| 词条 | Bishop v. Aronov |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Bishop v. Aronov |Court=United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit |CourtSeal= |ArgueDate= |ArgueYear= |DecideDate=March 15, |DecideYear=1991 |FullName=Phillip A. Bishop v. Aaron M. Aronov, Winton M. Blount, O.H. Delchamps, Jr., Sandrall Hullett, Guy Hunt, William Henry Mitchell, John T. Oliver, Jr., Thomas E. Rast, Yetta G. Samford, Jr., Martha H. Simms, Wayne Teague, Cleophus Thomas, Jr., George S. Shirley, Cordell Wynn, all in their official capacities as members of the Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama |Citations=926 F.2d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/926/1066/258472/ 1066]; 59 U.S.L.W. 2583; 65 Ed. Law Rep. 1109 |Prior=District Court ruled in favor of Bishop |Subsequent= |Holding= |Judges=Emmett Ripley Cox, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Floyd R. Gibson |Majority=Gibson |JoinMajority= |Concurrence= |JoinConcurrence= |Dissent= |JoinDissent= |LawsApplied= |keywords= }}Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991),[1] was a 1991 legal case in which Phillip A. Bishop, an exercise physiology professor at the University of Alabama, sued the college on free speech and academic freedom grounds, when it instructed him not to teach "intelligent design theory" in an extracurricular class and not to lecture on "evidences of God in Human Physiology" in class. The District Court for the Northern District of Alabama found in favor of Bishop but the university appealed and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that the classroom, during instructional time, was not an open forum, and that the university had a right to set the curriculum.[2][3] A similar case was Edwards v. California University of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 1998).[4]{{clear}} Related cases{{Religion vs. evolution cases}}References1. ^{{cite court |litigants=Bishop v. Aronov |vol=926 |reporter=F.2d |opinion=1066 |pinpoint= |court=11th Cir. |date=1991 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/926/1066/258472/ |accessdate=2017-12-26 |quote=}} {{usgovpd}} 2. ^The Law of Higher Education, William A. Kaplin, Barbara A. Lee, pp 262-263 3. ^Creationism, Ideology, and Science, Eugenie C. Scott, New York Academy of Sciences. Published as The Flight From Reason. Volume 775 of the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. June 24, 1996. 4. ^{{cite court |litigants=Edwards v. California University of Pennsylvania |vol=156 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=488 |pinpoint= |court=3d Cir. |date=1998 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/156/488/481543/ |accessdate=2017-12-26 |quote=}} External links
| case = Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991) | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/556562/phillip-a-bishop-v-aaron-m-aronov-winton-m-blount-oh-delchamps/ | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10981438984400959023 | justia =https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/926/1066/258472/ | openjurist =https://openjurist.org/926/f2d/1066{{University of Alabama}}{{US-case-law-stub}}{{creationism-stub}} 9 : United States education case law|United States Free Speech Clause case law|United States creationism and evolution case law|1991 in religion|1991 in United States case law|1991 in education|United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit cases|University of Alabama|United States lawsuits |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。