词条 | Journal ranking |
释义 |
Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it. They have been introduced as official research evaluation tools in several countries. MeasuresTraditionally, journal ranking "measures" or evaluations have been provided simply through institutional lists established by academic leaders or through committee vote. These approaches have been notoriously politicized and inaccurate reflections of actual prestige and quality, as they would often reflect the biases and personal career objectives of those involved in ranking the journals; also causing the problem of highly disparate evaluations across institutions.[1][2] Consequently, many institutions have required external sources of evaluation of journal quality. The traditional approach here has been through surveys of leading academics in a given field, but this approach too has potential for bias, though not as profound as that seen with institution-generated lists[2] Consequently, governments, institutions, and leaders in scientometric research have turned to a litany of observed bibliometric measures on the journal-level that can be used as surrogates for quality and thus eliminate the need for subjective assessment[3] Consequently, several journal-level metrics have been proposed, most citation-based:
Critical reflectionNegative consequences of rankings are generally well-documented and relate to the performativity of using journal rankings for performance measurement purposes.[20][21] For example, McKinnon (2017) has analyzed how the ABS-AJG ranking, which in spite of its methodological shortcomings is widely accepted in British business schools, has had negative consequences for the transportation and logistics management disciplines.[22] Universities now increasingly drop the idea that research quality can be measured based on the uni-dimensional scale of a journal ranking. This has, for example, led to the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), which has now been signed by thousands of researchers worldwide, asking “not [to] use journal-based metrics […] as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions”.[23] The Community for Responsible Research in Business Management (cRRBM) asks whether “even the academy is being served when faculty members are valued for the quantity and placement of their articles, not for the benefit their research can have for the world”.[24] National rankings{{anchor|By country}}Several national and international rankings of journals exist, e.g.:
They have been introduced as official research evaluation tools in several countries.[33]
See also
References1. ^Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Moody, Gregory D.; Gaskin, James; Galletta, Dennis F.; Humpherys, Sean; Barlow, Jordan B.; and Wilson, David W. (2013). Evaluating journal quality and the Association for Information Systems (AIS) Senior Scholars' journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value?," MIS Quarterly (MISQ), vol. 37(4), 993–1012. Also, see YouTube video narrative of this paper at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZQIDkA-ke0. 2. ^1 Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Romans, Denton; and Curtis, Aaron (2004). "Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), vol. 5(2), pp. 29–80 (http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2005/276) 3. ^Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Moody, Gregory D.; Gaskin, James; Galletta, Dennis F.; Humpherys, Sean; Barlow, Jordan B.; and Wilson, David W. (2013). "Evaluating journal quality and the Association for Information Systems (AIS) Senior Scholars' journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value?," MIS Quarterly (MISQ), vol. 37(4), 993–1012. Also, see YouTube video narrative of this paper at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZQIDkA-ke0. 4. ^Serenko A., Dohan M. , "Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence", Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 629-648, 2011 5. ^Holsapple, C.W., " A Publication Power Approach for identifying premier information systems journals", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 166-185, 2008 6. ^Serenko, A., Jiao, C., "Investigating information systems research in Canada", Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(1), 3-24, 2012 7. ^{{cite book |last=Alhoori |first=Hamed |author2=Furuta, Richard |title=Can Social Reference Management Systems Predict a Ranking of Scholarly Venues? |journal=Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries |year=2013 |volume=8092 |pages=138–143 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247768830 |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_14 |series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science |isbn=978-3-642-40500-6|citeseerx=10.1.1.648.3770 }} 8. ^Cornillier, F., Charles, V., "Measuring the attractiveness of academic journals: A direct influence aggregation model", Operations Research Letters, 43(2), 172–176, 2015 9. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/science-and-technology/elsevier-announces-enhanced-journal-metrics-snip-and-sjr-now-available-in-scopus |title=Elsevier Announces Enhanced Journal Metrics SNIP and SJR Now Available in Scopus |work=Press release |publisher=Elsevier |date= |accessdate=2014-07-27}} 10. ^{{cite journal |last1=Moed |first1=Henk |title=Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals |journal=Journal of Informetrics |date=2010 |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=256–27 7|doi=10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002|arxiv=0911.2632 }} 11. ^{{Cite journal |author1=Gabriel Pinski |author2=Francis Narin | title = Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory with application to literature of physics | journal = Information Processing & Management | year = 1976 | volume = 12 | issue = 5 | pages = 297–312 | doi = 10.1016/0306-4573(76)90048-0}} 12. ^{{cite journal |author1=S. J. Liebowitz |author2=J. P. Palmer. | year = 1984 | title = Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals | url = http://www.eco.uc3m.es/english/iue/rankings/10.pdf | format = PDF | journal = Journal of Economic Literature | volume = 22 | pages = 77–88 | jstor = 2725228 | issue = 1 }} 13. ^{{cite journal |author1=I. Palacios-Huerta |author2=O. Volij | year = 2004 | title = The Measurement of Intellectual Influence | journal = Econometrica | volume = 72 | issue = 3 | pages = 963–977 | doi = 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00519.x|citeseerx=10.1.1.165.6602 }} 14. ^{{cite journal |author1=Y. K. Kodrzycki |author2=P. D. Yu | year = 2006 | title = New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals | issue = 1 | journal = Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy | volume = 5 | doi = 10.2202/1538-0645.1520|citeseerx=10.1.1.178.7834 }} 15. ^{{cite book | author = Johan Bollen, Marko A. Rodriguez, and Herbert Van de Sompel. |date=December 2006 | title = Journal Status | journal = Scientometrics | volume = 69 | issue = 3 | arxiv = cs.GL/0601030 | bibcode = 2006cs........1030B | last2 = Rodriguez | last3 = Van De Sompel | page = 1030 | doi=10.1145/1255175.1255273|isbn=9781595936448 }} 16. ^{{cite journal |author=C. T. Bergstrom. |date=May 2007 |title=Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals |journal=College & Research Libraries News |volume=68 |issue=5 |url=http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crlnews/2007/may/eigenfactor.cfm |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101209142528/http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crlnews/2007/may/eigenfactor.cfm |archivedate=2010-12-09 |df= }} 17. ^{{cite web|author=Jevin D. West |url=http://www.eigenfactor.org |title=eigenfactor.org |publisher=eigenfactor.org |date= |accessdate=2014-05-18}} 18. ^List of ISI and Scopus Indexed Journals (2015)" " 19. ^{{Cite journal |last=Minasny |first=Budiman |last2=Hartemink |first2=Alfred E. |last3=McBratney |first3=Alex |last4=Jang |first4=Ho-Jun |date=2013-10-22 |title=Citations and thehindex of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar |url=https://peerj.com/articles/183/ |journal=PeerJ |language=en |volume=1 |pages=e183 |doi=10.7717/peerj.183 |pmid=24167778 |pmc=3807595 |issn=2167-8359}} 20. ^Espeland & Sauder, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1086/517897 21. ^Grant & Kovács, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2016-0155 22. ^McKinnon, A.C. (2017). Starry-eyed II: The Logistics Journal Ranking Debate Revisited. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47 (6). DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0097 23. ^https://sfdora.org/ 24. ^https://bized.aacsb.edu/articles/2018/05/the-moral-dilemma-to-business-research 25. ^Australian Research Council ranking of journals worldwide {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110612153752/http://www.arc.gov.au/era/default.htm |date=2011-06-12 }} 26. ^Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science (2014)" " 27. ^Publication Forum " " 28. ^{{cite web|url=http://dbh.nsd.uib.no/kanaler/?search=advanced|title=Publiseringskanaler - NSD - Norsk senter for forskningsdata|publisher=|accessdate=10 December 2016}} 29. ^ANVUR Riviste di classe A 30. ^{{cite web|url=https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2015/|title=Academic Journal Guide 2015 - Chartered Association of Business Schools|publisher=|accessdate=10 December 2016}} 31. ^{{cite web|url=http://library.comsats.edu.pk/hec_journals.aspx/|title=List of HEC Recognized Journals|publisher=|accessdate=10 December 2016}} 32. ^NAAS Journal Scoring 33. ^Pontille D., Torny D. , "The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities", Research Evaluation, 19(5), 347-360, 2010 34. ^Journal & Country Rank " " 2 : Citation metrics|Academic publishing |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。