请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Natural prolongation principle
释义

  1. History

  2. See also

  3. References

  4. Sources

The natural prolongation principle or principle of natural prolongation is a legal concept introduced in maritime claims submitted to the United Nations.

The phrase denotes a concept of political geography and international law that a nation's maritime boundary should reflect the 'natural prolongation' of where its land territory reaches the coast.

Oceanographic descriptions of the land mass under coastal waters became conflated and confused with criteria that are deemed relevant in border delimitation.[1] The concept was developed in the process of settling disputes if the borders of adjacent nations were located on a contiguous continental shelf.

An unresolved issue is whether a natural prolongation defined scientifically, without reference to equitable principles, is to be construed as a "natural prolongation" for the purpose of maritime border delimitation or maritime boundary disputes.[2]

History

The phrase natural prolongation was established as a concept in the North Sea Continental Cases[3] in 1969.[4]

The relevance and importance of natural prolongation as a factor in delimitation disputes and agreements has declined during the period in which international acceptance of UNCLOS III has expanded.[5]

The Malta/Libya Case[6] in 1985 is marked as the eventual demise of the natural prolongation principle being used in delimiting between adjoining national maritime boundaries.[7]

See also

  • Equidistance principle

References

1. ^Highet, Keith. (1989). "Whatever became of natural prolongation," in {{Google books|X2DssQNCz-sC|Rights to Oceanic Resources: Deciding and Drawing Maritime Boundaries, (Dorinda G. Dallmeyer et al., editors), pp. 87–100.|page=87}}
2. ^Capaldo, Giuliana Ziccardi. (1995). {{Google books|esfISSxc13cC|Répertoire de la jurisprudence de la cour internationale de justice (1947–1992). p. 409.|page=409}}.
3. ^North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v Netherlands) [1969] ICJ Reports 4 at 42.
4. ^Highet, {{Google books|X2DssQNCz-sC|pp. 89–90.|page=89}}
5. ^Kaye, Stuart B. (1995). Australia's maritime boundaries, pp. 12, 172.
6. ^Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Malta) (Judgment) [1985] ICJ Reports 13 at 29
7. ^Highet, {{Google books|X2DssQNCz-sC|pp. 91–95.|page=91}}

Sources

  • Capaldo, Giuliana Ziccardi. (1995). Répertoire de la jurisprudence de la cour internationale de justice (1947-1992). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. {{ISBN|9780792329930}}; {{ISBN|9780792335146}}; {{ISBN|9780792335153}}; OCLC 30701545
  • Dorinda G. Dallmeyer and Louis De Vorsey. (1989). Rights to Oceanic Resources: Deciding and Drawing Maritime Boundaries. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. {{ISBN|9780792300199}}; OCLC 18981568
  • Francalanci, Giampiero; Tullio Scovazzi; and Daniela Romanò. (1994). Lines in the Sea. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. {{ISBN|978-0-7923-2846-9}}; OCLC 30400059
  • Kaye, Stuart B. (1995). Australia's maritime boundaries. Wollongong, New South Wales: Centre for Maritime Policy (University of Wollongong). {{ISBN|9780864183927}}; OCLC 38390208
{{DEFAULTSORT:Natural prolongation principle}}

2 : Borders|Maritime boundaries

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/25 0:33:19