请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Osborn v. Bank of the United States
释义

  1. See also

  2. Notes

  3. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Osborn v. Bank of the United States
|ArgueDate=March 10
|ArgueYear=1824
|DecideDate=March 19
|DecideYear=1824
|FullName=Ralph Osborn and others, Appellants v. The President, Directors, and Company of the Bank of the United States, Respondents
|USVol=22
|USPage=738
|ParallelCitations=9 Wheat. 738; 6 L. Ed. 204; 1824 U.S. LEXIS 409
|Prior=Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ohio
|Subsequent=
|Holding=Eleventh Amendment is inapplicable in suits in which a state is not a party of record, even when a party is acting as a state official[1]
|SCOTUS=1823-1826
|Majority=Marshall
|JoinMajority=Washington, Todd, Duvall, Story, Thompson
|Dissent=Johnson
|LawsApplied=Eleventh Amendment
}}

Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 738 (1824), was a case set in the Banking Crisis of 1819, when many banks, including the Second Bank of the United States, demanded repayment for loans that they had issued on credit that they did not have. This led to an economic downturn and a shortage of money. In 1819, Ohio passed a law that put a tax on the Bank of the United States on the theory that taxing a bank would allow the state government to receive and distribute the scarce money.

On September 17, 1819, Ohio Auditor Ralph Osborn was given permission to seize $100,000 from a branch of the Bank of the United States. However, his agents mistakenly took $120,000 although the extra $20,000 was promptly returned. The bank chose to sue Osborn for the return of the additional $100,000, and a federal court ruled that Osborn violated a court order, prohibiting the taxing of the bank.

Osborn argued that he had never been properly served with the order but still had to return the money. A problem arose when Osborn could pay back only $98,000, as the other $2,000 had been used to pay the salary of Osborn's tax agents.

In 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Bank of the United States, ordering the return of the disputed $2,000.

See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 22

Notes

1. ^Richard H. Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System (Foundation Press, Fifth Edition, 2003), Pg 992.

External links

  • {{wikisource-inline|Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States}}
  • {{caselaw source

| case=Osborn v. Bank of the United States, {{ussc|22|738|1824|Wheat.|9|el=no}}
| findlaw=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/22/738.html
| justia=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/22/738/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep022/usrep022738/usrep022738.pdf
| openjurist =https://openjurist.org/22/us/738
}}{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

7 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Marshall Court|United States Constitution Article Three case law|United States Eleventh Amendment case law|1824 in United States case law|1824 in Ohio|Legal history of Ohio

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/10 15:37:20