词条 | Case study |
释义 |
In the social sciences and life sciences, a case study is a research method involving an up-close, in-depth, and detailed examination of a subject of study (the case), as well as its related contextual conditions. Case studies can be produced by following a formal research method. These case studies are likely to appear in formal research venues, as journals and professional conferences, rather than popular works. The resulting body of 'case study research' has long had a prominent place in many disciplines and professions, ranging from psychology, anthropology, sociology, and political science to education, clinical science, social work, and administrative science.[1][2]{{rp|5–6}} In doing case study research, the "case" being studied may be an individual, organization, event, or action, existing in a specific time and place. For instance, clinical science has produced both well-known case studies of individuals and also case studies of clinical practices.[3][4][5] However, when "case" is used in an abstract sense, as in a claim, a proposition, or an argument, such a case can be the subject of many research methods, not just case study research. Another suggestion is that case study should be defined as a research strategy, an empirical inquiry that investigates a phenomenon within its real-life context. Case study research can mean single and multiple case studies, can include quantitative evidence, relies on multiple sources of evidence, and benefits from the prior development of theoretical propositions. Case studies should not be confused with qualitative research and they can be based on any mix of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Single-subject research provides the statistical framework for making inferences from quantitative case-study data.[2][6] Case studies may involve both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Different types of case study research methodsIn business research, four common case study approaches are distinguished.[7][8] First, there is the "no theory first" type of case study design, which is closely connected to Kathleen M. Eisenhardt's methodological work.[7][9] The second type of research design is about "gaps and holes", following Robert K. Yin's guidelines and making positivist assumptions.[7][2] A third design deals with a "social construction of reality", represented by the work of Robert E. Stake.[7][10] Finally, the reason for case study research can also be to identify "anomalies"; a representative scholar of this approach is Michael Burawoy.[7][11] Each of these four approaches has its areas of application, but it is important to understand their unique ontological and epistomological assumptions. There are substantial methodological differences between these approaches. Case selection and structureAn average, or typical case, is often not the richest in information. In clarifying lines of history and causation it is more useful to select subjects that offer an interesting, unusual or particularly revealing set of circumstances. A case selection that is based on representativeness will seldom be able to produce these kinds of insights. When selecting a case for a case study, researchers will therefore use information-oriented sampling, as opposed to random sampling.[12] Outlier cases (that is, those which are extreme, deviant or atypical) reveal more information than the potentially representative case, as seen in cases selected for more qualitative safety scientific analyses of accidents.[13][14] A case may be chosen because of the inherent interest of the case or the circumstances surrounding it. Alternatively it may be chosen because of researchers' in-depth local knowledge; where researchers have this local knowledge they are in a position to "soak and poke" as Richard Fenno put it,[15] and thereby to offer reasoned lines of explanation based on this rich knowledge of setting and circumstances. Three types of cases may thus be distinguished for selection:
Whatever the frame of reference for the choice of the subject of the case study (key, outlier, local knowledge), there is a distinction to be made between the subject and the object of the case study. The subject is the "practical, historical unity" through which the theoretical focus of the study is being viewed.[16] The object is that theoretical focus – the analytical frame. Thus, for example, if a researcher were interested in US resistance to communist expansion as a theoretical focus, then the Korean War might be taken to be the subject, the lens, the case study through which the theoretical focus, the object, could be viewed and explicated.[17] Beyond decisions about case selection and the subject and object of the study, decisions need to be made about purpose, approach and process in the case study. Gary Thomas thus proposes a typology for the case study wherein purposes are first identified (evaluative or exploratory), then approaches are delineated (theory-testing, theory-building or illustrative), then processes are decided upon, with a principal choice being between whether the study is to be single or multiple, and choices also about whether the study is to be retrospective, snapshot or diachronic, and whether it is nested, parallel or sequential.[18] Marketing analysisSome cases study marketing analysis to ensure a full understanding of the effects on an organization. In a case where the market of any organization is in jepoardy, the agency will seek answers and solutions. In order to fulfill this need, the organization must gather pertient information. Case studies can be used to establish where the problem originates by utilizing several research methods. [19] Research methods should be chosen appropriately to conduct a thourough investigation. The primary methods used include: interviews, surveys, focus groups, observations and in some cases, field trials.[20] The methods chosen rely heavily on the amount of capital the organization is able to spend and the kind of data that is required by the group. Types of case studiesIn public-relations research, three types of case studies are used:[21]
Under the more generalized category of case study exist several subdivisions, each of which is custom selected for use depending upon the goals of the investigator. These types of case study include the following:
Case studies in businessAt Harvard Law School In 1870, Christopher Langdell departed from the traditional lecture-and-notes approach to teaching contract law and began using cases pled before courts as the basis for class discussions.[22] By 1920, this practice had become the dominant pedagogical approach used by law schools in the United States.[23] Research in business disciplines is usually based on a positivist epistemology,[24] namely, that reality is something that is objective and can be discovered and understood by a scientific examination of empirical evidence. But organizational behavior cannot always be easily reduced to simple tests that prove something to be true or false. Reality may be an objective thing, but it is understood and interpreted by people who, in turn, act upon it, and so critical realism, which addresses the connection between the natural and social worlds, is a useful basis for analyzing the environment of and events within an organization.[25] Case studies in management are generally used to interpret strategies or relationships, to develop sets of "best practices", or to analyze the external influences or the internal interactions of a firm.[26] With several notable exceptions (e.g., Janis on Groupthink)[27] HistoryFrederic Le Play first introduced the case-study method into social science in 1829 as a handmaiden to statistics in his studies of family budgets.[28]In all these disciplines, case studies were an occasion for postulating new theories, as in the grounded-theory work of sociologists Barney Glaser (1930- ) and Anselm Strauss (1916-1996).[29] One of the areas in which case studies have been gaining popularity is education and in particular educational evaluation.[30][31][32] Comparative case studies, in social science, policy, and education research; discusses one approach, which encourages researchers to compare horizontally, vertically, and temporally.[33] Related usesUsing case studies in research differs from their use in teaching, where they are commonly called case methods and casebook methods. Teaching case studies have been a highly popular pedagogical format in many fields ranging from business education to science education. Harvard Business School has been among the most prominent developers and users of teaching case studies.[34][35] Business school faculty generally develop case studies with particular learning objectives in mind. Additional relevant documentation, such as financial statements, time-lines, and short biographies, often referred to in the case study as exhibits, and multimedia supplements (such as video-recordings of interviews with the case subject) often accompany the case studies. Similarly, teaching case studies have become increasingly popular in science education. The National Center for Case Studies in Teaching Science has made a growing body of case studies available for classroom use, for university as well as secondary school coursework.[36][37] Case studies are commonly used in case competitions and in job interviews for consulting firms such as McKinsey & Company, CEB Inc. and the Boston Consulting Group, in which candidates are asked to develop the best solution for a case in an allotted time frame.[38] See also
References1. ^{{cite book |editor1-last=Mills |editor1-first=Albert J. |editor2-first=Gabrielle |editor2-last=Durepos |editor3-first=Elden |editor3-last=Wiebe |title=Encyclopedia of Case Study Research |publisher=SAGE Publications |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |year=2010 |page=xxxi |isbn=978-1-4129-5670-3 }} 2. ^1 2 {{cite book |last=Yin |first=Robert K. |authorlink=Robert K. Yin |title=Case Study Research: Design and Methods |url={{GBurl|OgyqBAAAQBAJ}} |edition=5th |year=2013 |publisher=SAGE Publications |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |isbn=978-1-4833-2224-7 }} 3. ^{{cite book | last = Rolls | first = Geoffrey | title = Classic Case Studies in Psychology | publisher = Hodder Education |location=Abingdon, England | year = 2005}} 4. ^{{cite book |first=Suzanne |last=Corkin |title=Permanent Present Tense: The Unforgettable Life of the Amnesic Patient, H.M. |publisher=Basic Books |location=New York |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-4650-3159-7 }} 5. ^{{cite book |editor1-first=Rodger |editor1-last=Kessler |editor2-first=Dale |editor2-last=Stafford |title=Collaborative Medicine Case Studies: Evidence in Practice |publisher=Springer |location=New York |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-3877-6893-9 }} 6. ^{{cite book |last=Lamnek |first=Siegfried |title=Qualitative Sozialforschung: Lehrbuch |url={{GBurl|XYLISAAACAAJ}} |year=2010 |publisher=Beltz |location=Weihnhein, Basel |isbn=978-3-621-27770-9 |page=4 |lang=DE }} 7. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite journal |first=Hans-Gerd |last=Ridder |title=The theory contribution of case study research designs |journal=Business Research |date=October 2017 |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=281–305 |issn=2198-2627 |doi=10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z }} 8. ^{{cite journal |first1=Catherine |last1=Welch |first2=Rebecca |last2=Piekkari |first3=Emmanuella |last3=Plakoyiannaki |first4=Eriikka |last4=Paavilainen-Mäntymäki |title=Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research |journal=Journal of International Business Studies |date=June 2011 |volume=42 |issue=5 |pages=740–762 |issn=1478-6990 |doi=10.1057/jibs.2010.55 |url=https://www.academia.edu/download/43015779/Theorising_from_Case_Studies_Towards_a_P20160224-27042-2c24kc.pdf |citeseerx=10.1.1.692.3967 }} 9. ^{{cite journal |last=Eisenhardt |first=Kathleen M. |authorlink=Kathleen M. Eisenhardt |title=Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic |journal=The Academy of Management Review |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=620–627 |year=1991 |jstor=258921 |doi=10.5465/amr.1991.4279496 }} 10. ^{{cite book |last=Stake |first=Robert E. |authorlink=Robert E. Stake |title=The Art of Case Study Research |url={{GBurl|ApGdBx76b9kC|pg=PR99}} |pages=99–102 |year=1995 |publisher=SAGE Publications |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |isbn=978-0-8039-5767-1}} 11. ^{{cite book |last=Burawoy |first=Michael |authorlink=Michael Burawoy |title=The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition |url={{GBurl|xCA7R-o8BMIC}} |year=2009 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=978-0-520-94338-4 }} 12. ^{{cite book |last=Flyvbjerg |first=Bent |chapter=Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research Inquiry |year=2007 |editor-last1=Seale |editor-first1=Clive |editor-last2=Silverman |editor-first2=David |editor-last3=Gobo |editor-first3=Giampietro |editor-first4=Jaber F. |editor-last4=Gubrium |title=Qualitative Research Practice: Concise Paperback Edition |journal=Qualitative Inquiry |volume=12 |issue=2 |page=390 |arxiv=1304.1186 |doi=10.1177/1077800405284363 |chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286140682 |publisher=SAGE Publications |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |isbn=978-1-4129-3420-6 }} 13. ^{{cite book |last1=Huang |first1=Huayi |year=2015 |title=Development of New Methods to Support Systemic Incident Analysis |type=Doctoral dissertation |publisher=Queen Mary University |location=London |url=https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/12866/Huang_Huayi_PhD_Final_111115.pdf }}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 14. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.014 |title='Accident investigation in the wild' – A small-scale, field-based evaluation of the STAMP method for accident analysis |journal=Safety Science |volume=82 |pages=129–43 |year=2016 |last1=Underwood |first1=Peter |last2=Waterson |first2=Patrick |last3=Braithwaite |first3=Graham }} 15. ^{{cite journal |last=Fenno |first=Richard F. |authorlink=Richard Fenno |title=Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics |journal=American Political Science Review |volume=80 |issue=1 |pages=3–15 |year=2014 |doi=10.2307/1957081 |jstor=1957081 }} 16. ^{{cite book |first=M. |last=Wieviorka |chapter=Case studies: history or sociology? |editor1-last = Ragin | editor1-first = Charles C. | editor1-link = Charles C. Ragin | editor2-last = Becker | editor2-first = Howard Saul | editor2-link = Howard S. Becker |title=What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry |chapter-url={{GBurl|vSNp2jtzCbEC|p=10}} | publisher = Cambridge University Press |page=10 | isbn = 9780521421881 | access-date=2016-06-20 | date = July 31, 1992 }} 17. ^{{cite book |first=Gary |last=Thomas |authorlink=Gary Thomas (academic) |title=How to Do Your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |publisher=SAGE Publications |year=2011 }}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 18. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1177/1077800411409884 |title=A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse, and Structure |journal=Qualitative Inquiry |volume=17 |issue=6 |pages=511–21 |year=2011 |last=Thomas |first=Gary |authorlink=Gary Thomas (academic) }} 19. ^Armstrong et al., 2014{{full|date=December 2017}} 20. ^Guesalaga et al., 2016{{full|date=December 2017}} 21. ^{{cite book| last1 = Stacks| first1 = Don W.| chapter = Case Study| editor1-last = Heath| editor1-first = Robert L.| title = Encyclopedia of Public Relations| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=AgpzAwAAQBAJ| publisher = SAGE Publications| publication-date = 2013| page = 99 | isbn = 9781452276229| access-date=2016-06-20| quote = There are three major types of case studies common to public relations: linear, process-oriented and grounded.| date = August 20, 2013}} 22. ^Kimball, B. A. (2009). The Inception of Modern Professional Education: C. C. Langdell, 1826–1906 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009){{pn|date=December 2017}} 23. ^{{cite journal |last1=Jackson |first1=Giles |year=2011 |title=Rethinking the case method |journal=Journal of Management Policy and Practice |volume=12 |issue=5 |pages=142–64 }} 24. ^{{cite journal |first1=Wai Fong |last1=Chua |date=October 1986 |title=Radical Developments in Accounting Thought |journal=The Accounting Review |volume=61 |issue=4 |pages=601–32 |jstor=247360 }} 25. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1080/15017410600914329 |title=Metatheory, Interdisciplinarity and Disability Research: A Critical Realist Perspective |journal=Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research |volume=8 |issue=4 |pages=278–97 |year=2006 |last1=Bhaskar |first1=Roy |last2=Danermark |first2=Berth }} 26. ^{{cite journal |last1=Klonoski |first1=Robert |year=2013 |title=The case for case studies: Deriving theory from evidence |journal=Journal of Business Case Studies |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=261–6 |doi=10.19030/jbcs.v9i3.7805 }} 27. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1541-0072.1973.tb00117.x |title=Groupthink and Group Dynamics: A Social Psychological Analysis of Defective Policy Decisions |journal=Policy Studies Journal |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=19–25 |year=1973 |last1=Janis |first1=Irving L }} 28. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.2307/3707549 |jstor=3707549 |title=Le Play's Contribution to Sociology: His Method |journal=The American Catholic Sociological Review |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=97–110 |year=1947 |last1=Healy |first1=Sister Mary Edward }} 29. ^Barney G. Glaser and Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (New York: Aldine, 1967). {{ISBN|978-0202302607}}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 30. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1080/0305764750050101 |title=Case‐study and the Social Philosophy of Educational Research |journal=Cambridge Journal of Education |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=2–11 |year=2006 |last1=MacDonald |first1=Barry |last2=Walker |first2=Rob }} 31. ^{{cite journal |last=MacDonald |first=Barry |year=1978 |title=The Experience of Innovation |journal=CARE Occasional Publications |issue=6 }}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 32. ^{{cite book |last=Kushner |first=S. |year=2000 |title=Personalizing Evaluation |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |publisher=SAGE Publications }}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 33. ^{{Cite book |title=Rethinking Case Study Research |last1=Bartlett |first1=Lesley |last2=Vavrus |first2=Frances |publisher= Routledge|year= 2017 |isbn= |location= |pages= }}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 34. ^{{cite journal |first1=David A. |last1=Garvin |year=2003 |title=Making the Case: Professional Education for the World of Practice |journal=Harvard Magazine |volume=106 |issue=1 |pages=56–107 |url=http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=15306 }} 35. ^{{cite book |first=W. |last=Ellet |title=The Case Study Handbook: How to Read, Write, and Discuss Persuasively about Cases |publisher=Harvard Business School Press |location=Boston, MA |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-422-10158-2 }}{{pn|date=December 2017}} 36. ^{{Cite book|title = Exploring Cases Using Emotion, Open Space and Creativity|last = Palmer|first = Grier|publisher = Libri|year = 2015|isbn = 978 1 909818 57 6|location = |pages = 19–38|last2 = Iordanou|first2 = Ioanna|work = Case-based Teaching and Learning for the 21st Century}} 37. ^{{cite web |url=http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/about/ |title=About Us |website=National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science (NCCSTS) |editor-first1=Clyde F. |editor-last1=Herreid |editor-first2=Nancy A. |editor-last2=Schiller |editor-first3=Carolyn |editor-last3=Wright |editor-first4=Ky |editor-last4=Herreid |publisher=University at Buffalo |accessdate=2018-09-12 }} 38. ^{{cite web|last1=Mamou|first1=Victor|title=Consulting Case Study|url=http://management-consulting-formula.com/consulting-case-study/|publisher=Management Consulting Formula|accessdate=2016-06-13}} Further reading
External links{{wikiquote}}{{Medical research studies}}{{Psychology}} 3 : Evidence|Evaluation methods|Scientific method |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。