请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board
释义

  1. References

  2. External links

{{one source|date=March 2011}}{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
|ArgueDate=October 15
|ArgueYear=1991
|DecideDate=December 9
|DecideYear=1991
|FullName=Simon & Schuster, INC., petitioner v. Members of New York State Crime Victims Board et al.
|USVol=502
|USPage=105
|ParallelCitations=112 S. Ct. 501; 116 L. Ed. 2d 476; 1991 U.S. LEXIS 7172
|Prior=On certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
|Subsequent=
|Holding=The New York Son of Sam law violated the First Amendment.
|SCOTUS=1991-1993
|Majority=O'Connor
|JoinMajority=Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia, Souter
|Concurrence=Blackmun
|Concurrence2=Kennedy
|NotParticipating=Thomas
|LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. I, Son of Sam law
}}

Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991),[1] was a Supreme Court case dealing with Son of Sam laws, which are state laws that prevent convicted criminals from publishing books about their crime for profit. Simon & Schuster challenged the law's application to profits from Nicholas Pileggi's book Life in a Mafia Family, which was written with paid assistance from former mobster Henry Hill. The court struck down the Son of Sam law in New York on the ground that the law was violative of the First Amendment, which protects free speech. Nevertheless, similar laws in other states remain unchallenged. The opinion of the court was written by Sandra Day O'Connor.

In the wake of this case, New York modified its law to apply to any economic benefits derived from criminal activities, not just proceeds from publications.[2]

References

1. ^{{ussc|name=Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board|502|105|1991}}.
2. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.answers.com/topic/son-of-sam-laws | title=Son-of-Sam Law | publisher=The Gale Group | work=Gale Encyclopedia of US History | year=2006 | accessdate=October 24, 2012}}

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, {{ussc|502|105|1991|el=no}}
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112664/simon-schuster-inc-v-members-of-ny-state-crime-victims-bd/
| findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/502/105.html
| googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=988401867966498877
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/us/502/105/case.html
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep502/usrep502105/usrep502105.pdf
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/90-1059{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}{{US1stAmendment|speech|state=expanded}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Simon and Schuster V. Crime Victims Board}}

4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|United States Free Speech Clause case law|1991 in United States case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/23 13:16:36