1. References

2. Further reading

3. See also

Constructive alignment is a principle used for devising teaching and learning activities, and assessment tasks, that directly address the intended learning outcomes (ILOs) in a way not typically achieved in traditional lectures, tutorial classes and examinations.^[1] Constructive alignment was devised by Professor John B. Biggs, and represents a marriage between a constructivist understanding of the nature of learning, and an aligned design for outcomes-based teaching education.

Constructive alignment is the underpinning concept behind the current requirements for programme specification, declarations of learning outcomes (LOs) and assessment criteria, and the use of criterion based assessment. There are two basic concepts behind constructive alignment:

• Learners construct meaning from what they do to learn. This concept derives from cognitive psychology and constructivist theory, and recognizes the importance of linking new material to concepts and experiences in the learner's memory, and extrapolation to possible future scenarios via the abstraction of basic principles through reflection.
• The teacher makes a deliberate alignment between the planned learning activities and the learning outcomes. This is a conscious effort to provide the learner with a clearly specified goal, a well designed learning activity or activities that are appropriate for the task, and well designed assessment criteria for giving feedback to the learner.

A branch of educational evaluation theory has emerged that focuses on constructive alignment as a key element in effective educational design. Known as design-focused evaluation,^[2] this approach seeks student feedback on the efficacy of the designed alignment between the intended learning outcomes and the teaching and learning activities students engage in during a course of study.

References

Further reading

• Biggs, J and Tang, C. (2011): Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (McGraw-Hill and Open University Press, Maidenhead)
• Biggs, J (2003): Aligning Teaching and Assessment to Curriculum Objectives, (Imaginative Curriculum Project, LTSN Generic Centre)
• Brooks, J. and Brooks, M. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms, ASCD)
• Cobb, P. (2002) Theories of knowledge and instructional design: a response to Colliver. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14 (1), 52-55
• Smith, C. D. (2008). Design-Focused Evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 631-645

See also

• Concept inventory
• Instructional scaffolding

• Constitutional Convention (political meeting)
• Constitutional Council (Chad)
• Constitutional Coup
• Constitutional Coups
• Constitutional Court (Italy)
• Constitutional Court of Belarus
• Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Constitutional Court of Bulgaria
• Constitutional Court of Colombia
• Constitutional Court of Korea
• Constitutional Court of Lithuania
• Constitutional Court of Romania
• Constitutional Court of Russia
• Constitutional Court of Slovenia
• Constitutional Court of South Korea
• Constitutional Court of Spain
• Constitutional Court of Thailand
• Constitutional Court of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
• Constitutional Court of the Republic of Belarus
• Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea
• Constitutional Court of Turkey
• Constitutional Court (Portugal)
• Constitutional Court (Spain)
• Constitutional Court (Thailand)
• Constitutional debate of Canada