| 词条 | Holmes v. United States |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Holmes v. United States |DecideDate=May 27 |DecideYear=1968 |FullName=Albert H. Holmes v. United States |USVol=391 |USPage=936 |ParallelCitations=88 S. Ct. 1835; 20 L. Ed. 2d 856; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1576 |Prior=United States v. Holmes, 387 F.2d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/387/781/261993/ 781] (7th Cir. 1967) |Subsequent= |Holding=Certiorari denied. |SCOTUS=1967-1969 |Majority= |JoinMajority= |Concurrence=Stewart |Dissent=Douglas |LawsApplied= }} For similarly titled cases, see United States v. Holmes (disambiguation). Holmes v. United States, 391 U.S. 936 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to a Jehovah's Witnesses minister who asked the Court to decide whether a draft of men into the Armed Forces in times of peace is constitutionally permissible.[1] The minister argued that, in the absence of a declaration of war, a draft was not authorized and was equivalent to involuntary servitude. Facts of the caseAlbert H. Holmes was classified in August 1965 as a conscientious objector by his Selective Service Appeal Board. Section 6(j) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1948 stated that a conscientious objector who, like petitioner, is also opposed to noncombatant military service, may in lieu of induction 'be ordered by his local board ... to perform ... such civilian work contributing to the maintenance of the national health, safety, or interest as the local board may deem appropriate. ...' Beginning in October 1965 Holmes exchanged a series of letters with his local board in which the Board explained to Holmes the types of civilian work available and Holmes asserted his religious scruples against serving the United States Government in any capacity, including civilian work programs. Holmes reiterated this position in a personal meeting with his local board. On February 7, 1966, the Board sent Holmes an order to report on February 21 to an Illinois state hospital for civilian work assignment. However, on the day he was due to report, Holmes notified the Board that he refused to do so for religious reasons.[1] Prior historyHolmes was charged with willful failure to report as ordered, in violation of 12(a) of the Selective Service Act. At his nonjury trial Holmes moved for judgment of acquittal. That motion was denied, Holmes was convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, one judge dissenting.[2] References1. ^1 {{ussc|name=Holmes v. United States|volume=391|page=936|pin=|year=1968}}. 2. ^United States v. Holmes, {{cite court |litigants= |vol=387 |reporter=F.2d |opinion=781 |pinpoint= |court=7th Cir. |date=1967 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/387/781/261993/ |accessdate=2018-12-10 |quote=}} External links
| case = Holmes v. United States, {{ussc|391|936|1968|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/107725/albert-h-holmes-v-united-states/ | findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/391/936.html | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/391/936/ | openjurist =https://openjurist.org/391/us/936{{DEFAULTSORT:Holmes V. United States}}{{JehovahsWitnesses-stub}} 7 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court|Jehovah's Witnesses litigation in the United States|1968 in United States case law|Conscription in the United States|1968 in religion|Christianity and law in the 20th century |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。