“Fossil fuel phase-out”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

Fossil fuel phase out refers to the discontinuation of the use of fossil fuels, through the decommissioning of operating fossil fuel-fired power plants, the prevention of the construction of new ones, and the use of alternative energy to replace the role of fossil fuels.

The purpose of fossil fuel phase-out is to reduce the negative externalities that use of fossil fuels cause. Negative externalities refer to the costs a certain activity has over people who did not choose to incur in them. A direct negative externality from fossil fuels' use is air pollution, and an indirect negative externality are mining accidents, that happen as a consequence of the extraction of fossil fuels. Fossil fuel burning contributes to climate change, as it releases greenhouse gas emissions.^[1]

Fossil fuels

Coal

To decrease carbon emissions and thus possibly stop extreme climate change, some have called for coal to be phased out.^[4]^[5] Climatologist James E. Hansen said "We need a moratorium on coal now...with phase-out of existing plants over the next two decades."^[6] According to a study published in Science in 2017, coal has to be phased-out globally by about 2030, if the agreed 2 °C target is taken seriously.^[7]

Some nations have decreased their coal consumption thus far in the 21st century, the greatest reductions being in the United States (coal consumption reduced by 176 million metric tons per year over the period 2000–2012), Canada (reduced by 21 million tons per year) and Spain (20 million tons per year). Other nations have increased their coal consumption in the same period, led by China (increased 2,263 million metric tons per year in the period 2000–2012), India (increased 367 million tons per year), and South Korea (59 million tons per year). Worldwide, coal consumption increased 60% during the period 2000–2012.^[8] As of 2012, 1200 new coal power plants were reportedly being planned worldwide, most of them in China and India.^[9] In the 2011–2013 period, the OECD group of Western European countries has increased the use of coal, attributed largely to the low cost of coal and the high price of imported natural gas in Western Europe.^[10]

However, coal consumption has peaked in China in 2013 or 2014, depending on the data used and fell in 2015 by 3.6%, even though there was a growth of GDP of 6.9%.^[11] After smaller increases, consumption remained below the prior peak by 2017.^[12] Worldwide coal consumption peaked in 2014 and declined in 2015 and 2016.^[13]

According to Scientific American, the average coal plant emits more than 100 times as much radiation per year than does a comparatively sized nuclear power plant, in the form of fly ash.^[14]

Some like the "coal advisory board" of the IEA believe that coal should not be phased out, considering that longer-term global economic growth cannot be achieved without adequate and affordable energy supplies, which will require continuing significant contributions from fossil fuels including coal. In this viewpoint, clean coal technology could reduce greenhouse gas emissions compatible with a low-emissions future.^[15] Some environmentalists and climatologists support a phase-out and criticise clean coal as not a solution to climate change.^[16] Entrepreneurs promote improved regulations and modernised technology.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} Sometimes coal is replaced by natural gas, which has lower carbon emissions and produces less pollutants. However natural gas is also a fossil fuel, so a switch from coal to natural gas does not contribute to a fossil fuel phase-out.

Oil

Oil is refined into fuel oil, diesel and gasoline. The refined products are primarily for transportation by conventional cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships. Popular alternatives are human-powered transport, public transport, electric vehicles, and biofuels.^[19]

Natural gas

Although natural gas has about half the carbon intensity of coal it is also the single largest source of atmospheric methane in the United States. It is seen by many as a temporary "bridge fuel" to replace coal, but in turn to be replaced by renewable sources. However this "bridge fuel" is likely to significantly extend the use of fossil fuel as the average plant life is 35 years.^[20] Gas consumption has tripled since 1971, and by 2015 it was generating half as much electricity as coal.^[21] Since the consumption of gas is expected to grow an additional 10% by 2040, the phase out is likely to be many years in the future.^[22]

Basis

The basis of phasing-out fossil fuels consists mainly of the projected lower cost of renewable sources of energy,^[23] but the avoidance of risks in health and mitigation of global warming are also important considerations.

Health

Using computer modeling he developed over 20 years, Mark Z. Jacobson has found that carbonaceous fuel soot emissions (which lead to respiratory illness, heart disease, and asthma) have resulted in 1.5 million premature deaths each year, mostly in the developing world where the non-fossil fuels wood and animal dung are used for cooking. Jacobson has also said that soot from diesel engines, coal-fired power plants, and burning wood is a "bigger cause of global warming than previously thought, and is the major cause of the rapid melting of the Arctic's sea ice".^[24]

In 2011, new evidence has emerged that there are considerable risks associated with traditional energy sources, and that major changes to the mix of energy technologies are needed:

Global warming mitigation

More recently, Hansen has stated that continued opposition to nuclear power threatens humanity's ability to avoid dangerous climate change.^[27] The letter, co-authored with other climate change experts declared "If we stay on the current path," he said, "those are the consequences we'll be leaving to our children. The best candidate to avoid that is nuclear power. It's ready now. We need to take advantage of it." and "Continued opposition to nuclear power threatens humanity's ability to avoid dangerous climate change."

Also in 2008, Pushker Kharecha and James Hansen published a peer-reviewed scientific study analyzing the effect of a coal phase-out on atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels.^[28] Their baseline mitigation scenario was a phaseout of global coal emissions by 2050. The authors describe the scenario as follows:

Kharecha and Hansen also consider three other mitigation scenarios, all with the same coal phase-out schedule but each making different assumptions about the size of oil and gas reserves and the speed at which they are depleted. Under the Business as Usual scenario, atmospheric CO₂ peaks at 563 parts per million (ppm) in the year 2100. Under the four coal phase-out scenarios, atmospheric CO₂ peaks at 422-446 ppm between 2045 and 2060 and declines thereafter. The key implications of the study are as follows: a phase-out of coal emissions is the most important remedy for mitigating human-induced global warming; actions should be taken toward limiting or stretching out the use of conventional oil and gas; and strict emissions-based constraints are needed for future use of unconventional fossil fuels such as methane hydrates and tar sands.

Others

The impulse of renewable energy can create jobs through the construction of new power plants and the manufacturing of the equipment that they need, as could be seen in the case of Germany and the wind power industry.^[29]

Studies about fossil fuel phase-out

In the Greenpeace and EREC's Energy (R)evolution scenario,^[30] the world would eliminate all fossil fuel use by 2090.^[31]^[32]^[33]

In December 2015, Greenpeace and Climate Action Network Europe released a report highlighting the need for an active phase-out of coal-fired generation across Europe. Their analysis derived from a database of 280 coal plants and included emissions data from official EU registries.^[34]

A September 2016 report by Oil Change International, concludes that the carbon emissions embedded in the coal, oil, and gas in currently working mines and fields, assuming that these run to the end of their working lifetimes, will take the world to just beyond the 2{{nnbsp}}°C limit contained in the 2015 Paris Agreement and even further from the 1.5{{nnbsp}}°C goal.^[35]^[36]^[37] The report observes that "one of the most powerful climate policy levers is also the simplest: stop digging for more fossil fuels".^[37]{{rp|5}}

In October 2016, the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and 11 other NGOs released a report on the impact of building new coal-fired power plants in countries where a significant proportion of the population lacks access to electricity. The report concludes that, on the whole, building coal-fired power plants does little to help the poor and may make them poorer. Moreover, wind and solar generation are beginning to challenge coal on cost.^[38]^[39]^[40]

A 2018 study in Nature Energy, suggests that 10 countries in Europe could completely phase out coal-fired electricity generation with their current infrastructure, whilst the United States and Russia could phase out at least 30%.^[41]

Challenges of fossil fuel phase-out

The phase-out of fossil fuels involves many challenges, and one of them is the reliance that currently the world has on them. In 2014, fossil fuels provided 81.1% of the primary energy consumption of the world, with approximately 11,109 Mtoe. This number is composed by 4,287 Mtoe of oil consumption; 3,918 Mtoe of coal consumption, and 2,904 Mtoe of natural gas consumption.^[42]

Fossil fuel phase-out can lead to an increment in electricity prices, because of the new investments needed to replace their share in the electricity mix with alternative energy sources.^[43] Another cause to increasing electricity price comes from the need to import the electricity that can't be generated nationally.^[44]

Another impact of a phase-out of fossil fuels is in the employment. In the case of employments in the fossil fuel industry, a phase-out is logically undesired, therefore, people in the industry will usually oppose any measures that put their industries under scrutiny.^[29] Endre Tvinnereim and Elisabeth Ivarsflaten studied the relationship between employment in the fossil fuel industry with the support to climate change policies. They proposed that one opportunity for displaced drilling employments in the fossil fuel industry could be in the geothermal energy industry. This was suggested as a result of their conclusion: people and companies in the fossil fuel industry will likely oppose measures that endanger their employments, unless they have other stronger alternatives.^[45] This can be extrapolated to political interests, that can push against the phase-out of fossil fuels initiative. One example is how the vote of US Congress members is related to the preeminence of fossil fuel industries in their respective states.^[46]

Legislation and initiatives to phase out coal

Major economies

In 8 June 2015, several newspapers ran an article wrote that the leaders of the Group of Seven (or G7, consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) agreed to phase-out fossil fuel use by 2100,^[47]^[48] as part of the efforts to keep global temperature increase under 2 °C. This was done as a prelude for the United Nations Climate Change Conference (a.k.a. COP 21) hosted in Paris, on December of the same year.

Australia

The Australian Greens party have proposed to phase out coal power stations. The NSW Greens proposed an immediate moratorium on coal-fired power stations and want to end all coal mining and coal industry subsidies. The Australian Greens and the Australian Labor Party also oppose nuclear power. The Federal Government and Victorian State Government want to modify existing coal-fired power stations into clean coal power stations.{{citation needed|date=October 2016}} The Federal Labor government extended the mandatory renewable energy targets, an initiative to ensure that new sources of electricity are more likely to be from wind power, solar power and other sources of renewable energy in Australia. Australia is one of the largest consumers of coal per capita, and also the largest exporter. The proposals are strongly opposed by industry, unions^[49] and the main Opposition Party in Parliament (now forming the party in government after the September 2013 election).

Canada

In 2005, Canada annually burned 60 million tons of coal, mainly for electrical power, increasing by 15 percent annually.

In November 2016, Canada announced plans to phase-out coal-fired electricity generation by 2030.^[50]

Beginning in 2005, Ontario, Canada planned coal phase-out legislation.^[51] Ontario annually consumed 15 million tons of coal in large power plants to supplement nuclear power. Nanticoke Generating Station was a major source of air pollution, and Ontario suffered "smog days" during the summer.{{citation needed|date = February 2014}}

In 2007, Ontario's Liberal government committed to phasing out all coal generation in the province by 2014. Premier Dalton McGuinty said, "By 2030 there will be about 1,000 more new coal-fired generating stations built on this planet. There is only one place in the world that is phasing out coal-fired generation and we're doing that right here in Ontario."^[52] The Ontario Power Authority projects that in 2014, with no coal generation, the largest sources of electrical power in the province will be nuclear (57 percent), hydroelectricity (25 percent), and natural gas (11 percent).^[53] In April 2014 Ontario Canada was the first jurisdiction in North America to eliminate coal in electricity generation.^[54] The final coal plant in Ontario, Thunder Bay Generating Station, stopped burning coal in April 2014.^[55]

China

There are currently no plans to phase out coal burning power stations in the People's Republic of China on the national level.

China's exceedingly high energy demand has pushed the demand for relatively cheap coal-fired power. Each week, another 2 GW of coal-fired power is put online in China. Coal supplies about 80% of China's energy needs today, and that ratio is expected to continue, even as overall power usage grows rapidly. Serious air quality deterioration has resulted from the massive use of coal and many Chinese cities suffer severe smog events.{{citation needed|date=May 2010}}

As a consequence the region of Beijing has decided to phase out all its coal-fired power generation by the end of 2015.^[56] {{Update inline|date=November 2016}}

In 2009, China had 172 GW of installed hydro capacity the largest in the world, producing 16% of China's electricity, the Eleventh Five-Year Plan has set a 300 GW target for 2020. China built the world's largest power plant of any kind, the Three Gorges Dam.

In addition to the huge investments in coal power, China has 32^[57] reactors under construction, the highest number in the world.

Analysis in 2016, showed that China's coal consumption appears to have peaked in 2014.^[58]^[59]

European Union

In July 2014, CAN Europe, WWF European Policy Office, HEAL, EEB and Climate-Alliance Germany published a report calling for the decommissioning of the thirty most polluting coal-fired power plants in Europe.^[60]

Belgium

After the government denied a 2009 application to build a new power plant in Antwerp, the Langerlo power station burned its last ton of coal in March 2016, ending the use of coal fired power plants in Belgium.^[61]

Denmark

As part of their Climate policy Plan, Denmark stated that it will phase out oil for heating purposes and coal by 2030. Additionally, their goal is to supply a 100% of their electricity and heating needs with renewable energy five years later (i.e. 2035).^[62]

France

In December 2017, to fight against global warming, France adopted a law banning new fossil fuel exploitation projects and closing current ones by 2040 in all of its territories. France thus became the first country to programme the end of fossil fuel exploitation.^[63]^[64]

Germany

In 2007, Germany announced plans to phase out hard coal-industry subsidies by 2018, a move which is expected to end hard coal mining in Germany. {{update after|2018|01|01}}^[66]^[67]^[68]^[69]^[70] This exit is later than the EU-mandated end by 2014.^[71] Solar and wind are major sources of energy and renewable energy generation, around 15% as of December 2013,^[72] and growing. Coal is still the largest source of power in Germany.

In 2007, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her party agreed to legislation to phase out Germany's hard coal mining sector. That does not mean that they support phasing out coal in general. There were plans to build about 25 new plants in the coming years. Most German coal power plants were built in the 1960s, and have a low energy efficiency. Public sentiment against coal power plants is growing and the construction or planning of some plants has been stopped.^[66]^[67]^[68]^[69]^[70] A number are under construction and still being built. No concrete plan is in place to reduce coal-fired electricity generation. As of October 2015, the remaining coal plants still under planning include: Niederaussem, Profen, and Stade. The coal plants currently under construction include: Mannheim, Hamm D, Datteln, and Willhelmshaven. Between 2012 and 2015, six new plants went online. All of these plants are 600–1800 MW_e.^[73]

In 2014, Germany's coal consumption dropped for the first time, having risen each year since the low during the 2009 recession.^[74]

A 2014 study, found that coal is not making a comeback in Germany, as is sometimes claimed. Rather renewables have more than offset the nuclear facilities that have been shut down as a result of Germany's nuclear phase-out (Atomausstieg). Hard coal plants now face financial stringency as their operating hours are cut back by the market. But in contrast, lignite-fired generation is in a safe position until the {{nowrap|mid-2020s}} unless government policies change. To phase-out coal, Germany should seek to strength the emissions trading system (EU-ETS), consider a carbon tax, promote energy efficiency, and strengthen the use of natural gas as a bridge fuel.^[75]

In 2016, the German government and affected lignite power plant operators Mibrag, RWE, and Vattenfall reached an understanding (Verständigung) on the transfer of lignite power plant units into security standby (Überführung von Braunkohlekraftwerksblöcken in die Sicherheitsbereitschaft). As a result, eight lignite-fired power plants are to be mothballed and later closed, with the first plant scheduled to cease operation in October 2016 and the last in October 2019. The affected operators will receive state compensation for foregone profits. The European Commission has declared government plans to use €1.6{{nbsp}}billion of public financing for this purpose to be in line with EU state aid rules.^[76]

A 2016 study, found that the phase-out of lignite in Lusatia (Lausitz) by 2030 can be financed by future owner EPH in a manner that avoids taxpayer involvement. Instead, liabilities covering decommissioning and land rehabilitation could be paid by EPH directly into a foundation, perhaps run by the public company LMBV. The study calculates the necessary provisions at €2.6{{nbsp}}billion.^[77]^[78]

In November 2016, the German utility STEAG announced it will be decommissioning five coal-fired generating units in North Rhine-Westphalia and Saarland due to low wholesale electricity prices.^[79]^[80]

A coal phase-out for Germany is implied in Germany's Climate Action Plan 2050, environment minister Barbara Hendricks said in an interview on 21{{nbsp}}November 2016. "If you read the Climate Action Plan carefully, you will find that the exit from coal-fired power generation is the immanent consequence of the energy sector target.{{nbsp}}... By 2030{{nbsp}}... half of the coal-fired power production must have ended, compared to 2014", she said.^[81]^[82]

Plans to cut down the ancient Hambach Forest to extend the Hambach open pit mine in 2018 have resulted in massive protests. On 5 Oct, 2018 a German court ruled against the further destruction of the forest for mining purposes. The ruling states, the court needs more time to reconsider the complaint. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, welcomed the court's ruling. The forest is located approximately 29 km km west of the city center of Cologne (specifically Cologne Cathedral).^[83]

In January 2019 the German Commission on Growth, Structural Change and Employment initiates Germany's plans to entirely phase out and shut down the 84 remaining coal-fired plants on its territory by 2038.^[84]

Netherlands

On 22 September 2016, the Dutch parliament voted for a 55% cut in {{CO2}} emissions by 2030, a move which would require the closure of the country's five coal-fired power plants. The vote is not binding on the government however.^[85]

Spain

In October 2018, the Sánchez government and Spanish Labour unions settled an agreement to close ten Spanish coal mines at the end of 2018. The government pre-engaged to spend 250 million Euro to pay for early retirements, occupational retraining and structural change. In 2018, about 2.3 per cent of the electric energy produced in Spain was produced in coal-burning power plants.^[86]

Sweden

Sweden is constructing hydrogen-based pilot steel plant to replace coke and coal usage in steel production.^[87] Once this technology is commercialized with the hydrogen generated from renewable energy sources (biogas or electricity), the carbon foot print of steel production would reduce drastically.^[88]

India

India is the third largest consumer of coal in the world. India's federal energy minister is planning to stop importing thermal coal by 2018.^[89]

The annual report of India's Power Ministry has a plan to grow power by about 80 GW as part of their 11th 5-year plan, and 79% of that growth will be in fossil fuel–fired power plants, primarily coal.^[90] India plans four new "ultra mega" coal-fired power plants as part of that growth, each 4000 MW in capacity. {{As of|2015}}, there are six nuclear reactors under construction. In the first half of 2016, the amount of coal-fired generating capacity in pre-construction planning in India fell by 40,000 MW, according to results released by the Global Coal Plant Tracker.^[91] In June 2016, India's Ministry of Power stated that no further power plants would be required in the next three years, and "any thermal power plant that has yet to begin construction should back off."^[92]

In cement production, carbon neutral biomass is being used to replace coal for reducing carbon foot print drastically.^[93]^[88]

New Zealand

In October 2007, the Clark Labour government introduced a 10{{nbsp}}year moratorium on new fossil fuel thermal power generation.^[94] The ban was limited to state-owned utilities, although an extension to the private sector was considered. The new government under MP John Key (NZNP) elected in November 2008 repealed this legislation.{{Citation needed|date=August 2015}}

In 2014, almost 80 per cent of the electricity produced in New Zealand was from sustainable energy.^[95]

On 6 August 2015, Genesis Energy Limited announced that it would close its two last coal-fired power stations.^[96]

South Africa

As of 2007, South Africa's power sector is the 8th highest global emitter of CO₂.^[97] In 2005/2006, 77% of South Africa's energy demand was directly met by coal,^[98] and when current projects come online, this ratio will increase in the near term.

There are no plans to phase out coal-fired power plants in South Africa, and indeed, the country is investing in building massive amounts of new coal-fired capacity to meet power demands, as well as modernizing the existing coal-fired plants to meet environmental requirements.

On April 6, 2010, the World Bank approved a $3.75B loan to South Africa to support the construction of the world's 4th largest coal-fired plant, at Medupi.^[99]

The proposed World Bank loan includes a relatively small amount{{snd}} $260 million{{snd}} for wind and solar power.

Rated at 4800 GW, Medupi Power Station would join other mammoth coal-fired power plants already in operation in the country, namely Kendal Power Station (4100 GW), Majuba Power Station (4100 GW), and Matimba Power Station (4000 GW), as well as a similar-capacity Kusile Power Station, at 4800 GW, currently under construction. Kusile is expected to come online in stages, starting in 2012, while Medupi is expected to first come online in 2013, with full capacity available by 2017. These schedules are provisional, and may change.{{citation needed|date=September 2016}}

Since 2008, South Africa's government started funding solar water heating installations. As of January 2016, there have been 400 000 domestic installations in total, with free-of-charge installation of low-pressure solar water heaters for low-cost homes or low-income households which have access to the electricity grid, while other installations are subsidised.^[100]

United Kingdom

The UK is also subject to the EU's Large Combustion Plant Directive covering non-CO2 emissions which is expected to bring many older plants to a close over the next few years as they are too expensive to upgrade.^[103]

The closure of the last coal power station in March 2016 ended coal-fired power production in Scotland.^[105]

United States

In 2017, fossil fuels provided 81 percent of the energy consumed in the United States, down from 86 percent in 2000.^[106]

In 2007, 154 new coal-fired plants were on the drawing board in 42 states.^[107] By 2012, that had dropped to 15, mostly due to new rules limiting mercury emissions, and limiting carbon emissions to 1,000 pounds of CO₂ per megawatt-hour of electricity produced.^[108]

In July 2013, US Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz outlined Obama administration policy on fossil fuels:

Then-US Energy Secretary Steven Chu and researchers for the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory have noted that greater electrical generation by non-dispatchable renewables, such as wind and solar, will also increase the need for flexible natural gas-powered generators, to supply electricity during those times when solar and wind power are unavailable.^[110]^[111] Gas-powered generators have the ability to ramp up and down quickly to meet changing loads.^[112]

In the US, many of the fossil fuel phase-out initiatives have taken place at the state or local levels.

California

Maine

On April 15, 2008, Maine Governor John E. Baldacci signed LD 2126, "An Act To Minimize Carbon Dioxide Emissions from New Coal-Powered Industrial and Electrical Generating Facilities in the State." The law, which was sponsored by Rep. W. Bruce MacDonald (D-Boothbay), requires the Board of Environmental Protection to develop greenhouse gas emission standards for coal gasification facilities. It also puts a moratorium in place on building any new coal gasification facilities until the standards are developed.^[115]

Oregon

In early March 2016, Oregon lawmakers approved a plan to stop paying for out-of-state coal plants by 2030 and require a 50 percent renewable energy standard by 2040.^[116] Environmental groups such as the American Wind Energy Association and leading Democrats praised the bill.

Texas

In 2006 a coalition of Texas groups organized a campaign in favor of a statewide moratorium on new coal-fired power plants. The campaign culminated in a "Stop the Coal Rush" mobilization, including rallying and lobbying, at the state capital in Austin on February 11 and 12th, 2007.^[117] Over 40 citizen groups supported the mobilization.^[118]

In January, 2007, A resolution calling for a 180-day moratorium on new pulverized coal plants was filed in the Texas Legislature by State Rep. Charles "Doc" Anderson (R-Waco) as House Concurrent Resolution 43.^[119] The resolution was left pending in committee.^[120] On December 4, 2007, Rep. Anderson announced his support for two proposed integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) coal plants proposed by Luminant (formerly TXU).^[121]

Washington state

Utility action in the US

Japan

Japan, the world's third-largest economy, made a major move to use more fossil fuels in 2012, when the nation shut down nuclear reactors following the Fukishima accident. Nuclear, which had supplied 30 percent of Japanese electricity from 1987 to 2011, supplied only 2 percent in 2012 (hydropower supplied 8 percent). Nuclear electricity was replaced with electricity from petroleum, coal, and liquified natural gas. As a result, electricity generation from fossil fuels rose to 90 percent in 2012.^[132]

In January 2017, the Japanese government announced plans to build 45 new coal-fired power plants in the next ten years, largely to replace expensive electricity from petroleum power plants.^[133]

Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles

Many countries and cities have introduced bans on the sales of new internal combustion engine vehicles, requiring all new cars to be electric vehicles or otherwise powered by clean, non-emitting sources.^[134]^[135] Such bans include the United Kingdom by 2040^[136] and Norway by 2025. Many transit authorities are working to purchase only electric buses while also restricting use of ICE vehicles in the city center to limit air pollution. Many US states have a zero-emissions vehicle mandate, incrementally requiring a certain percent of cars sold to be electric.

Public opinion

Opinion polls

Opinion research

In October 2007, Civil Society Institute released the results of a poll of 1,003 US citizens conducted by Opinion Research Corporation.

"75 percent of Americans—including 65 percent of Republicans, 83 percent of Democrats and 76 percent of Independents—would 'support a five-year moratorium on new coal-fired power plants in the United States if there was stepped-up investment in clean, safe renewable energy—such as wind and solar—and improved home energy-efficiency standards.' Women (80 percent) were more likely than men (70 percent) to support this idea. Support also was higher among college graduates (78 percent) than among those who did not graduate from high school (68 percent)."^[138]

"More than half of power plant-generated electricity comes from coal. Experts say that power plants are responsible for about 40 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide pollution linked to global warming. There are plans to build more than 150 new coal-fired power plants over the next several years. Would you support a five-year moratorium on new coal-fired power plants in the United States if there was stepped-up investment in clean, safe and renewable energy—such as wind and solar—and improved home energy-efficiency standards? Would you say definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no, or don't know."

Gallup

In 2013, the Gallup organization determined that 41% of Americans wanted less emphasis placed on coal energy, versus 31% who wanted more. Large majorities wanted more emphasis placed on solar (76%), wind (71%), and natural gas (65%).^[140]

ABC News/Washington Post

A 2009 ABC/Washington Post poll found 52% of Americans favored more coal mining (33% strongly favored), while 45% opposed (27% strongly opposed). The most support was for wind and solar, which were favored by 91% (79% strongly favored).^[141]

CLEAN call to action

In October 2007, fifteen groups led by Citizens Lead for Energy Action Now (CLEAN) called for a five-year moratorium on new coal-fired power plants, with no exception for plants sequestering carbon. The groups included Save Our Cumberland Mountains (Tennessee); Ohio Valley Environmental Council (West Virginia); Cook Inlet Keeper (Alaska); Christians for the Mountains (West Virginia); Coal River Mountain Watch (West Virginia); Kentuckians for the Commonwealth (Kentucky); Civil Society Institute (Massachusetts); Clean Power Now (Massachusetts); Indigenous Environmental Network (Minnesota); Castle Mountain Coalition (Alaska); Citizens Action Coalition (Indiana); Appalachian Center for the Economy & the Environment (West Virginia); Appalachian Voices (NC); and Rhode Island Wind Alliance (Rhode Island).^[142]

Environmental Defense Fund

The US-based Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) has taken a stand in favor of natural gas production and hydraulic fracturing, while pressing for stricter environmental controls on gas drilling, as a feasible way to replace coal.^[143] The organization has funded studies jointly with the petroleum industry on the environmental effects of natural gas production. The organization sees natural gas as a way to quickly replace coal, and that natural gas in time will be replaced by renewable energy.^[144] The policy has been criticized by some environmentalists.^[145] EDF counsel and blogger Mark Brownstein answered:

Shareholder resolutions in favor of a coal moratorium

Prominent individuals supporting a coal moratorium

Prominent individuals supporting a coal phase-out

Mayors supporting a coal moratorium

On 13 October 2007, Pocatello, Idaho, mayor Roger Chase told other mayors from across the state attending an Association of Idaho Cities legislative committee that he favored a moratorium no new coal plants in the state.^[160]

On 1 June 2007, Park City, Utah, mayor Dana Wilson wrote a letter to Warren Buffett expressing the city's opposition to three coal plants proposed by Rocky Mountain Power.^[161]

In November 2007, Salt Lake City mayor Rocky Anderson expressed his support for a coal moratorium at a rally organized by the Step It Up! campaign.^[162]

In December 2007, Charlottesville, VA, mayor Dave Norris blogged in favor of a moratorium on new coal-fired power plants.^[163] On 19 December 2007, Charlottesville passed the Charlottesville Clean Energy Resolution putting the city on record as supporting a moratorium.^[164]

Local governments supporting a coal moratorium

In January 2008, Black Hawk County (Iowa) Health Board recommended that the state adopt a moratorium on new coal-fired power plants until it enacts tougher air pollution standards.^[165]

Alternative Sources of Energy

Alternative energy refers to any source of energy that can substitute the role of fossil fuels. Renewable energy, or energy that is harnessed from renewable sources, is an alternative energy. However, alternative energy can refer to non renewable sources as well, like nuclear energy. Between the alternative sources of energy are: solar energy, hydroelectricity, marine energy, wind energy, geothermal energy, biofuels, ethanol and Hydrogen.

Energy efficiency is complementary to the use of alternative energy sources, when phasing-out fossil fuels.

Renewable energy

Renewable energy is energy that comes from resources which are naturally replenished such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides, waves, and geothermal heat. {{As of|2014}}, 19% of global final energy consumption comes from renewable resources, with 9% of all energy from traditional biomass, mainly used for heating, 1% from biofuels, 4% from hydroelectricity and 4% from biomass, geothermal or solar heat. Popular renewables (wind, solar, geothermal and biomass for power) accounted for another 1.4% and are growing rapidly.^[167] While renewable energy supplies are growing and have displaced coal in some regions, the amount of coal burned in 2021, is expected to be the same as it was in 2014.^[168]

Hydroelectricity

In 2015, hydroelectric energy generated 16.6% of the worlds total electricity and 70% of all renewable electricity.^[169] In Europe and North America environmental concerns around land flooded by large reservoirs ended 30 years of dam construction in the 1990s. Since then large dams and reservoirs continue to be built in countries like China, Brazil and India. Run-of-the-river hydroelectricity and small hydro have become popular alternatives to conventional dams that may create reservoirs in environmentally sensitive areas.

Wind power

A wind farm is a group of wind turbines in the same location used to produce electric power. A large wind farm may consist of several hundred individual wind turbines, and cover an extended area of hundreds of square miles, but the land between the turbines may be used for agricultural or other purposes. A wind farm may also be located offshore.

Wind power has grown dramatically since 2005 and by 2015 supplied almost 1% of global energy consumption.^[170]

Many of the largest operational onshore wind farms are located in the United States and China. The Gansu Wind Farm in China has over 5,000 MW installed with a goal of 20,000 MW by 2020. China has several other "wind power bases" of similar size. The Alta Wind Energy Center in California, United States is the largest onshore wind farm outside of China, with a capacity of 1020 MW of power.^[171] As of February 2012, the Walney Wind Farm in the United Kingdom is the largest offshore wind farm in the world at 367 MW, followed by Thanet Offshore Wind Project (300 MW), also in the United Kingdom. As of February 2012, the Fântânele-Cogealac Wind Farm in Romania is the largest onshore wind farm in Europe at 600 MW.^[172]

There are many large wind farms under construction and these include Sinus Holding Wind Farm (700 MW), Anholt Offshore Wind Farm (400 MW), BARD Offshore 1 (400 MW), Clyde Wind Farm (350 MW), Greater Gabbard wind farm (500 MW), Lincs Wind Farm (270 MW), London Array (1000 MW), Lower Snake River Wind Project (343 MW), Macarthur Wind Farm (420 MW), Shepherds Flat Wind Farm (845 MW), and Sheringham Shoal (317 MW).

Solar

In 2017, solar power provided 1.7% of total worldwide electricity production, growing at 35% per annum.^[179]

By 2020 the solar contribution to global final energy consumption is expected to exceed 1%.^[180]

Solar photovoltaics

Solar photovoltaic cells convert sunlight into electricity and many solar photovoltaic power stations have been built. The size of these stations has increased progressively over the last decade with frequent new capacity records.

As of January 2013, the largest individual photovoltaic (PV) power plants in the world are Agua Caliente Solar Project, (Arizona, over 247 MW connected{{snd}} to increase to 397 MW), Golmud Solar Park (China, 200 MW), Mesquite Solar project (Arizona, 150 MW), Neuhardenberg Solar Park (Germany, 145 MW), Templin Solar Park (Germany, 128 MW), Toul-Rosières Solar Park (France, 115 MW), and Perovo Solar Park (Ukraine, 100 MW). The Charanka Solar Park is a collection of solar power stations of which 214 MW were reported complete in April 2012,^[181] on a 2000 ha site.^[182] It is part of Gujarat Solar Park,^[183]^[184] a group of solar farms at various locations in the Gujarat state of India, with overall capacity of 702 MW.^[185] There are a total of 570 MW of solar parks in Golmud, with 500 MW more expected in 2012.^[186]

Many large plants are under construction. The Desert Sunlight Solar Farm is a 550 MW solar power plant under construction in Riverside County, California, that will use thin-film solar photovoltaic modules made by First Solar.^[187] The Topaz Solar Farm is a 550 MW photovoltaic power plant, being built in San Luis Obispo County, California.^[188] The Blythe Solar Power Project is a 500 MW photovoltaic station under construction in Riverside County, California. The Agua Caliente Solar Project is a 290 megawatt photovoltaic solar generating facility being built in Yuma County, Arizona. The California Valley Solar Ranch (CVSR) is a 250 megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic power plant, which is being built by SunPower in the Carrizo Plain, northeast of California Valley.^[189] The 230 MW Antelope Valley Solar Ranch is a First Solar photovoltaic project which is under construction in the Antelope Valley area of the Western Mojave Desert, and due to be completed in 2013.^[190]

Many of these plants are integrated with agriculture and some use innovative tracking systems that follow the sun's daily path across the sky to generate more electricity than conventional fixed-mounted systems. Solar power plants have no fuel costs or emissions during operation.

Concentrated solar power

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) systems use lenses or mirrors and tracking systems to focus a large area of sunlight into a small beam. The concentrated heat is then used as a heat source for a conventional power plant. A wide range of concentrating technologies exists; the most developed are the parabolic trough, the concentrating linear fresnel reflector, the Stirling dish and the solar power tower. Various techniques are used to track the Sun and focus light. In all of these systems a working fluid is heated by the concentrated sunlight, and is then used for power generation or energy storage.^[192]

Biofuels

Biomass

Biomass is biological material from living, or recently living organisms, most often referring to plants or plant-derived materials.^[195] As a renewable energy source, biomass can either be used directly, or indirectly{{snd}} once or converted into another type of energy product such as biofuel. Biomass can be converted to energy in three ways: thermal conversion, chemical conversion, and biochemical conversion.

Using biomass as a fuel produces air pollution in the form of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, NOx (nitrogen oxides), VOCs (volatile organic compounds), particulates and other pollutants at levels above those from traditional fuel sources such as coal or natural gas in some cases (such as with indoor heating and cooking).^[196]^[197]^[198] Utilization of wood biomass as a fuel can also produce fewer particulate and other pollutants than open burning as seen in wildfires or direct heat applications.^[199] Black carbon{{snd}} a pollutant created by combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels, and biomass{{snd}} is possibly the second largest contributor to global warming.^[200]{{rp|56–57}} In 2009 a Swedish study of the giant brown haze that periodically covers large areas in South Asia determined that it had been principally produced by biomass burning, and to a lesser extent by fossil fuel burning.^[201] Denmark has increased the use of biomass and garbage,^[202] and decreased the use of coal.^[203]

Nuclear energy

The 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report identifies nuclear energy as one of the technologies that can provide electricity with less than 5% of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of coal power.^[204] There are more than 60 nuclear reactors shown as under construction in the list of Nuclear power by country with China leading at 23. Globally, more nuclear power reactors have closed than opened in recent years but overall capacity has increased.^[205] China has stated its plans to double nuclear generation by 2030. India also plans to greatly increase its nuclear power.

Several countries have enacted laws to cease construction on new nuclear power stations. Several European countries have debated nuclear phase-outs and others have completely shut down some reactors. Three nuclear accidents have influenced the slowdown of nuclear power: the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in the United States, the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the USSR, and the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. Following the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, Germany has permanently shut down eight of its 17 reactors and pledged to close the rest by the end of 2022.^[206] Italy voted overwhelmingly to keep their country non-nuclear.^[207] Switzerland and Spain have banned the construction of new reactors.^[208] Japan's prime minister has called for a dramatic reduction in Japan's reliance on nuclear power.^[209] Taiwan's president did the same. Shinzō Abe, the new prime minister of Japan since December 2012, announced a plan to restart some of the 54 Japanese nuclear power plants and to continue some nuclear reactors under construction.

As of 2016, countries such as Australia, Austria, Denmark, Greece, Malaysia, New Zealand, and Norway have no nuclear power stations and remain opposed to nuclear power.^[210]^[211] Germany, Italy, Spain and Switzerland are phasing-out their nuclear power.^[205]^[211]^[212]^[213]

Energy efficiency

Moving away from fossil fuels will require changes not only in the way energy is supplied, but in the way it is used, and reducing the amount of energy required to deliver various goods or services is essential{{citation needed|date=November 2018}}. Opportunities for improvement on the demand side of the energy equation are as rich and diverse as those on the supply side, and often offer significant economic benefits.^[214]

A sustainable energy economy requires commitments to both renewables and efficiency. Renewable energy and energy efficiency are said to be the "twin pillars" of sustainable energy policy. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy has explained that both resources must be developed in order to stabilize and reduce carbon dioxide emissions:^[215]

The IEA has stated that renewable energy and energy efficiency policies are complementary tools for the development of a sustainable energy future, and should be developed together instead of being developed in isolation.^[216]

See also

References

1. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html|title=IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007|last=Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)|date=2007|website=Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|access-date=}}
2. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_1_01|title=Electric Power Monthly - Table 1.1. Net Generation by Energy Source|date=2017-02-24|publisher=US Energy Information Administration|accessdate=2017-03-10}}
3. ^¹{{cite web|url=https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2016.pdf|title=Key World Energy Statistics|date=2016|website=International Energy Agency|access-date=}}
4. ^Kharecha, P.A., and J.E. Hansen, "Implications of "peak oil" for atmospheric CO₂ and climate," Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB3012, {{doi|10.1029/2007GB003142}}
5. ^* Big Coal: The Dirty Secret Behind America's Energy Future by Jeff Goodell. 324 pages
6. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/europe/23coal.html?_r=2&hp=&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin|title=Europe Turns Back to Coal, Raising Climate Fears|last=Rosenthal|first=Elizabeth|date=23 April 2008|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|quote=“We need a moratorium on coal now,” he added, “with phase-out of existing plants over the next two decades.”|accessdate=11 July 2012}}
7. ^Johan Rockström et al.: A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. In: Science. 355, 6331, 2017, pp. 1269–1271, {{DOI|10.1126/science.aah3443}}
8. ^US Energy Information Administration, International statistics: coal consumption, 2012.
9. ^{{cite news | first=Damian | last=Carrington | url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/nov/20/coal-plants-world-resources-institute | title=More than 1,000 new coal plants being planned | newspaper=The Guardian, | date=19 November 2012}}
10. ^{{cite web | publisher=US EIA | url=http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail/2013-09-27/multiple-factors-push-western-europe-use-less-natural-gas-and-more | title=Multiple factors push Western Europe to use less natural gas and more coal | date=27 September 2013 | deadurl=yes | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927150527/http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail/2013-09-27/multiple-factors-push-western-europe-use-less-natural-gas-and-more | archivedate=27 September 2013 | df=dmy-all }}
11. ^{{cite journal | last1 = Qi | first1 = Ye |display-authors=etal | year = 2016 | title = China's post-coal growth | url = | journal = Nature Geoscience | volume = 9| issue = 8| pages = 564–566| doi = 10.1038/ngeo2777 | bibcode = 2016NatGe...9..564Q}}
12. ^Ye, Qi and Lu, Jiaqi(November 20, 2018) [https://www.brookings.edu/2018/01/22/chinas-coal-consumption-has-peaked/ "China's coal comsumption has peake"], Brookings Institution
13. ^ {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
14. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste|title=Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste: By burning away all the pesky carbon and other impurities, coal power plants produce heaps of radiation|date=2009-05-18|accessdate=2009-05-18}}
15. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.iea.org/ciab/papers/ciab.pdf|title=Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions - The Potential of Coal|website=Coal Industry Advisory Board/International Energy Agency|publisher=Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency|accessdate=28 July 2014}}
16. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5975|title=Clean Coal: Wave of the Future or Empty Rhetoric?|website=Worldwatch Institute|publisher=Worldwatch Institute|accessdate=28 July 2014}}
17. ^{{cite web|url=https://poweringpastcoal.org/about/Powering_Past_Coal_Alliance_Members|title=Powering Past Coal Alliance members list|last=|first=|date=|website=Poweringpastcoal.org|access-date=20 September 2018}}
18. ^{{cite web|url=https://poweringpastcoal.org/about/Powering_Past_Coal_Alliance_Declaration|title=Powering Past Coal Alliance declaration|last=|first=|date=|website=Poweringpastcoal.org|access-date=20 September 2018}}
19. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-vehicles#.XBACe2gvPnE|title=Clean Vehicles|accessdate=2018-12-11}}
20. ^{{cite web|url=https://energycenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/nav/policy/research-and-reports/Natural_Gas_Bridge_Fuel.pdf|format=PDF|title=Natural Gas as a Bridge Fuel : Measuring the Bridge|website=Energycenter.org|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
21. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyNaturalGasTrends.pdf |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160417225701/https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyNaturalGasTrends.pdf|title=Key natural gas trends|year=2015|archive-date=2016-04-17|website=Iea.org|page=6}}
22. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.iea.org/topics/naturalgas/|title=Natural gas|website=Iea.org}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.irena.org/publications/2018/Jan/Renewable-power-generation-costs-in-2017|title=Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017|website=Irena.org}}
24. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Scientists-say-soot-a-key-factor-in-warming-3180603.php#ixzz0v1KwN5yZ | title=Scientists say soot a key factor in warming | work=SFGate | date=28 July 2010 | accessdate=19 July 2016 | author=Perlman, David}}
25. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/pdfs/Toward%20a%20Sustainable%20Future%2011-16-11.pdf |title=Toward a Sustainable Future for the U.S. Power Sector: Beyond Business as Usual 2011 |author=Synapse Energy Economics |date=16 November 2011 |website=Civilsocietyinstitute.org }}
26. ^{{cite journal | last2=Sato |first2=Makiko| last3=Kharecha |first3=Pushker| last4=Beerling|first4=David|last5=Berner|first5=Robert|last6=Masson-Delmotte|first6=Valerie|authorlink6=Valerie Masson-Delmotte | last7=Pagani |first7=Mark | last8=Raymo | first8=Maureen| last9=Royer | first9=Dana L | date=31 October 2008 | title=Target atmospheric {{co2}}: Where should humanity aim?|url=http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2008/TargetCO2_20080407.pdf|journal=The Open Atmospheric Science Journal|volume=2|issue=1|pages=217–231|arxiv=0804.1126|bibcode=2008OASJ....2..217H|doi=10.2174/1874282300802010217|access-date=2016-10-31|first1=James|last1=Hansen|first10=James C|last10=Zachos}}
27. ^{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/03/world/nuclear-energy-climate-change-scientists-letter/|title=Top climate change scientists issue open letter to policy influencers - CNN.com|date=3 November 2013|author=By|work=CNN}}
28. ^{{cite journal|year=2008|title=Implications of "peak oil" for atmospheric CO₂ and climate|url=http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abstracts/2008/Kharecha_Hansen.html|journal=Global Biogeochem. Cycles|volume=22|issue=3|pages=GB3012|arxiv=0704.2782|bibcode=2008GBioC..22.3012K|doi=10.1029/2007GB003142|author1=Kharecha, P.A.|author2=J.E. Hansen}}
29. ^¹{{Cite journal|last=Heinrichs|first=Heidi Ursula|last2=Schumann|first2=Diana|last3=Vögele|first3=Stefan|last4=Biß|first4=Klaus Hendrik|last5=Shamon|first5=Hawal|last6=Markewitz|first6=Peter|last7=Többen|first7=Johannes|last8=Gillessen|first8=Bastian|last9=Gotzens|first9=Fabian|date=2017-05-01|title=Integrated assessment of a phase-out of coal-fired power plants in Germany|journal=Energy|volume=126|pages=285–305|doi=10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.017}}
30. ^ {{dead link|date=December 2013}}
31. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/climate-change/energyrevolution |title=Energy Revolution |publisher=Greenpeace International |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
32. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.erec.org/fileadmin/erec_docs/Documents/Press_Releases/Press_release_Greenpeace_EREC__October_2008.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2008-10-28 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081029182526/http://www.erec.org/fileadmin/erec_docs/Documents/Press_Releases/Press_release_Greenpeace_EREC__October_2008.pdf |archivedate=29 October 2008 |df=dmy }}
33. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn15043-world-can-halt-fossil-fuel-use-by-2090.html |title=Science news and science jobs from New Scientist - New Scientist |publisher=Environment.newscientist.com |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
34. ^{{cite book | first1 = Dave | last1 = Jones | first2 = Kathrin | last2 = Gutmann | title = End of an era: why every European country needs a coal phase-out plan | date = December 2015 | publisher = Greenpeace and Climate Action Network Europe | location = London, UK and Brussels, Belgium | url = https://www.greenpeace.de/sites/www.greenpeace.de/files/publications/end-of-era-coal-phase-out-plan-20151204.pdf | access-date = 2016-09-14}}
35. ^{{cite news | last = Mathiesen | first = Karl | title = Existing coal, oil and gas fields will blow carbon budget{{snd}} study | date = 23 September 2016 | work = The Guardian | location = London, UK | url = https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/23/existing-coal-oil-and-gas-fields-will-blow-carbon-budget-study | access-date = 2016-09-28}}
36. ^{{cite press release | first = David | last = Turnbull | title = Fossil Fuel Expansion Has Reached the Sky's Limit: Report | url = http://priceofoil.org/2016/09/22/release-fossil-fuel-expansion-has-reached-the-skys-limit-report/ | location = Washington DC, US | publisher = Oil Change International | date = 22 September 2016 | access-date = 2016-09-27}}
37. ^¹{{cite book | first = Greg | last = Muttitt | title = The sky's limit: why the Paris climate goals require a managed decline of fossil fuel production | date = September 2016 | publisher = Oil Change International | location = Washington DC, US | url = http://priceofoil.org/content/uploads/2016/09/OCI_the_skys_limit_2016_FINAL_2.pdf | access-date = 2016-09-27}}
38. ^{{cite news | last = Nuccitelli | first = Dana | title = Coal doesn’t help the poor; it makes them poorer | work = The Guardian | location = London, United Kingdom | date = 31 October 2016 | issn = 0261-3077 | url = https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/oct/31/coal-doesnt-help-the-poor-it-makes-them-poorer | access-date = 2016-10-31}}
39. ^{{cite web | first1 = Ilmi | last1 = Granoff | first2 = James Ryan | last2 = Hogarth | first3 = Sarah | last3 = Wykes | first4 = Alison | last4 = Doig | title = Beyond coal: scaling up clean energy to fight global poverty | date = October 2016 | work = Overseas Development Institute (ODI) | location = London, United Kingdom | url = https://www.odi.org/publications/10589-beyond-coal-scaling-clean-energy-fight-global-poverty | access-date = 2016-10-31}}
40. ^{{cite book|url=https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/10964.pdf|title=Beyond coal: Scaling up clean energy to fight global poverty — Position paper|last2=Hogarth|first2=James Ryan|last3=Wykes|first3=Sarah|last4=Doig|first4=Alison|date=October 2016|publisher=Overseas Development Institute (ODI)|location=London, United Kingdom|access-date=2016-10-31|first1=Ilmi|last1=Granoff}}
41. ^{{Cite journal|last=Wilson|first=IAG|last2=Staffell|first2=I|date=2018|title=Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing|journal=Nature Energy|volume=3|issue=5|pages=365–372|doi=10.1038/s41560-018-0109-0|bibcode=2018NatEn...3..365W}}
42. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2016.pdf|title=Key World Energy Statistics|last=|first=|date=2016|website=International Energy Agency|access-date=}}
43. ^{{Cite journal|last=Green|first=R|last2=Staffell|first2=I|date=2016|title=Electricity in Europe: exiting fossil fuels?|url=https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/article-pdf/32/2/282/7298756/grw003.pdf|journal=Oxford Review of Economic Policy|volume=32|issue=2|pages=282–303|doi=10.1093/oxrep/grw003}}
44. ^{{cite journal|author=Yilmaz, H. Ü., Bchini, Q., Keles, D., Hartel, R., Fichtner, W., Mikulić, M., & Jakšić, D.|date=2016|title=Impacts of a UK and German coal phase-out on the electricity mix and CO 2 emissions in Europe|journal=Insight Energy|url=http://www.insightenergy.org/system/publication_files/files/000/000/045/original/HET14_Coal_Phaseout_Final.pdf?1474967926|format=PDF}}
45. ^{{Cite journal|last=Tvinnereim|first=Endre|last2=Ivarsflaten|first2=Elisabeth|date=2016-09-01|title=Fossil fuels, employment, and support for climate policies|journal=Energy Policy|volume=96|pages=364–371|doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.052}}
46. ^{{Cite journal|last=Cragg|first=Michael I.|last2=Zhou|first2=Yuyu|last3=Gurney|first3=Kevin|last4=Kahn|first4=Matthew E.|date=2013-04-01|title=Carbon Geography: The Political Economy of Congressional Support for Legislation Intended to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Production|ssrn=2225690}}
47. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/08/g7-leaders-agree-phase-out-fossil-fuel-use-end-of-century|title=G7 leaders agree to phase out fossil fuel use by end of century|last=Connolly|first=Kate|date=2015-06-08|work=The Guardian|access-date=2017-04-30|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}
48. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/ec2c365a-0ddf-11e5-aa7b-00144feabdc0|title=G7 leaders agree to phase out fossil fuels|last=Clark|first=Pilita|date=8 June 2015|work=Financial Times|access-date=|last2=Wagstyl|first2=Stefan|month=}}
49. ^Australian Options Magazine, CFMEU on coal phase out {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320100225/http://www.australian-options.org.au/issues/options_53/article_colley.php |date=20 March 2012 }}
50. ^{{cite news | title = Canada plans to phase out coal-powered electricity by 2030 | date = 21 November 2016 | work = The Guardian | location = London, United Kingdom | issn = 0261-3077 | url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/21/canada-coal-electricity-phase-out-2030 | access-date = 2016-11-22}}
51. ^Ontario's Coal Phase-out Will Have Drastic Consequences, Say The Thinking Companies. Businesswire.com, 16 February 2005
52. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070618/ont_coal_plants_070618/20070618 |title=Ont. Liberals promise to close coal plants by 2014 |publisher=CTV News |accessdate=2013-12-27 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090805111218/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070618/ont_coal_plants_070618/20070618 |archivedate=5 August 2009 |df=dmy-all }}
53. ^Ontario Power Authority, [https://web.archive.org/web/20130716053358/http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/power-planning/long-term-energy-plan-2013 Long-Term Energy Plan 2013], module 3, 2014.
54. ^{{cite web|url=https://news.ontario.ca/mei/en/2014/04/creating-cleaner-air-in-ontario-1.html|title=Creating Cleaner Air in Ontario}}
55. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.opg.com/news-and-media/news-releases/Documents/140415TBGSBurnsLastCoal.pdf|format=PDF|title=Ontario Power Generation Moves to Cleaner Energy Future : Thunder Bay Station Burns Last Piece of Coal|website=Opg.com|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
56. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.platts.com/latest-news/electric-power/singapore/chinas-beijing-city-to-abolish-coal-fired-power-27490804|title=China's Beijing city to abolish coal-fired power plants by end 2014 - Electric Power - Platts News Article & Story|website=Platts.com}}
57. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/CountryDetails.aspx?current=CN |title=PRIS - Country Details |website=Iaea.org |accessdate=2013-09-24}}
58. ^{{cite news | first = Damian | last = Carrington | title = China's coal peak hailed as turning point in climate change battle | date = 25 July 2016 | newspaper = The Guardian | url = https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/25/china-coal-peak-hailed-turning-point-climate-change-battle | access-date = 2016-07-25}}
59. ^{{cite journal | first1 = Ye |last1 = Qi | first2 = Nicholas |last2 = Stern | first3 = Tong | last3 = Wu | first4 = Jiaqi |last4 = Lu | first5 = Fergus | last5 = Green | author-link2 = Nicholas Stern, Baron Stern of Brentford | title = China's post-coal growth | date = 25 July 2016 | journal = Nature Geoscience | doi = 10.1038/ngeo2777 | volume=9 |issue = 8 | pages=564–566| bibcode = 2016NatGe...9..564Q }}
60. ^{{cite book | first1 = Kathrin | last1 = Gutmann | first2 = Julia | last2 = Huscher | first3 = Darek | last3 = Urbaniak | first4 = Adam | last4 = White | first5 = Christian | last5 = Schaible | first6 = Mona | last6 = Bricke | title = Europe's dirty 30: how the EU's coal-fired power plants are undermining its climate efforts | date = July 2014 | publisher = CAN Europe, WWF European Policy Office, HEAL, the EEB, and Climate-Alliance Germany | location = Brussels, Belgium | url = http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/dirty_30_report_finale.pdf | access-date = 2016-09-22}}
61. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.caneurope.org/publications/press-releases/987-belgium-says-goodbye-to-coal-power-use|title=Belgium says goodbye to coal power use...|website=Caneurope}}
62. ^[https://stateofgreen.com/files/download/386] {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
63. ^Agence France-Presse, [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/20/france-bans-fracking-and-oil-extraction-in-all-of-its-territories "France bans fracking and oil extraction in all of its territories "], The Guardian, 20 December 2017 (page visited on 30 December 2017).
64. ^{{fr}} "La France devient le premier pays à programmer la fin des hydrocarbures", Radio télévision suisse, 30 December 2017 (page visited on 30 December 2017).
65. ^{{cite journal | first1 = Manuel | last1 = Frondel | first2 = Rainer | last2 = Kambeck | first3 = Christoph M | last3 = Schmidt | title = Hard coal subsidies: a never-ending story? | year = 2007 | journal = Energy Policy | volume = 35 | number = 7 | pages = 3807–3814 | doi = 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.019}}
66. ^¹{{cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/01/30/afx3374339.html |work=Forbes |title=Germany to shut down coal mines in 2018 |date=30 January 2007 }}{{dead link|date=June 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}
67. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,463172,00.html |title=End of an Industrial Era: Germany to Close its Coal Mines |publisher=Spiegel Online |date=2007-01-30 |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
68. ^¹{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/business/6309841.stm | work=BBC News | title=German plan to close coal mines | date=29 January 2007 | accessdate=2 May 2010}}
69. ^¹{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/|title=Breaking News, World News & Multimedia|website=Nytimes.com|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
70. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,463174,00.html |title=The World From Berlin: Good Riddance to Coal Mining |publisher=Spiegel Online |date=2007-01-30 |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
71. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/germany-stays-firm-on-plan-to-scrap-coal-subsidies-in-2018/a-6243150|title=Germany stays firm on plan to scrap coal subsidies in 2018 |date=17 November 2010|publisher=Deutsche Welle|website=Dw.com}}
72. ^{{cite web|author= |url=http://www.rncos.com/Blog/2009/02/Germany-targets-47-Renewable-Energy-Production-by-2020.html |title=Germany targets 47% Renewable Energy Production by 2020 |website=Rncos.com |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
73. ^{{cite web|url=http://energytransition.de/2015/10/the-demise-of-coal-in-germany-and-globally/|title=The demise of coal in Germany and globally|date=15 October 2015}}
74. ^{{cite book | title = BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2015 | publisher = BP | location = London, UK | url = https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-full-report.pdf | access-date = 2016-10-07}}
75. ^{{cite book | last1 = Jungjohann | first1 = Arne | last2 = Morris | first2 = Craig | title = The German coal conundrum | date = June 2014 | publisher = Heinrich Böll Stiftung | location = Washington, DC, US | url = http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/German_Coal_Conundrum.pdf | access-date = 2016-10-07}}
76. ^{{cite web | title = EU Commission Approves State Aid for Closure of Lignite-Fired Power Plants | date = 31 May 2016 | website = German Energy Blog | url = http://www.germanenergyblog.de/?p=19921 | access-date = 2016-07-28}}
77. ^{{cite web | title = IEEFA Europe: Blueprint for a Lignite Phase-Out in Germany | work = Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis | date = 22 September 2016 | url = http://ieefa.org/ieefa-europe-blueprint-lignite-phase-germany/ | access-date = 2016-09-23}}
78. ^{{cite book | first1 = Gerard | last1 = Wynn | first2 = Javier | last2 = Julve | title = A Foundation-Based Framework for Phasing Out German Lignite in Lausitz | date = September 2016 | publisher = Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) | url = http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/A-Foundation-Based-Framework-for-Phasing-Out-German-Lignite-in-Lausitz_September2016.pdf | access-date = 2016-09-23}}
79. ^{{cite news | title = Utility to shut down five coal plants | date = 3 November 2016 | work = Clean Energy Wire (CLEW) | location = Berlin, Germany | url = https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/german-energy-use-stable-energiewendes-sobering-results/utility-shut-down-five-coal-plants | access-date = 2016-11-03}}
80. ^{{cite news | title = Steag: Energiekonzern schaltet fünf Kohlekraftwerke ab | trans-title = Steag: Energy corporation switches off five coal-fired power plants | language = German | date = 2 November 2016 | newspaper = Handelsblatt | location = Düsseldorf, Germany | url = https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/industrie/steag-energiekonzern-schaltet-fuenf-kohlekraftwerke-ab/14784534.html | access-date = 2016-11-03}}
81. ^{{cite news | title = Coal exit is in the Climate Action Plan | date = 21 November 2016 | work = Clean Energy Wire (CLEW) | location = Berlin, Germany | url = https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/climate-plan-implies-coal-exit-minister-merkel-seeks-4th-term/coal-exit-climate-action-plan | access-date = 2016-11-22}}
82. ^{{cite news | first1 = Susanne | last1 = Götze | first2 = Susanne | last2 = Schwarz | title = Kohleausstieg steht im Klimaschutzplan | trans-title = Coal exit is in the Climate Action Plan | language = German | date = 21 November 2016 | work = klimaretter.info | location = Berlin, Germany | url = http://www.klimaretter.info/politik/hintergrund/22297-hendricks-kohleausstieg-steht-im-klimaschutzplan | access-date = 2016-11-22}}
83. ^{{Cite news|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/05/europe/germany-hambach-forest-court-intl/index.html|title=Hambach Forest clearance halted by German court|last=CNN|first=Laura Smith-Spark,|work=CNN|access-date=2018-11-16}}
84. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-germany-coal-power-20190126-story.html?fbclid=IwAR14A0KZXf1C6mMCOFATn9VktwTtkOz32P1E2MUKMMIskZ6M84l6Cu9Wx5E |title=Germany to close all 84 of its coal-fired power plants, will rely primarily on renewable energy |author-last=Kirschbaum |author-first=Erik |date=January 26, 2019 |website=Latimes.com |access-date=January 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190130002321/https://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-germany-coal-power-20190126-story.html?fbclid=IwAR14A0KZXf1C6mMCOFATn9VktwTtkOz32P1E2MUKMMIskZ6M84l6Cu9Wx5E |archive-date=2019-01-30 |dead-url=no |quote=Germany, one of the world’s biggest consumers of coal, will shut down all 84 of its coal-fired power plants over the next 19 years to meet its international commitments in the fight against climate change, a government commission said Saturday.}}
85. ^{{cite news | first = Arthur | last = Neslen | title = Dutch parliament votes to close down country's coal industry | date = 23 September 2016 | newspaper = The Guardian | location = London, UK | url = https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/23/dutch-parliament-votes-to-close-down-countrys-coal-industry | access-date = 2016-09-23}}
86. ^theguardian.com 26. October 2018: [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/26/spain-to-close-most-coal-mines-after-striking-250m-deal Spain to close most coal mines after striking €250m deal]
87. ^{{cite web|url=https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/coal/sweden-starts-construction-on-fossil-fuel-free-steel-plant/64675998 |title=Sweden starts construction on fossil fuel-free steel plant |accessdate=21 June 2018 }}
88. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.solarpaces.org/new-iea-report/ |title=New IEA Report: Renewable Energy for Industry |accessdate=21 June 2018 }}
89. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/thermal-coal-imports-must-be-stopped-goyal/article7209584.ece|title=Thermal coal imports will stop by 2017: Goyal|first=Our|last=Bureau|date=15 May 2015}}
90. ^{{cite web|url=http://powermin.nic.in/indian_electricity_scenario/pdf/Annual_Report_2008-09_English.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2010-04-13 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718131617/http://powermin.nic.in/indian_electricity_scenario/pdf/Annual_Report_2008-09_English.pdf |archivedate=18 July 2011 |df=dmy }}
91. ^Alister Doyle, [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-coal-idUSKCN11C2N4 "Global coal power plans fall in 2016, led by China, India: study,"] Reuters, 6 September 2016
92. ^"India won't need extra power plants for next three years, says government report", The Economic Times, 2 June 2016
93. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.zkg.de/en/artikel/zkg_Geocycle_secures_biomass_needs_from_local_farmers_in_India_3116884.html |title=Lafargeholcim - Geocycle secures biomass needs from local farmers in India |accessdate=21 June 2018 }}
94. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.powergenworldwide.com/index/display/articledisplay/308764/articles/power-engineering/industry-news/new-zealand-issues-ten-year-ban-on-new-thermal-power-plants.html |title=New Zealand issues ten-year ban on new thermal power plants |work=Power-Gen Worldwide |publisher=PennWell Corporation |date=2007-10-11 |accessdate=2011-01-07 }}
95. ^{{cite news | website=Sciencealert.com | date=10 August 2015 | url=http://www.sciencealert.com/new-zealand-will-shut-down-its-last-large-coal-fired-power-stations-in-2018 | title=New Zealand will shut down its last large coal-fired power generators in 2018 }}
96. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20150806/pdf/430b9m38rq42jm.pdf | title=Market release: GNE announces timetable to end coal-fired generation in New Zealand}}
97. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071114163448.htm|title=Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Power Plants Rated Worldwide|website=Sciencedaily.com}}
98. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dme.gov.za/energy/coal.stm |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2010-01-14 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091202053007/http://www.dme.gov.za/energy/coal.stm |archivedate=2 December 2009 |df=dmy }}
99. ^{{cite news| url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7088297.ece | work=The Times | location=London | title=Britain may block World Bank loan for coal plant in South Africa | first=Ben | last=Webster | date=April 6, 2010 | accessdate=May 2, 2010}}
100. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.ee.co.za/article/solar-water-heater-rollout-programme-gains-momentum.html|title=Solar water heater rollout programme gains momentum|first1=Mike|last1=Rycroft|date=14 January 2016|website=Ee.co.za}}
101. ^{{cite news| url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/apr/23/clean-coal-energy-policy | location=London | work=The Guardian | first=John | last=Vidal | title=Clean coal push marks reversal of UK energy policy | date=April 23, 2009}}
102. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1806551/huhne-promises-coal-plants-ccs |title=Huhne promises no more coal plants without CCS |website=Businessgreen.com |date=17 Aug 2010 |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
103. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/industrial/eu-international/lcpd/ |title=Large Combustion Plant Directive « Industrial emissions |website=Defra.gov.uk |accessdate=2013-12-27 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120424052427/http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/industrial/eu-international/lcpd/ |archivedate=24 April 2012 |df=dmy }}
104. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/12001752/UK-coal-plants-must-close-by-2025-Amber-Rudd-to-announce.html|title=UK coal plants must close by 2025, Amber Rudd announces}}
105. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-35882883|title=Longannet switch-off ends coal-fired power production in Scotland|date=24 March 2016|via=www.bbc.com}}
106. ^US Energy Information Administration, [https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/sec1_7.pdf Primary energy consumption by source], accessed 5 Apr. 2018
107. ^[https://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2006/10/71952 Eco Concern: Coal Plant Boom] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101214223405/http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2006/10/71952 |date=14 December 2010 }}
108. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303404704577307524051798192|title=EPA Proposes CO|author=Keith Johnson in Washington, Rebecca Smith in San Francisco and Kris Maher in Pittsburgh|date=28 March 2012|work=WSJ}}
109. ^Ernest Moritz, Excerpts of Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz’s Remarks at National Energy Technology Laboratory in Morgantown, United States Department of Energy, 29 July 2013.
110. ^April Lee and others, Opportunities for synergy between natural gas and renewable energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Dec. 2012.
111. ^John Funk, DOE boss says shale gas could benefit wind and solar, Cleveland Plain Dealer, 18 Jan. 2012.
112. ^US EIA, Natural gas-fired combustion turbines are generally used to meet peak electricity load, 1 Oct. 2013.
113. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.energy.ca.gov/emission_standards/index.html |title=SB 1368 Emission Performance Standards |website=Energy.ca.gov |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
114. ^"California Takes on Power Plant Emissions: SB 1368 Sets Groundbreaking Greenhouse Gas Performance Standard," Natural Resources Defense Council Fact Sheet, August 2007.
115. ^Rhonda Erskine, "Maine Governor Baldacci Signs Bill to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions," WCSH WCSH6.com, April 15, 2008
116. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/oregon-lawmakers-approve-far-reaching-climate-change-bill/ar-BBqiuvg?ocid=ansmsnnews11|title=Oregon lawmakers approve far-reaching climate change bill|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305215204/http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/oregon-lawmakers-approve-far-reaching-climate-change-bill/ar-BBqiuvg?ocid=ansmsnnews11|archivedate=5 March 2016|df=dmy-all}}
117. ^"Stop the Coal Rush" Rally & Lobby Day Set for February 11 & 12" {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081030034206/http://texas.sierraclub.org/press/newsreleases/20070125.asp |date=30 October 2008 }}, Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter.
118. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.stopthecoalrush.com/participating-organizations/ |title=StopTheCoalRush - Hot Rush in Marketing |work=stopthecoalrush.com |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080513110722/http://www.stopthecoalrush.com/participating-organizations/ |archivedate=13 May 2008 |df=dmy }}]
119. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/80R/billtext/pdf/HC00043I.pdf|title=Text of HCR 43}}
120. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=HCR43|title=Texas Legislature Online - 80(R) History for HCR 43|work=state.tx.us}}
121. ^Rep. Anderson press release {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080828213707/http://www.docandersonfortexas.com/news.htm |date=28 August 2008 }}, December 4, 2007.
122. ^¹Christina Russell, "Wallula Coal Plant Proposal Controversial Among Students, Faculty," Whitman College Pioneer, 11/15/07
123. ^{{cite web|url=http://customerservicenumbers.com/co-progress-energy-carolinas |title=Progress Energy Carolinas Customer Service Phone Number, Reviews |website=Customerservicenumbers.com |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
124. ^"Progress Energy Carolinas sets goal of doubling efficiency savings to 2,000 MW," Progress Energy Inc press release, June 1, 2007.
125. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.rmao.com/documents/psco_rmao_oasis.html |title=Public Service Company of Colorado |website=Rmao.com |accessdate=2013-12-27 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130729232842/http://www.rmao.com/documents/psco_rmao_oasis.html |archivedate=29 July 2013 |df=dmy }}
126. ^¹²³"Don't Get Burned: The Risks of Investing in New Coal-Fired Generating Facilities," {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081030225727/http://www.iccr.org/news/press_releases/pdf%20files/DontGetBurned08.pdf |date=30 October 2008 }} Synapse Energy Economics, 2008, p. 11 (PDF file)
127. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mnpower.com/ |title=Minnesota Power, an ALLETE Company - Home |website=Mnpower.com |accessdate=2013-12-27}}
128. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.avistautilities.com/|title=Welcome to Avista|work=avistautilities.com}}
129. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.northwesternenergy.com/|title=Home|work=northwesternenergy.com}}
130. ^"NorthWestern Energy Plans For More Wind; Says New Coal is Too Risky," {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080723130232/http://www.rnp.org/News/news_NWEnergy2007IRP17Dec07.html |date=23 July 2008 }} Renewable Northwest Project, 12/17/07.
131. ^{{cite web|url=http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=12363|title=EERE News: Georgia Power Wins Approval to Switch Coal Plant to Biomass Power|work=energy.gov}}
132. ^[https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=10391 "Japan’s fossil-fueled generation remains high because of continuing nuclear plant outages"], US Energy Information Administration, 15 March 2013.
133. ^Babs McHugh, "Japan plans to build 45 coal power plants in next decade," Platts, 3 Feb. 2017.
134. ^{{cite web|url=https://climateprotection.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Survey-on-Global-Activities-to-Phase-Out-ICE-Vehicles-FINAL-Oct-3-2018.pdf|title=Survey of Global Activity to Phase Out Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles|last=Burch|first=Isabella|date=September 2018|website=Climateprotection.org|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}
135. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/international-trade-governance-and-sustainable-transport-mahesh-sugathan.pdf|title=International Trade Governance and Sustainable Transport: The Expansion of Electric Vehicles|last=|first=|date=December 2017|website=International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}
136. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/25/britain-to-ban-sale-of-all-diesel-and-petrol-cars-and-vans-from-2040|title=Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040|last1=Asthana|first1=Anushka|last2=Taylor|first2=Matthew|date=25 July 2017|newspaper=The Guardian}}
137. ^Cited in Tim Flannery, Atmosphere of Hope. Solutions to the Climate Crisis, Penguin Books, 2015, pages 123-124 ({{ISBN|9780141981048}}).
138. ^Opinion Research Corporation, A Post Fossil-Fuel America {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201122738/http://www.cleanenergyaction.net/101807_CLEAN_survey_report.pdf |date=1 December 2008 }}, Executive Summary, National Opinion Survey Produced for Citizens Lead for Energy Action Now (CLEAN),A Project of the Civil Society Institute, 18 October 2007
139. ^Opinion Research Corporation, A Post Fossil-Fuel America {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201122738/http://www.cleanenergyaction.net/101807_CLEAN_survey_report.pdf |date=1 December 2008 }}, National Opinion Survey Produced for Citizens Lead for Energy Action Now (CLEAN),A Project of the Civil Society Institute, page 18, October 18, 2007
140. ^Gallup, Americans want more emphasis on solar, wind, natural gas, 27 Mar. 2013.
141. ^ABC News/Washington Post, Energy policy has initial support, 28 August 2009.
142. ^CLEAN press release {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080509155325/http://www.cleanenergyaction.net/101807release.cfm |date=9 May 2008 }}, 18 October 2007.
143. ^EDF, Natural gas policy, accessed 4 Oct. 2013.
144. ^EDF, Why natural gas is important, accessed 4 Oct. 2013.
145. ^Larry Bernstein, [https://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-22/national/39441658_1_oil-companies-energy-companies-kennedy-jr Environmental Defense Fund scolded by other green organizations on ‘fracking’] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131109052409/http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-22/national/39441658_1_oil-companies-energy-companies-kennedy-jr |date=9 November 2013 }}, Washington Post, 22 May 2013.
146. ^Mark Brownstein, Why EDF is working on natural gas, 10 Sept. 2012
147. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.1sky.org/about/1sky-solutions/no-new-coal|title=Solutions: Get Off Coal; Invest in Renewable Energy|work=1sky.org}}
148. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.coopamerica.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/coal/index.cfm|title=Green America Climate Action: Dirty Energy: Coal is Bad|website=Coopamerica.org}}
149. ^{{cite web|url=http://kansas.sierraclub.org/Wind/Coal%20Moratorium.htm |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2008-09-23 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081030050120/http://kansas.sierraclub.org/Wind/Coal%20Moratorium.htm |archivedate=30 October 2008 |df=dmy }}
150. ^Citizens {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080820161141/http://www.cleanenergyaction.net/callaction.cfm |date=20 August 2008 }}
151. ^{{cite web |url=http://ran.org/what_we_do/global_finance/spotlight/coal_is_over/ |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2008-09-23 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080124054605/http://ran.org/what_we_do/global_finance/spotlight/coal_is_over/ |archivedate=24 January 2008 |df=dmy }}
152. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.risingtide.org.au/cleancoal |title=Rising Tide - Your Eyes on Climate Change |work=risingtide.org.au |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160517051339/http://www.risingtide.org.au/cleancoal |archivedate=17 May 2016 |df=dmy }}
153. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sierraclub.org/|title=Sierra Club Home Page: Explore, Enjoy, and Protect the Planet|work=Sierra Club}}
154. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sixdegrees.org.au|title=Six Degrees - Coal and Climate Change|work=sixdegrees.org.au}}
155. ^{{cite web |url=http://stepitup2007.org/article.php?id=469 |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2008-09-23 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011124939/http://stepitup2007.org/article.php?id=469 |archivedate=11 October 2007 |df=dmy-all }}
156. ^{{cite web|url=https://trilliuminvest.com/shareholder-proposal/moritorium-on-coal-financing/|title=Bank of America - Moritorium on Coal Financing (2008)|website=Trilliuminvest.com|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
157. ^{{cite news | first = Michelle | last = Nichols | title = Gore urges civil disobedience to stop coal plants | date = 24 September 2008 | work = Reuters | url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-coal-goreenivro-idUSTRE48N7AA20080924 | access-date = 2016-09-22}}
158. ^{{cite av media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG0pUjBr8KU|title=Economics of Coal in IA: Investor Sees Poor Future for Coal|date=22 January 2008|work=YouTube}}
159. ^"Google CEO ERic Schmidt offers energy plan," San Jose Mercury News, September 9, 2008
160. ^ {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
161. ^ {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
162. ^"Event Report: Step It Up SLC," {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100406073257/http://events.stepitup2007.org/november/reports/2097 |date=6 April 2010 }} 11/3/07.
163. ^{{cite web |url=http://cvilledave.blogspot.com/2007/12/clean-energy-for-cville-beyond.html |title=Clean Energy for Cville & Beyond |work= CvilleDave |author=Dave Norris |date=14 December 2007 |access-date= 21 September 2016}}
164. ^{{cite web |title=Charlottesville Clean Energy Resolution |url=https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Charlottesville_Clean_Energy_Resolution |website=Sourcewatch.org|publisher=The Center for Media and Democracy |accessdate=20 September 2018 |date=17 December 2007}}
165. ^"Board calls for coal plant moratorium,". The Waterloo-Cedar Falls Courier, 16 January 2008.
166. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html|title=Statistical Review of World Energy - Energy economics - Home|website=Bp.com|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
167. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/REN21_GSR2016_KeyFindings_en_10.pdf|title=pg18|website=Ren21.net|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
168. ^ {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
169. ^ {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
170. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/REN21_GSR2016_KeyFindings_en_10.pdf|title=page 18|website=Ren21.net|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
171. ^Terra-Gen Press Release {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150902091230/http://www.terra-genpower.com/News/Terra-Gen-Power-Announces-Closing-of-$650-Million-.aspx |date=2 September 2015 }}, 17 April 2012
172. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/4051.html|title=CEZ Group - The Largest Wind Farm in Europe Goes Into Trial Operation|author1=FG Forrest |author2=a. s. |author3=fg {zavináč } fg {tečka} cz - Content Management System - Edee CMS; SYMBIO Digital, s. r. o. - Webdesign|work=cez.cz}}
173. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/sections/climate-environment/denmark-breaks-its-own-world-record-wind-energy-321002|title=Denmark breaks its own world record in wind energy|website=EURACTIV.com}}
174. ^{{cite web|url=http://energinet.dk/EN/El/Nyheder/Sider/Dansk-vindstroem-slaar-igen-rekord-42-procent.aspx|title=New record-breaking year for Danish wind power|website=Energinet.dk|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160125083857/http://energinet.dk/EN/El/Nyheder/Sider/Dansk-vindstroem-slaar-igen-rekord-42-procent.aspx|archivedate=25 January 2016|df=dmy-all}}
175. ^Wittrup, Sanne. "Dong: Vores kraftværker bruger allerede billig vindmøllestrøm i elpatroner" Ingeniøren, 15 January 2015. Retrieved: January 2015.
176. ^Blarke, Morten Boje. "Liste over el-drevne varmepumper i fjernvarmen" SmartVarme.dk, 12 February 2014. Retrieved: January 2015.
177. ^Capion, Karsten. "Analyse nr. 9 - Mulighederne for den fremtidige fjernvarmeproduktion i decentrale områder {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208211010/http://www.danskenergi.dk/Analyse/Analyser/09_MulighederFjernvarmeDecentraleOmraader.aspx |date=8 December 2015 }}" Danish Energy, 15 January 2014. Retrieved: 15 January 2015.
178. ^Blarke, Morten Boje. "Store eldrevne varmepumper{{dead link|date=October 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}" Aalborg University, 17 April 2013. Retrieved: January 2015.
179. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/renewable-energy/solar-energy.html|title=BP Global: Solar energy|website=Bp.com}}
180. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/REN12-GSR2015_Onlinebook_low_nolinks.pdf|title=pg 27 & 28|website=Ren21.net|accessdate=26 March 2019}}
181. ^{{cite news|title=Gujarat's 214 MW solar park named as Asia's largest single PV plant|url=http://www.pv-tech.org/news/gujarats_214mw_solar_park_named_as_asias_largest_single_pv_plant|access-date=2016-09-23|newspaper=PV Tech|date=23 April 2012}}
182. ^{{cite web|title=Site plan of Charanka Solar Park, Gujarat, India|url=http://www.wiki-solar.org/map/sites/index.html?Charanka_Solar_Park?a?13?23.9?71.2|publisher=Wiki-Solar|accessdate=5 March 2015}}
183. ^Asia's largest solar field 'Gujarat Solar Park' switched on in India {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130612041950/http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/article/4/20120419201204191656225152164bad9/Asia%E2%80%99s-largest-solar-field-%E2%80%98Gujarat-Solar-Park%E2%80%99-switched-on-in-India.html |date=12 June 2013 }}
184. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.gujaratsolarpark.com/|title=Website|work=gujaratsolarpark.com}}
185. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sldcguj.com/Report/InstalledCapacity.asp|title=State Load Despatch Centre (SLDC)|work=sldcguj.com|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130127100001/http://www.sldcguj.com/Report/InstalledCapacity.asp|archivedate=27 January 2013|df=dmy-all}}
186. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/usa/business/2012-03/02/content_14744509.htm|title=China|work=chinadaily.com.cn}}
187. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/09/doe-closes-on-three-major-solar-projects |title=DOE Closes on Four Major Solar Projects |date= 30 September 2011 |work= Renewable Energy World }}
188. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/12/billionaire-buffett-bets-on-solar-energy |title=Billionaire Buffett Bets on Solar Energy |author=Steve Leone |date=7 December 2011 |work=Renewable Energy World }}
189. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nrg-energy-completes-acquisition-of-250-megawatt-california-valley-solar-ranch-from-sunpower-2011-09-30 |title=NRG Energy Completes Acquisition of 250-Megawatt California Valley Solar Ranch from SunPower |date=30 September 2011 |work=MarketWatch }}
190. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/current/2011/kw40/exelon-purchases-230-mw-antelope-valley-solar-ranch-one-from-first-solar.html |title=Exelon purchases 230 MW Antelope Valley Solar Ranch One from First Solar |date=4 October 2011 |work=Solar Server |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118064557/http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/current/2011/kw40/exelon-purchases-230-mw-antelope-valley-solar-ranch-one-from-first-solar.html |archivedate=18 January 2012 |df=dmy }}
191. ^{{cite web |url= |title=Saving for a rainy day |author=Edwin Cartlidge |date=18 November 2011 |work=Science (Vol 334) |pages=922–924 }}
192. ^Martin and Goswami (2005), p. 45
193. ^The Royal Society (January 2008). Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges, {{ISBN|978-0-85403-662-2}}, p. 61.
194. ^Gordon Quaiattini. Biofuels are part of the solution{{dead link|date=January 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} Canada.com, 25 April 2008. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
195. ^Biomass Energy Center {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061008081905/http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/portal/page?_pageid=76,15049&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL |date=8 October 2006 }}. Biomassenergycentre.org.uk. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
196. ^{{cite news|url=http://michiganmessenger.com/33868/proposed-biomass-plant-better-than-coal |title=Proposed biomass plant: Better than coal? |author=Eartha Jane Melzer |date=26 January 2010 |work=The Michigan Messenger |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120514091947/http://michiganmessenger.com/33868/proposed-biomass-plant-better-than-coal |archivedate=14 May 2012 }}
197. ^{{Cite journal | last1 = Zhang | first1 = J. | last2 = Smith | first2 = K. R. | doi = 10.1289/ehp.9479 | title = Household Air Pollution from Coal and Biomass Fuels in China: Measurements, Health Impacts, and Interventions | journal = Environmental Health Perspectives | volume = 115 | issue = 6 | pages = 848–855 | year = 2007 | pmid = 17589590| pmc =1892127 }}
198. ^{{cite journal|doi=10.1007/BF01319012|journal=Archives of Virology|volume=130|issue=1–2|title=Announcement|year=1993|page=225}}
199. ^{{cite journal|doi=10.3155/1047-3289.61.1.63|journal=Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association|volume=61|issue=1|year=2011|pages=63–68|title=Emission Reductions from Woody Biomass Waste for Energy as an Alternative to Open Burning|last1=Springsteen|first1=Bruce|last2=Christofk|first2=Tom|last3=Eubanks|first3=Steve|last4=Mason|first4=Tad|last5=Clavin|first5=Chris|last6=Storey|first6=Brett}}
200. ^{{cite book | last = Starke | first = Linda | title = State of the World 2009: Into a Warming World: a WorldWatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society | date = 2009 | publisher = WW Norton and Company | isbn = 978-0-393-33418-0}}
201. ^{{cite journal|doi=10.1126/science.1164857|title=Brown Clouds over South Asia: Biomass or Fossil Fuel Combustion?|year=2009|last1=Gustafsson|first1=O.|last2=Krusa|first2=M.|last3=Zencak|first3=Z.|last4=Sheesley|first4=R. J.|last5=Granat|first5=L.|last6=Engstrom|first6=E.|last7=Praveen|first7=P. S.|last8=Rao|first8=P. S. P.|last9=Leck|first9=C.|last10=Rodhe|first10=H.|journal=Science|volume=323|issue=5913|pages=495–8|pmid=19164746|display-authors=8|bibcode=2009Sci...323..495G}}
202. ^Klimaråd: Affaldsimport vil belaste dansk CO2-regnskab {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151128144041/http://www.danskfjernvarme.dk/nyheder/presseklip/151127klimaraad-affaldsimport-vil-belaste-dansk-co2regnskab |date=28 November 2015 }} 27 November 2015.
203. ^Danish energy statistics, 2014 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160121123923/http://www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/info/tal-kort/statistik-noegletal/aarlig-energistatistik/energistatistik_2014.pdf |date=21 January 2016 }} page 5 and 12
204. ^ {{dead link|date=March 2019}}
205. ^¹{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/11/difference-engine-0|title=Difference Engine: The nuke that might have been|date=11 November 2013|author=|work=The Economist}}
206. ^{{cite news|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/05/30/us-germany-nuclear-idUKTRE74Q2P120110530|title=German government wants nuclear exit by 2022 at latest|date=30 May 2011|work=Reuters|author=Annika Breidthardt}}
207. ^{{cite web|url=http://referendum.interno.it/referendum/refe110612/RFT0003.htm|title=Italy Nuclear Referendum Results|date=13 June 2011|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120325171121/http://referendum.interno.it/referendum/refe110612/RFT0003.htm|archivedate=25 March 2012|df=dmy}}
208. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/11/27/post-fukushima-nuclear-power-changes-latitudes.html|title=Nuclear Power Goes Rogue|date=28 November 2011|author=Henry Sokolski|work=Newsweek}}
209. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-28/nuclear-promotion-dropped-in-japan-energy-policy-after-fukushima.html|title=Nuclear Promotion Dropped in Japan Energy Policy After Fukushima|date=28 October 2011|lastauthoramp=yes|author1=Tsuyoshi Inajima|author2=Yuji Okada|work=Bloomberg}}
210. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/18441163|title=Nuclear power: When the steam clears|date=24 March 2011|page=|author=|work=The Economist}}
211. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/47834|title=Germany: Nuclear power to be phased out by 2022|date=5 June 2011|author=Duroyan Fertl|work=Green Left}}
212. ^Erika Simpson and Ian Fairlie, [https://lfpress.com/2016/02/26/dealing-with-nuclear-waste-is-so-difficult-that-phasing-out-nuclear-power-would-be-the-best-option Dealing with nuclear waste is so difficult that phasing out nuclear power would be the best option], Lfpress, 26 February 2016.
213. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/business/global/26nuclear.html?_r=1|title=Switzerland Decides on Nuclear Phase-Out|date=25 May 2011|page=|author=James Kanter|newspaper=The New York Times}}
214. ^InterAcademy Council (2007). Lighting the way: Toward a sustainable energy future {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071128074454/http://www.interacademycouncil.net/Object.File/Master/12/053/Executive%20Summary.pdf |date=28 November 2007 }}
215. ^¹American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (2007). The Twin Pillars of Sustainable Energy: Synergies between Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technology and Policy Report E074.
216. ^International Energy Agency (2007). Global Best Practice in Renewable Energy Policy Making
217. ^{{cite web |url=http://content.sierraclub.org/coal/ |title=Beyond Coal |work=sierraclub.org}}