请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Right to petition
释义

  1. Jurisdictions

     United States 

  2. See also

  3. References

The right to petition government for redress of grievances is the right to make a complaint to, or seek the assistance of, one's government, without fear of punishment or reprisals, ensured by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (1791). Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ensures the right to petition to the European Parliament.[1]

The right can be traced back to the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany,[2] the Bill of Rights 1689, the Petition of Right (1628), and Magna Carta (1215).

Jurisdictions

United States

{{Main|Right to petition in the United States}}

The prohibition of abridgment of the "right to petition" originally referred only to the Congress and the US federal courts. The incorporation doctrine later expanded the protection of the right to its current scope, over all state and federal courts and legislatures, and the executive branches of the state[3] and federal governments.

The right to petition includes, under its umbrella, the petition. For example, in January 2006, the US Senate considered S. 2180,[4] an omnibus "ethics reform" bill. This bill contained a provision (Section 204)[5] to establish federal regulation, for the first time, of certain efforts to encourage "grassroots lobbying". The bill said that "'grassroots lobbying' means the voluntary efforts of members of the general public to communicate their own views on an issue to Federal officials or to encourage other members of the general public to do the same".

This provision was opposed by a broad array of organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Right to Life Committee, and the National Rifle Association.{{Citation needed|reason=source?|date=December 2011}} On January 18, 2007, the US Senate voted 55-43 to strike Section 221 from the bill.{{cn|date=November 2018}}

There are ongoing conflicts between organizations that wish to impose greater restrictions on citizen's attempts to influence or "lobby" policymakers.[6] and the right of individuals, groups, and corporations (via corporate personhood {{Citation needed|date=February 2012}}), to lobby[3] the government.

Another controversial bill, the Executive Branch Reform Act, H.R. 984, would require over 8,000 Executive Branch officials to report into a public database nearly any "significant contact" from any "private party", a term that the bill defines to include almost all persons other than government officials. The bill defines "significant contact" to be any "oral or written communication (including electronic communication) . . . in which the private party seeks to influence official action by any officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States." This covers all forms of communication, one way or two ways, including letters, faxes, e-mails, phone messages, and petitions. The bill is supported by some organizations as an expansion of "government in the sunshine", but other groups oppose it as an infringing on the right to petition by making it impossible for citizens to communicate their views on controversial issues to government officials without those communications becoming a matter of public record.[7][8][9]

See also

  • Strategic lawsuit against public participation
  • We the People (petitioning system)

References

1. ^Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000), Article 44
2. ^Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, Article 17
3. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.illinoisfirstamendmentcenter.com/petition.php |publisher=Illinois First Amendment Center |title=The Right to Petition |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130411172748/http://www.illinoisfirstamendmentcenter.com/petition.php |archivedate=April 11, 2013 }}
4. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/s2180|publisher=govtrack.us|title=Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006}}
5. ^{{cite web|url= https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/s2180/text/is#link=II_204_a_2_~Q1_18_~T1&nearest=idDA833CD0144B4F8A95945AEBE61D69F8:|title=Section 204|publisher=govtrack.us}}{{citation broken|date=August 2012}}
6. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/petition/topic.aspx?topic=sue |publisher=First Amendment Center |first=Adam |last=Newton |title=Petition - Right to sue |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110324191941/http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/petition/topic.aspx?topic=sue |archivedate=March 24, 2011 }}
7. ^Memorandum {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070401080352/http://www.nrlc.org/FreeSpeech/WaxmanDavisHR984.pdf |date=2007-04-01 }}: "Congressman Waxman advances grave new threat to citizens’ ‘right to petition’ government officials," by Douglas Johnson and Susan Muskett, J.D., National Right to Life Committee, February 20, 2007.
8. ^Letter from Richard D. Hertling {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070614123520/http://www.nrlc.org/FreeSpeech/DoJletteronHR984.pdf |date=2007-06-14 }}, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legislative Affairs, U.S. Department of Justice, to the Honorable Henry Waxman, Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, March 8, 2007.
9. ^Letter from Robert I. Cusick {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070627173348/http://www.nrlc.org/FreeSpeech/OGEcommentsHR984.pdf |date=2007-06-27 }}, Director, Office of Government Ethics, to the Honorable Henry A. Waxman, Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, February 14,valentines day, 2007.
{{DEFAULTSORT:Right To Petition}}Droit de pétition請願権آزادی عرضداشت

3 : Right to petition|Human rights|Human rights by issue

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/23 18:30:10