| 词条 | Illinois v. Wardlow |
| 释义 |
| Litigants = Illinois v. Wardlow | ArgueDate = November 2 | ArgueYear = 1999 | DecideDate = January 12 | DecideYear = 2000 | FullName = Illinois, Petitioner v. William aka Sam Wardlow | USVol = 528 | USPage = 119 | ParallelCitations = 120 S. Ct. 673; 145 L. Ed. 2d 570; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 504 | Docket = | OralArgument = | OralReargument = | OpinionAnnouncement = | Prior = [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2115969/people-v-wardlow/ 183 Ill. 2d 306], 701 N.E.2d 484 (1998) | Subsequent = | Holding = The police had reasonable suspicion to justify the stop because nervous, evasive behavior, like fleeing a high crime area upon noticing police officers, is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion to justify a stop | SCOTUS = 1994-2005 | Majority = Rehnquist | JoinMajority = O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas | Dissent = Stevens | JoinDissent = Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer | LawsApplied = U.S. Const. amend. IV Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000), is a case decided before the United States Supreme Court involving U.S. criminal procedure regarding searches and seizures. HoldingIn an opinion delivered by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the Supreme Court held in a 5 to 4 decision that the police had reasonable suspicion to justify the stop. DissentJustice John Paul Stevens argued in dissent that the government did not articulate enough facts to establish reasonable suspicion and that there were not enough facts in the record to corroborate the government's claim. See also
ReferencesFurther reading
External links
| case = Illinois v. Wardlow, {{ussc|528|119|2000|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118326/illinois-v-wardlow/ | findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/528/119.html | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14848456241848254334 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/528/119/case.html | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep528/usrep528119/usrep528119.pdf | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1999/98-1036{{Chicago Police Department}}{{US4thAmendment|warrantexceptions|state=expanded}} 7 : United States Fourth Amendment case law|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|2000 in Illinois|2000 in United States case law|Legal history of Illinois|Chicago Police Department |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。