词条 | Sobolev inequality |
释义 |
In mathematics, there is in mathematical analysis a class of Sobolev inequalities, relating norms including those of Sobolev spaces. These are used to prove the Sobolev embedding theorem, giving inclusions between certain Sobolev spaces, and the Rellich–Kondrachov theorem showing that under slightly stronger conditions some Sobolev spaces are compactly embedded in others. They are named after Sergei Lvovich Sobolev. Sobolev embedding theoremLet {{math|W k,p(Rn)}} denote the Sobolev space consisting of all real-valued functions on {{math|Rn}} whose first {{mvar|k}} weak derivatives are functions in {{math|Lp}}. Here {{mvar|k}} is a non-negative integer and {{math|1 ≤ p < ∞}}. The first part of the Sobolev embedding theorem states that if {{math|k > ℓ}} and {{math|1 ≤ p < q < ∞}} are two real numbers such that {{math|(k − ℓ)p < n}} and: then and the embedding is continuous. In the special case of {{math|k {{=}} 1}} and {{math|ℓ {{=}} 0}}, Sobolev embedding gives where {{math|p∗}} is the Sobolev conjugate of {{mvar|p}}, given by This special case of the Sobolev embedding is a direct consequence of the Gagliardo–Nirenberg–Sobolev inequality. The second part of the Sobolev embedding theorem applies to embeddings in Hölder spaces {{math|C r,α(Rn)}}. If {{math|n < p}} and with {{math|α ∈ (0, 1]}} then one has the embedding This part of the Sobolev embedding is a direct consequence of Morrey's inequality. Intuitively, this inclusion expresses the fact that the existence of sufficiently many weak derivatives implies some continuity of the classical derivatives. GeneralizationsThe Sobolev embedding theorem holds for Sobolev spaces {{math|W k,p(M)}} on other suitable domains {{mvar|M}}. In particular ({{harvnb|Aubin|1982|loc=Chapter 2}}; {{harvnb|Aubin|1976}}), both parts of the Sobolev embedding hold when
Kondrachov embedding theorem{{main article|Rellich–Kondrachov theorem}}On a compact manifold with {{math|C1}} boundary, the Kondrachov embedding theorem states that if {{math|k > ℓ}} andthen the Sobolev embedding is completely continuous (compact). Note that the condition is just as in the first part of the Sobolev embedding theorem, with the equality replaced by an inequality, thus requiring a more regular space {{math|W k,p(M)}}. Gagliardo–Nirenberg–Sobolev inequalityAssume that {{mvar|u}} is a continuously differentiable real-valued function on {{math|Rn}} with compact support. Then for {{math|1 ≤ p < n}} there is a constant {{mvar|C}} depending only on {{mvar|n}} and {{mvar|p}} such that with 1/p* = 1/p - 1/n. The case is due to Sobolev, to Gagliardo and Nirenberg independently. The Gagliardo–Nirenberg–Sobolev inequality implies directly the Sobolev embedding The embeddings in other orders on {{math|Rn}} are then obtained by suitable iteration. Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev lemmaSobolev's original proof of the Sobolev embedding theorem relied on the following, sometimes known as the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev fractional integration theorem. An equivalent statement is known as the Sobolev lemma in {{harv|Aubin|1982|loc=Chapter 2}}. A proof is in {{harv|Stein|loc=Chapter V, §1.3}}. Let {{math|0 < α < n}} and {{math|1 < p < q < ∞}}. Let {{math|Iα {{=}} (−Δ)−α/2}} be the Riesz potential on {{math|Rn}}. Then, for {{mvar|q}} defined by there exists a constant {{mvar|C}} depending only on {{mvar|p}} such that If {{math|p {{=}} 1}}, then one has two possible replacement estimates. The first is the more classical weak-type estimate: where {{math|1/q {{=}} 1 − α/n}}. Alternatively one has the estimatewhere is the vector-valued Riesz transform, c.f. {{harv|Schikorra | Spector | Van Schaftingen}}. The boundedness of the Riesz transforms implies that the latter inequality gives a unified way to write the family of inequalities for the Riesz potential. The Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev lemma implies the Sobolev embedding essentially by the relationship between the Riesz transforms and the Riesz potentials. Morrey's inequalityAssume {{math|n < p ≤ ∞}}. Then there exists a constant {{mvar|C}}, depending only on {{mvar|p}} and {{mvar|n}}, such that for all {{math|u ∈ C1(Rn) ∩ Lp(Rn)}}, where Thus if {{math|u ∈ W 1,p(Rn)}}, then {{mvar|u}} is in fact Hölder continuous of exponent {{mvar|γ}}, after possibly being redefined on a set of measure 0. A similar result holds in a bounded domain {{mvar|U}} with {{math|C1}} boundary. In this case, where the constant {{mvar|C}} depends now on {{math|n, p}} and {{mvar|U}}. This version of the inequality follows from the previous one by applying the norm-preserving extension of {{math|W 1,p(U)}} to {{math|W 1,p(Rn)}}. General Sobolev inequalitiesLet {{mvar|U}} be a bounded open subset of {{math|Rn}}, with a {{math|C1}} boundary. ({{mvar|U}} may also be unbounded, but in this case its boundary, if it exists, must be sufficiently well-behaved.) Assume {{math|u ∈ W k,p(U)}}, then we consider two cases: {{math|k < n/p}}In this case {{math|u ∈ Lq(U)}}, where We have in addition the estimate , the constant {{mvar|C}} depending only on {{math|k, p, n}}, and {{mvar|U}}. {{math|k > n/p}}Here, {{mvar|u}} belongs to a Hölder space, more precisely: where We have in addition the estimate the constant {{mvar|C}} depending only on {{math|k, p, n, γ}}, and {{mvar|U}}. CaseIf , then {{mvar|u}} is a function of bounded mean oscillation and for some constant {{mvar|C}} depending only on {{mvar|n}}. This estimate is a corollary of the Poincaré inequality. Nash inequalityThe Nash inequality, introduced by {{harvs|first=John|last=Nash|authorlink=John Forbes Nash, Jr.|year=1958|txt}}, states that there exists a constant {{math|C > 0}}, such that for all {{math|u ∈ L1(Rn) ∩ W 1,2(Rn)}}, The inequality follows from basic properties of the Fourier transform. Indeed, integrating over the complement of the ball of radius {{mvar|ρ}}, {{NumBlk|:||{{EquationRef|1}}}}by Parseval's theorem. On the other hand, one has which, when integrated over the ball of radius {{mvar|ρ}} gives {{NumBlk|:||{{EquationRef|2}}}}where {{math|ωn}} is the volume of the {{mvar|n}}-ball. Choosing {{mvar|ρ}} to minimize the sum of ({{EquationNote|1}}) and ({{EquationNote|2}}) and again applying Parseval's theorem: gives the inequality. In the special case of {{math|n {{=}} 1}}, the Nash inequality can be extended to the {{math|Lp}} case, in which case it is a generalization of the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality ({{harvnb|Brezis|2011}}, Comments on Chapter 8). In fact, if {{mvar|I}} is a bounded interval, then for all {{math|1 ≤ r < ∞}} and all {{math|1 ≤ q ≤ p < ∞}} the following inequality holds where: References
3 : Inequalities|Sobolev spaces|Compactness theorems |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。