请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 KTM Class 82
释义

  1. Overhauls & Refurbishment

  2. Design

  3. Service History

  4. Formation

  5. Gallery

  6. References

{{Infobox EMU
| name = Class 82
| image = Class 82 KTM Komuter train, Kuala Lumpur.jpg
| imagesize = 300px
| background = yellow
| caption = A Class 82 (EMU41) Komuter train at Kuala Lumpur
| manufacturer = Union Carriage & Wagon
| operator = Keretapi Tanah Melayu
| formation = 3 per trainset
| numberbuilt = 66 cars (22 sets)
  • All of the trainset are retired from service due to lack of spare parts and closure of the company.

| lines = Batu Caves-Port Klang Route
Rawang-Seremban Route
| service = 1999-2015
| transmission = Electric
| carbody = Aluminium, heavy steel material
| height = 3 855 mm
| width = 2 750 mm
| floorheight = 1 100 mm
| weight = 130 t
| capacity = 462 (212 seats)
| maxspeed = 160 km/h (Design)
120 km/h (Service)
| traction = GTO-VVVF
(GEC Alsthom)
| depots = Batu Gajah Rail Depot
Sentul Komuter Depot
| trainlength = 68.4 m
| carlength = 22.2 m (end cars)
23.2 m (intermediate cars)
| doors = 2 double-leaf plug sliding doors per side
| art-sections = none
| brakes = Single-pipe regenerative break system
| gauge = 1 000 mm
| electricsystem = 25 kV, 50 Hz catenary overhead line
| collectionmethod = Double-arm Z-shaped pantograph
}}

The Class 82 was a type of sub-urban rail electric multiple unit that once operated by Keretapi Tanah Melayu on its KTM Komuter services. In 1996-1997, 22 sets, for a total of 66 cars were built and delivered by Union Carriage & Wagon of South Africa. The class 82 sets were deployed in stages, with the final batch, being operational as late as December 1998. The class 82 similar to its sister classes, operated in three-car formations. It was only during the height of KTM Kommuter 1999-2001 that, the KTM class 8x family saw three-plus-three formations.

[1]

The KTM class 82 three-car formation consists of two motor cabs at either end of the set and a single trailer car in between, the trailer car in between is equipped with a double-arm Z shaped pantograph for 25 kV AC electric pick up. Narrow gangways integrate the three-car sets, allowing full walking from cab to cab. Each car features two double-leaf electric plug doors at either side. Printed route maps are displayed each doors, along with emergency stop levers.

Overhauls & Refurbishment

Over its operational life, the KTM class 82 has seen its life extended through, numerous schemes of overhauling and refurbishment. However, due to closure of Union carriage & Wagons’s international rail business saw an end to any future replacement parts for the class 82. Tropical weather which the class 82 proved more that than taxing for the class 82 with the premature failure of many irreplaceable parts. Although, there has been attempts to substitute parts with those of a different make, the economics and technological expertise were not on the side of the class 82, and the class 82 soon found itself in the precarious state of having to resort to cannibalize the parts of older sets in order to keep the remaining fleet in operation.[2][3]

In 2012, an attempt of fresh refurbishments has seen a mixture of traverse and longitudinal seating being introduced with a heavy emphasis on longitudinal seating, in acknowledgement of the classes' main role being in an intra-city commuter. Although, this was a good attempt at making increasing the overall capacity, it failed to addressed a key fundamental problem, the sets were running without replacement parts and off the shelf replacement parts from other makes are incompatible with this class.

2012 also saw the introduction of the special hybrid train service, where diesel locomotives were made to pull these decrepit class 82 bodies with functional doors, lighting and A/C(short form for air conditioner). Since the power transformers and power pick up systems could not be replaced, the company elected the use of additional diesel generators affixed on hopper wagons to power up the EMU. In effect, it reduced the role of these sets to nothing more than unpowered passenger coaches, but its use still had better convenience than compared to KTMB’s traditional unpowered coaches, which typically tend to be those specifically designed for long-distance intercity use, i.e. the doors were narrow and few, with limited standing space while having an open emphasis on comfortable seating. As mentioned the class 82 is not like that, and was design specifically to meet its role as a sub-urban commuter and gracefully step up to its role as a commuter rail wagon.

Design

The class 82 was designed with a streamlined sloped head with two high beam lamps concentrated at the center top with two standard headlights at either sides. An ARR coupling system is used, and this is compatible with all of KTMB’s modern rolling stock. Route direction is indicated on the front of the train within a confined fluorescent lighted box using a lightly transparent plastic. The drivers cab features a dedicated access to outside on top of the door access to the passenger area. The class 82 have two double-leaf pressure plug doors per side each coach. The cab head is designed to be bottom heavy with the bulk of the power transformers located beneath the coach with full use of the top for passenger use, power traction motors are contained within the bogey itself. In terms of safety, the front outer frame is made of heavy carbonized steel, that is capable of sustaining high impact.

Unlike the latter class 92,[4] the class 82 like its sister classes are endowed with multi-layered tempered glass that is of a higher degree of impact resistance. The class 82 has a top speed of 140 km/h, at the time of launch this was similar to the top speed of the other classes but significantly faster than the railbuses that were in use at the time. During normal operation, 120 km/h was the typical top speed with the average speed being around 45 km/h. Compared to the class 81 and other railbus(except class 83), the class 82 was found to be the give better energy efficiency when compared to the class 81, this is due to the superior GEC Alsthom regenerative braking system being used and gave better acceleration during runs.

Service History

The class 82 used to operate in a fixed 3-car formation for its regular service. During the 1995-1999 period it used to operate at peak hours in a 3+3 car formation. But this configuration was soon discontinued.

Briefly from 2010-2012, all train sets of this class were used in a hybrid diesel pull configuration in which an unpowered EMU would be towed by a diesel locomotive and while it gets electricity from an attached commercial generator wagon.

Since the transformers and power pick-ups could not be replaced, the company dubbed this as KTM "Hybrid" trains, serviced at both Batu Caves-Klang and Kajang-Rawang routes.[5]

Despite its young age, the arrival of the KTM Class 92 in 2012 resulted in total retirement of the entire KTM class 82 fleet, with the many cannibalised for parts, while others are being retired due to accidents and incidents, there are no more working sets available for use, added to complexity of having not able to source any more parts from factory. This marks the end of the entire KTM class 82's short history.

6 Class 82 sets have been abandoned at Ipoh Rail Yard. The other sets are currently unknown in their location.

Formation

Set DesignationCar NumberStatus
Car 1Car 2Car 3
EMU 41C8201T8201C8202Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 42C8203T8202C8204Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 43C8205T8203C8206Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 44C8207T8204C8208Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 45C8209T8205C8210Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 46C8211T8206C8212Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 47C8213T8207C8214Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 48C8215T8208C8216Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 49C8217T8209C8218Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 50C8219T8210C8220Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 51C8221T8211C8222Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 52C8223T8212C8224Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 53C8225T8213C8226Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 54C8227T8214C8228Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 55C8229T8215C8230Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 56C8231T8216C8232Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 57C8233T8217C8234Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 58C8235T8218C8236Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 59C8237T8219C8238Retired from Hybrid Service
EMU 60C8239T8220C8240Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 61C8241T8221C8242Abandoned at Ipoh
EMU 62C8243T8222C8244Abandoned at Ipoh

Gallery

References

1. ^{{cite web|title=KOMI|url=http://www.ktmkomuter.com.my/about_us/komi.php#here|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100429181809/http://www.ktmkomuter.com.my/about_us/komi.php#here|dead-url=yes|archive-date=29 April 2010|work=ktmkomuter.com.my|publisher=KTM Komuter|accessdate=29 January 2012}}
2. ^{{cite web|last1=Loh|first1=Joseph|title=Major signalling problem temporarily halts KTM Komuter train service|url=http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2013/08/02/KTM-Komuter-down/|website=The Star|accessdate=11 September 2014}}
3. ^{{cite web|last1=jayagandi|first1=jayaraj|title=Back on track|url=http://www.thestar.com.my/Travel/Malaysia/2011/05/03/Back-on-track/|website=TheStar|accessdate=11 September 2014}}
4. ^{{cite web|last=Kaos|first=Joseph|title=New trains vandalised|url=http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/7/4/nation/11599820&sec=nation|work=The Star Online|publisher=The Star|accessdate=8 July 2012}}
5. ^{{cite news| title=KTMB running hybrid trains to deal with congestion| url=http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/5/15/nation/20090515114616&sec=nation| publisher=The Star| author=Kng Zheng Guan| date=2009-05-15| deadurl=yes| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090516234443/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2009%2F5%2F15%2Fnation%2F20090515114616&sec=nation| archivedate=2009-05-16| df=}}
{{Rail transport in Malaysia}}

2 : KTM Komuter|Multiple units of Malaysia

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/13 12:45:45