| 词条 | Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran |ArgueDate=January 16 |ArgueYear=2002 |DecideDate=June 20 |DecideYear=2002 |FullName=Rush Prudential HMO, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Debra C. Moran, et al. |USVol=536 |USPage=355 |ParallelCitations=122 S. Ct. 2151; 153 L. Ed. 2d 375; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4644; 70 U.S.L.W. 4600; 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2921; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 409 |Prior=On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=1994-2005 |Majority=Souter |JoinMajority=Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer |Dissent=Thomas |JoinDissent=Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy |LawsApplied=Illinois's Health Maintenance Organization Act Employee Retirement Income Security Act, {{USC|29|1001}} et seq. }} Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002),[1] was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)[2] did not preempt an Illinois medical-review statute. ERISA envisions a national standard for welfare and pension plans so state laws which "relate to" ERISA plans are preempted under Section 514 of ERISA. However, ERISA contains a "savings" clause which saves state laws which regulate insurance under Section 514(b). The statute at issue in Moran regulated insurance, which is one of the functions HMOs perform. Although HMOs provide healthcare as well as insurance, the statute does not require choosing a single or primary function of an HMO. Congress has long recognized that HMOs are risk-bearing organizations subject to state regulation. Finally, allowing States to regulate the insurance aspects of HMOs will not interfere with the desire of Congress for uniform national standards under ERISA. See also
References1. ^{{ussc|name=Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran|volume=536|page=355|pin=|year=2002}}. 2. ^{{USC|29|1001}} et seq. External links
| case = Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, {{ussc|536|355|2002|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/121159/rush-prudential-hmo-inc-v-moran/ | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10884783685506879589 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/355/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep536/usrep536355/usrep536355.pdf | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-1021{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 5 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|Employee Retirement Income Security Act|2002 in United States case law|Prudential Financial |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。