词条 | List of representations of e |
释义 |
The mathematical constant {{math|e}} can be represented in a variety of ways as a real number. Since {{math|e}} is an irrational number (see proof that e is irrational), it cannot be represented as the quotient of two integers, but it can be represented as a continued fraction. Using calculus, {{math|e}} may also be represented as an infinite series, infinite product, or other sort of limit of a sequence. As a continued fractionEuler proved that the number {{math|e}} is represented as the infinite simple continued fraction[1] {{OEIS|id=A003417}}: Its convergence can be tripled{{clarify|reason=By what measure?|date = April 2017}}{{cn|date = April 2017}} by allowing just one fractional number: Here are some infinite generalized continued fraction expansions of {{math|e}}. The second is generated from the first by a simple equivalence transformation. This last, equivalent to [1; 0.5, 12, 5, 28, 9, ...], is a special case of a general formula for the exponential function: As an infinite seriesThe number {{math|e}} can be expressed as the sum of the following infinite series: for any real number x. In the special case where x = 1 or −1, we have: ,[2] and Other series include the following: [3] where is the {{mvar|n}}th Bell number. Consideration of how to put upper bounds on e leads to this descending series: which gives at least one correct (or rounded up) digit per term. That is, if 1 ≤ n, then More generally, if x is not in {2, 3, 4, 5, ...}, then As an infinite productThe number {{math|e}} is also given by several infinite product forms including Pippenger's product and Guillera's product [4][5] where the nth factor is the nth root of the product as well as the infinite product More generally, if 1 < B < e2 (which includes B = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7), then As the limit of a sequenceThe number {{math|e}} is equal to the limit of several infinite sequences: and (both by Stirling's formula). The symmetric limit,[6] may be obtained by manipulation of the basic limit definition of {{math|e}}. The next two definitions are direct corollaries of the prime number theorem[7] where is the nth prime and is the primorial of the nth prime. where is the prime counting function. Also: In the special case that , the result is the famous statement: In trigonometryTrigonometrically, {{math|e}} can be written in terms of the sum of two hyperbolic functions, at {{math|1=x = 1}}. Notes1. ^{{cite web|url=http://eulerarchive.maa.org/hedi/HEDI-2006-02.pdf|title=How Euler Did It: Who proved e is Irrational?|last=Sandifer|first=Ed|date=Feb 2006|publisher=MAA Online|accessdate=2017-04-23}} {{DEFAULTSORT:e, Representations}}2. ^{{cite web|url=http://oakroadsystems.com/math/loglaws.htm|title=It's the Law Too — the Laws of Logarithms|last=Brown|first=Stan|date=2006-08-27|publisher=Oak Road Systems|accessdate=2008-08-14|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080813175402/http://oakroadsystems.com/math/loglaws.htm|archivedate=2008-08-13|df=}} 3. ^Formulas 2–7: H. J. Brothers, Improving the convergence of Newton's series approximation for e, The College Mathematics Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, (2004), pp. 34–39. 4. ^J. Sondow, [https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0401406 A faster product for pi and a new integral for ln pi/2,] Amer. Math. Monthly 112 (2005) 729–734. 5. ^J. Guillera and J. Sondow, [https://arxiv.org/abs/math.NT/0506319 Double integrals and infinite products for some classical constants via analytic continuations of Lerch's transcendent,]Ramanujan Journal 16 (2008), 247–270. 6. ^H. J. Brothers and J. A. Knox, New closed-form approximations to the Logarithmic Constant e, The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 20, No. 4, (1998), pp. 25–29. 7. ^S. M. Ruiz 1997 6 : Transcendental numbers|Mathematical constants|Exponentials|Logarithms|E (mathematical constant)|Real transcendental numbers |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。