请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Hills v. Gautreaux
释义

  1. See also

  2. References

  3. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Hills v. Gautreaux
|ArgueDate=January 20
|ArgueYear=1976
|DecideDate=April 20
|DecideYear=1976
|FullName=Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v Gautreaux et al.
|USVol=425
|USPage=284
|ParallelCitations=96 S. Ct. 1538; 47 L. Ed. 2d 792
|Prior=Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
|Holding=Racially discriminatory public housing programs violate the 5th Amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1964, and remedial action to alleviate the effects of such a practice not only is appropriate but also extends beyond city limits to the housing market of the city.
|SCOTUS=1975-1981
|Majority=Stewart
|JoinMajority=Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
|Concurrence=Marshall
|JoinConcurrence=Brennan, White
|NotParticipating=Stevens
|LawsApplied=U.S. Const. Amend. V; Civil Rights Act of 1964
}}

Hills v. Gautreaux, 425 U.S. 284 (1976), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.

In this case, a number of Chicago families living in housing projects were awarded Section 8 vouchers allowing them to move to the suburbs in compensation for the housing project's substandard conditions. Carla Anderson Hills was the United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; the eponymous lead respondent was Dorothy Gautreaux. The court ruled that the department had violated the Fifth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The significance of the case lies in the sociological conclusions that can be drawn from it. A number of families chose to move, while others stayed, and Northwestern University researchers studying the two populations concluded that low-income women who moved to the suburbs "clearly experienced improved employment and earnings, even though the program provided no job training or placement services."[1] The disparity arguably proves that concentrated poverty is self-perpetuating and simply alleviating this concentration offers an avenue for improving the quality of life of those afflicted by urban poverty.

See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 425
  • Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity

References

1. ^After the Projects - American RadioWorks - American Public Media, americanradioworks.publicradio.org

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Hills v. Gautreaux, {{ussc|425|284|1976|el=no}}
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109428/hills-v-gautreaux/
| googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2960530663838124692
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/425/284/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep425/usrep425284/usrep425284.pdf
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1975/74-1047
  • Waiting for Gautreaux 2006 book by Alexander Polikoff, lead plaintiff's attorney in Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority et al.
  • {{Cite news |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-gautreaux-chicago-public-housing-20181221-story.html |title=End in sight for long-running, landmark public housing discrimination lawsuit |last=Meisner |first=Jason |date=December 21, 2018 |work=Chicago Tribune |access-date=2018-12-22 |language=en-US}}
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

4 : United States equal protection case law|United States Supreme Court cases|1976 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/21 10:56:39