请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Grosjean v. American Press Co.
释义

  1. Background

  2. Decision

  3. See also

  4. References

  5. Further reading

  6. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
| Litigants = Grosjean v. American Press Co.
| ArgueDateA = January 13
| ArgueDateB = 14
| ArgueYear = 1936
| DecideDate = February 10
| DecideYear = 1936
| FullName = Alice Lee Grosjean, Supervisor of Public Accounts for the State of Louisiana v. American Press Co., et al.
| USVol = 297
| USPage = 233
| ParallelCitations = 56 S. Ct. 444; 80 L. Ed. 660; 1936 U.S. LEXIS 524
| Prior = Am. Press Co. v. Grosjean, 10 F. Supp. [https://www.leagle.com/decision/193517110fsupp1611136 161] (E.D. La. 1935); probable jurisdiction noted, 56 S. Ct. 129 (1935).
| Subsequent =
| Holding = The Louisiana tax was an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment.
| SCOTUS = 1932-1937
| Majority = Sutherland
| JoinMajority = unanimous
| LawsApplied = U.S. Const. amend. I
}}

Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233 (1936), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court over a challenge to a separate sales tax on newspapers with circulation of over 20,000.

Background

Louisiana Governor Huey Long received more support in rural areas whereas the larger urban newspapers tended to be more critical of him. His administration levied a 2% gross receipts tax in an attempt to tax newspapers critical of him into submission. The 13 newspapers impacted by the tax all sued in federal court.

Decision

The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, found the tax unconstitutional. The decision held that states could charge customary taxes on media but higher taxes ran afoul of the First Amendment. Specifically, the court found the law similar to the British Stamp Act of 1712 in that it would it suppress free speech through taxation and allowing a similar law would be against the clear Founders' Intent of the Bill of Rights. Justice George Sutherland wrote that "the revolution really began when, in 1765, that government sent stamps for newspaper duties to the American colonies." [1]

The case is often cited because it defined corporations as "persons" for purposes of analysis under the Equal Protection clause.

See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 297

References

1. ^{{ussc|name=Grosjean v. American Press Co.|volume=297|page=233|pin=246|year=1936}}.

Further reading

  • {{cite book |title=The Kingfish and the Constitution: Huey Long, the First Amendment, and the Emergence of Modern Press Freedom in America |last=Cortner |first=Richard C. |year=1996 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=Westport, CT |isbn=0-313-29842-4 |pages= }}
  • {{cite book |title=Freedom of the press |last=Schwartz |first=Bernard |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1992 |publisher=Facts on File |location=New York |isbn=0-8160-2505-3 |pages= }}

External links

  • {{wikisource-inline|Grosjean v. American Press Company}}
  • {{caselaw source

| case=Grosjean v. American Press Co., {{ussc|297|233|1936|el=no}}
| cornell =https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/297/233
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/102601/grosjean-v-american-press-co/
| findlaw=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/297/233.html
| googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6705329678148498819
| justia=http://supreme.justia.com/us/297/233/case.html
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep297/usrep297233/usrep297233.pdf
| openjurist =https://openjurist.org/297/us/233
}}{{US1stAmendment|press|state=expanded}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Grosjean V. American Press Co.}}{{SCOTUS-stub}}

8 : United States Free Speech Clause case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court|United States taxation and revenue case law|1936 in United States case law|Legal history of Louisiana|1936 in Louisiana|Sales taxes

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/10 21:44:29