| 词条 | Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. |ArgueDate=December 17 |ArgueYear=1940 |DecideDate=January 13 |DecideYear=1941 |FullName=Sibbach v. Wilson & Company, Incorporated |USVol=312 |USPage=1 |ParallelCitations=61 S. Ct. 422; 85 L. Ed. 479; 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1032 |Prior=108 F.2d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/108/415/1477883/ 415] (7th Cir. 1939); cert. granted, {{ussc|309|650|1940|el=no}}. |Holding=In a diversity jurisdiction case, important and substantial procedures are considered "Procedural" not "Substantive" and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply. |SCOTUS=1940-1941 |Majority=Roberts |JoinMajority=Hughes, McReynolds, Stone, Reed |Dissent=Frankfurter |JoinDissent=Black, Douglas, Murphy |LawsApplied= }} Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1 (1941), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that under American law important and substantial procedures are not substantive, rather they are still considered procedural, and federal law applies. This was a post-Erie decision, and thus the decision whether to apply the law of the state of jurisdiction or uniform federal rules depended on whether the rule in question was procedural or substantive in nature. See also
External links
| case = Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., {{ussc|312|1|1941|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/312/1/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep312/usrep312001/usrep312001.pdf{{DEFAULTSORT:Sibbach v. Wilson and Co.}}{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} 5 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court|Conflict of laws case law|Diversity jurisdiction case law|1941 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。