| 词条 | Bond v The Queen |
| 释义 |
| name = Bond v The Queen | court = High Court of Australia | image = Coat of Arms of Australia.svg | date decided = 14 August 1992 | full name = Bond v The Queen | citations = {{cite AustLII|HCA|13|2000|parallelcite=(2000) 201CLR 213; 169 ALR 607}} | judges = Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne JJ | prior actions=The Queen v Bond (1997) 24 ACSR 518; (1997) 95 A Crim R 246 | appealed from = WA Court of Criminal Appeal | subsequent actions = | opinions = (6:0) The authority contained in s17 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) did not give the Commonwealth DPP the power to institute appeals in state courts. (per curiam) (6:0) The common law principles relating to the validity of acts done by an invalidly appointed public officer had no application. (per curiam)}} Bond v The Queen,[1] was a significant case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the power of the Commonwealth DPP to institute appeals in state courts. BackgroundAlan Bond had pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court of Western Australia to 2 charges of failing to act honestly in his capacity as an officer of a company, with intent to defraud the company and its shareholders. He was sentenced to a total 4 years imprisonment. The Director of Public Prosecutions appealed his sentence to the Court of Criminal Appeal, of which the court allowed the appeal and sentenced Alan Bond to 7 years imprisonment.[1] Alan Bond appealed to the High Court on the grounds that the Director of Public Prosecutions didn't have the authority to appeal the sentence imposed on him. References1. ^1 {{cite AustLII|HCA|13|2000|litigants=Bond v The Queen |parallelcite=(2000) 201 CLR 213; (2000) 169 ALR 607}}. External links{{law-stub}} 4 : High Court of Australia cases|2000 in case law|2000 in Australian law|Australian criminal law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。