词条 | Australian family law | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
释义 |
Family Law in Australia is contained in various pieces of legislation, but also includes the common law and laws of equity, which affect the family and the relationship between those people - including when those relationships end. Most family law is practised in the Family Court of Australia. Laws affecting married and de facto couplesThe federal Family Law Act 1975 covers divorce, children's orders, property division, spousal maintenance and related matters. Since 1 March 2009 (1 July 2010 in South Australia) de facto couples are also covered by the Family Law Act in states or territories which have conferred their power over de facto relationships to federal jurisdiction. The power has been conferred in all jurisdictions except Western Australia.[1] Before the conferring of the power to the Commonwealth, state and territory laws applied to de facto relationships, which also continue to apply in non participating states or territories. Since 2009, the definition of "de facto couple" has included same-sex couples. The definition applies throughout Australia, in Commonwealth, state and territory legislation.[2] The names for de facto and similar relationships in each state and territory are as follows:
De facto relationships not recognised outside AustraliaBecause of how the power from state or territory to federal jurisdiction was conferred (see Section 51(xxxvii) of the Australian Constitution), de facto couples outside Australia are not covered by the Family Law Act. This is because there must be a nexus between the de facto couple and a state or territory, as the law can only be applied within a state or territory.[6][7][8][9] If a de facto couple moves out of an Australian state or territory they do not take the state or territory with them so the law cannot apply to them. The legal status and rights and obligations of the de facto or unmarried couple would then be recognised by the country's laws of where they are ordinarily resident. See the section on Family Court of Australia for further explanation on jurisdiction on de facto relationships. This is unlike marriage, which is legally recognised internationally outside of the country of marriage. Laws affecting childrenThe family law framework deals with parenting arrangements to ensure the best interests of children,[10] especially in circumstances where they are at risk or where their parents or carers are separating. Although child protection is primarily dealt with on a state and territory basis, under state and territory legislation, parenting arrangements could also be dealt with under the federal Family Law Act 1975.[11] A government-administered child support scheme enables parents to reach private agreements, or to register with the Child Support Agency Australia. The Child Support Agency may require one parent to make payments to the other, depending on the division of care and on each parent's income, among other factors. Since 1989 child support has been assessed under the Child Support (Assessment) Act, 1989, administered by Child Support Agency Australia.[12] Australian domestic law also enacts some of Australia's obligations under international law, such as the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which is dealt with in the Family Law Act 1975. On 22 May 2006, the Family Law Act 1975 was amended by the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006, which applies to any court matters involving children that were in court on or after 1 July 2006.[13] The primary object of this law is to ensure that the courts always have the "best interests of the child" as the paramount consideration.[14] An object of this law is to ensure that the best interests of children are met by ensuring that "children have the benefit of both of their parents having a meaningful involvement in their lives, to the maximum extent consistent with the best interests of the child".[15] Many however argue that such an arrangement actually works against achieving this, and today continue to push for further reform.{{Citation needed|date=September 2017}} Property and financial outcomesAustralia is an equitable distribution country,[16] meaning that net wealth is not split evenly (50/ 50) upon divorce. Instead Courts are given wide powers, taking into account 27 or so statutory factors, so as to determine what a "just and equitable " division of wealth would be.[17] The vast majority of outcomes result in a division of 55-65% in favour of the wife, or economically weaker spouse, before payment of legal fees.{{Citation needed|date=January 2018}} This process is not without its critics: on average the wealth re-allocation process takes between 2 years, or for the more wealthy, up to 4 years.{{Citation needed|date=January 2018}} See also
References1. ^Was I in a De Facto Relationship? Davoren Associates. Retrieved on 2015-01-15. 2. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|act|fla1975114|Family Law Act 1975|4AA}} De facto relationships. 3. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5440 |title=Norfolk Island Legislation Amendment Bill 2015}} (Cth). 4. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5619 |title=Territories Legislation Amendment Bill 2016}} (Cth). 5. ^{{cite web |url=http://regional.gov.au/territories/norfolk_island/reforms/ |title=Norfolk Island reform}} 6. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UWALawRw/2003/2.html |title=The Referral of State Powers |last=French |first=Robert |author-link=Robert French}} (2003) 31(1) University of Western Australia Law Review 19. 7. ^{{cite AustLII|HCA|33|2007|litigants=Thomas v Mowbray |parallelcite=(2007) 233 CLR 307.}} 8. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|act|fla1975114|Family Law Act 1975|90SD}}, s 90SK and s 90RA. 9. ^{{cite AustLII|VSCA|165|2006|litigants=R v Thomas |courtname=auto}} 10. ^{{cite AustLII|HCA|63|1979|litigants=Gronow v Gronow |parallelcite=(1979) 144 CLR 513 |date=14 December 1979}}. 11. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|act|fla1975114|Family Law Act 1975|60A}} What this Division does. 12. ^{{Cite journal|last=Henderson-Kelly|first=Sandra|date=2005|title=Does the Child Support Sacred Cow Milk Parents of Administrative Justice?|url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AIAdminLawF/2005/3.pdf|journal=Australian Institute of Administrative Law Forum (AIAL Forum)|volume=44|pages=26-43|via=}} 13. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|num_act|flapra2006500|Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006}}. 14. ^{{Cite AustLII|HCA|4|2010|litigants=MRR v GR |parallelcite=(2010) 240 CLR 461}} {{cite web |url=http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2010/hca04-2010-03-03.pdf |title=Judgment Summary |publisher=High Court |date=3 March 2010}} 15. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|act|fla1975114|Family Law Act 1975|60B}}(1)(a) Objects of Part and principles underlying it. 16. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|act|fla1975114|Family Law Act 1975|79}}(2). 17. ^{{Cite Legislation AU|Cth|act|fla1975114|Family Law Act 1975|75}}. External links
2 : Australian family law|Public policy in Australia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。