| 词条 | Sati (Buddhism) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 释义 |
Sati (in Pali;[1] Sanskrit: smṛti) is mindfulness or awareness, a spiritual or psychological faculty (indriya) that forms an essential part of Buddhist practice. It is the first factor of the Seven Factors of Enlightenment. "Correct" or "right" mindfulness (Pali: sammā-sati, Sanskrit samyak-smṛti) is the seventh element of the Noble Eightfold Path. DefinitionThe Buddhist term translated into English as "mindfulness" originates in the Pali term sati and in its Sanskrit counterpart smṛti. According to Robert Sharf, the meaning of these terms has been the topic of extensive debate and discussion.{{sfn|Sharf|2014|p=942}} Smṛti originally meant "to remember", "to recollect", "to bear in mind", as in the Vedic tradition of remembering sacred texts. The term sati also means "to remember". In the Satipațțhāna-sutta the term sati means to maintain awareness of reality, whereby the true nature of phenomena can be seen.{{sfn|Sharf|2014|p=942}} Sharf refers to the Milindapanha, which explained that the arisement of sati calls to mind the wholesome dhammas such as the four establishments of mindfulness, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven awakening-factors, the Noble Eightfold Path, and the attainment of insight.[2] According to Rupert Gethin, {{quote|[sati] should be understood as what allows awareness of the full range and extent of dhammas; sati is an awareness of things in relation to things, and hence an awareness of their relative value. Applied to the satipațțhānas, presumably what this means is that sati is what causes the practitioner of yoga to "remember" that any feeling he may experience exists in relation to a whole variety or world of feelings that may be skillful or unskillful, with faults or faultless, relatively inferior or refined, dark or pure."{{sfn|Sharf|2014|p=943}}{{refn|group=note|Quotes from Gethin, Rupert M.L. (1992), The Buddhist Path to Awakening: A Study of the Bodhi-Pakkhiȳa Dhammā. BRILL's Indological Library, 7. Leiden and New York: BRILL}}}}Sharf further notes that this has little to do with "bare attention", the popular contemporary interpretation of sati, "since it entails, among other things, the proper discrimination of the moral valence of phenomena as they arise".{{sfn|Sharf|2014|p=943}} According to Paul Williams, referring to Erich Frauwallner, mindfulness provided the way to liberation, "constantly watching sensory experience in order to prevent the arising of cravings which would power future experience into rebirths".{{sfn|Williams|2000|p=46}}{{refn|group=note|Frauwallner, E. (1973), History of Indian Philosophy, trans. V.M. Bedekar, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Two volumes., pp.150 ff}} According to Vetter, dhyana may have been the original core practice of the Buddha, which aided the maintenance of mindfulness.{{sfn|Vetter|1988}} Translations{{Buddhist term| fontsize=100% | title=Mindfulness | pi= sati (सति) | sa= smṛti (स्मृति) | en= mindfulness, awareness, inspection, recollection, retention | bo= དྲན་པ། | bo-Latn=Wylie: dran pa; THL: trenpa/drenpa | zh= nian, 念 | vi= niệm | turkish= farkındalık | ja= 念 (ネン) | ja-Latn= nen | ko=염 | ko-Latn=yeom / yŏm | si=සති }} The Buddhist term translated into English as "mindfulness" originates in the Pali term sati and in its Sanskrit counterpart smṛti. Translators rendered the Sanskrit word as trenpa in Tibetan (wylie: dran pa) and as nian 念 in Chinese. PaliThe Pali-language scholar Thomas William Rhys Davids (1843–1922) first translated sati in 1881 as English mindfulness in sammā-sati "Right Mindfulness; the active, watchful mind".[3] Noting that Daniel John Gogerly (1845) initially rendered sammā-sati as "Correct meditation",[4] Davids explained, {{quote|sati is literally 'memory' but is used with reference to the constantly repeated phrase 'mindful and thoughtful' (sato sampajâno); and means that activity of mind and constant presence of mind which is one of the duties most frequently inculcated on the good Buddhist."[5]}}Henry Alabaster, in The Wheel of the Law: Buddhism Illustrated From Siamese Sources by the Modern Buddhist, A Life of Buddha, and an Account of the Phrabat (1871), had earlier defined "Satipatthan/Smrityupasthana" as "The act of keeping one's self mindful."[6]The English term mindfulness already existed before it came to be used in a (western) Buddhist context. It was first recorded as myndfulness in 1530 (John Palsgrave translates French pensee), as mindfulnesse in 1561, and mindfulness in 1817. Morphologically earlier terms include mindful (first recorded in 1340), mindfully (1382), and the obsolete mindiness (ca. 1200).[7] John D. Dunne, an associate professor at Emory University whose current research focuses especially on the concept of "mindfulness" in both theoretical and practical contexts, asserts that the translation of sati and smṛti as mindfulness is confusing and that a number of Buddhist scholars have started trying to establish "retention" as the preferred alternative.[8]Bhikkhu Bodhi also points to the meaning of "sati" as "memory": {{quote|The word derives from a verb, sarati, meaning “to remember,” and occasionally in Pali sati is still explained in a way that connects it with the idea of memory. But when it is used in relation to meditation practice, we have no word in English that precisely captures what it refers to. An early translator cleverly drew upon the word mindfulness, which is not even in my dictionary. This has served its role admirably, but it does not preserve the connection with memory, sometimes needed to make sense of a passage.[9]}}SanskritThe Sanskrit word smṛti स्मृति (also transliterated variously as smriti, smRti, or sm'Rti) literally means "that which is remembered", and refers both to "mindfulness" in Buddhism and "a category of metrical texts" in Hinduism, considered second in authority to the Śruti scriptures. Monier Monier-Williams's Sanskrit-English Dictionary differentiates eight meanings of smṛti स्मृति, "remembrance, reminiscence, thinking of or upon, calling to mind, memory":
ChineseBuddhist scholars translated smṛti with the Chinese word nian 念 "study; read aloud; think of; remember; remind". Nian is commonly used in Modern Standard Chinese words such as guannian 觀念 (观念) "concept; idea", huainian 懷念 (怀念) "cherish the memory of; think of", nianshu 念書 (念书) "read; study", and niantou 念頭 (念头) "thought; idea; intention". Two specialized Buddhist terms are nianfo 念佛 "chant the name of Buddha; pray to Buddha" and nianjing 念經 (念经) "chant/recite sutras". This Chinese character nian 念 is composed of jin 今 "now; this" and xin 心 "heart; mind". Bernhard Karlgren graphically explains nian meaning "reflect, think; to study, learn by heart, remember; recite, read – to have 今 present to 心 the mind".[11] The Chinese character nian or nien 念 is pronounced as Korean yeom or yŏm 염, Japanese ネン or nen, and Vietnamese niệm. A Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms gives basic translations of nian: "Recollection, memory; to think on, reflect; repeat, intone; a thought; a moment."[12]The Digital Dictionary of Buddhism gives more detailed translations of nian "mindfulness, memory":
Alternate translationsThe terms sati/smriti have been translated as: {{div col|colwidth=22em}}
PracticeOriginally, mindfulness provided the way to liberation, by paying attention to sensory experience, preventing the arising of disturbing thoughts and emotions which cause the further chain of reacions leading to rebirth.{{sfn|Williams|2000|p=46}}[15] In the later tradition, especially Theravada, mindfulness is an antidote to delusion (Pali: Moha), and is considered as such one of the 'powers' (Pali: bala) that contribute to the attainment of nirvana, in particular when it is coupled with clear comprehension of whatever is taking place. Nirvana is a state of being in which greed, hatred and delusion (Pali: moha) have been overcome and abandoned, and are absent from the mind. Satipaṭṭhāna - guarding the senses{{Main|Satipaṭṭhāna}}The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta (Sanskrit: Smṛtyupasthāna Sūtra) is an early text dealing with mindfulness. The Theravada Nikayas prescribe that one should establish mindfulness (satipaṭṭhāna) in one's day-to-day life, maintaining as much as possible a calm awareness of the four upassanā: one's body, feelings, mind, and dharmas. According to Grzegorz Polak, the four upassanā have been misunderstood by the developing Buddhist tradition, including Theravada, to refer to four different foundations. According to Polak, the four upassanā do not refer to four different foundations, but to the awareness of four different aspects of raising mindfulness:{{sfn|Polak|2011}}
Rupert Gethin notes that the contemporary Vipassana movement interprets the Satipatthana Sutta as "describing a pure form of insight (vipassanā) meditation" for which samatha (calm) and jhāna are not necessary. Yet, in pre-sectarian Buddhism, the establishment of mindfulness was placed before the practice of the jhanas, and associated with the abandonment of the five hindrances and the entry into the first jhana.[16]{{refn|group=note|Gethin: "The sutta is often read today as describing a pure form of insight (vipassanā) meditation that bypasses calm (samatha) meditation and the four absorptions (jhāna), as outlined in the description of the Buddhist path found, for example, in the Sāmaññaphala-sutta [...] The earlier tradition, however, seems not to have always read it this way, associating accomplishment in the exercise of establishing mindfulness with abandoning of the five hindrances and the first absorption."[16]}} According to Paul Williams, referring to Erich Frauwallner, mindfulness provided the way to liberation, "constantly watching sensory experience in order to prevent the arising of cravings which would power future experience into rebirths."{{sfn|Williams|2000|p=46}}{{refn|group=note|Frauwallner, E. (1973), History of Indian Philosophy, trans. V.M. Bedekar, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Two volumes., pp.150 ff}} Buddhadasa also argued that mindfulness provides the means to prevent the arising of disturbing thought and emotions, which cause the further chain of reactions leading to rebirth of the ego and selfish thought and behavior.{{sfn|Buddhadasa|2014|p=78-80, 101-102, 117 (note 42)}} According to Vetter, dhyana may have been the original core practice of the Buddha, which aided the maintenance of mindfulness.{{sfn|Vetter|1988}} Samprajaña, apramāda and atappa{{See also|Dhamma vicaya}}Satii was famously translated as "bare attention" by Nyanaponika Thera. Yet, in Buddhist practice, "mindfulness" is more than just "bare attention"; it has the more comprehensive and active meaning of samprajaña, "clear comprehension," and apramāda, "vigilance".[17]{{refn|group=note|[I]n Buddhist discourse, there are three terms that together map the field of mindfulness [...] [in their Sanskrit variants] smṛti (Pali: sati), samprajaña (Pali: Sampajañña) and apramāda (Pali: appamada).[17]}} All three terms are sometimes (confusingly) translated as "mindfulness", but they all have specific shades of meaning. In a publicly available correspondence between Bhikkhu Bodhi and B. Alan Wallace, Bodhi has described Ven. Nyanaponika Thera's views on "right mindfulness" and sampajañña as follows: {{quote|I should add that Ven. Nyanaponika himself did not regard “bare attention” as capturing the complete significance of {{IAST|satipaṭṭhāna}}, but as representing only one phase, the initial phase, in the meditative development of right mindfulness. He held that in the proper practice of right mindfulness, sati has to be integrated with sampajañña, clear comprehension, and it is only when these two work together that right mindfulness can fulfill its intended purpose.[18]{{refn|group=note| According to this correspondence, Ven. Nyanaponika spend his last ten years living with and being cared for by Bodhi. Bodhi refers to Nyanaponika as "my closest kalyāṇamitta in my life as a monk."}}}}In the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, sati and sampajañña are combined with atappa (Pali; Sanskrit: ātapaḥ), or "ardency,"{{refn|group=note|Dictionary.com:adjective
Anapanasati - mindfulness of breathing{{Main|Anapanasati}}Ānāpānasati (Pali; Sanskrit: ānāpānasmṛti; Chinese: 安那般那; Pīnyīn: ānnàbānnà; Sinhala: ආනා පානා සති), meaning "mindfulness of breathing" ("sati" means mindfulness; "ānāpāna" refers to inhalation and exhalation), is a form of Buddhist meditation now common to the Tibetan, Zen, Tiantai, and Theravada schools of Buddhism, as well as western-based mindfulness programs. Anapanasati means to feel the sensations caused by the movements of the breath in the body, as is practiced in the context of mindfulness. According to tradition, Anapanasati was originally taught by the Buddha in several sutras including the Ānāpānasati Sutta.{{refn|group=note|In the Pali canon, the instructions for anapanasati are presented as either one tetrad (four instructions) or four tetrads (16 instructions). The most famous exposition of four tetrads – after which Theravada countries have a national holiday (see uposatha) – is the Anapanasati Sutta, found in the Majjhima Nikaya (MN), sutta number 118 (for instance, see Thanissaro, 2006). Other discourses which describe the full four tetrads can be found in the Samyutta Nikaya's Anapana-samyutta (Ch. 54), such as SN 54.6 (Thanissaro, 2006a), SN 54.8 (Thanissaro, 2006b) and SN 54.13 (Thanissaro, 1995a). The one-tetrad exposition of anapanasati is found, for instance, in the Kayagata-sati Sutta (MN 119; Thanissaro, 1997), the Maha-satipatthana Sutta (DN 22; Thanissaro, 2000) and the Satipatthana Sutta (MN 10; Thanissaro, 1995b).}} (MN 118) The Āgamas of early Buddhism discuss ten forms of mindfulness.{{refn|group=note|The Ekottara Āgama has:[20]
Vipassanā - discriminating insight{{Main|Vipassanā}}Satipatthana, as four foundations of mindfulness, c.q. anapanasati, "mindfulness of breathing," is being employed to attain Vipassanā (Pāli), insight into the true nature of reality as impermanent and anatta, c.q. sunyata, lacking any permanent essence.[22][23]In the Theravadin context, this entails insight into the three marks of existence, namely the impermanence of and the unsatisfactoriness of every conditioned thing that exists, and non-self. In Mahayana contexts, it entails insight into what is variously described as sunyata, dharmata, the inseparability of appearance and emptiness (two truths doctrine), clarity and emptiness, or bliss and emptiness.[24] Vipassanā is commonly used as one of two poles for the categorization of types of Buddhist practice, the other being samatha (Pāli; Sanskrit: śamatha).[25] Though both terms appear in the Sutta Pitaka{{refn|group=note| AN 4.170 (Pali):“Yo hi koci, āvuso, bhikkhu vā bhikkhunī vā mama santike arahattappattiṁ byākaroti, sabbo so catūhi maggehi, etesaṁ vā aññatarena. Katamehi catūhi? Idha, āvuso, bhikkhu samathapubbaṅgamaṁ vipassanaṁ bhāveti[...] Puna caparaṁ, āvuso, bhikkhu vipassanāpubbaṅgamaṁ samathaṁ bhāveti[...] Puna caparaṁ, āvuso, bhikkhu samathavipassanaṁ yuganaddhaṁ bhāveti[...] Puna caparaṁ, āvuso, bhikkhuno dhammuddhaccaviggahitaṁ mānasaṁ hoti[...] English translation: Friends, whoever — monk or nun — declares the attainment of arahantship in my presence, they all do it by means of one or another of four paths. Which four? There is the case where a monk has developed insight preceded by tranquility. [...] Then there is the case where a monk has developed tranquillity preceded by insight. [...] Then there is the case where a monk has developed tranquillity in tandem with insight. [...] "Then there is the case where a monk's mind has its restlessness concerning the Dhamma [Comm: the corruptions of insight] well under control.[26] AN 2.30 Vijja-bhagiya Sutta, A Share in Clear Knowing: "These two qualities have a share in clear knowing. Which two? Tranquility (samatha) & insight (vipassana). "When tranquility is developed, what purpose does it serve? The mind is developed. And when the mind is developed, what purpose does it serve? Passion is abandoned. "Defiled by passion, the mind is not released. Defiled by ignorance, discernment does not develop. Thus from the fading of passion is there awareness-release. From the fading of ignorance is there discernment-release."[27] SN 43.2 (Pali): "Katamo ca, bhikkhave, asaṅkhatagāmimaggo? Samatho ca vipassanā".[28] English translation: "And what, bhikkhus, is the path leading to the unconditioned? Serenity and insight."[29]}}, Gombrich and Brooks argue that the distinction as two separate paths originates in the earliest interpretations of the Sutta Pitaka,{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=96-144}} not in the suttas themselves.{{sfn|Brooks|2006}}{{refn|group=note|Brooks: "While many commentaries and translations of the Buddha's Discourses claim the Buddha taught two practice paths, one called "shamata" and the other called "vipassanā," there is in fact no place in the suttas where one can definitively claim that."{{sfn|Brooks|2006}}}} Vipassana and samatha are described as qualities which contribute to the development of mind (bhāvanā). According to Vetter, Bronkhorst and Gombrich, discriminating insight into transiency as a separate path to liberation was a later development,{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxxiv–xxxvii}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}}{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=131}} under pressure of developments in Indian religious thinking, which saw "liberating insight" as essential to liberation.{{sfn|Vetter|1988}} This may also have been due to an over-literal interpretation by later scholastics of the terminology used by the Buddha,{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=96-134}} and to the problems involved with the practice of dhyana, and the need to develop an easier method.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxxv}} According to Wynne, the Buddha combined meditative stabilisation with mindful awareness and "an insight into the nature of this meditative experience."[30] Various traditions disagree which techniques belong to which pole.{{sfn|Schumann|1974}} According to the contemporary Theravada orthodoxy, samatha is used as a preparation for vipassanā, pacifying the mind and strengthening the concentration in order to allow the work of insight, which leads to liberation. Vipassanā-meditation has gained popularity in the west through the modern Buddhist vipassana movement, modeled after Theravāda Buddhism meditation practices,{{sfn|McMahan}} which employs vipassanā and ānāpāna (anapanasati, mindfulness of breathing) meditation as its primary techniques and places emphasis on the teachings of the {{IAST|Satipaṭṭhāna}} Sutta. Mindfulness (psychology){{Main|Mindfulness}}Mindfulness practice, inherited from the Buddhist tradition, is being employed in psychology to alleviate a variety of mental and physical conditions, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety, and in the prevention of relapse in depression and drug addiction.[31] "Bare attention"Georges Dreyfus has expressed unease with the definition of mindfulness as "bare attention" or "nonelaborative, nonjudgmental, present-centered awareness", stressing that mindfulness in Buddhist context means also "remembering", which indicates that the function of mindfulness also includes the retention of information. Dreyfus concludes his examination by stating: {{quote|[T]he identification of mindfulness with bare attention ignores or, at least, underestimates the cognitive implications of mindfulness, its ability to bring together various aspects of experience so as to lead to the clear comprehension of the nature of mental and bodily states. By over-emphasizing the nonjudgmental nature of mindfulness and arguing that our problems stem from conceptuality, contemporary authors are in danger of leading to a one-sided understanding of mindfulness as a form of therapeutically helpful spacious quietness. I think that it is important not to lose sight that mindfulness is not just a therapeutic technique but is a natural capacity that plays a central role in the cognitive process. It is this aspect that seems to be ignored when mindfulness is reduced to a form of nonjudgmental present-centered form of awareness of one’s experiences.[32]}}Robert H. Sharf notes that Buddhist practice is aimed at the attainment of "correct view", not just "bare attention": {{quote|Mahasi's technique did not require familiarity with Buddhist doctrine (notably abhidhamma), did not require adherence to strict ethical norms (notably monasticism), and promised astonishingly quick results. This was made possible through interpreting sati as a state of "bare awareness" — the unmediated, non-judgmental perception of things "as they are," uninflected by prior psychological, social, or cultural conditioning. This notion of mindfulness is at variance with premodern Buddhist epistemologies in several respects. Traditional Buddhist practices are oriented more toward acquiring "correct view" and proper ethical discernment, rather than "no view" and a non-judgmental attitude.[33]}}Jay L. Garfield, quoting Shantideva and other sources, stresses that mindfulness is constituted by the union of two functions, calling to mind and vigilantly retaining in mind. He demonstrates that there is a direct connection between the practice of mindfulness and the cultivation of morality – at least in the context of Buddhism from which modern interpretations of mindfulness are stemming.[34]See also{{Portal|Thinking}}{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
Notes1. ^{{cite web|title=Sati|url=http://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.3:1:2991.pali|archive-url=https://archive.is/20121212102108/http://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.3:1:2991.pali|dead-url=yes|archive-date=2012-12-12|work=The Pali Text Society's Pali-English Dictionary|publisher=Digital Dictionaries of South Asia, University of Chicago}} 2. ^{{cite journal| last1 = Sharf| first1 = Robert| title = Mindfulness and Mindlessness in Early Chan| url = http://buddhiststudies.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/sharf/documents/Sharf_Mindfulness%20and%20Mindlessness.pdf| journal = Philosophy East and West| date = October 2014| volume = 64| issue = 4| page = 943| issn = 0031-8221| access-date = 2015-12-03| quote = Even so, your Majesty, sati, when it arises, calls to mind dhammas that are skillful and unskillful, with faults and faultless, inferior and refined, dark and pure, together with their counterparts: these are the four establishings of mindfulness, these are the four right endeavors, these are the four bases of success, these are the five faculties, these are the five powers, these are the seven awakening-factors, this is the noble eight-factored path, this is calm, this is insight, this is knowledge, this is freedom. Thus the one who practices yoga resorts to dhammas that should be resorted to and does not resort to dhammas that should not be resorted to; he embraces dhammas that should be embraced and does not embrace dhammas that should not be embraced.}} 3. ^T. W. Rhys Davids, tr., 1881, [https://books.google.com/books?id=ciqzXBSFkp8C Buddhist Suttas], Clarendon Press, p. 107. 4. ^D. J. Gogerly, "On Buddhism", [https://books.google.com/books?id=5gaMCEjql_4C Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society], 1845, pp. 7-28 and 90-112. 5. ^Davids, 1881, p. 145. 6. ^The Wheel of the Law: Buddhism Illustrated From Siamese Sources by the Modern Buddhist, A Life of Buddha, and an Account of the Phrabat by Henry Alabaster, Trubner & Co., London: 1871 pg 197[https://books.google.com/books?id=UcIOAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA197&dq=mindful#v=onepage&q=mindful&f=false] 7. ^Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., 2002 8. ^Lecture, Stanford University Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education, c 18:03 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121120171057/http://ccare.stanford.edu/node/21 |date=November 20, 2012 }} 9. ^TRANSLATOR FOR THE BUDDHA: AN INTERVIEW WITH BHIKKHU BODHI 10. ^Monier-Williams Online Dictionary. N.B.: these definitions are simplified and wikified. 11. ^Bernhard Karlgren, 1923, Analytic Dictionary of Chinese and Sino-Japanese, Paul Geunther, p. 207. Dover reprint. 12. ^William Edward Soothill and Lewis Hodous, 1937, A Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms: with Sanskrit and English Equivalents and a Sanskrit-Pali Index{{dead link|date=May 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}. 13. ^Digital Dictionary of Buddhism{{dead link|date=May 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} 14. ^James H. Austin (2014), Zen-Brain Horizons: Toward a Living Zen, MIT Press, p.83 15. ^Buddhadasa, Heartwood of the Bodhi-tree 16. ^1 Gethin, Rupert, Sayings of the Buddha: New Translations from the Pali Nikayas (Oxford World's Classics), 2008, p. 142. 17. ^1 "Mindfulness and the Mind," by Subhuti. Madhyamavani Online 18. ^"The Nature of Mindfulness and Its Role in Buddhist Meditation" A Correspondence between B.A. wallace and the Venerable Bikkhu Bodhi, Winter 2006, p.4 19. ^"Mindfulness Defined," by Thanissaro Bhikku. pg 2 20. ^Nan Huaijin. Working Toward Enlightenment: The Cultivation of Practice. York Beach: Samuel Weiser. 1993. pp. 118-119, 138-140. 21. ^Nan Huaijin. Working Toward Enlightenment: The Cultivation of Practice. York Beach: Samuel Weiser. 1993. p. 146. 22. ^{{cite book|title=Essentials of Mahamudra: Looking Directly at the Mind, by Khenchen Thrangu Rinpoche |isbn = 978-0861713714|last1 = Rinpoche|first1 = Khenchen Thrangu|last2= Thrangu|first2= Rinpoche|year=2004 }} 23. ^Henepola Gunaratana, Mindfulness in plain English, Wisdom Publications, pg 21. 24. ^{{cite web |author=Defined by Reginald A. Ray |url=http://archive.thebuddhadharma.com/issues/2004/summer/dharma_dictionary.htm |title="Vipashyana," by Reginald A. Ray. Buddhadharma: The Practitioner's Quarterly, Summer 2004 |publisher=Archive.thebuddhadharma.com |date= |accessdate=2013-05-30 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140102200123/http://archive.thebuddhadharma.com/issues/2004/summer/dharma_dictionary.htm |archivedate=2014-01-02 |df= }} 25. ^{{cite web|title=What is Theravada Buddhism?|url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/theravada.html|work=Access to Insight|publisher=Access to Insight|accessdate=17 August 2013}} 26. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.170.than.html |title=AN 4.170 Yuganaddha Sutta: In Tandem. Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu |publisher=Accesstoinsight.org |date=2010-07-03 |accessdate=2013-05-30}} 27. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an02/an02.030.than.html |title=AN 2.30 Vijja-bhagiya Sutta, A Share in Clear Knowing. Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu |publisher=Accesstoinsight.org |date=2010-08-08 |accessdate=2013-05-30}} 28. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.agama.buddhason.org/SN/SN1171.htm |title=SN 43.2 |publisher=Agama.buddhason.org |date= |accessdate=2013-05-30}} 29. ^Bikkhu Bodhi, The Connected Discourses of the Buddha, p. 1373 30. ^Alexander Wynne, The origin of Buddhist meditation. Routledge, 2007, page 94-95. 31. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/scan/nsm034 |title=Mindfulness training and neural integration: Differentiation of distinct streams of awareness and the cultivation of well-being |year=2007 |last1=Siegel |first1=D. J. |journal=Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience |volume=2 |issue=4 |pages=259–63 |pmc=2566758}} 32. ^"Is Mindfulness Present-Centered and Nonjudgmental? A Discussion of the Cognitive Dimensions of Mindfulness" by Georges Dreyfus 33. ^Geoffrey Samuel, Mindfulness or Mindlessness: Traditional and Modern Buddhist Critiques of "Bare Awareness" 34. ^"Mindfulness and Ethics: Attention, Virtue and Perfection" by Jay Garfield References{{Reflist|2}}Sources{{refbegin}}
External links{{Wiktionary|念}} |