| 词条 | Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co. |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co. |Court=United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit |CourtSeal= |ArgueDate= |ArgueYear= |DecideDate=August 11, |DecideYear=2009 |FullName=Sinaltrainal, Isidro Segundo Gil, The Estate of, Luis Eduardo Garcia, Alvaro Gonzalez Lopez, Jose Domingo Flores, Jorge Humberto Leal, Juan Carlos Galvis, Alvaro Gonzalez, John Doe, as representative of the Estate of Isidro Segundo Gil, Luis Adolfo Cardona, John Doe II, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Coca-Cola Company, Coca-Cola De Colombia, S.A., Panamerican Beverages Company, LLC, Panamco, LLC, Panamco Industrail De Gaseosas, S.A., A.K.A. Panamco Columbia, S.A., Richard I. Kirby, et al. |Citations=578 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20090811058 1252] |Prior=256 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2003); 474 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (S.D. Fla. 2006) |Subsequent= |Holding= |Judges=Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Susan H. Black, Emmett Ripley Cox |Majority=Black |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied=Alien Tort Claims Act, {{USC|28|1350}} }} Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola, 578 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2009), was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld the dismissal of a case filed by Colombian trade union Sinaltrainal (National Union of Food Workers) against Coca-Cola in a Miami district court, demanding monetary compensation of $500 million under the Alien Tort Claims Act for the deaths of three workers in Colombia. LawsuitIn 2001 Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola was filed in the Florida Third District Court of Appeal, demanding a monetary compensation for $500 million for the deaths of three workers, members of the National Union for Food Industry Workers who worked in the Coca Cola Bebidas y Alimentos plant in Carepa in northern Colombia.[1] The lawsuit was brought by the Colombian trade union Sinaltrainal (National Union of Food Workers) and alleged that Panamco, a Colombian Coca-Cola bottling company, assisted paramilitaries in murdering several union members. Even though the alleged human rights violation occurred in Colombia, the union attempted to use the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) to bring the case into a U.S. district court. The ATCA grants U.S. courts jurisdiction in any dispute where it is alleged that a tort has been committed in violation of the "law of nations" or a treaty of the United States.[2] The plaintiffs also alleged violations of the Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). AppealOn March 31, 2003, the US District Court dismissed charges against The Coca-Cola Company because the alleged wrongdoing either occurred in the United States but was too removed from the injury or occurred abroad and did not have a substantial origin within the United States.[3] Federal Judge Jose E. Martinez allowed the case to go forward against two Coca-Cola bottlers: Bebidas y Alimentos and Panamerican Beverages, but not against Coke itself.[4] On September 4, 2006, Judge Martinez dismissed the remaining claims against the two bottlers. On August 11, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in favor of Coca-Cola, affirming the District Court's ruling.[5] In dismissing the ATCA claims, the court cited a lack of evidence to link the actions of the paramilitaries to the Colombian government and Coca-Cola.[6] Additionally, the Eleventh Circuit converted the District Court's dismissal of the TVPA claims on jurisdictional grounds to a dismissal on the merits for failure to state a claim.[7] "Killer Coke" CampaignA few months after the case, on April 16, 2003 Sinaltrainal union members launched the website killercoke.org,[8][9] which called for the boycott of Coca Cola. Notes1. ^{{cite news| first =Juan| last =Forero| authorlink =| date =July 26, 2001| title =Union Says Coca-Cola in Colombia Uses Thugs |newspaper=New York Times| volume =| issue =| id =| url =http://www.usleap.org/Colombia/Coke/NYT7-26-01UnionSaysCocaColainColombiaUsesThugs.htm| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20051109163731/http://www.usleap.org/Colombia/Coke/NYT7-26-01UnionSaysCocaColainColombiaUsesThugs.htm| archivedate=2005-11-09}} 2. ^{{USC|28|1350}}. 3. ^{{cite journal| first =Author | last =Unknown| authorlink =| date =May 12, 2003| title =Coca-Cola avoids lawsuit over labor leader's murder| journal =Civil RICO Report| volume =19| issue =1| id =| url =http://bailey83221.livejournal.com/74169.html#3a}} 4. ^{{cite news| first =Jeffrey | last =Cohan | authorlink =| date =April 29, 2003| title =Coke Targeted In Union Lawsuit Case Marks Unusual Effort To Aid Labor In Colombia |newspaper=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | volume =| issue =| pages =A–1| id =| url =http://bailey83221.livejournal.com/74169.html#4a}} 5. ^{{cite court |litigants=Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co. |vol=578 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=1252 |pinpoint= |court=11th Cir. |date=2009 |url=https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20090811058 |accessdate=2019-02-20 |quote=}} 6. ^Sinaltrainal, 578 F.3d at 1265. 7. ^Sinaltrainal, 578 F.3d at 1270. 8. ^killercoke.org 9. ^{{cite journal| first =Dean | last =Foust| authorlink =|author2=Geri Smith |author3=Elizabeth Woyke | date =January 23, 2006| title ="Killer Coke" Or Innocent Abroad? Controversy over anti-union violence in Colombia has colleges banning Coca-Cola | journal =Business Week | volume =3968| issue =|page=46| id =| url =http://bailey83221.livejournal.com/74169.html#1a}} External links
7 : 2003 in United States case law|2009 in United States case law|United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit cases|United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida cases|Colombian conflict (1964–present)|Coca-Cola litigation|Boycott organizers |
| 随便看 |
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。