词条 | Kessler syndrome |
释义 |
The Kessler syndrome (also called the Kessler effect,[1][2] collisional cascading or ablation cascade), proposed by the NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler in 1978, is a scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) is high enough that collisions between objects could cause a cascade where each collision generates space debris that increases the likelihood of further collisions.[3] One implication is that the distribution of debris in orbit could render space activities and the use of satellites in specific orbital ranges impractical for many generations.[3] Debris generation and destructionEvery satellite, space probe, and manned mission has the potential to produce space debris. A cascading Kessler syndrome becomes more likely as satellites in orbit increase in number. As of 2014, there were about 2,000 commercial and government satellites orbiting the earth.[4] It is estimated that there are 600,000 pieces of space junk ranging from 1 cm to 10 cm, and on average one satellite is destroyed each year.[4][5] The most commonly used orbits for both manned and unmanned space vehicles are low earth orbits, which cover an altitude range low enough for residual atmospheric drag to be sufficient to help keep the zone clear. Collisions that occur in this altitude range are also less of an issue because the directions into which the fragments fly and/or their lower specific energy often result in orbits intersecting with Earth or having perigee below this altitude. Orbital decay is much slower at altitudes where atmospheric drag is insignificant. Slight atmospheric drag, lunar perturbation, and solar wind drag can gradually bring debris down to lower altitudes where fragments finally re-enter, but this process can take millennia at very high altitudes. ImplicationsThe Kessler syndrome is troublesome because of the domino effect and feedback runaway wherein impacts between objects of sizable mass spall off debris from the force of the collision. The shrapnel can then hit other objects, producing even more space debris: if a large enough collision or explosion were to occur, such as between a space station and a defunct satellite, or as the result of hostile actions in space, then the resulting debris cascade could make prospects for long-term viability of satellites in low earth orbit extremely low.[6][7] However, even a catastrophic Kessler scenario at LEO would pose minimal risk for launches continuing past LEO, or satellites travelling at medium Earth orbit (MEO) or geosynchronous orbit (GEO). The catastrophic scenarios predict an increase in the number of collisions per year, as opposed to a physically impassable barrier to space exploration that occurs in higher orbits. Avoidance and reductionDesigners of a new vehicle or satellite are frequently required to demonstrate that it can be safely disposed of at the end of its life, for example by use of a controlled atmospheric reentry system or a boost into a graveyard orbit.[8] In order to obtain a license to provide telecommunications services in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires all geostationary satellites launched after March 18, 2002 to commit to moving to a graveyard orbit at the end of their operational life.[9] U.S. government regulations require a boost, , of ≈300 km.[10] A proposed energy-efficient means of deorbiting a spacecraft from MEO is to shift it to an orbit in an unstable resonance with the Sun or Moon that speeds up orbital decay.[11][12] One technology proposed to help deal with fragments from 1 cm to 10 cm in size is the laser broom, a proposed multimegawatt land-based laser that could deorbit debris: the side of the debris hit by the laser would ablate and create a thrust that would change the eccentricity of the remains of the fragment until it would re-enter harmlessly.[13] Potential triggerThe Envisat satellite is a large, inactive satellite with a mass of {{convert|8211|kg|lb|abbr=on}} that drifts at {{convert|785|km|mi|abbr=on}}, an altitude where the debris environment is the greatest—two catalogued objects can be expected to pass within about 200 meters of Envisat every year[16]—and likely to increase. It could easily become a major debris contributor from a collision during the next 150 years that it will remain in orbit.[14] In fiction
See also
References1. ^{{cite web |url=http://articles.cnn.com/2002-05-03/tech/orbit.debris_1_low-earth-orbits-space-junk-international-space-station?_s=PM:TECH |title=Scientist: Space weapons pose debris threat – CNN |website=Articles.CNN.com |date=2002-05-03 |accessdate=2011-03-17 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120930100948/http://articles.cnn.com/2002-05-03/tech/orbit.debris_1_low-earth-orbits-space-junk-international-space-station?_s=PM:TECH |archivedate=2012-09-30 |df= }} 2. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/98jul/junk.htm |title=The Danger of Space Junk – 98.07 |website=TheAtlantic.com |accessdate=2011-03-17}} 3. ^1 {{cite journal | author=Donald J. Kessler and Burton G. Cour-Palais | title=Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites: The Creation of a Debris Belt | journal=Journal of Geophysical Research | year=1978 | volume=83 | pages=2637–2646 | doi=10.1029/JA083iA06p02637|bibcode = 1978JGR....83.2637K }} 4. ^1 {{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-28948367 |title=Lockheed Martin in space junk deal with Australian firm |work=BBC News |date=28 August 2014 |accessdate=2014-08-28 }} 5. ^{{cite web |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160516084751/http://www.iflscience.com/space/space-debris-has-chipped-one-isss-windows |url=http://www.iflscience.com/space/space-debris-has-chipped-one-isss-windows |work=I Fucking Love Science |deadurl=no |title=Space Debris Has Chipped One Of The ISS's Windows |accessdate=2016-05-16 |archivedate=2016-05-16 |date=2016-05-15 |first=Alfredo |last=Carpineti}} 6. ^{{cite web| url = http://physics.ucsc.edu/cosmo/Mountbat.PDF| title = Debris and Future Space Activities| accessdate =| author =| last = Primack| first = Joel R.| authorlink =| year = 2002| format = PDF| work =| publisher = Physics Department, University of California| location =| pages =| language =| doi =| dateformat =| quote = With enough orbiting debris, pieces will begin to hit other pieces, setting off a chain reaction of destruction that will leave a lethal halo around the Earth.}} 7. ^{{cite web| url = http://physics.ucsc.edu/cosmo/UNESCOr.pdf| title = Star Wars Forever? – A Cosmic Perspective| accessdate =| author = Joel R. Primack| last =| first =| authorlink =|author2=Nancy Ellen Abrams | format =| work =| publisher =| location =| pages =| language =| doi =| dateformat =| quote = the deliberate injection into LEO of large numbers of particles as a cheap but effective anti-satellite measure.}} 8. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_040628.html | title=FCC Enters Orbital Debris Debate |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080506022635/http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_040628.html |archivedate = 2008-05-06}} 9. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_040628.html |title=FCC Enters Orbital Debris Debate |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090724183455/http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_040628.html |archivedate=2009-07-24 |df= }} 10. ^{{cite web | url=http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/library/USG_OD_Standard_Practices.pdf | title=US Government Orbital Debris Standard Practices}} 11. ^{{cite journal|last1= Witze|first1= A.|title=The quest to conquer Earth’s space junk problem|journal= Nature|volume= 561|issue= 7721|date= 2018-09-05|pages= 24–26|doi= 10.1038/d41586-018-06170-1}} 12. ^{{cite journal|last1= Daquin|first1= J.|last2= Rosengren|first2=A. J.|last3= Alessi|first3=E. M.|last4= Deleflie|first4= F.|last5= Valsecchi|first5=G. B.|last6= Rossi|first6= A.|title=The dynamical structure of the MEO region: long-term stability, chaos, and transport|journal= Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy|volume= 124|issue= 4|year= 2016|pages= 335–366|doi= 10.1007/s10569-015-9665-9|arxiv= 1507.06170}} 13. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.spacedaily.com/news/debris-00a.html |title=NASA Hopes Laser Broom Will Help Clean Up Space Debris |publisher=SpaceDaily |accessdate=2011-03-17}} 14. ^1 {{cite news | first = Andrea | last = Gini | title = Don Kessler on Envisat and the Kessler Syndrome | date = 25 April 2012 | url = http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/2012/04/25/don-kessler-envisat-kessler-syndrome/ | work = Space Safety Magazine | accessdate = 2012-05-09}} 15. ^{{cite news |last= Sinha-Roy |first=Piya |title=Gravity gets lift at Comic-Con as director Cuaron leaps into space |date=July 20, 2013|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/21/comiccon-film-gravity-idUSL1N0FQ0EV20130721 |publisher=Reuters |accessdate=2013-09-05 }} 16. ^{{cite news |last1=Freeman |first1=Daniel |title=Neal Stephenson's Seveneves – A Low-Spoiler "Science" Review |url=http://berkeleysciencereview.com/neal-stephensons-seveneves-a-low-spoiler-science-review/ |accessdate=4 August 2015 |work=Berkeley Science Review |date=18 May 2015 }} Further reading
| url = http://webpages.charter.net/dkessler/files/KesSym.html | title = The Kessler Syndrome (As Discussed by Donald J. Kessler) | accessdate = 2010-05-26 | author = | last = Kessler | first = D | authorlink = | year = 2009 | work = | publisher = | location = | pages = | language = | doi = | archiveurl =https://web.archive.org/web/20100527195029/http://webpages.charter.net/dkessler/files/KesSym.html | archivedate =2010-05-27 | dateformat = | dead-url = yes | quote = }}
External links
4 : Pollution|Space hazards|Space warfare|Meteorological hypotheses |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。