha level of .80 as a "good" cutoff value for our psychometric

examination of the GSD

(Henson, 2001).[11]

Construct validity

Construct validity concerns

whether evidence can show that what the instrument is measuring is at all what

the offered theory claims it is (whether each construct in the model "adequately

represents what is intended by theoretical account of the construct being

measured"[12]).

The data disconfirmed

both the two- and four-factor confirmatory models. In the post hoc exploratory

factor analyses, many of the factor pattern/structure coefficients were

ambiguously associated with two or more of the four theoretical channels as

well. Overall, there was little support for the GSD's theoretical basis or

design and the concomitant accurate portrayal of one's cognitive learning

style.[13]

[F]ar more work is needed on the GSD if indeed two bipolar

dimensions and Gregorc's mediational or channel theory are to be empirically

supported and if it is to be appropriately used with samples of

adults.[14]

Consistent with Joniak and Isaksen (1988) and O'Brien (1990), the GSD did not

display sufficient empirical evidence to validate the instrument's scores or to

confirm Gregorc's theoretical interpretation of four learning style channels or

two bipolar

dimensions.[15]

Supporting evidence, learning style models generally

A report from the UK think-tank Demos reported that

the evidence for a variety of learning style models is "highly variable",

that "authors are not by any means always frank about the evidence for their

work, and secondary sources ... may ignore the question of evidence altogether,

leaving the impression that there is no problem here."

[16]

Major works

  • Gregorc Style Delineator - A psychometric test
  • An Adult's Guide to Style, Gabriel Systems, Maynard (1982).
  • Mind Styles FAQs Book
  • The Mind Styles Model: Theory, Principles and Practice

See also

Learning styles

Footnotes

1. ^Gregorc Associates site accessed July 2007
2. ^[https://web.archive.org/web/20080208182558/http://library.thinkquest.org/C005704/content_hwl_gls.php3 Learning Styles at ThinkQuest.org] accessed July 2007
3. ^ 
4. ^Gregorc 1984, p. 3.
5. ^Gregorc 1984
6. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006, p. 492.
7. ^Sewall 1986
8. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006
9. ^Reliability (statistics)
10. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006, p. 494.
11. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006, p. 495.
12. ^Validity (statistics)#Construct validity
13. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006, abstract.
14. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006, pp. 498-9.
15. ^Reio and Wiswell 2006, p. 499.
16. ^Hargreaves, D., et al. (2005).[https://web.archive.org/web/20071222065214/http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/aboutlearning About learning: Report of the Learning Working Group]. Demos, p. 11.

References

  • {{anchor|refdtam}}Anthony F. Gregorc. Gregorc Style Delineator: Development, Technical, and Administration Manual. Gregorc Associates, Inc., 1984.
  • {{anchor|refSewall}}Timothy J. Sewall. "The measurement of learning style: a critique of four assessment tools". Technical report (ERIC ED267247), Wisconsin University, Green Bay, Assessment Center, 1986.
  • {{cite journal

|doi=10.1177/0013164405282459
|author=Thomas G. Reio Jr. and Albert K. Wiswell
|title=An Examination of the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Gregorc Style Delineator
|year=2006
|journal=Educational and Psychological Measurement
|volume=66
|issue=3
|pages=489
|ref=refReioWiswell}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Gregorc, Anthony F}}

7 : American psychologists|Living people|Educational psychologists|Intelligence researchers|Miami University alumni|Kent State University alumni|Year of birth missing (living people)

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/11 8:07:06