| 词条 | Dunlop v. Bachowski |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Dunlop v. Bachowski |ArgueDate=April 21 |ArgueYear=1975 |DecideDate=June 2 |DecideYear=1975 |FullName=John Thomas Dunlop, Secretary of Labor v. Bachowski, et al. |USVol=421 |USPage=560 |ParallelCitations=95 S. Ct. 1851; 44 L. Ed. 2d 377; 1975 U.S. LEXIS 140; 77 Lab. Cas. (CCH) ¶ 10,872; 89 L.R.R.M. 2435 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=1972-1975 |Majority=Brennan |JoinMajority=Burger, Douglas, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell |Concurrence=Burger |Concurrence/Dissent=Rehnquist |LawsApplied= }}Dunlop v. Bachowski, 421 U.S. 560 (1975), is a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 gives federal courts jurisdiction to review decisions of the United States Department of Labor to proceed (or not) with prosecutions under the Act. In this case, there was a disputed election within the United Steelworkers. The Court declined to authorize a jury-type trial into the reasons for the department's decisions, and instead held that court may only review the department's rationales under the "arbitrary and capricious" test.[1] References1. ^Beerman, Jack M. Administrative Law. New York, N.Y.: Aspen Publishers, 2006, p. 37. External links
6 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States administrative case law|1975 in United States case law|United Steelworkers litigation|United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court|United States labor case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。