| 词条 | SAML 1.1 |
| 释义 |
Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) is an XML standard for exchanging authentication and authorization data between security domains. SAML is a product of the OASIS (organization) Security Services Technical Committee. SAML 1.1 was ratified as an OASIS standard in September 2003. The critical aspects of SAML 1.1 are covered in detail in the official documents SAMLCore and SAMLBind. If you are new to SAML, you should probably read the introductory SAML topic first, and then the SAMLOverview document from OASIS. Prior to SAML 1.1, SAML 1.0 was adopted as an OASIS standard in November 2002. SAML has undergone one minor (V1.1) and one major revision (V2.0) since V1.0, which itself is a relatively simple protocol. SAML 1.0 is of more than historical interest, however, since the US Federal [https://web.archive.org/web/20081210081853/http://www.cio.gov/eauthentication/ E-Authentication Initiative] has adopted SAML 1.0 as its core technology. Versions 1.0 and 1.1 of SAML are similar. See SAMLDiff for specific differences between the two standards. This article concentrates on SAML 1.1 since it is an important standard upon which many other standards and implementations depend. Warning: Implementers and deployers should note well that all code examples in this article are non-normative and for illustration purposes only. Consult the OASIS SAML specifications for normative requirements. SAML 1.1 AssertionsSAML assertions contain statements that service providers use to make access control decisions. For instance, authentication statements assert to the service provider that the principal did indeed authenticate with the identity provider at a particular time using a particular method of authentication. Other information about the principal may be disclosed in an authentication statement. In the authentication statement below, for example, the e-mail address of the principal is asserted to the service provider:
An e-mail address (as in the above example) will suffice in a large number of situations. In some cases, however, additional information is needed before a service provider can make an access control decision. As an example, suppose that students are allowed to access scholarships data. An attribute statement can indicate whether or not the principal has an affiliation of "student", which the service provider uses to allow or deny access (resp.) to the scholarships application:
Attributes are often obtained from an LDAP directory, so consistent representations of attributes across security domains is crucial. In the above example showing how a student might obtain access to a scholarships application, the service provider is functioning as both a policy enforcement point and a policy decision point. In some situations, it may be preferable to associate the policy decision point with the identity provider. In this case, the service provider passes a URI to the identity provider who asserts an authorization decision statement that dictates whether or not the principal should be allowed access to the secured resource at the given URI.
The three statement types are not mutually exclusive. For example, both authentication statements and attribute statements may be included in a single assertion (as shown above). This precludes the need to make subsequent round trips between the service provider and identity provider. SAML 1.1 ProtocolsA SAML protocol is a simple request-response protocol. A SAML requester sends a SAML
Similarly, a SAML responder returns a SAML
The bindings and profiles needed to affect this message exchange are detailed in the following sections. SAML 1.1 BindingsSAML 1.1 formally defines just one protocol binding, the SAML SOAP binding. A compatible SAML 1.1 implementation must implement SAML over SOAP over HTTP (a synchronous protocol binding). Other transport mechanisms besides HTTP are permitted, provided the protocol-independent aspects of the SAML SOAP binding are observed (see section 3.1.2 of SAMLBind). The SAML 1.1 SOAP binding is built on top of version 1.1 of SOAP (the numbering is purely coincidental). A SAML requester wraps a SAML Any SAML markup must be included in the SOAP body. SAML 1.1 does not define any SAML-specific SOAP headers. A requester is free to insert any SOAP headers it wishes (although none are required). Recall that in SOAP 1.1, a A SAML responder must not depend on this value, however. A secure connection is not required for SAML requests and responses, but in those situations where message integrity and confidentiality are required, HTTP over SSL 3.0 or TLS 1.0 with a server-side certificate is required. A SAML responder may return a "403 Forbidden" response when it refuses to respond to a SAML requester. A responder must return a "500 Internal Server Error" response in the event of a SOAP error (a SOAP fault element must be included as well). Otherwise, a "200 OK" response is returned, even in the presence of a SAML processing error. Such a response will include a SAML SAML 1.1 ProfilesIn general, profiles describe the use cases and message exchanges required to ultimately transfer assertions from an identity provider to a service provider. SAML 1.1 specifies two Web Browser SSO Profiles:
The Browser/POST Profile relies on a "push" operation that passes an SSO assertion by value through the browser using HTTP POST. We say that the identity provider "pushes" the assertion to the service provider. The Browser/Artifact Profile employs a "pull" mechanism. The profile essentially passes an SSO assertion from the identity provider to the service provider by reference (through the browser using HTTP Redirect), which is subsequently dereferenced via a back-channel exchange (i.e., the service provider "pulls" the assertion from the identity provider using SAML over SOAP over HTTP). These profiles support cross-domain single sign-on (SSO). The specification does not define any additional profiles. In particular, SAML 1.1 does not support a profile to secure a web service message nor does it support a single logout profile. Both SAML 1.1 profiles begin at the inter-site transfer service, which is managed by the identity provider. How the principal arrives at the transfer service in the first place is not dictated by the specification. See sections 4.1 and 4.2 of SAMLOverview for possible scenarios. In practice, a client accessing a secured resource at a service provider will be redirected to the inter-site transfer service at the identity provider, but the precise sequence of steps needed to accomplish this is not outlined by SAML 1.1. (See section 4.3 of SAMLOverview for some rough ideas along these lines.) This scenario is thoroughly addressed in SAML 2.0. After visiting the inter-site transfer service, the principal is transferred to the assertion consumer service at the service provider. Exactly how the principal is transferred from the inter-site transfer service to the assertion consumer service depends on the profile used. In the case of the Browser/Artifact Profile, a redirect is used; in the case of the Browser/POST Profile, the client issues a POST request (with or without user intervention). To expedite processing by the assertion consumer service, two separate URLs are specified:
These and other endpoint locations may be recorded in metadata files. Exactly how the identity provider obtains a trusted metadata file, or otherwise determines the trusted endpoint locations of a particular service provider, is out of scope with respect to SAML 1.1. Note that a conforming SAML 1.1 identity provider must provide an inter-site transfer service. Similarly, a SAML 1.1 service provider must provide an assertion consumer service. Browser/POST ProfileThe SAML 1.1 Browser/POST profile specifies the following four (4) steps. The terminology used in the original specification has been modified slightly to conform to that of the SAML 2.0 specification. The message flow begins with a request directed at the IdP. Request the Inter-site Transfer Service at the IdPThe principal (via an HTTP user agent) requests the Inter-site Transfer Service at the identity provider: where GET /TransferService?TARGET=target HTTP/1.1 Host: idp.example.org The profile does not specify how the URL to the Transfer Service (with Respond with an HTML formThe Inter-site Transfer Service returns an HTML document containing a HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: nnnn ... ... where the
The SAML Response must be digitally signed by the identity provider. Important: It is assumed that the principal has already established a security context at the identity provider, otherwise the Inter-site Transfer Service would be unable to provide an authentication statement in the SAML Request the Assertion Consumer Service at the SPThe user agent requests the Assertion Consumer Service at the service provider: POST /ACS/POST HTTP/1.1 Host: sp.example.com Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: nnnn TARGET=target&SAMLResponse=response where the values of the Note: To automate the submission of the form, the following line of JavaScript may appear anywhere on the page: This assumes of course that the page contains a single Respond to the principal's requestThe Assertion Consumer Service consumes the SAML Browser/Artifact ProfileThe SAML 1.1 Browser/Artifact profile specifies the following six (6) steps. The terminology used in the original specification has been modified slightly to conform to that of the SAML 2.0 specification. The message flow begins with a request directed at the IdP. Request the Inter-site Transfer Service at the IdPThe principal (via an HTTP user agent) requests the Inter-site Transfer Service at the identity provider: where GET /TransferService?TARGET=target HTTP/1.1 Host: idp.example.org The profile does not specify how the URL to the transfer service (with Redirect to the Assertion Consumer ServiceThe principal is redirected to the Assertion Consumer Service at the service provider, that is, the following response is returned to the user agent: HTTP/1.1 302 Found Location: https://sp.example.com/ACS/Artifact?TARGET=target&SAMLart=artifact where Important: It is assumed that the principal has already established a security context at the identity provider, otherwise the Inter-site Transfer Service would be unable to provide an authentication statement. Request the Assertion Consumer Service at the SPThe user agent requests the Assertion Consumer Service at the service provider: where GET /ACS/Artifact?TARGET=target&SAMLart=artifact HTTP/1.1 Host: sp.example.com Request the Artifact Resolution Service at the IdPThe Assertion Consumer Service at the service provider begins a back-channel exchange with the Artifact Resolution Service at the identity provider. A SAML SOAP message is bound to an HTTP POST request: POST /ArtifactResolutionService HTTP/1.1 Host: idp.example.org Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: nnn SOAPAction: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security
where Respond with a SAML AssertionThe identity provider completes the back-channel exchange by responding with a SAML assertion bound to a SAML SOAP message: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: nnnn
In this case, the authentication statement includes a Respond to the principal's requestThe Assertion Consumer Service parses the SAML See also
References{{refbegin}}
2 : Computer security software|XML-based standards |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。