请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Enlargement of the eurozone
释义

  1. Accession procedure

     Convergence criteria  Additional requirements  Changeover plan  Alternate proposals 

  2. Historical enlargements

     Exchange-rate regime for EU members 

  3. Future enlargements

     Bulgaria  Croatia  Czech Republic  Denmark  Hungary  Poland  Romania  Sweden  United Kingdom 

  4. Outside the EU

     Current adopters  European microstates  Kosovo and Montenegro  Potential adopters  Iceland  Dutch overseas territories  Danish overseas territories  French overseas territories  Northern Cyprus 

  5. Public opinion

  6. See also

  7. Notes

  8. References

{{Eurozone labelled map}}

The enlargement of the eurozone is an ongoing process within the European Union (EU). All member states of the European Union, except Denmark and the United Kingdom which negotiated opt-outs from the provisions, are obliged to adopt the euro as their sole currency once they meet the criteria, which include: complying with the debt and deficit criteria outlined by the Stability and Growth Pact, keeping inflation and long-term governmental interest rates below certain reference values, stabilising their currency's exchange rate versus the euro by participating in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II), and ensuring that their national laws comply with the ECB statute, ESCB statute and articles 130+131 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The obligation for EU member states to adopt the euro was first outlined by article 109.1j of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, which became binding on all new member states by the terms of their treaties of accession.

{{As of|2016}}, there are 19 EU member states in the eurozone, of which the first 11 (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain) introduced the euro on 1 January 1999 when it was electronic only. Greece joined 1 January 2001, one year before the physical euro coins and notes replaced the old national currencies in the eurozone. Subsequently, the following seven countries also joined the eurozone on 1 January in the mentioned year: Slovenia (2007), Cyprus (2008), Malta (2008), Slovakia (2009),[1] Estonia (2011),[2] Latvia (2014)[3] and Lithuania (2015).

Seven remaining states are on the enlargement agenda: Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Denmark is not obliged to join, though should the country decide to do so it may join the eurozone with little difficulty as Denmark is already part of the ERM II. The United Kingdom voted to leave the EU in a referendum in June 2016 and so is unlikely to join the eurozone.[4][5][6][7]

Accession procedure

{{Main article|Euro convergence criteria}}

All EU members which have joined the bloc since the signing of the Maastricht treaty in 1992 are legally obliged to adopt the euro once they meet the criteria, since the terms of their accession treaties make the provisions on the euro binding on them. In order for a state to formally join the eurozone, enabling them to mint euro coins and get a seat at the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Eurogroup, a country must be a member of the European Union and comply with five convergence criteria, which were initially defined by the Maastricht Treaty in 1992. These criteria include: complying with the debt and deficit criteria outlined by the Stability and Growth Pact, keeping inflation and long-term governmental interest rates below reference values, and stabilising their currency's exchange rate versus the euro. Generally, it is expected that the last point will be demonstrated by two consecutive years of participation in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II),[8] though according to the Commission "exchange rate stability during a period of non-participation before entering ERM II can be taken into account."[9] The country must also ensure that their national laws are compliant with the ECB statute, ESCB statute and articles 130+131 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Since the convergence criteria require participation in the ERM, and non-eurozone states are responsible for deciding when to join ERM, they can ultimately control when they adopt the euro by staying outside the ERM and thus deliberately failing to meet the convergence criteria until they wish to. In some non-eurozone states without an opt-out, there has been discussion about holding referendums on approving their euro adoption.[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Of the 16 states which have acceded to EU since 1992, the only state to have staged a euro referendum to date is Sweden, which in 2003 rejected its government's proposal to adopt the euro in 2006.

Convergence criteria

The convergence progress for the newly accessed EU member states, is supported and evaluated by the yearly submission of the "Convergence programme" under the Stability and Growth Pact. As a general rule, the majority of economic experts recommend for newly accessed EU member states with a forecasted era of catching up and a past record of "macroeconomic imbalance" or "financial instability", that these countries first use some years to address these issues and ensure "stable convergence", before taking the next step to join the ERM II, and as the final step (when complying with all convergence criteria) ultimately adopt the euro. In practical terms, any non-euro EU member state can become an ERM II member whenever they want, as this mechanism does not define any criteria to comply with. Economists however consider it to be more desirable for "unstable countries", to maintain their flexibility of having a floating currency, rather than getting an inflexible and partly fixed currency as an ERM II member. Only at the time of being considered fully "stable", the member states will be encouraged to enter into ERM II, in which they need to stay for a minimum of two years without presence of "severe tensions" for their currency, while at the same time also ensuring compliance with the other four convergence criteria, before finally being approved to adopt the euro.[19]

{{Euro convergence criteria}}
Reference values for the HICP criteria and interest rate criteria

The compliance check above was conducted in June 2014, with the HICP and interest rate reference values specifically applying for the last assessment month with available data (April 2014). As reference values for HICP and interest rates are subject for monthly changes, any EU member state with a euro derogation has the right to ask for a renewed compliance check at any time during the year. For this potential extra assessment, the table below feature Eurostat's monthly publication of values being used in the calculation process to determine the reference value (upper limit) for HICP inflation and long-term interest rates, where a certain fixed buffer value is added to the moving unweighted arithmetic average of the three EU Member States with the lowest HICP inflation rates (ignoring states classified as "outliers").

The black values in the table are sourced by the officially published convergence reports, while the lime-green values are only qualified estimates, not confirmed by any official convergence report but sourced by monthly estimation reports published by the Polish Ministry of Finance. The reason why the lime-green values are only estimates is that the "outlier" selection (ignoring certain states from the reference value calculation) besides depending on a quantitative assessment also depends on a more complicated overall qualitative assessment, and hence it can not be predicted with absolute certainty which of the states the Commission will deem to be outliers. So any selection of outliers by the lime-green data lines shall only be regarded as qualified estimates, which potentially could be different from those outliers which the Commission would have selected if they had published a specific report at the concerned point of time.{{refn|A particular high uncertainty exists for the Polish selection of HICP outliers, as it is only based upon evaluation of the first part of the official outlier criteria. The official outlier criteria require both (1) The HICP rate to be significantly below the eurozone average and (2) This "significant below" HICP to stem from adverse price developments from exceptional factors (i.e. severe enforced wage cuts, exceptional developments in energy/food/currency markets, or a strong recession). Precedent assessment cases proof the second part of the outlier criteria also needs to be met, i.e. Finland had a HICP criteria value being 1.7% below eurozone average in August 2004 without being classified to be "HICP outlier" by the European Commission,[20] and Sweden likewise had a HICP criteria value being 1.4% below eurozone average in April 2013 without being classified to be "HICP outlier" by the European Commission.[21]
In addition to the uncertainty related to the fact that the Polish source only evaluate the first requirement, there is also uncertainty related to the Polish quantification of what "significant below" means. For all assessment months until March 2014, the Polish source had adopted the assumption (based on precedent assessment cases) that "all states with HICP criteria values minimum 1.8% below eurozone average" should be classified to be "HICP outliers". Based on the 2014 EC Convergence report's classification of Cyprus with a HICP criteria value only 1.4% below eurozone average as a "HICP outlier", the Polish source accordingly also adjusted their "HICP outlier selection criteria" from April 2014 onwards, so that it now automatically classify "all states with HICP criteria values minimum 1.4% below eurozone average" as "HICP outliers".[22] The European Commission never quantified what "significant below" means, which is why the Polish source attempts to quantify it based on precedent assessment cases, but this also means it is uncertain whether or not the currently assumed 1.4% limit is correct. It could perhaps just as well be 1.0%.|name="Polish outlier selection uncertainty"|group=nb}}

The national fiscal accounts for the previous full calendar year are released each year in April (next time 24 April 2019).[23] As the compliance check for both the debt and deficit criteria always awaits this release in a new calendar year, the first possible month to request a compliance check will be April, which would result in a data check for the HICP and interest rates during the reference year from 1 April to 31 March. Any EU member state may also ask the European Commission to conduct a compliance check, at any point of time during the remainder of the year, with HICP and interest rates always checked for the past 12 months – while debt and deficit compliance always will be checked for the three-year period encompassing the last completed full calendar year and the two subsequent forecast years.[24][25] As of 10 August 2015, none of the remaining euro derogation states without an opt-out had entered ERM II,[26] which makes it highly unlikely that any of them will request that the European Commission conduct an extraordinary compliance check ahead of the publication of the next regular convergence report scheduled June 2016.

Additional requirements

In the wake of the financial crisis, Eurozone governments have sought to apply additional requirements on acceding countries. Bulgaria, initially aiming to join the banking union after its ERM accession agreed to enter into closer cooperation with it simultaneously to joining ERM II, requiring its banks to first undergo stress tests. Bulgaria also agreed to reinforce supervision of the non-bank financial sector and fully implement EU anti money-laundering rules. While the reforms from the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (which applies only to Bulgaria and Romania) were also expected, leaving the CVM is not a precondition.[27]

Changeover plan

Each country aspiring to adopt the euro has been requested by the European Commission to develop a "strategy for criteria compliance" and "national euro changeover plan". In the "changeover plan", the country can select from between three scenarios for euro adoption:[28]

  1. Madrid scenario (with a transition period between euro adoption day and the physical circulation of euros)
  2. Big-bang scenario (euro adoption day coincides with the first day of circulating euros)
  3. Big-bang scenario with phaseout (same as the second scenario, but with a transitional period for legal documents like contracts to be denoted in euros)

The second scenario is recommended for candidate countries, while the third is only advised if at a late stage in the preparational process they experience technical difficulties (i.e. with IT systems), which would make an extended transitional period for the phasing out of the old currency at the legal level a necessity.[28] The European Commission has published a handbook detailing how states should prepare for the changeover. It recommends that a national steering committee is established at a very early stage of the state's preparation process, with the task to outline detailed plans for the following five actions:[29]

  1. Prepare the public with an information campaign and dual price display.
  2. Prepare the public sector's introduction at the legal level.
  3. Prepare the private sector's introduction at the legal level.
  4. Prepare the vending machine industry so that they can deliver adjusted and quality tested vending machines.
  5. Frontload banks as well as public and private retail sectors several months (no earlier than 4 months&91;30&93;) ahead of the euro adoption day, with their needed supply of euro coins and notes.

The table below summarises each candidate country's national plan for euro adoption and currency changeover.[31]

State Coordinating institutionChangeover plan
(latest version)		 Introduc-tion[32] Dual circulation
period		 Exchange of coins period Dual price display Coin design
BUL}} Bulgaria2015:07Coordination Council for the preparation of Bulgaria for eurozone membership
(founded Jul.2015)[34]		Only published a
strategy plan[33]		 – – – –Approved
CRO}} Croatia – – – – – –Competition
under
consideration
CZE}} Czech Republic2006:02National Coordination Group
(founded Feb.2006)		2007:04Approved Apr.2007[34]Big-Bang2 weeksBanks:
6 months,
Central bank:
5 years		Start 1 month after Council approval of euro adoption, and lasts until 12 months after adoptionCompetition
under
consideration
DEN}} Denmark –2000The original plan from 2000[35] is no longer valid, and will be replaced by a new plan ahead of a referendum. Madrid scenario
(as per the 2000 plan)		 4 weeks
or 2 months
(as per the 2000 plan)		 Central bank:
30 years
(as per the 2000 plan)		 Start on the day of euro circulation, and last 4 weeks or 2 months
(as per the 2000 plan)		 In 2000, prior to the euro referendum that year, a possible coin design was published. [36]
HUN}} Hungary2007:09National Euro Coordination Committee
(founded Sep.2007)		2009:12Updated Dec.2009[37]Big-Bangless than
1 month
(not decided yet)		Central bank:
5 years		Start 1 day after Council approval of euro adoption, and lasts until 6 months after adoptionNot yet
decided
POL}} Poland2009:11Government Plenipotentiary for the Euro Adoption in Poland
National Coordination Committee for Euro ChangeoverCoordinating Council

(founded Nov.2009)

2011Approved in 2011
(updated plan in preparation){{Non-euro_currencies_of_the_European_Union/RefTag>1=Cite from the 2014 Polish convergence report: Due to the significant reform agenda in the European Union and in the euro area, the current objective is to update the National Euro Changeover Plan with reference to the impact of those changes on Poland's euro adoption strategy. The date of completion of the document is conditional on the adoption of binding solutions on the EU forum concerning the key institutional changes, in particular, those referring to the banking union. The outcome of these changes determines the area of the necessary institutional and legal adjustments as well as the national balance of costs and benefits arising from introduction of the common currency.[38]
{{0}}

Cite from the 2015 Polish convergence report: Taking into account the scale of institutional changes in the European Union and the euro area, it was deemed proper to update the "National Euro Changeover Plan" as regards the consequences of these changes for the preparation strategy. The outcome of these changes determines the area of the necessary institutional and legal adjustments as well as the national balance of costs and benefits arising from introduction of the common currency. The date of completion of works on the update of the "Plan" depends on the completion of the main works on the institutional reform of the Economic and Monetary Union.[39]|name=Poland|group=nb}}

 – – – –Public survey
under consideration
ROU}} Romania2011:05Interministerial Committee for changeover to euro
(founded May 2011)		 – –11 months[40] – –Not yet
decided
SWE}} Sweden – – – – – –Not under consideration
GBR}} United Kingdom – – – – – –Not under consideration

Alternate proposals

The European microstates of Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and the Vatican City are not covered by convergence criteria, but by special monetary agreements that allow them to issue their own euro coins. However, they have no input into the economic affairs of the euro.[43] In 2009 the authors of a confidential International Monetary Fund (IMF) report suggested that in light of the ongoing global financial crisis, the EU Council should consider granting EU member states which are having difficulty complying with all five convergence criteria the option to "partially adopt" the euro, along the lines of the monetary agreements signed with the microstates outside the EU. These states would gain the right to adopt the euro and issue a national variant of euro coins, but would not get a seat in ECB or the Eurogroup until they met all the convergence criteria.[41] However, the EU has not agreed to this alternative accession process.

Historical enlargements

{{Further information|History of the euro}}{{Euro adoption past}}

The eurozone was born with its first 11 Member States on 1 January 1999. The first enlargement of the eurozone, to Greece, took place on 1 January 2001, one year before the euro had physically entered into circulation. Along with the formal eurozone states, the euro also replaced currencies in four microstates, Kosovo, and Montenegro who all used the currencies of one of the member countries. Denmark and Sweden held referendums on joining the euro, but voters voted down the referendums leading both to remain outside. The first enlargements after the euro entered circulation were to states which joined the EU in 2004; namely Slovenia in 2007, followed by Cyprus and Malta in 2008, Slovakia in 2009, Estonia in 2011, Latvia in 2014, and Lithuania in 2015.

{{clear}}

Exchange-rate regime for EU members

The chart below provides a full historical summary of exchange-rate regimes for EU members since the European Monetary System with its Exchange Rate Mechanism and the related new common currency ECU was born on 13 March 1979. The euro replaced the ECU 1:1 at the exchange rate markets, on 1 January 1999. During 1979–1999, the German mark functioned as a de facto anchor for the ECU, meaning there was only a minor difference between pegging a currency against ECU and pegging it against the German mark.

{{Exchange-rate regime for EU members}}

Future enlargements

All members who joined the union from 1995 onwards are required by treaty to adopt the euro as soon as they meet the criteria; only Denmark and the United Kingdom obtained treaty opt-outs from participation in the Maastricht Treaty when the euro was agreed upon. For the others, the single currency was a requirement of EU membership.

{{Non-euro currencies of the European Union|group=nb}}{{Euro accession map}}

Bulgaria

{{Main article|Bulgaria and the euro}}

The lev is not part of ERM II, but since the launch of the euro in 1999, it has been pegged to the euro at a fixed rate of €1 = BGN 1.95583 through a strictly managed currency board.{{Non-euro_currencies_of_the_European_Union/RefTag|name=Bulgaria|group=nb}} In all of the three latest annual assessment reports, Bulgaria managed to comply with four out of the five economic convergence criteria for euro adoption, only failing to comply with the criteria requiring the currency of the state to have been a stable ERM II member for a minimum of two years.[42][43][44] The former governor of the Bulgarian National Bank, Kolyo Paramov, in office when the currency board of the state was established, believes that adoption of the euro soon would "trigger a number of positive economic effects": Sufficient money supply (leading to increased lending which is needed to improve economic growth), getting rid of the currency board which prevents the national bank functioning as a lender of last resort to rescue banks in financial troubles, and finally private and public lending would benefit from lower interest rates (at least half as high).[45]

Prior to 2015 it had been government policy to hold-off application until the European sovereign-debt crisis had resolved[46][47] but with the election of Boyko Borisov, Bulgaria began pursuing membership. In January 2015, Finance Minister Vladislav Goranov aimed to apply during the current government. He began talks with the Eurogroup[48] and established a co-ordination council to prepare for membership.[49][50] Following the 2017 parliamentary elections Borisov's government was re-elected. Borisov stated that he intended to apply to join ERM II[51] but Goranov elaborated that the government would only seek to join once the eurozone states were ready to approve the application, and that he expected to have clarity of this by the end of 2017.[52] On taking the presidency of the Council of the European Union in January 2018, Prime Minister Boyko Borisov indicated no clarification had been given but announced he was going to pursue applications for both ERM II and Schengen by July regardless.[53][54][55][56] Bulgaria sent a letter to the Eurogroup at the end of June on its desire to participate in ERM II, and issued a commitment to enter into a "close cooperation" agreement with the banking union that July.[57][58]

However, this deadline was put back to July 2019 due to extra conditions requested by Eurozone governments, namely that Bulgaria;[27]

  • Join the banking union at the same time as ERM (meaning Bulgaria's banks must first pass stress-tests).
  • Reinforce supervision of the non-bank financial sector and fully implement EU anti money-laundering rules.
  • Thoroughly implement the reforms from the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM).

While the CVM reforms are mentioned, and progress in judicial reform and organised crime is expected, leaving the CVM is not a precondition.[27]

Croatia

{{Main article|Croatia and the euro}}Croatia's currency, the kuna, has used the euro (and prior to that one of the euro's major predecessors, the Deutsche Mark) as its main reference since its creation in 1994, and a long-held policy of the Croatian National Bank has been to keep the kuna's exchange rate with the euro within a relatively stable range. Prior to Croatia becoming a member of the EU on 1 July 2013, Boris Vujčić, governor of the Croatian National Bank, stated that he would like the kuna to be replaced by the euro as soon as possible after accession.[59] In 2013 the European Central Bank expected Croatia to be approved for ERM II membership at the earliest in 2016, leading to a subsequent euro adoption at the earliest in 2019.[60] In Croatia's first assessment under the convergence criteria in May 2014, the country satisfied the inflation and interest rate criteria, but did not satisfy the public finances and ERM membership criteria.[61]

In April 2015, President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic stated in a Bloomberg interview she was "confident that Croatia would introduce the euro by 2020", while Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic said at the government session that "some occasional announcements when Croatia will introduce the euro shouldn't be taken seriously. We'll try to make it as soon as possible, but I distance myself from any dates and ask that you don't comment on it. When the country is ready, it will enter the euro area. The criteria are very clear."[62] In November 2017, Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic said he was aiming for Croatia to join ERM II by 2020 and to introduce the Euro by 2025.[63]

Czech Republic

{{Main article|Czech Republic and the euro}}

Following their accession to the EU in May 2004, the Czech Republic aimed to replace the koruna with the euro in 2010, however this was postponed indefinitely.[64] The European sovereign-debt crisis further decreased the Czech Republic's interest in joining the eurozone.[70] There have been calls for a referendum before adopting the euro, with former Prime Minister Petr Nečas saying that the conditions had significantly changed since their accession treaty was ratified.[65] President Miloš Zeman also supports a referendum, but does still advocate adoption of the euro.[66]

Adoption was supported under Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka[67] but supported a recommendation from the Czech National Bank to refrain from setting a target date.[68] The government agreed that if it was re-elected in 2017 then it would agree a roadmap for adoption by 2020,[69] however the election was lost to Andrej Babiš who is against euro adoption in the near-term.[70]

Denmark

{{Main article|Denmark and the euro}}

Denmark has pegged its krone to the euro at €1 = DKK 7.46038 ± 2.25% through the ERM II since it replaced the original ERM on 1 January 1999. During negotiations of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, Denmark secured a protocol which gave it the right to decide if and when they would join the euro. Denmark subsequently notified the Council of the European Communities of their decision to opt out of the euro. This was done in response to the Maastricht treaty having been rejected by the Danish people in a referendum earlier that year. As a result of the changes, the treaty was ratified in a subsequent referendum held in 1993. On 28 September 2000, a euro referendum was held in Denmark resulting in a 53.2% vote against the government's proposal to join the euro.

Since 2007, the Danish government has discussed holding another referendum on euro adoption.[71] However the political and financial uncertainty due to the European government-debt crisis led this to be postponed.[72] Opinion polls, which had generally favoured euro adoption from 2002 to 2010, showed a rapid decline in support during the height of the EU debt crisis,[73] reaching a low in May 2012 with 26% in favor towards 67% against while 7% were in doubt.[74]

Hungary

{{Main article|Hungary and the euro}}

With their accession to the EU in 2004, Hungary began planning to adopt the euro in place of the forint. However, the country's high deficit delayed this. After the 2006 election, Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány introduced austerity measures, reducing the deficit to less than 5% in 2007 from 9.2%. In February 2011, newly elected Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, of the soft eurosceptic Fidesz party, made clear that he did not expect the euro to be adopted in Hungary before 1 January 2020.[75] Orbán said the country was not yet ready to adopt the currency and they will not discuss the possibility until the public debt reaches a 50% threshold.[76] The public debt-to-GDP ratio was 81.0% when Orban's 50% target was set in 2011, and it is currently forecast to decline to 73.5% in 2016.[77] In April 2013, Viktor Orbán further added that Hungarian purchasing power parity weighted GDP per capita must also reach 90% of the eurozone average.[78] Shortly after Viktor Orbán had been re-elected as Prime Minister for another four-year term in April 2014,[79] the Hungarian Central Bank announced they plan to distribute a new series of Forint bank notes in 2018.[80] In June 2015, Orbán himself declared that his government would no longer entertain the idea of replacing the forint with the euro in 2020, as was previously suggested, and instead expected the forint to remain "stable and strong for the next several decades".[81]

In July 2016, National Economy Minister Mihály Varga suggested that country could adopt the euro by the "end of the decade", but only if economic trends continue to improve and the common currency becomes more stable.[82][83] While Varga backed away from that, saying convergence was still needed, Sándor Csányi (the head of the country's largest bank and ranked the second most influential man in Hungary) argued that further integration of the eurozone would provide a likely catalyst as Hungary would not want to be left out of closer integration. Attila Chikan, a professor of economics at Corvinus University, and a former economy minister to Orban, added that "Orban is at once very pragmatic and impulsive, he can make decisions very fast and sometimes on unexpected grounds."[84]

Poland

{{Main article|Poland and the euro}}

The Polish government in 2012 under Prime Minister Donald Tusk had favoured euro adoption, however it did not have the required majority in the Sejm to amend the constitution due to the opposition of the Law and Justice Party to the euro.[85][86] [87] Further opposition arose due to the on-going sovereign-debt crisis, with the Polish National Bank recommending Poland wait until the Eurozone had overcome the crisis.[88] The leader of the Law and Justice Party, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, stated in 2013 that "I do not foresee any moment when the adoption of the euro would be advantageous for us" and called for a referendum on euro adoption.[89] Donald Tusk responded saying he was open to a referendum, as part of a package in Parliament to approve the constitutional amendment.[90] However the 2015 Polish elections were won by Law and Justice who not only opposed any further moves towards membership, but whose relations with the EU has degenerated due to a potential violation of EU values by Poland. A group of Polish economists have suggested that euro adoption could be a way of smoothing over relations from the dispute.[91]

Polls have generally showed that Poles are opposed to adopting the euro straight away,[92][93] with a eurobarometer poll in April 2015 showing that 44 per cent of Polish people are in favour of introducing the euro (a decrease of 1 per cent from 2014), whereas 53 per cent are opposed (no change from 2014).[94][95][96] However, polls conducted by TNS Polska throughout 2012–2015 have consistently shown support for eventually adopting the euro,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105]

though that support depends on the target date. According to the latest TNS Polska poll from June 2015, the share who supported adoption was 46% against 41%. When asked about the appropriate timing, the supporters were divided into three groups of equal size, with 15% advocating for adoption within the next 5 years, another 14% preferring it should happen between 6–10 years from now, and finally 17% arguing it should happen more than 10 years from now.[105]

Romania

{{Main article|Romania and the euro}}

Originally, the euro was scheduled to be adopted by Romania in place of the leu by 2014.[106] In April 2012 the Romanian convergence report submitted under the Stability and Growth Pact listed 1 January 2015 to be the target date for euro adoption.[107] In April 2013 Prime Minister Victor Ponta has stated that "eurozone entry remains a fundamental objective for Romania but we can't enter poorly prepared", and that 2020 was a more realistic target.[108] The Romanian Central Bank governor, Mugur Isărescu, admitted the target was ambitious, but obtainable if the political parties passed a legal roadmap for the required reforms to be implemented, and clarified this roadmap should lead to Romania entering ERM II only on 1 January 2017 so the euro could be adopted after two years of ERM II membership on 1 January 2019.[109]

As of April 2015, the Romanian government concluded it was still on track to attain its target for euro adoption in 2019, both in regards of ensuring full compliance with all nominal convergence criteria and in regards of ensuring a prior satisfying degree of "real convergence". The Romanian target for "real convergence" ahead of euro adoption, is for its GDP per capita (in purchasing power standards) to be above 60% of the same average figure for the entire European Union, and according to the latest outlook, this relative figure was now forecast to reach 65% in 2018 and 71% in 2020,[110] after having risen at the same pace from 29% in 2002 to 54% in 2014.[111] However, in September 2015 Romania's central bank governor Mugur Isarescu said that the 2019 target was no longer realistic.[112] The target date was initially 2022, as Teodor Meleșcanu, the foreign minister of Romania declared on 28 August 2017 that, as they "meet all formal requirements", Romania "could join the currency union even tomorrow". However, he thought Romania "will adopt the euro in five years."[113] In March 2018, however, members of the ruling Party of Social Democrats (PSD) voted at an extraordinary congress to back a 2024 target year to adopt the euro as Romania's currency.[114]

Sweden

{{Main article|Sweden and the euro}}

Although Sweden is required to replace the krona with the euro eventually, it maintains that joining the ERM II, a requirement for euro adoption, is voluntary,[115][116] and has chosen to not join pending public approval by a referendum, thereby intentionally avoiding the fulfillment of the adoption requirements. On 14 September 2003 56% of Swedes voted against adopting the euro in a referendum.[117] Most of Sweden's major parties believe that it would be in the national interest to join, but they have all pledged to abide by the result of the referendum. Former Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt stated in December 2007 that there will be no referendum until there is stable support in the polls.[118] The polls have generally showed stable support for the "no" alternative, except some polls in 2009 showing a support for "yes". Since 2010 the polls have shown strong support for "no" again. According to a eurobarometer poll in April 2015, 32 per cent of Swedes are in favour of introducing the euro (an increase of 9 per cent from November 2014), whereas 66 per cent are opposed (a decrease of 7 per cent from November 2014).[95][119]

United Kingdom

{{Main article|United Kingdom and the euro}}

The United Kingdom entered the ERM in October 1990. The UK government spent over £6 billion trying to keep its currency within the narrow limits prescribed by ERM, but was forced to exit the programme within two years after its currency the pound sterling came under major pressure from currency speculators. The ensuing crash of 16 September 1992 was subsequently dubbed "Black Wednesday". During the negotiations of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 the UK secured an opt-out from adopting the euro.[120] The Labour government of Tony Blair argued that the UK should join the euro, contingent on approval in a referendum, if five economic tests were met. The UK Treasury first assessed tests in October 1997, when it was decided that the UK economy was neither sufficiently converged with that of the rest of the EU, nor sufficiently flexible, to justify a recommendation of membership at that time. The assessment of June 2003 concluded that not all were met.[121] The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government elected in 2010 pledged not to join the euro during its term of office,[122][123] due to expire in 2015. The Conservative government that followed the coalition does not have any plans for euro adoption; rather, it held a referendum on continuing to be a member of the EU at all, which resulted in a vote in favour of leaving the EU of 52% to 48% against.[4][5][6][7]

Outside the EU

{{See also|Future enlargement of the European Union}}

The EU's position is that no independent sovereign state is allowed to join the eurozone without first being a full member of the European Union (EU). However, four independent sovereign European microstates situated within the borders of the eurozone states, have such a small size — rendering them unlikely ever to join the EU — that they have been allowed to adopt the euro through the signing of monetary agreements, which granted them rights to mint local euro coins without gaining a seat in the European Central Bank. In addition, some dependent territories of EU member states have also been allowed to use the euro without being part of the EU, conditional the signing of agreements where a eurozone state guarantee their prior adoption of regulations applying specifically for the eurozone.

Current adopters

European microstates

State Adopted euro Notes Pop.
Andorra}}[124]format=dmy|2002|1|1}} (de facto){{refn|Between 1 January 2002, when the euro was launched, and 1 April 2012, when their Monetary Agreement with the EU came into force, Andorra did not have an official currency but used the euro as their de facto currency.}}
{{dts|format=dmy|2012|4|1}} (de jure)[125]		format=dmy|2013|7|1}}{{Nts|82000}}
Monaco}}[126][127][128]format=dmy|1999|1|1}}format=dmy|2002|1|1}}{{Nts|32671}}
San Marino}}[129][130][131]format=dmy|1999|1|1}}format=dmy|2002|1|1}}{{Nts|29615}}
Vatican City}}[132][133][134]format=dmy|1999|1|1}}format=dmy|2002|1|1}}{{Nts|800}}
Kosovo}}{{efn|name=status|group=nb}}format=dmy|2002|1|1}}{{refn|The Deutsche Mark was declared by UNMIK as legal tender in Kosovo on 4 October 1999.[135] When Germany yielded the Deutsche Mark for the Euro on 1 January 2002, this also happened in Kosovo. Subsequently the Republic of Kosovo unilaterally adopted the Euro as its official currency.}}
(unilateral adoption)		 Potential Candidate
Seeking EU Membership[136]		{{Nts|1700000}}
Montenegro}}format=dmy|2002|1|1}}{{refn|Montenegro abandon the use of the Yugoslav dinar in November 1999. Since then, the Deutsche Mark was used as legal tender. When Germany yielded the Deutsche Mark for the Euro on 1 January 2002, Montenegro unilaterally adopted the Euro as its official currency.}}
(unilateral adoption)		 Candidate Seeking
EU Membership[137]		{{Nts|684736}}

The European microstates of Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City, which had a monetary agreement with a eurozone state when the euro was introduced, were granted a special permission to continue these agreements and to issue separate euro coins, but they don't get any input or observer status in the economic affairs of the eurozone. Andorra, which had used the euro unilaterally since the inception of the currency, negotiated a similar agreement which granted them the right to officially use the euro as of 1 April 2012 and to issue euro coins.[125]

Kosovo and Montenegro

{{Further information|Kosovo and the euro|Montenegro and the euro}}Kosovo{{efn|name=status}} and Montenegro have unilaterally adopted and used the euro since its launch, as they previously used the German mark rather than the Yugoslav dinar. This was due to political concerns that Serbia would use the currency to destabilise these provinces (Montenegro was then in a union with Serbia) so they received Western help in adopting and using the mark (though there was no restriction on the use of the dinar or any other currency). They switched to the euro when the mark was replaced, but have signed no monetary agreement with the ECB; rather the country depends only on euros already in circulation.[138][139] Kosovo also still uses the Serbian dinar, which replaced the Yugoslav dinar, in areas mainly populated by the Serbian minority.[140]

Potential adopters

Iceland

During the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis, instability in the króna led to discussion in Iceland about adopting the euro. However, Jürgen Stark, a Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, has stated that "Iceland would not be able to adopt the EU currency without first becoming a member of the EU".[141] Iceland subsequently applied for EU membership. As of the ECB's May 2012 convergence report, Iceland did not meet any of the convergence criteria.[142] One year later, the country had achieved compliance with the deficit criteria and had begun to decrease its debt-to-GDP ratio,[143] but still suffered from elevated HICP inflation and long-term governmental interest rates.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}} On 13 September 2013, a newly elected government dissolved the accession negotiation team and thus suspended Iceland's application to join the European Union until a referendum can be held on whether or not the accession negotiations should resume; if negotiations do resume, after they are completed the public will then have the opportunity in a second referendum to vote on "whether or not Iceland shall join the EU on the negotiated terms".[144][145][146]

Dutch overseas territories

Territory ISO 3166-1 code ISO 4217 code Comment
Aruba}} AW AWG Aruba is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, but not the EU. It uses the Aruban florin, which is pegged to the US dollar.(1 dollar = 1.79 florins)
Curaçao}} Curaçao CW ANG Currently uses the Netherlands Antillean guilder and had planned to introduce the Caribbean guilder in 2014, although the change has been delayed. Both are pegged to the US dollar.(1 dollar = 1.79 guilder)[147]
Sint Maarten}} Sint Maarten SX ANG Currently uses the Netherlands Antillean guilder and had planned to introduce the Caribbean guilder in 2014, although the change has been delayed. Both are pegged to the US dollar.(1 dollar = 1.79 guilder)[147]
Netherlands}} Caribbean Netherlands BQ USD Uses the US Dollar.

Danish overseas territories

The Danish krone is currently used by both of its dependent territories, Greenland and Faroe Islands, with their monetary policy controlled by the Danish Central Bank.[148] If Denmark does adopt the euro, separate referendums would be required in both territories to decide whether they should follow suit. Both territories have voted not to be a part of the EU in the past, and their populations will not participate in the Danish euro referendum.[149] The Faroe Islands use a special version of the Danish krone notes that have been printed with text in the Faroese language.[150] It is regarded as a foreign currency, but can be exchanged 1:1 with the Danish version.[148][150] On 5 November 2009 the Faroese Parliament approved a proposal to investigate the possibility for euro adoption, including an evaluation of the legal and economic impact of adopting the euro ahead of Denmark.[151][152][153][154]

French overseas territories

The CFP franc is currently used as a euro pegged currency by three French overseas collectivities: French Polynesia, Wallis and Futuna and New Caledonia. The French government has recommended that all three territories decide in favour of adopting the euro. French Polynesia has declared themselves in favour of joining the eurozone. Wallis and Futuna announced a neutral standpoint, that they would support a currency choice similar to what New Caledonia chooses. However, New Caledonia has not yet made any decision, because they first await the fallout of an independence referendum, scheduled to be held at the latest in November 2018,{{efn|According to the Nouméa Accord, the Congress of New Caledonia is entitled to schedule an independence referendum during 2014–18, if a ⅔ majority for this exist in the Congress. If the Congress refrain to call the referendum during 2014–18, the French state will call for it to take place in November 2018. Should the electorate vote "yes" to full independence, then the territory will change status from its current OCT status to become a fully sovereign state. Should the electorate vote "no" to full independence, then a second independence referendum will be called two years later, asking if the electorate is certain about their choice. If the electorate confirm their "no vote" in the second independence referendum, another third one will be called two years later, asking if the electorate is absolutely sure. If the "no vote" will be confirmed again, this settle the question, meaning that New Caledonia will maintain its current autonomy powers while continuing being a dependent OCT associated with France. In theory, the territory also have the third option "to become an integrated part of France as an Outermost region (OMR status)" — which automatically also would make it an integrated part of EU and the Eurozone — but this is not under consideration by any of the established political parties on the island, and thus not an option the electorate can vote for in the independence referendum.[155]|name="New Caledonia independence referendum"|group=nb}} as this might influence their opinion whether or not to adopt the euro. If the three collectivities decide to adopt the euro, the French government would make an application on their behalf to the European Council, and the switch to the euro could be made after a couple of years. If the collectivities fail to reach a unanimous decision about the future of the CFP franc, it would be technically possible to implement an individual currency decision for each territory.[156]

Northern Cyprus

{{seealso|Northern Cyprus and the European Union}}

Northern Cyprus is legally part of the EU, but law is suspended due to north being under the control of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which the EU does not recognise. The North uses the Turkish lira instead of the euro, although the euro circulates alongside the lira and other currencies. On the resolution of the Cyprus dispute and the reunification of the island, the euro would become the official currency of the north also as part of the South's membership.[157]

Public opinion

Public support for the euro in states who joined the EU 2004-2013[
//#158'>158]
{{Graph:Chart|width=1200|height=300|legend=Country (adoption year)|type=line|x=02/2004,10/2004,05/2005,10/2005,03/2006,09/2006,04/2007,09/2007,03/2008,10/2008,06/2009,10/2009,05/2010,11/2010,05/2011,11/2011,05/2012,11/2012,05/2013,11/2013,05/2014,11/2014,05/2015,11/2015,05/2016,11/2016,05/2017,11/2017|y1=85,87,83,77,82,83,91,86,90,90,86,88,82,83,81,81,80,83,77,78,79,75,78,77,80,85,83,85|y2=65,59,53,46,46,43,50,46,58,58,67,63,57,63,55,55,52,48,47,44,53,51,44,49,53,52,60,67|y3=46,46,50,50,47,55,64,63,72,63,68,66,66,67,68,61,63,64,68,69,73,77,78,74,75,77,77,77|y4=68,69,72,60,63,65,69,63,66,76,89,86,87,89,82,78,80,72,77,78,74,79,81,78,78,81,80,80|y5=46,55,59,53,48,49,54,54,56,58,31,63,57,63,71,64,71,69,73,76,80,83,83,82,78,81,83,84|y6=55,59,57,55,46,53,47,48,54,47,48,53,55,52,53,42,39,35,43,53,68,74,78,72,78,78,78,76|y7=63,69,60,54,46,55,54,48,57,48,52,52,50,51,48,46,42,43,40,40,50,63,73,67,65,67,65,68|y8=74,67,63,65,62,66,64,57,68,61,60,59,55,54,57,50,54,46,44,51,41,45,43,37,42,38,39,39|y9=,63,59,61,59,63,68,66,,65,63,59,67,67,64,63,62,52,61,57,53,56,56,56,54,52,51,43|y10=56,60,63,60,57,60,60,53,53,53,51,55,36,41,28,22,24,22,25,26,24,25,22,20,21,25,20,22|y11=63,60,64,64,66,61,67,65,63,63,63,66,67,71,61,54,47,50,50,55,53,54,55,49,51,52,52,57|y12=59,65,56,50,54,52,54,49,49,44,47,46,43,47,38,38,35,36,29,35,37,40,32,34,35,34,32,36|y13=74,71,74,66,65,70,73,71,72,71,72,71,64,64,65,61,60,56,56,58,63,65,64,63,57,55,60,57|y1Title=Slovenia (2007)|y2Title=Cyprus (2008)|y3Title=Malta (2008)|y4Title=Slovakia (2009)|y5Title=Estonia (2011)|y6Title=Latvia (2014)|y7Title=Lithuania (2015)|y8Title=Bulgaria|y9Title=Croatia|y10Title=Czech Republic|y11Title=Hungary|y12Title=Poland|y13Title=Romania|colors=#75475F,#CEA4E0,#560D76,#2F22AB,#7FB7D3,#0F6590,#30C5D6,#CCC38A,#405D13,#F3990F,#F0F03A,#8E844B,#CAF30F}}

See also

  • Enlargement of the European Union
  • History of the European Union

Notes

{{Notelist|colwidth=45em|group=nb|refs={{efn|name=status|{{Kosovo-note}}}} }}
1. ^{{Cite news|last=Kubosova |first=Lucia |title= Slovakia confirmed as ready for Euro |url=http://euobserver.com/9/26096 |publisher=euobserver.com |date=5 May 2008 |accessdate=25 January 2009}}
2. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.france24.com/en/20100608-eu-ministers-offer-estonia-entry-eurozone-january-1-currency-europe |title=Ministers offer Estonia entry to eurozone January 1 |publisher=France24.com |date= |accessdate=26 April 2011}}
3. ^{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1307_en.htm|title=Latvia becomes the 18th Member State to adopt the euro|date=31 December 2013|accessdate=31 December 2013|publisher=European Commission}}
4. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2016/jun/23/eu-referendum-result-live-counting-leave-remain-brain-in-europe|title=Brexit: Nicola Sturgeon says second Scottish referendum 'highly likely'|first1=Andrew|last1=Sparrow|first2=Matthew|last2=Weaver|first3=Philip|last3=Oltermann|first4=Adam|last4=Vaughan|first5=Anushka|last5=Asthana|first6=Mark|last6=Tran|first7=Jessica|last7=Elgot|first8=Holly|last8=Watt|first9=Jennifer|last9=Rankin|first10=Henry|last10=McDonald|first11=Maev|last11=Kennedy|first12=Frances|last12=Perraudin|first13=Arthur|last13=Neslen|first14=Lisa|last14=O'Carroll|first15=Nadia|last15=Khomami|first16=Steven|last16=Morris|first17=Pamela|last17=Duncan|first18=Katie|last18=Allen|first19=Severin|last19=Carrell|first20=Rowena|last20=Mason|first21=Helena|last21=Bengtsson|first22=Caelainn|last22=Barr|first23=Simon|last23=Goodley|first24=Libby|last24=Brooks|first25=Graeme|last25=Wearden|first26=Ben|last26=Quinn|first27=Randeep|last27=Ramesh|first28=Nick|last28=Fletcher|first29=Jill|last29=Treanor|first30=Justin|last30=McCurry|first31=Richard|last31=Adams|first32=Josh|last32=Halliday|first33=David|last33=Pegg|first34=Claire|last34=Phipps|first35=Deborah|last35=Mattinson|first36=Peter|last36=Walker|date=24 June 2016}}
5. ^1 {{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/world/europe/britain-brexit-european-union-referendum.html|title=Britain Votes to Leave E.U., Stunning the World|last=Erlanger|first=Steven|date=23 June 2016|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=24 June 2016}}
6. ^1 {{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/business/international/brexit-financial-economic-impact-leave.html|title=Turbulence and Uncertainty for the Market After 'Brexit'|last=Goodman|first=Peter S.|date=23 June 2016|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=24 June 2016}}
7. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/eu-referendum-results-live-brexit-wins-as-britain-votes-to-leave/|title=EU referendum results live: Brexit wins as Britain votes to leave European Union|access-date=24 June 2016|website=Telegraph.co.uk|last=Hughes|first=Laura}}
8. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/policyaccexchangerateen.pdf|title=POLICY POSITION OF THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK ON EXCHANGE RATE ISSUES RELATING TO THE ACCEDING COUNTRIES|date=18 December 2003|accessdate=19 August 2014|publisher=European Central Bank}}
9. ^{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52002DC0243&from=EN|title=REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION – CONVERGENCE REPORT 2002 SWEDEN|date=22 May 2002|accessdate=19 August 2014|publisher=European Commission}}
10. ^{{cite web|title=New EU members to break free from euro duty|url=http://www.euractiv.com/euro-finance/new-eu-members-break-free-eurozone-duty-news-507564|publisher=Euractiv.com|date=13 September 2011|accessdate=7 September 2013}}
11. ^{{cite web|url=https://euobserver.com/political/114118|title=Czech PM mulls euro referendum|publisher=EUobserver|date=28 October 2011}}
12. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.radio.cz/en/section/curraffrs/czechs-deeply-divided-on-eus-fiscal-union|title=Czechs deeply divided on EU's fiscal union|publisher=Radio Praha|date=19 January 2012}}
13. ^{{cite web|url=http://praguemonitor.com/2012/01/20/formin-euro-referendum-casts-doubt-czech-pledge-eu|title=ForMin: Euro referendum casts doubt on Czech pledges to EU|publisher=Prague Daily Monitor|date=20 January 2012|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201154357/http://praguemonitor.com/2012/01/20/formin-euro-referendum-casts-doubt-czech-pledge-eu|archivedate=1 February 2014|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
14. ^{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7695487.stm|title=Poland may get referendum on euro|date=28 October 2008|publisher=BBC|accessdate=26 August 2015}}
15. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-z-kraju,3/l-kaczynski-najpierw-referendum-potem-euro,75326.html|title=L. Kaczyński: najpierw referendum, potem euro|date=31 October 2008|accessdate=26 August 2015}}
16. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d1ea63fc-9636-11e2-9ab2-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3jyclMUXw|title=Poland opens way to euro referendum|date=26 March 2013|accessdate=26 August 2015|first=Jan|last=Cienski|newspaper=Financial Times}}
17. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/politics-derail-polands-quest-for-the-euro/a-18670762|title=Politics derail Poland's quest for the euro|date=26 August 2015|publisher=Deutsche Welle}}
18. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.nineoclock.ro/pm-ponta-referendum-on-euro-adoption-possible-in-2017-2018/|title=Victor Ponta: Un referendum, înainte de a intra efectiv în zona euro, ar fi o măsură democratică|date=2 June 2015|accessdate=26 August 2015|first=Carmen|last=Vintilă}}
19. ^{{Cite web| url=http://www.ecb.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp10.pdf| title=The acceding countries' strategies towards ERM II and the adoption of the euro: an analytical review |format=PDF|publisher=ECB|date=February 2004| accessdate=1 September 2012}}
20. ^{{cite web|url=http://ftp.infoeuropa.eurocid.pt/database/000034001-000035000/000034009.pdf|title=Convergence Report 2004|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=20 October 2004|accessdate=19 August 2005}}
21. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2013/pdf/ee3_en.pdf|title=Convergence Report 2013|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=3 June 2013}}
22. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mf.gov.pl/documents/764034/1002547/Monitor_2014_06.pdf|title=Nominal Convergence Monitor April 2014 (Monitor konwergencji nominalnej kwietniu 2014)|format=PDF|language=Polish|publisher=Ministry of Finance (Poland)|date=4 July 2014}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/news/release-calendar|title=Release Calendar for Euro Indicators|publisher=Eurostat|accessdate=26 September 2018}}
24. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/conrep/cr201205en.pdf|title=Convergence Report (May 2012)|format=PDF|publisher=ECB|date=May 2012|accessdate=18 November 2012}}
25. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee4_en.pdf|title=Convergence Report 2014|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=4 June 2014|accessdate=4 June 2014}}
26. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bundesbank.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publications/Statistical_Supplement_5/2015/2015_08_exchange_rate_statistics.pdf?__blob=publicationFile|title=Exchange rate statistics: August 2015|format=PDF|work=Central rates and intervention rates in Exchange Rate Mechanism II|publisher=Deutsche Bundesbank|date=14 August 2015}}
27. ^1 2 [https://www.ft.com/content/4b622248-8609-11e8-a29d-73e3d454535d Bulgaria agrees to conditions for joining euro], Financial Times 12 July 2018
28. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/adoption/scenarios/index_en.htm|title=Adopting the euro: Scenarios for adopting the euro|date=20 March 2012 |accessdate=13 March 2013}}
29. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication12436_en.pdf|title=Preparing the introduction of the euro – a short handbook|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=15 April 2008|accessdate=15 March 2013}}
30. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.int/ecb/legal/pdf/02006o0009-20080705-en.pdf|title=Unofficial consolidated text: Guideline of the ECB of 19 June 2008 amending Guideline ECB/2006/9 on certain preparations for the euro cash changeover and on frontloading and sub-frontloading of euro banknotes and coins outside the euro area (ECB/2008/4)(OJ L 176)|format=PDF|publisher=ECB|date=5 July 2008|accessdate=15 March 2013}}
31. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/pdf/2014/fifteenth_report_on_the_practical_preparations_annex_en.pdf|title=Fifteenth Report on the practical preparations for the future enlargement of the euro area|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=21 November 2014}}
32. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/adoption/scenarios/index_en.htm|work=ec.europa.eu/|accessdate=7 September 2013|title=Scenarios for adopting the euro}}
33. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bnb.bg/bnbweb/groups/public/documents/bnb_law/agreements_bnb-cm_en.pdf|title=Agreement between the Council of Ministers and the Bulgarian National Bank on the introduction of the Euro in the Republic of Bulgaria|format=PDF|publisher=Bulgarian National Bank|date=26 November 2004}}
34. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.zavedenieura.cz/cps/rde/xbcr/euro/NP_EN_06-08-07.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=19 August 2014 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121224094128/http://www.zavedenieura.cz/cps/rde/xbcr/euro/NP_EN_06-08-07.pdf |archivedate=24 December 2012 |df=dmy-all }}
35. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.evm.dk/resources/oem/static/publikationer/overgangeu/hele.pdf|title=Overgang til euro ved dansk deltagelse|format=PDF|publisher=Økonomiministeriet|date=14 June 2000|accessdate=27 October 2012}}
36. ^{{cite web|title=Illustration af danske euromønter|url=http://www.eu-oplysningen.dk/emner/euro/Afstemning/DKmoenter/|work=eu-oplysningen.dk|accessdate=7 September 2013|language=Danish}}
37. ^{{cite web|url=http://english.mnb.hu/Root/Dokumentumtar/ENMNB/euro_pages/NAT2009_EN_FU.PDF|title=National Changeover Plan for Hungary: first update December 2009|format=PDF|publisher=Magyar Nemzeti Bank (National Euro Co-ordination Committee)|date=7 January 2010}}
38. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/csr2014/cp2014_poland_en.pdf|title=Convergence programme: 2014 update|publisher=Republic of Poland|format=PDF|date=April 2014}}
39. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mf.gov.pl/documents/764034/1010438/The+Convergence+Programme+-+2015|title=Convergence Programme: 2015 update |publisher=Polish Ministry of Finance|date=20 May 2015}}
40. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/guvernanti-romania-poate-adopta-euro-in-2015-928355.html|title= Guvernanţi: România poate adopta euro în 2015|publisher=Evenimentul Zilei|date= 29 April 2011|language=Romanian}}
41. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.lse.co.uk/FinanceNews.asp?ArticleCode=4e8qzm7o9lg3mdr|title=Lithuanian PM keen on fast-track euro idea| publisher=London South East|date=7 April 2007}}
42. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/pdf/ee-2012-3_en.pdf|title=Convergence Report May 2012|publisher=European Commission|date=May 2012}}
43. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2013/pdf/ee3_en.pdf|title=Convergence Report June 2013|publisher=European Commission|date=June 2013}}
44. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee4_en.pdf|title=Convergence Report June 2014|publisher=European Commission|date=June 2014}}
45. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.novinite.com/articles/166023/Joining+Euro+to+Have+Positive+Impact+on+Bulgaria's+Economy+-+Experts|title=Joining Euro to Have Positive Impact on Bulgaria's Economy - Experts |publisher=Sofia News Agency (Novinite)|date=19 January 2015}}
46. ^{{cite web|url=http://bnr.bg/sites/en/Lifestyle/BGEU/Pages/2607BulgariaputsoffEurozonemembershipfor2015.aspx|title=Bulgaria puts off Eurozone membership for 2015|publisher=Radio Bulgaria|date=26 July 2011|accessdate=2 September 2012|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131220222945/http://bnr.bg/sites/en/Lifestyle/BGEU/Pages/2607BulgariaputsoffEurozonemembershipfor2015.aspx|archivedate=20 December 2013}}
47. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-15/bulgaria-sees-euro-recovery-to-boost-growth-quickly-kostov-says.html|title=Bulgaria Sees Euro Recovery to Boost Growth Quickly, Kostov Says|publisher=Bloomberg|date=15 January 2014}}
48. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/sections/euro-finance/bulgaria-says-it-will-start-talks-join-euro-311331|title=Bulgaria says it will start talks to join the euro|date=16 January 2015}}
49. ^{{Cite web|title = Bulgaria creates council for preparation for euro zone membership|url = http://sofiaglobe.com/2015/07/01/bulgaria-creates-council-for-preparation-for-euro-zone-membership/|website = The Sofia Globe|date=1 July 2015}}
50. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=da&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=bg&tl=en&u=http://www.government.bg/cgi-bin/e-cms/vis/vis.pl%3Fs%3D001%26p%3D0228%26n%3D7157%26g%3D&usg=ALkJrhhwhkBbNEgc68JBKKHR-fF55WduiA|title=A Coordinating Council on Bulgaria's membership in the euro area|language=Bulgarian|publisher=Bulgarian Government|date=1 July 2015}}
51. ^{{citeweb|url=http://sofiaglobe.com/2017/03/31/gerb-leader-borissov-bulgaria-will-apply-to-join-euro-zone/|title=GERB leader Borissov: Bulgaria will apply to join euro zone|date=31 March 2017|accessdate=6 April 2017|work=Sofia Globe}}
52. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.financialobserver.eu/recent-news/bulgaria-to-know-its-chances-for-ERM-II-accession-by-end-2017/|title=Bulgaria to know its chances for ERM II accession by end-2017|date=3 July 2017|accessdate=4 July 2017|publisher=Central European Financial Observer}}
53. ^[https://euobserver.com/news/140517 Bulgaria to take first steps towards euro], EUOBSERVER 11 January 2018
54. ^[https://www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/bulgaria-expects-to-apply-for-eurozone-waiting-room-by-july/ Bulgaria expects to apply for eurozone waiting room by July], EURACTIV 11 January 2018
55. ^[https://www.reuters.com/article/bulgaria-eurozone/update-2-defiant-bulgaria-to-push-for-erm-2-membership-idUSL8N1P625A UPDATE 2-Defiant Bulgaria to push for ERM-2 membership] Retuers 11 January 2018
56. ^Bulgaria renews calls for euro as it takes on EU presidency, Euronews 11 January 2018
57. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/36111/letter-by-bulgaria-on-ERM-II-participation.pdf|title=Letter by Bulgaria on ERM II participation|date=29 June 2018}}
58. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/07/12/statement-on-bulgaria-s-path-towards-ERM-II-participation |title=Statement on Bulgaria's path towards ERM II participation|accessdate=12 July 2018}}
59. ^{{cite news|last=THOMSON|first=AINSLEY|title=Croatia Aims for Speedy Adoption of Euro|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324063304578525240431831674|publisher=Wall Street Journal|accessdate=7 September 2013}}
60. ^{{cite web|title=Konferencija HNB-a u Dubrovniku: Hrvatska može uvesti euro najranije 2019|url=http://www.banka.hr/hrvatska/konferencija-hnb-a-u-dubrovniku-hrvatska-moze-uvesti-euro-najranije-2019|language=Croatian|publisher=HNB|date=14 June 2013|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202132257/http://www.banka.hr/hrvatska/konferencija-hnb-a-u-dubrovniku-hrvatska-moze-uvesti-euro-najranije-2019|archivedate=2 February 2014|df=dmy-all}}
61. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee4_en.pdf|title=Convergence Report - 2014|date=April 2014|accessdate=26 September 2014|publisher=European Commission}}
62. ^{{cite web|url=https://vlada.gov.hr/news/deficit-to-fall-below-3-pct-of-gdp-public-debt-to-stop-rising-by-2017/16907|title=Deficit to fall below 3 pct of GDP, public debt to stop rising by 2017|publisher=Government of the Republic of Croatia|date=30 April 2015}}
63. ^{{citeweb|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-croatia-euro/croatia-wants-to-adopt-euro-within-7-8-years-prime-minister-idUSKBN1CZ0Q5|title=Croatia wants to adopt euro within 7-8 years: prime minister|first=Igor|last=Ilic|publisher=Reuters|date=30 October 2017|accessdate=31 October 2017}}
64. ^{{cite news | url = http://www.novinky.cz/ekonomika/topolanek-a-tuma--euro-v-roce-2010-v-cr-nebude_96164_cd1o5.html | title = Topolánek a Tůma: euro v roce 2010 v ČR nebude | language = Czech |trans-title=| work = Novinky.cz | date = 19 September 2006 }}
65. ^{{cite news | url = http://euobserver.com/843/114118 | title = Czech PM mulls euro referendum | first = Valentina | last = Pop | work = EUObserver | date = 28 October 2011 | accessdate = 28 October 2011 | quote = "The conditions under which the Czech citizens decided in a referendum in 2003 on the country's accession to the EU and on its commitment to adopt the single currency, euro, have changed. That is why the ODS will demand that a possible accession to the single currency and the entry into the European stabilisation mechanism be decided on by Czech citizens," the ODS resolution says.}}
66. ^{{cite news | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/world/europe/czechs-split-deeply-over-joining-the-euro.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 | title = Czechs Split Deeply Over Joining the Euro | first = Dan | last = Bilefsky | work = The New York Times | date = 1 March 2013 }}
67. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/26/us-czech-euro-idUSBRE93P0ET20130426|title=Skeptical Czechs may be pushed to change tone on euro|publisher=Reuters|date=26 April 2013|accessdate=30 April 2013}}
68. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.cnb.cz/en/public/media_service/press_releases_cnb/2013/20131218_sladenost_maastricht_eurozona.html|title=CNB and MoF recommend not to set euro adoption date yet|publisher=Czech National Bank|date=18 December 2013}}
69. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bne.eu/content/story/czech-government-sets-target-agreeing-euro-adoption-process-2020|title=Czech government sets target of agreeing euro adoption process by 2020|publisher=IntelliNews|date=28 April 2015}}
70. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.lidovky.cz/ano-chce-zrusit-superhrubou-mzdu-a-zavest-slevy-na-pojistnem-pu0-/zpravy-domov.aspx?c=A170903_101815_ln_domov_ele0|title=Babiš odhalil program: odmítá euro, chce zavření evropské hranice (The new prime minister revealed his programme: he rejects Euro and wants to close European borders)|language=Czech|publisher=Lidovky.cz|date=11 January 2018}}
71. ^{{Cite news| url = https://www.theguardian.com/eu/story/0,,2215481,00.html| title = Danes to hold referendum on relationship with EU| date = 22 November 2007| accessdate =22 November 2007|work=The Guardian |location=UK | first=Allegra | last=Stratton}}
72. ^{{cite news|last=Brand|first=Constant|title=Denmark scraps border-control plans|url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2011/october/denmark-scraps-border-control-plans/72315.aspx|accessdate=18 October 2011|newspaper=European Voice|date=13 October 2011}}
73. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-27/debt-crisis-pushes-danish-euro-opposition-to-record-poll-shows.html|title=Debt Crisis Pushes Danish Euro Opposition to Record, Poll Shows |publisher=Bloomberg|date=27 September 2011|accessdate=22 January 2013}}
74. ^{{cite web|url=http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/tuksi4/media/cmsmedia/2246_content_2_2859.pdf|title=Greens Analyseinstitut|publisher=Børsen (Greens Analyseinstitut)|date=7 May 2012|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130120193927/http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/tuksi4/media/cmsmedia/2246_content_2_2859.pdf|archivedate=20 January 2013|df=dmy-all}}
75. ^{{cite web | url=http://index.hu/gazdasag/magyar/2011/02/05/orban_2020-ig_nem_lesz_euronk/ | title=Orbán: We won't have euro until 2020.(In Hungarian.) | publisher=Index | date=5 February 2011| accessdate=26 March 2011}}
76. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.vg.hu/gazdasag/gazdasagpolitika/matolcsy-2020-ban-lehet-magyar-euro-342616 | title=Matolcsy: Hungarian euro is possible in 2020|language=Hungarian| publisher=Világgazdaság | date=4 March 2011|accessdate=26 March 2011}}
77. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu/forecasts/2015_spring/hu_en.pdf|title=European Economic Forecast Spring 2015 - 17.Hungary|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=5 May 2015}}
78. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.politics.hu/20130426/orban-hungary-will-keep-forint-until-its-gdp-reaches-90-of-eurozone-average/|title=Orbán: Hungary will keep forint until its GDP reaches 90% of eurozone average|publisher=All Hungary Media Group|date=26 April 2013}}
79. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26908404|title=Hungary election: PM Viktor Orban declares victory|publisher=BBC|date=6 April 2014}}
80. ^{{cite web|url=https://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2014/09/01/hungarys-new-notes-speak-of-late-conversion-to-euro/|title=Hungary's New Notes Speak of Late Conversion to Euro|publisher=The Wall Street Journal|date=1 September 2014}}
81. ^{{cite web|url=http://hungarianfreepress.com/2015/06/03/orban-hungary-will-not-adopt-the-euro-for-many-decades-to-come/|title=Orbán: Hungary will not adopt the euro for many decades to come|publisher=Hungarian Free Press|date=3 June 2015}}
82. ^{{cite web|url=http://dailynewshungary.com/hungarys-economy-minister-sees-possibility-for-adopting-euro-by-2020/|title=HUNGARY'S ECONOMY MINISTER SEES POSSIBILITY FOR ADOPTING EURO BY 2020 – UPDATE|publisher=Daily News Hungary|date=3 June 2015}}
83. ^{{cite web|url=http://epaper.brecorder.com/2016/07/27/7-page/779083-news.html|title=Hungary mulls euro adoption by 2020|publisher=BR-epaper|date=19 July 2016}}
84. ^[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-05/skeptic-hungary-can-t-resist-euro-pull-forever-top-banker-says Top Banker Says Hungary May Adopt the Euro Sooner Than Expected] Bloomberg 5 October 2017
85. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/22/us-poland-euro-idUSBRE90L0A320130122|title=Poland president says no euro entry decision before 2015 ballots|date=22 January 2013|accessdate=9 February 2013|publisher=Reuters}}
86. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/parties-in-poland-battle-over-whether-to-introduce-euro-a-881739.html|title=Core or Periphery?: Poland's Battle Over Embracing the Euro|last=Puhl|first=Jan|date=6 February 2013|accessdate=8 February 2013|publisher=Der Spiegel}}
87. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm | title=Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2nd April 1997, as published in Dziennik Ustaw (Journal of Laws) No. 78, item 483 | publisher=Parliament of the Republic of Poland | accessdate=25 September 2009}}
88. ^{{cite web |url=http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki7ka.nsf/0/B8B64432DCBBA328C1257A8B00371E53/$File/764.pdf |title=Monetary policy guidelines for 2013 (print nr.764)|format=PDF|language=Polish |publisher=Sejm|work=The Monetary Policy Council of the Polish National Bank (page 9)|date=27 September 2012|accessdate=28 October 2012}}
89. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.thenews.pl/1/12/Artykul/127752,Kaczynski-calls-for-referendum-on-euro|title=Polish opposition calls for single currency referendum|date=19 February 2013|accessdate=22 February 2013|publisher=Polskie Radio}}
90. ^{{cite news|last=Cienski|first=Jan|title=Poland opens way to euro referendum|url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d1ea63fc-9636-11e2-9ab2-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2Ojsmo4Rb|accessdate=28 March 2013|newspaper=Financial Times|date=26 March 2013}}
91. ^[https://www.politico.eu/article/the-case-for-poland-to-join-the-euro/ Euro push in Poland pitched as peace offering with EU], Politico 4 January 2018
92. ^1 {{Cite news| url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE65F15Z20100616 | title=Czechs, Poles cooler to euro as they watch debt crisis |agency=Reuters | date = 16 June 2010 |accessdate=18 June 2010}}
93. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.pl/artykuly/sekcje/wydarzenia/az-58-proc--polakow-przeciw-wprowadzeniu-euro,27543,1|title=As much as 58% of Poles are against the euro|language=Polish|publisher=Forbes.pl|date=5 June 2012|accessdate=21 February 2013}}
94. ^"April 2014 Eurobarometer poll"
95. ^1 "April 2015 Eurobarometer poll"
96. ^"April 2015 Eurobarometer poll"
97. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.pl/artykuly/sekcje/wydarzenia/az-58-proc--polakow-przeciw-wprowadzeniu-euro,27543,1|title=As much as 58% of Poles are against the euro|language=Polish|publisher=Forbes.pl|date=5 June 2012}}
98. ^{{cite web|url=http://m.onet.pl/biznes/kraj,l94p0|title=TNS Poland: 49 per cent respondents in favor of the euro, 40 per cent against (TNS Polska: 49 proc. badanych za przyjęciem euro, 40 proc. przeciw)|language=Polish|publisher=Onet.business|date=27 September 2013}}
99. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.parkiet.com/artykul/1352088.html|title=TNS: 45 per cent respondents in favor of the euro, 40 per cent against (TNS OBOP: 45 proc. badanych za przyjęciem euro, 40 proc. przeciw)|language=Polish|publisher=Parkiet|date=17 December 2013}}
100. ^{{cite web|url=http://wpolityce.pl/polityka/188699-polacy-nie-chca-euro-63-badanych-obawia-sie-przyjecia-europejskiej-waluty|title=Poles do not want the euro. 63% of respondents fear the adoption of the euro (Polacy nie chcą euro. 63% badanych obawia się przyjęcia europejskiej waluty)|language=Polish|publisher=Wpolityce.pl|date=25 March 2014}}
101. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pb.pl/3757890,53980,tns-46-proc.-polakow-za-przyjeciem-euro-42-proc.-przeciw|title=TNS: 46 per cent Poles for adoption of the euro; 42 per cent against (TNS: 46 proc. Polaków za przyjęciem euro; 42 proc. przeciw)|language=Polish|publisher=Puls Biznesu|date=2 July 2014}}
102. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/dispatches/tns-polska-odsetek-osob-oceniajacych-wejscie-do-emu-za-blad-wzrosl-o-2-pkt-proc-do-51-proc/|title=TNS Polska: Odsetek osób oceniających wejście do euro za błąd wzrósł do 51 proc|language=Polish|publisher=Obserwator Finansowy|date=25 September 2014|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141107154002/http://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/dispatches/tns-polska-odsetek-osob-oceniajacych-wejscie-do-emu-za-blad-wzrosl-o-2-pkt-proc-do-51-proc/|archivedate=7 November 2014|df=dmy-all}}
103. ^{{cite web|url=http://biznes.interia.pl/raport/euro_w_polsce/news/tns-polska-49-proc-za-40-proc-przeciwko-wprowadzeniu-w,2068117,5420|title=TNS Poland: 49 per cent for, 40 per cent against the introduction of the euro in Poland (TNS Polska: 49 proc. za, 40 proc. przeciwko wprowadzeniu w Polsce euro)|language=Polish|publisher=Interia.pl|date=21 December 2014}}
104. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Nastawienie-do-przyjecia-euro-bez-wiekszych-zmian-dominuja-sceptycy-3311535.html|title=Attitudes to adopt the euro without major changes, dominated by skeptics (Nastawienie do przyjęcia euro bez większych zmian, dominują sceptycy)|language=Polish|publisher=Bankier.pl|date=25 March 2015}}
105. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.pl/gospodarka/artykul/coraz-mniejsze-oczekiwania-polakow-wobec-euro-006973|title=Poles are increasingly skeptic against the euro (Polacy coraz sceptyczniejsi wobec euro|language=Polish|publisher=EurActiv|date=24 June 2015}}
106. ^{{cite web | url = http://www.zf.ro/eveniment/isarescu-trecem-la-euro-dupa-2012-3009254/ | title = Isarescu: Trecem la euro dupa 2012 | accessdate = 1 February 2011 | date = 18 May 2006 | language = Romanian}}
107. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/nd/cp2012_romania_en.pdf|title=Government of Romania: 2012–15 Convergence Programme|publisher=European Commission|date=30 April 2012|accessdate=1 September 2012}}
108. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/10002050/Romania-abandons-target-date-for-joining-euro.html|title=Romania abandons target date for joining euro|date=18 April 2013|accessdate=1 May 2013|publisher=The Daily Telegraph|last=Trotman|first=Andrew|location=London}}
109. ^{{cite web|url=http://business-review.eu/featured/isarescu-romania-needs-law-to-enforce-2019-euro-adoption-target-68724|title=Isarescu: Romania needs law to enforce 2019 Euro-adoption target|publisher=Business Review|date=19 August 2014}}
110. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/csr2015/cp2015_romania_en.pdf|title=Government of Romania Convergence Programme 2015-2018|publisher=Government of Romania|date=April 2015}}
111. ^{{cite web|url=http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?query=BOOKMARK_DS-053404_QID_3F4549E6_UID_-3F171EB0&layout=TIME,C,X,0;GEO,L,Y,0;INDIC_NA,L,Z,0;AGGREG95,L,Z,1;INDICATORS,C,Z,2;&zSelection=DS-053404INDIC_NA,VI_PPS_EU28_HAB;DS-053404AGGREG95,00;DS-053404INDICATORS,OBS_FLAG;&rankName1=INDICATORS_1_2_-1_2&rankName2=AGGREG95_1_2_-1_2&rankName3=INDIC-NA_1_2_-1_2&rankName4=TIME_1_0_0_0&rankName5=GEO_1_2_0_1&sortC=ASC_-1_FIRST&rStp=&cStp=&rDCh=&cDCh=&rDM=true&cDM=true&footnes=false&empty=false&wai=false&time_mode=ROLLING&time_most_recent=true&lang=EN&cfo=%23%23%23%2C%23%23%23.%23%23%23|title=Purchasing power parities (PPPs), price level indices and real expenditures for ESA2010 aggregates: GDP Volume indices of real expenditure per capita in PPS (EU28=100)|publisher=Eurostat|date=16 June 2015}}
112. ^{{cite web | url=https://euobserver.com/tickers/130506 | title = Central Bank: Romania 2019 euro membership 'not feasible' | accessdate = 30 December 2015 | publisher=EUObserver | date = 30 September 2015 | language = English}}
113. ^{{cite web | url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/28/reuters-america-romania-may-join-euro-zone-in-2022-says-foreign-minister--report.html | title = Romania may join euro zone in 2022, says foreign minister - report | accessdate = 28 August 2017 | publisher=CNBC | date = 28 August 2017 | language = English}}
114. ^{{cite web | url=https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-romania-politics/romanias-ruling-party-congress-votes-to-join-euro-in-2024-idUKKCN1GM0O6 | title = Romania's ruling party congress votes to join euro in 2024 | accessdate = 26 September 2018 | publisher=Reuters | date = 10 March 2018 | language = English}}
115. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.eu-upplysningen.se/Sverige-i-EU/Sverige-sa-nej-till-euron/ |title=Sverige sa nej till euron |publisher=Swedish Parliament|date=28 August 2013 |accessdate=12 August 2014 |language=Swedish}}
116. ^{{cite web| url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/adoption/erm2/index_en.htm | title=Information on ERM II | publisher=European Commission | date=22 December 2009 | accessdate=16 January 2010}}
117. ^{{Cite web| url=http://www.val.se/val/emu2003/resultat/slutresultat/ | title=Folkomröstning 14 september 2003 om införande av euron | language=Swedish | accessdate=2 February 2008 | publisher=Swedish Election Authority}}
118. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article1377536.ab |title= Glöm euron, Reinfeldt| publisher=Aftonbladet | date=2 December 2007 | accessdate=3 February 2008 | language=Swedish}}
119. ^{{Cite web|url = http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb82/eb82_first_en.pdf|title = Public Opinion in the European Union|date = 1 November 2014|accessdate = 23 June 2015|website = |publisher = |last = |first = }}
120. ^{{ cite web | author=Parliament of the United Kingdom | title=Volume: 587, Part: 120 (12 Mar 1998: Column 391, Baroness Williams of Crosby) | date=12 March 1998 | work=House of Lords Hansard | url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldhansrd/vo980312/text/80312-21.htm | accessdate=13 October 2007 }}
121. ^{{ cite news | author=Staff writer | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3307487.stm | title=Euro poll question revealed |publisher=BBC News | date=11 December 2003 | accessdate=17 October 2007 }}
122. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8677088.stm|title= At-a-glance: Cameron coalition's policy plans|date=13 May 2010|accessdate=13 September 2010|publisher=BBC News}}
123. ^BBC News 'David Cameron and Nick Clegg pledge 'united' coalition'
124. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:369:0001:0013:EN:PDF|title=Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra|date=17 December 2011|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
125. ^1 2 {{cite web |title=The euro outside the euro area |publisher=Europa (web portal)|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/world/outside_euro_area/index_en.htm|accessdate=26 February 2011}}
126. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31999D0096:EN:NOT|title=Council Decision of 31 December 1998 on the position to be taken by the Community regarding an agreement concerning the monetary relations with the Principality of Monaco|date=4 February 1999|accessdate=26 January 2013|journal=Official Journal of the European Communities}}
127. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:142:0059:0073:EN:PDF |title=Monetary agreement between the Government of the French Republic, on behalf of the European Community, and the Government of his Serene Highness the Prince of Monaco |date=31 May 2002|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
128. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:023:0013:0024:EN:PDF|title=Commission Decision of 28 November 2011 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union of the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Monaco|date=28 January 2012|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
129. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31999D0097:EN:NOT|title=Council Decision of 31 December 1998 on the position to be taken by the Community regarding an agreement concerning the monetary relations with the Republic of San Marino|date=4 February 1999|accessdate=26 January 2013|journal=Official Journal of the European Communities}}
130. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:209:0001:0004:EN:PDF |title=Monetary agreement between Italian, on behalf of the European Community, and the Republic of San Marino |date= 27 July 2001|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
131. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:121:0005:0017:EN:PDF|title=Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of San Marino|date=26 April 2012|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
132. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31999D0098:EN:NOT|title=Council Decision of 31 December 1998 on the position to be taken by the Community regarding an agreement concerning the monetary relations with Vatican City|date=4 February 1999|accessdate=26 January 2013|journal=Official Journal of the European Communities}}
133. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:299:0001:0004:EN:PDF|title=Monetary agreement between the Italian Republic, on behalf of the European Community, and the Vatican City State and, on its behalf, the Holy See|date=25 October 2001|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
134. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:028:0013:0018:EN:PDF|title=Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Vatican City State|date=4 February 2010|accessdate=8 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
135. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607234444/http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm|archivedate=7 June 2011|date=4 October 1999|publisher=UNMIK|title=Administrative Direction No. 1999/2}}
136. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/kosovo/index_en.htm|title=Enlargement – Kosovo|publisher=European Commission|accessdate=8 September 2012}}
137. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/montenegro/index_en.htm|title=Enlargement – Montenegro|publisher=European Commission|accessdate=8 September 2012}}
138. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/01/business/euro.php |title=Euro used as legal tender in non-EU nations – Business – International Herald Tribune – The New York Times |work=International Herald Tribune |date=1 January 2007 |accessdate=31 January 2012}}
139. ^{{cite press release|url=http://www.unmikonline.org/press/unmik/dpi/press/html/2001/press/pr40.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118125546/http://www.unmikonline.org/press/unmik/dpi/press/html/2001/press/pr40.html|archivedate=18 January 2012|date=2 September 1999|title=Kouchner Signs Regulation on Foreign Currency}}
140. ^{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidate-countries/kosovo/economic_profile_en.htm |archive-url=https://archive.is/20120707171032/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidate-countries/kosovo/economic_profile_en.htm |dead-url=yes |archive-date=7 July 2012 |title=European Commission – Enlargement – Kosovo – Economic profile – Enlargement |publisher=European Commission |date=30 October 2010 |accessdate=31 January 2012 }}
141. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2008/02/23/iceland-cannot-adopt-euro-with-joining-eu-says-stark/|title=Iceland cannot adopt the Euro without joining EU, says Stark|publisher=IceNews|date=23 February 2008|accessdate=22 January 2013}}
142. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/conrep/cr201205en.pdf|title=Convergence Report May 2012|publisher=European Central Bank|date=May 2012|accessdate=20 January 2013}}
143. ^{{cite web|title=European economic forecast – Winter 2013 |url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2013/pdf/ee1_en.pdf|publisher=European Commission | date=22 February 2013 |accessdate=22 February 2013}}
144. ^{{cite web |first=Valentina |last=Pop |title=Iceland dissolves EU accession team |work=EU Observer |date=13 September 2013|url=http://euobserver.com/enlargement/121419|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140326073329/http://euobserver.com/enlargement/121419|archivedate=26 March 2014}}
145. ^{{cite web |first=Nikolaj |last=Nielsen |title=Iceland leader snubs EU membership |work=EU Observer |date=22 May 2013 |url=http://euobserver.com/enlargement/120194|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020063853/http://euobserver.com/enlargement/120194|archivedate=20 October 2013}}
146. ^{{cite news|title=Stjórnarsáttmáli kynntur á Laugarvatni|url=http://ruv.is/frett/stjornarsattmali-kynntur-a-laugarvatni|accessdate=25 May 2013|date=22 May 2013|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111184157/http://ruv.is/frett/stjornarsattmali-kynntur-a-laugarvatni|archivedate=11 November 2013}}
147. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.centralbank.an/faq |title=Archived copy |accessdate=16 May 2014 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140407084222/http://www.centralbank.an/faq |archivedate=7 April 2014 |df=dmy-all }}
148. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.logting.fo/files/casestate/9197/011.09%20Skjal%20A.pdf|title=Document A: Presentation by Bodil Nyboe Andersen "Økonomien i rigsfællesskabet"|format=PDF|language=Danish|publisher=Føroyskt Løgting|date=25 May 2004|accessdate=22 January 2013}}
149. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/publications/Documents/2000/06/kvo2_00uk.pdf|title=Use of Euro in Affiliated Countries and Territories Outside the EU|format=PDF|publisher=Danmarks Nationalbank|date=30 June 2000|accessdate=22 January 2013}}
150. ^1 {{Cite web |url=http://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/banknotes_and_coins/Faroeislands/Pages/default.aspx|title=The Faroese banknote series |publisher=Danmarks Nationalbank |accessdate=31 January 2013}}
151. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.logting.fo/files/casestate/9193/011.09%20Evra-gjaldoyra%20(1).pdf |title=Løgtingsmál nr. 11/2009: Uppskot til samtyktar um at taka upp samráðingar um treytir fyri evru sum føroyskt gjaldoyra|format=PDF|language=Faroese|publisher=|date=4 August 2009 |accessdate=26 April 2011}}
152. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/12707/Rich_Faroe_Islands_may_adopt_euro.html |title=Rich Faroe Islands may adopt euro |publisher=Fishupdate.com |date=12 August 2009 |accessdate=26 April 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110617030435/http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/12707/Rich_Faroe_Islands_may_adopt_euro.html |archivedate=17 June 2011 |df=dmy }}
153. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2009/08/06/euro-wanted-as-currency-in-faroe-islands/ |title=Euro wanted as currency in Faroe Islands |publisher=Icenews.is |date=8 August 2009 |accessdate=26 April 2011}}
154. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.logting.fo/casenormal/viewState.gebs?caseState.id=9195|title=11/2009: Uppskot consenting to undertake conversations of trust for introducing euro as a Faroese currency (second reading)|language=Faroese|publisher=Føroyskt Løgting|date=5 November 2009|accessdate=22 January 2013}}
155. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2014/05/13/nouvelle-caledonie-on-a-ouvert-un-processus-de-decolonisation-par-etapes_4416064_3224.html|title=Nouvelle-Calédonie: "On a ouvert un processus de décolonisation par étapes" (New Caledonia: "A staged decolonization process has begun")|language=French|publisher=Le Monde|date=13 May 2014}}
156. ^{{Cite web|url=http://region-developpement.univ-tln.fr/en/pdf/R31/12-Lagadec.pdf |title=Nouvelle-Calédonie : Entre Émancipation, Passage A L'Euro Et Recherche De Ressources Nouvelles |format=PDF |date=2010 |accessdate=26 April 2011}}
157. ^Euro adoption northern Cyprus, inCyprus 18 May 2016
158. ^http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/index#p=1&instruments=STANDARD&yearFrom=1999&yearTo=2017

References

{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}{{Euro topics}}{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2017}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Enlargement Of The Eurozone}}

3 : Politics of the European Union|Enlargement of intergovernmental organizations|Economy of the European Union
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/11 23:16:51