| 词条 | Flaming Creatures |
| 释义 |
| name = Flaming Creatures | image = Flaming Creatures.jpg | caption = Theatrical release poster | director = Jack Smith | producer = Jack Smith | starring = Piero Heliczer Frances Francine Sheila Bick Joel Markman Mario Montez (as Dolores Flores) Arnold Rockwood Judith Malina Marian Zazeela | distributor = | released = {{film date|1963|4|29}} | runtime = 43 minutes | country = United States | language = English | budget = $300 }} Flaming Creatures is a 1963 American experimental film directed by Jack Smith. The film shows performers dressed in elaborate drag for several disconnected scenes, including a lipstick commercial, an orgy, and an earthquake. It premiered April 29, 1963 at the Bleecker Street Cinema in New York City. Because of its graphic depiction of sexuality, some venues refused to show Flaming Creatures, and in March 1964, police interrupted a screening and seized a print of the film. Jonas Mekas, Ken Jacobs, and Florence Karpf were charged, and the film was ruled to be in violation of New York's obscenity laws. Mekas and Susan Sontag mounted a critical defense of Flaming Creatures, and it became a cause célèbre for the underground film movement. DescriptionMost of the film's characters are sexually ambiguous, including transvestites, intersex, and drag performers. Flaming Creatures is largely non-narrative, and its action is often interrupted by cutaways to close-ups of body parts.[1] The film opens with credit sequence set to the soundtrack of Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves and the announcement that "Ali Baba comes today." Two creatures laze in a garden and dance. In what Smith called the "smirching sequence", characters apply lipstick while a mock advertisement poses the question, "Is there lipstick that doesn't come off when you suck cocks?" Two creatures chase each other, and one throws the other to the ground.[2] Several creatures gather around her in a rape scene, which grows into a large orgy. The earth begins to quake, and the creatures collapse.[3] A vampire resembling Marilyn Monroe climbs out of a coffin and drains some of the lifeless creatures. This reignites the action, and the creatures rise again to dance with one another.[1] ProductionSmith shared an apartment with artist Marian Zazeela for a period in the early 1960s.[4] He published The Beautiful Book, a series of photographs with Zazeela that began to develop the aesthetic of Flaming Creatures. Smith conceived the film as a vehicle for Zazeela. However, she began working with composer La Monte Young and was unable to participate in Smith's project.[4][5] After she moved out, he became roommates with Tony Conrad and replaced Zazeela with Sheila Bick.[6] He filmed Flaming Creatures in mid to late 1962. He held shoots during weekends on the roof of the Windsor Theatre, at 412 Grand Street in the Bronx.[7][8] Dick Preston offered his loft above the theatre for use as a prop department and dressing room.[9] Smith had observed the effects of using out-of-date film working on Ken Jacobs' Star Spangled to Death and decided to use the technique after seeing Ron Rice's The Flower Thief.[10] He used stolen Army surplus Kodak Plus-X reversal film.[11][12] The reels were out-of-date, giving parts of the film a foggy or high-contrast texture.[13] The film's working title was Pasty Thighs and Moldy Midriffs; Smith also considered using Flaking Moldy Almond Petals, Moldy Rapture, or Horora Femina.[14] Smith made Flaming Creatures as a way to film "all the funniest stuff he could think of" and depict "different ideas of glamour."[15] He produced the film on a very low budget of $300.[16] Smith's shared an apartment with Tony Conrad, who produced the film's soundtrack. The two lived in a building on the Lower East Side, where Angus MacLise lived and René Rivera (later known as Mario Montez) moved. They held informal group sessions during the evening which Conrad recorded.[7] The soundtrack incorporates "Siboney" by Ernesto Lecuona, "Amapola" by Joseph Lacalle, and various pasodobles.[17] Smith began screening unfinished versions of Flaming Creatures to friends. Piero Heliczer held a benefit for the film at painter Jerry Joffen's loft. Mekas discussed a private screening of the film through his column in The Village Voice, and Conrad produced a second version of the soundtrack for the film's theatrical premiere.[18] Release historyEarly screeningsFlaming Creatures premiered April 29, 1963 as part of a double feature with Blonde Cobra at the Bleecker Street Cinema in Manhattan, New York. Later screenings were held at the Gramercy Theatre. Because the film had not been submitted for licensing, the shows were free and audiences were asked to donate to the "Love and Kisses for Censors Film Society".[18] Film Culture voted in December 1963 to award Smith its Independent Film Award for the film.[19] It rented the Tivoli Theatre, known for showing sexploitation films, and planned a screening of Flaming Creatures, excerpts from Smith's Normal Love, and Andy Warhol's Newsreel.[19][18] The theatre canceled the event due to the obscene content in Flaming Creatures. Several hundred people gathered at the theatre, and Smith was given his award in an impromptu ceremony.[19] A crowd of several hundred people led by Barbara Rubin occupied the Tivoli until police could clear the building.[20]At the third Knokke Experimental Film Festival, the selection committee rejected Flaming Creatures out of concern that it fell afoul of Belgium's obscenity laws. In protest, Mekas resigned from the festival jury, and several American filmmakers threatened to withdraw their films.[21] Mekas smuggled in the film in a canister for Stan Brakhage's Dog Star Man and held continuous private screenings out of his hotel. On New Year's Eve, Mekas, Rubin, and P. Adams Sitney forced their way into a projection booth and screened a portion of the film.[21][22] Obscenity trial and censorshipIn February 1964, the Film-Makers' Cinematheque successfully showed the films from the Tivoli program at the New Bowery Theater, as a program titled "Our Infamous Surprise Program". During the program's third showing on March 3, police stopped the event while Flaming Creatures was being screened.[19] They arrested Mekas, Ken Jacobs, Florence Karpf, and Jerry Sims and seized the film reels and projection equipment.[19][23] The police department did not return the only print of Warhol's film, about the making of Normal Love, and it is now considered lost.[19] Mekas held a benefit screening of Un chant d'amour to raise money for a legal defense fund but was arrested again.[24] Civil rights lawyer Emile Zola Berman accepted the case, believing it would potentially reach the U.S. Supreme Court.[25] Sims, who had been taking tickets, managed to avoid prosecution by claiming he had not seen what was on the screen.[26] People of the State of New York v. Kenneth Jacobs, Florence Karpf and Jonas Mekas was heard on June 12, 1964.[27] As part of the defense, expert testimony came from filmmaker Shirley Clarke, poet Allen Ginsberg, writer Susan Sontag, filmmaker Willard Van Dyke, and film historian Herman G. Weinberger.[28][29] The defendants were convicted but given suspended sentences.[27] They appealed on the grounds that the trial had excluded the expert testimony provided. The New York Supreme Court heard the appeal and reversed the convictions. It stated in its opinion that "whatever view this Court might hold as to the obscenity of 'Flaming Creatures,' it is manifest that the appellants herein believe in good faith that the film is not obscene."[30] Fifty years later, the prosecutor for the case issued an apology to Mekas, writing, "Although my appreciation of free expression and aversion to censorship developed more fully as I matured, I should have sooner acted more courageously."[29] In April 1965, an off-campus screening by students of the University of New Mexico was raided by police, who seized the print. In November 1966, a screening by the UT Austin chapter of Students for a Democratic Society was broken up.[31] A January 1967 screening at the University of Michigan resulted in the confiscation of the film and the arrest of four students, triggering protests and a sit-in by students.[32][33] A screening at the University of Notre Dame at its Pornography and Censorship Conference in 1969 was canceled. When students attempted to screen prohibited films, police interrupted the event, leading to the school's first known violent conflict between police and students.[34][35] Later historySmith and Mekas fell out, with Smith accusing Mekas of stealing the original Flaming Creatures print on behalf of Anthology Film Archives.[36][37] Smith was opposed to giving his works a fixed form, preferring to continue re-editing his films.[37] The print was lost until 1978, when Jerry Tartaglia found it in a discarded pile of scrap and returned it to Smith.[38] It was not until after Smith's death in 1989 that larger institutions started to screen Flaming Creatures.[37] Critic J. Hoberman and performer Penny Arcade saved Smith's belongings and had a restoration of the film made, a project which took five years.[11] The New York Film Festival showed the film in 1991, and the Museum of the Moving Image included it in a 1997 retrospective of Smith's work.[37] Senate use and effect on Fortas' Supreme Court nominationIn 1968, Abe Fortas was nominated to be Chief Justice of the United States. Fortas had supported reversing the original convictions for screening Flaming Creatures, so Senator James Eastland, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, requested that the print seized at the University of Michigan be sent to Washington.[39] James Clancy, representing Citizens for Decent Literature, showed the film among other material, inviting senators to view what Fortas had held in several decisions did not constitute obscenity.[40] Nixon adviser Pat Buchanan credited the effort with ruining Fortas' nomination.[41] ReceptionKen Kelman described Flaming Creatures as a Miltonian "ancient ritual chant…not for the Paradise Lost, but for the Hell Satan gained."[42] Arthur Knight called the film a "faggoty stag-reel ... defiling at once both sex and cinema."[43] Pete Hamill described it as "a sophomoric exercise in the kind of sex that Henry Miller dealt with 30 years ago."[44] Following the seizure of the film, the director of the Homosexual League of New York called Flaming Creatures "long, disturbing and psychologically unpleasant".[45] Amos Vogel likened it to a film noir that "despite flashes of brilliance and moments of perverse, tortured beauty" was full of "limp genitalia and limp art."[46] Susan Sontag praised the film in a 1966 essay as a "rare modern work of art: it is about joy and innocence."[47] P. Adams Sitney described Flaming Creatures as "a myth of recovered innocence" in which Smith "utterly transforms his sources and uncovers a mythic center from which they had been closed off."[48] Jonathan Rosenbaum called the film "one of the greatest and most pleasurable avant-garde movies ever made".[49] According to The Village Voice Film Guide, Gregory Markopoulos "was only slightly exaggerating when he commented that ... early audiences were astounded when their secret Hollywood fantasies burst upon the screen".[50] It is listed in the film reference book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, which says "The film's distinctive beauty is due largely to Smith's nimble use of the handheld camera. His unexpected framings yield dense images of fabrics, body parts, and heavily made-up faces."{{Sfn|Scheider|2013}} Having never seen the original film, video artist Bec Stupak created a "remake" of Flaming Creatures in 2006 based only on descriptions of the film.[51] Todd Haynes alludes to the film with a fictional band named the Flaming Creatures in his 1998 feature Velvet Goldmine.[52] Notes1. ^1 Siegel 1997, p. 95. 2. ^Hoberman 2008, pp. 11–7. 3. ^Sitney 2002, pp. 335–6. 4. ^1 Joseph 2008, p. 231. 5. ^Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 159. 6. ^Hoberman 2008, p. 24. 7. ^1 {{cite journal |last=Siegel |first=Marc |year=2014 |title=...For MM |journal=Criticism |publisher=Wayne State University Press |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=361–74}} 8. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/up-on-the-roof-20120105|title=Up on the Roof by J. Hoberman - Moving Image Source|website=www.movingimagesource.us|access-date=2018-12-11}} 9. ^Hoberman 2008, pp. 25–6. 10. ^Sitney 2002, p. 335. 11. ^1 {{cite AV media |people= |date=February 20, 2004 |title=All Things Considered |medium=Radio broadcast |publisher=NPR }} 12. ^{{cite journal |last=Dixon |first=Wheeler |date=1986 |title=Financing for the Independent Filmmaker: Sources and Strategies |journal=Journal of Film and Video |publisher=University of Illinois Press |volume=38 |issue=1 |page=31}} 13. ^Joseph 2008, p. 229. 14. ^Hoberman 2008, p. 29. 15. ^{{cite journal |last=Siegel |first=Marc |year=2014 |title=Beyond the Rented World: An Introduction |journal=Criticism |publisher=Wayne State University Press |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=153–7}} 16. ^{{cite journal |last=Johnson |first=Dominic |year=2014 |title=Modern Death: Jack Smith, Fred Herko, and Paul Thek |journal=Criticism |publisher=Wayne State University Press |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=211–34}} 17. ^{{cite journal |last=Suárez |first=Juan A. |year=2014 |title=Jack Smith, Hélio Oiticica, Tropicalism |journal=Criticism |publisher=Wayne State University Press |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=295–328}} 18. ^1 2 Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 161. 19. ^1 2 3 4 5 {{cite journal |last=Angell |first=Callie |year=2014 |title=Batman and Dracula: The Collaborations of Jack Smith and Andy Warhol |journal=Criticism |publisher=Wayne State University Press |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=159–86}} 20. ^Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, pp. 161–2. 21. ^1 {{cite journal |last=Broughton |first=James |authorlink=James Broughton |year=1964 |title=Kokke-le Route |journal=Film Quarterly |publisher=University of California Press |volume=17 |issue=3 |page=14}} 22. ^Siegel 1997, p. 91. 23. ^{{cite news |date=March 4, 1964 |title=Avant-Garde Movie Seized as Obscene |newspaper=The New York Times |page=33 }} 24. ^Hoberman and Rosenbaum 1983, p. 60. 25. ^Hoberman 2008, p. 44. 26. ^MacDonald 1998, p. 375. 27. ^1 Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6. 28. ^Pierson 2011, p. 8. 29. ^1 {{cite news |last=Leland |first=John |date=October 31, 2015 |title=The Prosecution Rests in a 1964 Obscenity Case |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/nyregion/the-prosecution-resets-in-a-1964-obscenity-case.html |newspaper=The New York Times |access-date=July 4, 2016 }} 30. ^Pierson 2011, p. 20. 31. ^Hoberman 2008, p. 46. 32. ^{{cite web |url=http://michigantoday.umich.edu/a7699/ |title=The flap over 'Flaming Creatures' |last=Glenn |first=Alan |date=April 14, 2010 |website=Michigan Today |access-date=July 4, 2016}} 33. ^Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, pp. 162–3. 34. ^Suárez 1996, p. 183. 35. ^{{cite web |url=http://magazine.nd.edu/news/56876-echoes-the-damnedest-experience-we-ever-had/ |title=Echoes: The damnedest experience we ever had |last=Hunt |first=Tara |year=2015 |website=Notre Dame Magazine |access-date=July 4, 2016}} 36. ^Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 81. 37. ^1 2 3 {{cite journal |last=Matturri |first=John |year=2014 |title=Jack Smith: Notes on Some Homeless Objects |journal=Criticism |publisher=Wayne State University Press |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=279–94}} 38. ^Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 208. 39. ^{{cite news |date=July 28, 1968 |title=Film Screening Asked in Inquiry over Fortas |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |page=E6 }} 40. ^Silverstein 2007. 41. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/nixon-lbj-and-the-first-shots-in-the-judges-war/ |title=Nixon, LBJ, and the First Shots in the Judges' War |last=Buchanan |first=Pat |authorlink=Pat Buchanan |date=April 7, 2017 |website=The American Conservative |access-date=December 10, 2017}} 42. ^{{cite journal |last=Kelman |first=Ken |year=1963 |title=Smith Myth |journal=Film Culture |issue=29 |page=5}} 43. ^{{cite journal |last=Knight |first=Arthur |authorlink=Arthur Knight (film critic) |year=1963 |title=New American Cinema? |journal=Saturday Review |page=41}} 44. ^{{cite journal |last=Hamill |first=Pete |authorlink=Pete Hamill |date=September 28, 1963 |title=Explosion in the Movie Underground |journal=The Saturday Evening Post |page=83}} 45. ^Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 74. 46. ^{{cite news |last=Vogel |first=Amos |authorlink=Amos Vogel |date=May 7, 1964 |title=Flaming Creatures Cannot Carry Freedom's Torch |newspaper=The Village Voice |pages=9–18 }} 47. ^Sontag 2001, p. 229. 48. ^Sitney 2002, pp. 335–7. 49. ^{{cite news |last=Rosenbaum |first=Jonathan |authorlink=Jonathan Rosenbaum |date=February 19, 1998 |title=Sweet Outrage |url=http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/sweet-outrage/Content?oid=895615 |newspaper=Chicago Reader |volume=27 |issue=20 |access-date=July 4, 2016 }} 50. ^Hoberman 2010, p. 115. 51. ^{{cite journal |last=Hoberman |first=J. |date=September 2011 |title=Jack in the Box |journal=Artforum |volume=50 |issue=1 |page=95}} 52. ^Morrison 2007, p. 66. References
External links
12 : 1960s avant-garde and experimental films|1960s LGBT-related films|1963 films|American avant-garde and experimental films|American black-and-white films|American erotic films|American films|American LGBT-related films|Film censorship in the United States|Films directed by Jack Smith|Obscenity controversies in film|Censored films |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。