| 词条 | Finvenkismo |
| 释义 |
Finvenkismo ({{lang-en|Finvenkism}}) is an ideological current within the Esperanto movement dating back to L. L. Zamenhof, the initiator of Esperanto. The name is derived from the concept of a fina venko (English: final victory) denoting the moment when Esperanto will be used as the predominant second language throughout the world. A finvenkist is thus someone who hopes for and/or works towards this "final victory" of Esperanto. According to some finvenkists, this "final victory" of Esperanto may help eradicate war, chauvinism and cultural oppression. Recently, some Esperantists have campaigned for the expression fina venko to be replaced with fina sukceso ("final success") because the former reminds some people of war due to its similarity to the German word endsieg. OriginAs Zamenhof created Esperanto with the goal of eventual use by everyone as a second language for international communication, finvenkismo has been around for as long as Esperanto itself. In the early days of the Esperanto movement, essentially all Esperantists were also finvenkists. However, as the Esperanto community grew, so did the diversity of ideologies among Esperantists, some of whom began to challenge the merits of finvenkismo. Thus, one could be an Esperantist without being a finvenkist at all. Possible ways to achieveDuring the 1910 World Esperanto Congress, Zamenhof highlighted two ways that fina venko could be achieved: through diligent self-directed study of Esperanto by all people in the world, or by government action permitting or requiring Esperanto literacy to be taught in schools:[1] {{Quote box| quote = The final victory, towards which we strive, can be gotten in two ways: through the effort of private individuals, that is to say via a mass movement, or by government decree. It's easiest to believe that our goal will be achieved via the first way (self-study), because in that case, our current case, world governments will come to us with their blessing, as they are wont to do, only when all the work is already finished.{{em|La celo, por kiu ni laboras, povas esti atingita per du vojoj: aŭ per laborado de homoj privataj, t.e. de la popolaj amasoj, aŭ per dekreto de la registaroj. Plej kredeble nia afero estos atingita per la vojo unua, ĉar al tia afero, kiel nia, la registaroj venas kun sia sankcio kaj helpo ordinare nur tiam, kiam ĉio estas jam tute preta.}} | source = Speech by L. L. Zamenhof before the 1910 World Esperanto Congress | align = none | width = auto | style = display: table | quoted = 1 | salign = right }}Among Esperantists, as Esperanto matured, the two ways began to be called {{Interlanguage link|desubismo|eo|desubismo|WD=}} ("from below -ism") and {{Interlanguage link|desuprismo|eo|desuprismo|WD=}} ("from above -ism") respectively. Raŭmismo and CivitanismoSince 1980, finvenkismo encountered criticism by so-called raŭmistoj. This ideological current interprets the Esperanto community as a language diaspora, whose members should not concentrate on the propagation of the language but rather on its cultivation. The term Raŭmismo comes from the Manifesto of Rauma signed by many participants of the International Youth Congress in the Finnish town Rauma in 1980. Soon the word Raŭmismo acquired two different meanings: According to some, a Raŭmist is just someone who uses Esperanto without propagating it. According to the more ideological Raŭmismo, a Raŭmist is someone who considers the Esperanto community a self chosen linguistic minority and supports attempts to get a state-like representation for this minority. This more ideological Raŭmismo is now often called Civitanismo, because it is the official ideology of the Esperanta Civito (Esperanto Citizens' Community), an organisation which attempts to be such a state-like representation of the Esperanto diaspora. Even though nowadays most Esperantists highly value cultivating the language—and the proportion of Esperanto-speakers who cultivate the language without propagating it is larger than ever—the ideological Raŭmismo (Civitanismo) has isolated itself somewhat within the Esperanto community because Civitanists are perceived to spend more energy on criticising the finvenkist Esperanto movement than on cultivating Esperanto. In response to the criticisms from Raŭmists, the finvenkist Esperanto movement has produced the Prague Manifesto, which attempts at showing the importance of finvenkismo in our modern society by emphasizing democratic communication, language rights, preservation of language diversity, and effective language education. References1. ^{{Cite speech|first=L. L.|last=Zamenhof|author-link=L. L. Zamenhof|event=Sesa Kongreso Esperantista (Sixth World Esperanto Congress)|language=Esperanto|url=http://www.steloj.de/esperanto/paroloj/kongr6a.html|date=15 August 1910|title=Parolado antaŭ la Sesa Kongreso Esperantista en Washington en la 15a de aŭgusto 1910|trans-title=Speech before the Sixth World Esperanto Congress in Washington on 15 August 1910|location=Washington, D.C.|publisher=|via=transcription done 12 August 1992 by Hirotaka, Masaaki from a paper copy and hosted on Steloj.de}} External links
2 : Esperanto culture|Language policy |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。