词条 | Nemo iudex in causa sua |
释义 |
This principle may also be called:
The legal effect of a breach of natural justice is normally to stop the proceedings and render any judgment invalid; it should be quashed or appealed, but may be remitted for a valid re-hearing. The phrase is credited to Sir Edward Coke in the 17th century.[3] It is also found in The Moral Sayings of Publius Syrus, a Roman Slave (1856), by Darius Lyman, Jun., A. M. See also
References1. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.legal-glossary.org/nemo-judex-in-sua-causa/ |title=Legal definition of Nemo iudex in causa sua |publisher=legal-glossary.org |date= |accessdate=2014-02-24}} {{Italic title}}{{conflict of interest}}{{Latin-legal-phrase-stub}}2. ^R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy, [1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER 233 3. ^ABA Journal, "Show Me the Money: States, ABA Try to Figure Out When Campaign Cash Leads to a Judge’s Recusal", 1 March 2012 (retrieved 28 June 2017). 2 : Latin legal terminology|Legal doctrines and principles |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。