请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Protection of Broadcasts and Broadcasting Organizations Treaty
释义

  1. Current status

  2. Broadcaster rights

  3. Overview

  4. Reception

     Positive  Negative 

  5. See also

      Related laws    Related technologies    Other  

  6. References

  7. External links

{{multiple issues|{{lead too short|date=January 2010}}{{Notability|date=November 2008}}{{update|date=July 2016}}
}}

The World Intellectual Property Organization's Protection of Broadcasts and Broadcasting Organizations Treaty or the Broadcast Treaty is a proposed treaty designed to afford broadcasters some control and copyright-like control over the content of their broadcasts.[1][2]

Current status

Between May 1 and May 5, 2006, the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (or SCCR) established a Basic Proposal in order to develop protection rights for all broadcast organizations. However, members at the meeting decided at the time to exclude webcasting from the treaty, as well as establish a Revised Draft Basic Proposal in a September 2006 congregation. The revised proposal would in fact consider creating protection rights for webcasting, netcasting, and simulcasting. Between September 25 and October 3, 2006, members of the SCCR met in Geneva and agreed to finalize the draft text at a later time. They would have another conference meeting between July 11 and August 1, 2007 in order to update the rights of broadcasting organizations.

Broadcaster rights

Under the treaty, media broadcasters would have the right to protect the content of their media transmissions. Moreover, they would have the right to protect their broadcasts from reproduction, retransmission, and even from public communication. All copyright protections would endure for 50 years.

Overview

According to the US Government:

Because existing international agreements relevant to broadcasting protections do

not cover advancements in broadcasting technology that were not envisioned when they

were concluded, in 1998 the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights

(SCCR) of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) decided to proceed

with efforts to negotiate and draft a new treaty that would extend protection to new

methods of broadcasting, but has yet to achieve consensus on a text. In recent years, a

growing signal piracy problem has increased the urgency of concluding a new treaty,

resulting in a decision to restrict the focus to signal-based protections for traditional

broadcasting organizations and cablecasting. Consideration of controversial issues of

protections for webcasting (advocated by the United States) and simulcasting will be

postponed. However, considerable work remains to achieve a final proposed text as the

basis for formal negotiations to conclude a treaty by the end of 2007, as projected. A

concluded treaty would not take effect for the United States unless Congress enacts

implementing legislation and the United States ratifies the treaty with the advice and

consent of the Senate. Noting that the United States is not a party to the 1961 Rome

Convention, various stakeholders have argued that a new broadcasting treaty is not

needed, that any new treaty should not inhibit technological innovation or consumer use,

and that Congress should exercise greater oversight over U.S. participation in the

negotiations.

Note that this was in 2007 and in November/2008 the US re-opened talks about the Treaty and the internet.[3][4]

Reception

Positive

{{expand section|date=September 2016}}

Negative

The Electronic Frontier Foundation argues that "the only thing the Broadcasting Treaty is good for is crushing innovation".[5]

Podcasters - like the ones represented by UK Podcasters Association - don't like that the treaty "would require signatory countries to provide legal protection for technological protection measures (TPM) and is likely to lead to technology mandate laws controlling the design of broadcast-receiving devices." Podcasters and the EFF also worries that the Treaty will hurt innovation in podcasting and internet distribution technologies.[6][7]

Intel, AT&T, Sony, CTIA - The Wireless Association, the US Public Interest Research Group, and the American Association of Law Libraries says that "Creating broad new... rights in order to protect broadcast signals is misguided and unnecessary, and risks serious unintended negative consequences" and "We note with concern that treaty proponents have not clearly identified the particular problems that the treaty would ostensibly solve, and we question whether there are in fact significant problems that are not addressed adequately under existing law".[6][8]

See also

Related laws

  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act
  • Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
  • Free Trade Area of the Americas
  • Bill C-61
  • Copyright

Related technologies

  • Web television
  • Content delivery network
  • Internet television
  • P2PTV
  • Peer-to-peer
  • Podcasting
  • YouTube
  • Internet

Other

  • World Intellectual Property Organization
  • User-generated content
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • Creative Commons

References

1. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.ukpa.info/2006/09/11/joint-statement-of-podcasting-organizations-and-podcasters-on-the-proposed-wipo-treaty-for-the-protection-of-broadcasts-and-broadcasting-organizations/ |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2009-07-21 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827233054/http://www.ukpa.info/2006/09/11/joint-statement-of-podcasting-organizations-and-podcasters-on-the-proposed-wipo-treaty-for-the-protection-of-broadcasts-and-broadcasting-organizations/ |archivedate=2008-08-27 |df= }}
2. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/issues/wipo_broadcast_treaty|title=Broadcasting Treaty|work=Electronic Frontier Foundation|accessdate=13 October 2014}}
3. ^{{cite web |url=http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/RS22585-070126.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2011-10-27 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://swap.stanford.edu/20090511070119/http://www.ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/RS22585-070126.pdf |archivedate=2009-05-11 |df= }}
4. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/11/wipo-broadcasting-treaty-back-dead|title=The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty: Back from the Dead?|work=Electronic Frontier Foundation|accessdate=13 October 2014}}
5. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/04/only-thing-broadcasting-treaty-good-crushing-innovation|title=The Only Thing the Broadcasting Treaty Is Good For Is Crushing Innovation|work=Electronic Frontier Foundation|accessdate=13 October 2014}}
6. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.thecre.com/wdw/2006/20060918.html|title=WatchDog Watch Archive|publisher=|accessdate=13 October 2014}}
7. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.podcastingnews.com/2006/09/11/eff-podcasters-announce-opposition-to-proposed-wipo-treaty/ |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2009-07-21 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://archive.is/20120907181038/http://www.podcastingnews.com/2006/09/11/eff-podcasters-announce-opposition-to-proposed-wipo-treaty/ |archivedate=2012-09-07 |df= }}
8. ^{{cite web |url=http://drn.okfn.org/node/135 |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2009-07-21 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090611014533/http://drn.okfn.org/node/135 |archivedate=2009-06-11 |df= }}

External links

  • The text of the treaty
  • [https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/briefs/broadcasting.html WIPO Background brief on Protection of Broadcasters]
  • A statement from several companies, groups, organisations and interested parties
  • [https://archive.is/20120907181038/http://www.podcastingnews.com/2006/09/11/eff-podcasters-announce-opposition-to-proposed-wipo-treaty/ EFF, Podcasters Announce Opposition to Proposed WIPO Treaty - Podcasting News]
{{Web syndication}}

5 : World Intellectual Property Organization treaties|Media technology|Podcasting|Proposed treaties|Telecommunications treaties
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/9/23 15:34:01