请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 British Columbia Government Employees' Union v British Columbia (AG)
释义

  1. Background

  2. See also

  3. External links

{{SCCInfoBox
|case-name=British Columbia Government Employees' Union v British Columbia (AG)
|full-case-name=The British Columbia Government Employees' Union v. The Attorney General of British Columbia
|heard-date=March 3, 1988
|decided-date=October 20, 1988
|citations=[1988] 2 S.C.R. 214
|docket=19518
|history=Judgment for the Attorney General of British Columbia in the British Columbia Court of Appeal
|ruling= Appeal dismissed.
|ratio= A court has the authority to find picketers in contempt of court if they obstruct people officially connected with the court or its process, or prevents the public from accessing the court, notwithstanding the picket is otherwise lawful. Preventing such picketing does not infringe the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
|SCC=1987-1988
|Majority=Dickson C.J. (paras. 1-73)
|JoinMajority=
|Concurrence=McIntyre J. (paras. 74-78)
|JoinConcurrence=
|NotParticipating=Beetz, Estey, and Le Dain JJ.
|LawsApplied=

}}{{italic title|all=yes|noerror}}

British Columbia Government Employees' Union v British Columbia (AG), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to picket as a freedom of expression under section 2(b) of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Background

In November 1983, the British Columbia Government and Service Employees' Union (BCGEU), of which the employees of the superior courts were members, went on strike. The staff of the British Columbia Supreme Court picketed outside of the court house and only let in a minimum number of people needed for urgent cases. When Chief Justice Allan McEachern arrived in the morning to see the staff picketing he went to his office and issued an order on his own motion prohibiting picket lines outside of courthouses in British Columbia.

The issues before the Supreme Court of Canada were:

  1. whether the judge could constitutionally enjoin picketing of court-houses by a union representing court employees engaged in a lawful strike;
  2. whether an enactment by a provincial legislature or by Parliament could validly deprive a judge of a Supreme Court of his inherent authority to protect the functions and processes of his and other courts without an amendment to the Constitution of Canada;
  3. whether the order restraining picketing and other activities within the precincts of all court-houses in British Columbia infringed or denied the rights and freedoms guaranteed by ss. 2(b), (c), 7, 11(a), (c) and (d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and if so, whether the order was justified by s. 1 of the Charter.

The majority held that the judge could enjoin the picketers and that his order violated the freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Charter, but was saved under section 1.

See also

  • List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)

External links

  • {{lexum-scc2|1988|2|214|3}}
{{canada-law-stub}}

6 : Canadian freedom of expression case law|Supreme Court of Canada cases|Labour relations in Canada|1988 in Canadian case law|Section Two Charter case law|Labour relations in British Columbia

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/11 0:15:10