“Solar power”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

Photovoltaics were initially solely used as a source of electricity for small and medium-sized applications, from the calculator powered by a single solar cell to remote homes powered by an off-grid rooftop PV system. Commercial concentrated solar power plants were first developed in the 1980s. The 392 MW Ivanpah installation is the largest concentrating solar power plant in the world, located in the Mojave Desert of California.

As the cost of solar electricity has fallen, the number of grid-connected solar PV systems has grown into the millions and utility-scale photovoltaic power stations with hundreds of megawatts are being built. Solar PV is rapidly becoming an inexpensive, low-carbon technology to harness renewable energy from the Sun. The current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is the 850 MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Qinghai, China.

The International Energy Agency projected in 2014 that under its "high renewables" scenario, by 2050, solar photovoltaics and concentrated solar power would contribute about 16 and 11 percent, respectively, of the worldwide electricity consumption, and solar would be the world's largest source of electricity. Most solar installations would be in China and India. In 2017, solar power provided 1.7% of total worldwide electricity production, growing at 35% per annum.^[2] As of 2018, the unsubsidised levelised cost of electricity for utility scale solar power is around $43/MWh.^[3]

Mainstream technologies

Many industrialized nations have installed significant solar power capacity into their grids to supplement or provide an alternative to conventional energy sources while an increasing number of less developed nations have turned to solar to reduce dependence on expensive imported fuels (see solar power by country). Long distance transmission allows remote renewable energy resources to displace fossil fuel consumption. Solar power plants use one of two technologies:

Photovoltaics

A solar cell, or photovoltaic cell (PV), is a device that converts light into electric current using the photovoltaic effect. The first solar cell was constructed by Charles Fritts in the 1880s.^[5] The German industrialist Ernst Werner von Siemens was among those who recognized the importance of this discovery.^[6] In 1931, the German engineer Bruno Lange developed a photo cell using silver selenide in place of copper oxide,^[7] although the prototype selenium cells converted less than 1% of incident light into electricity. Following the work of Russell Ohl in the 1940s, researchers Gerald Pearson, Calvin Fuller and Daryl Chapin created the silicon solar cell in 1954.^[8] These early solar cells cost 286 USD/watt and reached efficiencies of 4.5–6%.^[9]

The array of a photovoltaic power system, or PV system, produces direct current (DC) power which fluctuates with the sunlight's intensity.

For practical use this usually requires conversion to certain desired voltages or alternating current (AC), through the use of inverters.^[4]

Modules are wired together to form arrays, then tied to an inverter, which produces power at the desired voltage, and for AC, the desired frequency/phase.^[4]

Many residential PV systems are connected to the grid wherever available, especially in developed countries with large markets.^[10]

In certain applications such as satellites, lighthouses, or in developing countries, batteries or additional power generators are often added as back-ups. Such stand-alone power systems permit operations at night and at other times of limited sunlight.

Concentrated solar power

Concentrated solar power (CSP), also called "concentrated solar thermal", uses lenses or mirrors and tracking systems to concentrate sunlight, then use the resulting heat to generate electricity from conventional steam-driven turbines.

A wide range of concentrating technologies exists: among the best known are the parabolic trough, the compact linear Fresnel reflector, the Stirling dish and the solar power tower. Various techniques are used to track the sun and focus light. In all of these systems a working fluid is heated by the concentrated sunlight, and is then used for power generation or energy storage.^[11] Thermal storage efficiently allows up to 24-hour electricity generation.^[12]

A parabolic trough consists of a linear parabolic reflector that concentrates light onto a receiver positioned along the reflector's focal line. The receiver is a tube positioned along the focal points of the linear parabolic mirror and is filled with a working fluid. The reflector is made to follow the sun during daylight hours by tracking along a single axis. Parabolic trough systems provide the best land-use factor of any solar technology.^[13] The SEGS plants in California and Acciona's Nevada Solar One near Boulder City, Nevada are representatives of this technology.^[17]^[14]

The Stirling solar dish combines a parabolic concentrating dish with a Stirling engine which normally drives an electric generator. The advantages of Stirling solar over photovoltaic cells are higher efficiency of converting sunlight into electricity and longer lifetime.

The 50 kW Big Dish in Canberra, Australia is an example of this technology.^[18]

A solar power tower uses an array of tracking reflectors (heliostats) to concentrate light on a central receiver atop a tower. Power towers can achieve higher (thermal-to-electricity conversion) efficiency than linear tracking CSP schemes and better energy storage capability than dish stirling technologies.^[18] The PS10 Solar Power Plant and PS20 solar power plant are examples of this technology.

Hybrid systems

A hybrid system combines (C)PV and CSP with one another or with other forms of generation such as diesel, wind and biogas. The combined form of generation may enable the system to modulate power output as a function of demand or at least reduce the fluctuating nature of solar power and the consumption of non renewable fuel. Hybrid systems are most often found on islands.

The idea is to increase the efficiency of the combined solar/thermoelectric system to convert the solar radiation into useful electricity.

Development and deployment

Early days

The early development of solar technologies starting in the 1860s was driven by an expectation that coal would soon become scarce. Charles Fritts installed the world's first rooftop photovoltaic solar array, using 1%-efficient selenium cells, on a New York City roof in 1884.^[28] However, development of solar technologies stagnated in the early 20th century in the face of the increasing availability, economy, and utility of coal and petroleum.^[29] In 1974 it was estimated that only six private homes in all of North America were entirely heated or cooled by functional solar power systems.^[30] The 1973 oil embargo and 1979 energy crisis caused a reorganization of energy policies around the world and brought renewed attention to developing solar technologies.^[31]^[32] Deployment strategies focused on incentive programs such as the Federal Photovoltaic Utilization Program in the US and the Sunshine Program in Japan. Other efforts included the formation of research facilities in the United States (SERI, now NREL), Japan (NEDO), and Germany (Fraunhofer–ISE).^[33]

Between 1970 and 1983 installations of photovoltaic systems grew rapidly, but falling oil prices in the early 1980s moderated the growth of photovoltaics from 1984 to 1996.

Mid-1990s to early 2010s

In the mid-1990s, development of both, residential and commercial rooftop solar as well as utility-scale photovoltaic power stations, began to accelerate again due to supply issues with oil and natural gas, global warming concerns, and the improving economic position of PV relative to other energy technologies.^[34] In the early 2000s, the adoption of feed-in tariffs—a policy mechanism, that gives renewables priority on the grid and defines a fixed price for the generated electricity—led to a high level of investment security and to a soaring number of PV deployments in Europe.

Current status

For several years, worldwide growth of solar PV was driven by European deployment, but has since shifted to Asia, especially China and Japan, and to a growing number of countries and regions all over the world, including, but not limited to, Australia, Canada, Chile, India, Israel, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, and the United States.

Worldwide growth of photovoltaics has averaged 40% per year from 2000 to 2013^[40] and total installed capacity reached 303 GW at the end of 2016 with China having the most cumulative installations (78 GW)^[35] and Honduras having the highest theoretical percentage of annual electricity usage which could be generated by solar PV (12.5%).^[35]^[36] The largest manufacturers are located in China.^[37]^[38]

Concentrated solar power (CSP) also started to grow rapidly, increasing its capacity nearly tenfold from 2004 to 2013, albeit from a lower level and involving fewer countries than solar PV.^[39]{{rp|51}}

Forecasts

In 2010, the International Energy Agency predicted that global solar PV capacity could reach 3,000 GW or 11% of projected global electricity generation by 2050—enough to generate 4,500 TWh of electricity.^[40]

Four years later, in 2014, the agency projected that, under its "high renewables" scenario, solar power could supply 27% of global electricity generation by 2050 (16% from PV and 11% from CSP).

Photovoltaic power stations

The Desert Sunlight Solar Farm is a 550 MW power plant in Riverside County, California, that uses thin-film CdTe-modules made by First Solar.^[41] As of November 2014, the 550 megawatt Topaz Solar Farm was the largest photovoltaic power plant in the world. This was surpassed by the 579 MW Solar Star complex. The current largest photovoltaic power station in the world is Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, in Gonghe County, Qinghai, China.

Concentrating solar power stations

Commercial concentrating solar power (CSP) plants, also called "solar thermal power stations", were first developed in the 1980s. The 377 MW Ivanpah Solar Power Facility, located in California's Mojave Desert, is the world’s largest solar thermal power plant project. Other large CSP plants include the Solnova Solar Power Station (150 MW), the Andasol solar power station (150 MW), and Extresol Solar Power Station (150 MW), all in Spain. The principal advantage of CSP is the ability to efficiently add thermal storage, allowing the dispatching of electricity over up to a 24-hour period. Since peak electricity demand typically occurs at about 5 pm, many CSP power plants use 3 to 5 hours of thermal storage.^[65]

Economics

Cost

The typical cost factors for solar power include the costs of the modules, the frame to hold them, wiring, inverters, labour cost, any land that might be required, the grid connection, maintenance and the solar insolation that location will receive. Adjusting for inflation, it cost $96 per watt for a solar module in the mid-1970s. Process improvements and a very large boost in production have brought that figure down to 68 cents per watt in February 2016, according to data from Bloomberg New Energy Finance.^[69] Palo Alto California signed a wholesale purchase agreement in 2016 that secured solar power for 3.7 cents per kilowatt-hour. And in sunny Dubai large-scale solar generated electricity sold in 2016 for just 2.99 cents per kilowatt-hour – "competitive with any form of fossil-based electricity — and cheaper than most."^[70]

Photovoltaic systems use no fuel, and modules typically last 25 to 40 years. Thus, capital costs make up most of the cost of solar power. Operations and maintenance costs for new utility-scale solar plants in the US are estimated to be 9 percent of the cost of photovoltaic electricity, and 17 percent of the cost of solar thermal electricity.^[71] Governments have created various financial incentives to encourage the use of solar power, such as feed-in tariff programs. Also, Renewable portfolio standards impose a government mandate that utilities generate or acquire a certain percentage of renewable power regardless of increased energy procurement costs. In most states, RPS goals can be achieved by any combination of solar, wind, biomass, landfill gas, ocean, geothermal, municipal solid waste, hydroelectric, hydrogen, or fuel cell technologies.^[72]

Levelized cost of electricity

The PV industry has adopted levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) as the unit of cost. The electrical energy generated is sold in units of kilowatt-hours (kWh). As a rule of thumb, and depending on the local insolation, 1 watt-peak of installed solar PV capacity generates about 1 to 2 kWh of electricity per year. This corresponds to a capacity factor of around 10–20%. The product of the local cost of electricity and the insolation determines the break even point for solar power. The International Conference on Solar Photovoltaic Investments, organized by EPIA, has estimated that PV systems will pay back their investors in 8 to 12 years.^[73] As a result, since 2006 it has been economical for investors to install photovoltaics for free in return for a long term power purchase agreement. Fifty percent of commercial systems in the United States were installed in this manner in 2007 and over 90% by 2009.^[74]

Current installation prices

In its 2014 edition of the Technology Roadmap: Solar Photovoltaic Energy report, the International Energy Agency (IEA) published prices for residential, commercial and utility-scale PV systems for eight major markets as of 2013 (see table below). However, DOE's SunShot Initiative has reported much lower U.S. installation prices. In 2014, prices continued to decline. The SunShot Initiative modeled U.S. system prices to be in the range of $1.80 to $3.29 per watt.^[76] Other sources identify similar price ranges of $1.70 to $3.50 for the different market segments in the U.S.,^[77] and in the highly penetrated German market, prices for residential and small commercial rooftop systems of up to 100 kW declined to $1.36 per watt (€1.24/W) by the end of 2014.^[78] In 2015, Deutsche Bank estimated costs for small residential rooftop systems in the U.S. around $2.90 per watt. Costs for utility-scale systems in China and India were estimated as low as $1.00 per watt.^[79]

Grid parity

Grid parity, the point at which the cost of photovoltaic electricity is equal to or cheaper than the price of grid power, is more easily achieved in areas with abundant sun and high costs for electricity such as in California and Japan.^[80] In 2008, The levelized cost of electricity for solar PV was $0.25/kWh or less in most of the OECD countries. By late 2011, the fully loaded cost was predicted to fall below $0.15/kWh for most of the OECD and to reach $0.10/kWh in sunnier regions. These cost levels are driving three emerging trends: vertical integration of the supply chain, origination of power purchase agreements (PPAs) by solar power companies, and unexpected risk for traditional power generation companies, grid operators and wind turbine manufacturers.^[90]{{dead link|date = June 2015}}

Grid parity was first reached in Spain in 2013,^[81] Hawaii and other islands that otherwise use fossil fuel (diesel fuel) to produce electricity, and most of the US is expected to reach grid parity by 2015.^[82]{{failed verification|date = June 2015}}^[83]

In 2007, General Electric's Chief Engineer predicted grid parity without subsidies in sunny parts of the United States by around 2015; other companies predicted an earlier date:^[84] the cost of solar power will be below grid parity for more than half of residential customers and 10% of commercial customers in the OECD, as long as grid electricity prices do not decrease through 2010.^[85]

Productivity by location

The productivity of solar power in a region depends on solar irradiance, which varies through the day and is influenced by latitude and climate.

The locations with highest annual solar irradiance lie in the arid tropics and subtropics. Deserts lying in low latitudes usually have few clouds, and can receive sunshine for more than ten hours a day.^[86]^[87] These hot deserts form the Global Sun Belt circling the world. This belt consists of extensive swathes of land in Northern Africa, Southern Africa, Southwest Asia, Middle East, and Australia, as well as the much smaller deserts of North and South America.^[88] Africa's eastern Sahara Desert, also known as the Libyan Desert, has been observed to be the sunniest place on Earth according to NASA.^[89]^[90]

Different measurements of solar irradiance (direct normal irradiance, global horizontal irradiance) are mapped below :

Self consumption

In cases of self consumption of the solar energy, the payback time is calculated based on how much electricity is not purchased from the grid. For example, in Germany, with electricity prices of 0.25 €/kWh and insolation of 900 kWh/kW, one kWp will save €225 per year, and with an installation cost of 1700 €/KWp the system cost will be returned in less than seven years.^[91] However, in many cases, the patterns of generation and consumption do not coincide, and some or all of the energy is fed back into the grid. The electricity is sold, and at other times when energy is taken from the grid, electricity is bought. The relative costs and prices obtained affect the economics. In many markets, the price paid for sold PV electricity is significantly lower than the price of bought electricity, which incentivizes self consumption.^[92] Moreover, separate self consumption incentives have been used in e.g. Germany and Italy.^[92] Grid interaction regulation has also included limitations of grid feed-in in some regions in Germany with high amounts of installed PV capacity.^[92]^[93] By increasing self consumption, the grid feed-in can be limited without curtailment, which wastes electricity.^[94]

A good match between generation and consumption is key for high self consumption, and should be considered when deciding where to install solar power and how to dimension the installation. The match can be improved with batteries or controllable electricity consumption.^[94] However, batteries are expensive and profitability may require provision of other services from them besides self consumption increase.^[95] Hot water storage tanks with electric heating with heat pumps or resistance heaters can provide low-cost storage for self consumption of solar power.^[94] Shiftable loads, such as dishwashers, tumble dryers and washing machines, can provide controllable consumption with only a limited effect on the users, but their effect on self consumption of solar power may be limited.^[94]

Energy pricing and incentives

The political purpose of incentive policies for PV is to facilitate an initial small-scale deployment to begin to grow the industry, even where the cost of PV is significantly above grid parity, to allow the industry to achieve the economies of scale necessary to reach grid parity. The policies are implemented to promote national energy independence, high tech job creation and reduction of CO₂ emissions. Three incentive mechanisms are often used in combination as investment subsidies: the authorities refund part of the cost of installation of the system, the electricity utility buys PV electricity from the producer under a multiyear contract at a guaranteed rate, and Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SRECs)

Rebates

With investment subsidies, the financial burden falls upon the taxpayer, while with feed-in tariffs the extra cost is distributed across the utilities' customer bases. While the investment subsidy may be simpler to administer, the main argument in favour of feed-in tariffs is the encouragement of quality. Investment subsidies are paid out as a function of the nameplate capacity of the installed system and are independent of its actual power yield over time, thus rewarding the overstatement of power and tolerating poor durability and maintenance. Some electric companies offer rebates to their customers, such as Austin Energy in Texas, which offers $2.50/watt installed up to $15,000.^[96]

Net metering

In net metering the price of the electricity produced is the same as the price supplied to the consumer, and the consumer is billed on the difference between production and consumption. Net metering can usually be done with no changes to standard electricity meters, which accurately measure power in both directions and automatically report the difference, and because it allows homeowners and businesses to generate electricity at a different time from consumption, effectively using the grid as a giant storage battery. With net metering, deficits are billed each month while surpluses are rolled over to the following month. Best practices call for perpetual roll over of kWh credits.^[97] Excess credits upon termination of service are either lost, or paid for at a rate ranging from wholesale to retail rate or above, as can be excess annual credits. In New Jersey, annual excess credits are paid at the wholesale rate, as are left over credits when a customer terminates service.^[98]

Feed-in tariffs (FIT)

With feed-in tariffs, the financial burden falls upon the consumer. They reward the number of kilowatt-hours produced over a long period of time, but because the rate is set by the authorities, it may result in perceived overpayment. The price paid per kilowatt-hour under a feed-in tariff exceeds the price of grid electricity. Net metering refers to the case where the price paid by the utility is the same as the price charged.

The complexity of approvals in California, Spain and Italy has prevented comparable growth to Germany even though the return on investment is better.{{citation needed|date = June 2015}} In some countries, additional incentives are offered for BIPV compared to stand alone PV.

Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SRECs)

Alternatively, SRECs allow for a market mechanism to set the price of the solar generated electricity subsity. In this mechanism, a renewable energy production or consumption target is set, and the utility (more technically the Load Serving Entity) is obliged to purchase renewable energy or face a fine (Alternative Compliance Payment or ACP). The producer is credited for an SREC for every 1,000 kWh of electricity produced. If the utility buys this SREC and retires it, they avoid paying the ACP. In principle this system delivers the cheapest renewable energy, since the all solar facilities are eligible and can be installed in the most economic locations. Uncertainties about the future value of SRECs have led to long-term SREC contract markets to give clarity to their prices and allow solar developers to pre-sell and hedge their credits.

Financial incentives for photovoltaics differ across countries, including Australia, China,^[99] Germany,^[100] Israel,^[101] Japan, and the United States and even across states within the US.

The Japanese government through its Ministry of International Trade and Industry ran a successful programme of subsidies from 1994 to 2003. By the end of 2004, Japan led the world in installed PV capacity with over 1.1 GW.^[102]

In 2004, the German government introduced the first large-scale feed-in tariff system, under the German Renewable Energy Act, which resulted in explosive growth of PV installations in Germany. At the outset the FIT was over 3x the retail price or 8x the industrial price. The principle behind the German system is a 20-year flat rate contract. The value of new contracts is programmed to decrease each year, in order to encourage the industry to pass on lower costs to the end users. The programme has been more successful than expected with over 1GW installed in 2006, and political pressure is mounting to decrease the tariff to lessen the future burden on consumers.

Subsequently, Spain, Italy, Greece—that enjoyed an early success with domestic solar-thermal installations for hot water needs—and France introduced feed-in tariffs. None have replicated the programmed decrease of FIT in new contracts though, making the German incentive relatively less and less attractive compared to other countries. The French and Greek FIT offer a high premium (EUR 0.55/kWh) for building integrated systems. California, Greece, France and Italy have 30–50% more insolation than Germany making them financially more attractive. The Greek domestic "solar roof" programme (adopted in June 2009 for installations up to 10 kW) has internal rates of return of 10–15% at current commercial installation costs, which, furthermore, is tax free.

In 2006 California approved the 'California Solar Initiative', offering a choice of investment subsidies or FIT for small and medium systems and a FIT for large systems. The small-system FIT of $0.39 per kWh (far less than EU countries) expires in just 5 years, and the alternate "EPBB" residential investment incentive is modest, averaging perhaps 20% of cost. All California incentives are scheduled to decrease in the future depending as a function of the amount of PV capacity installed.

At the end of 2006, the Ontario Power Authority (OPA, Canada) began its Standard Offer Program, a precursor to the Green Energy Act, and the first in North America for distributed renewable projects of less than 10 MW. The feed-in tariff guaranteed a fixed price of $0.42 CDN per kWh over a period of twenty years. Unlike net metering, all the electricity produced was sold to the OPA at the given rate.

Grid integration

The overwhelming majority of electricity produced worldwide is used immediately, since storage is usually more expensive and because traditional generators can adapt to demand. Both solar power and wind power are variable renewable energy, meaning that all available output must be taken whenever it is available by moving through transmission lines to where it can be used now. Since solar energy is not available at night, storing its energy is potentially an important issue particularly in off-grid and for future 100% renewable energy scenarios to have continuous electricity availability.^[106]

Solar electricity is inherently variable and predictable by time of day, location, and seasons. In addition solar is intermittent due to day/night cycles and unpredictable weather. How much of a special challenge solar power is in any given electric utility varies significantly. In a summer peak utility, solar is well matched to daytime cooling demands. In winter peak utilities, solar displaces other forms of generation, reducing their capacity factors.

In an electricity system without grid energy storage, generation from stored fuels (coal, biomass, natural gas, nuclear) must be go up and down in reaction to the rise and fall of solar electricity (see load following power plant). While hydroelectric and natural gas plants can quickly follow solar being intermittent due to the weather, coal, biomass and nuclear plants usually take considerable time to respond to load and can only be scheduled to follow the predictable variation. Depending on local circumstances, beyond about 20–40% of total generation, grid-connected intermittent sources like solar tend to require investment in some combination of grid interconnections, energy storage or demand side management. Integrating large amounts of solar power with existing generation equipment has caused issues in some cases. For example, in Germany, California and Hawaii, electricity prices have been known to go negative when solar is generating a lot of power, displacing existing baseload generation contracts.^[107]^[108]

Conventional hydroelectricity works very well in conjunction with solar power; water can be held back or released from a reservoir as required. Where a suitable river is not available, pumped-storage hydroelectricity uses solar power to pump water to a high reservoir on sunny days, then the energy is recovered at night and in bad weather by releasing water via a hydroelectric plant to a low reservoir where the cycle can begin again.^[109]

This cycle can lose 20% of the energy to round trip inefficiencies, this plus the construction costs add to the expense of implementing high levels of solar power.

In stand alone PV systems batteries are traditionally used to store excess electricity. With grid-connected photovoltaic power system, excess electricity can be sent to the electrical grid. Net metering and feed-in tariff programs give these systems a credit for the electricity they produce. This credit offsets electricity provided from the grid when the system cannot meet demand, effectively trading with the grid instead of storing excess electricity. Credits are normally rolled over from month to month and any remaining surplus settled annually.^[111]

When wind and solar are a small fraction of the grid power, other generation techniques can adjust their output appropriately, but as these forms of variable power grow, additional balance on the grid is needed. As prices are rapidly declining, PV systems increasingly use rechargeable batteries to store a surplus to be later used at night. Batteries used for grid-storage stabilize the electrical grid by leveling out peak loads usually for several minutes, and in rare cases for hours. In the future, less expensive batteries could play an important role on the electrical grid, as they can charge during periods when generation exceeds demand and feed their stored energy into the grid when demand is higher than generation.

Although not permitted under the US National Electric Code, it is technically possible to have a “plug and play” PV microinverter. A recent review article found that careful system design would enable such systems to meet all technical, though not all safety requirements.^[112] There are several companies selling plug and play solar systems available on the web, but there is a concern that if people install their own it will reduce the enormous employment advantage solar has over fossil fuels.^[113]

Common battery technologies used in today's home PV systems include, the valve regulated lead-acid battery– a modified version of the conventional lead–acid battery, nickel–cadmium and lithium-ion batteries. Lead-acid batteries are currently the predominant technology used in small-scale, residential PV systems, due to their high reliability, low self discharge and investment and maintenance costs, despite shorter lifetime and lower energy density. Lithium-ion batteries have the potential to replace lead-acid batteries in the near future, as they are being intensively developed and lower prices are expected due to economies of scale provided by large production facilities such as the Gigafactory 1. In addition, the Li-ion batteries of plug-in electric cars may serve as a future storage devices in a vehicle-to-grid system. Since most vehicles are parked an average of 95% of the time, their batteries could be used to let electricity flow from the car to the power lines and back. Other rechargeable batteries used for distributed PV systems include, sodium–sulfur and vanadium redox batteries, two prominent types of a molten salt and a flow battery, respectively.^[114]^[115]^[116]

The combination of wind and solar PV has the advantage that the two sources complement each other because the peak operating times for each system occur at different times of the day and year. The power generation of such solar hybrid power systems is therefore more constant and fluctuates less than each of the two component subsystems.^[21] Solar power is seasonal, particularly in northern/southern climates, away from the equator, suggesting a need for long term seasonal storage in a medium such as hydrogen or pumped hydroelectric.^[117] The Institute for Solar Energy Supply Technology of the University of Kassel pilot-tested a combined power plant linking solar, wind, biogas and hydrostorage to provide load-following power from renewable sources.^[118]

Research is also undertaken in this field of artificial photosynthesis. It involves the use of nanotechnology to store solar electromagnetic energy in chemical bonds, by splitting water to produce hydrogen fuel or then combining with carbon dioxide to make biopolymers such as methanol. Many large national and regional research projects on artificial photosynthesis are now trying to develop techniques integrating improved light capture, quantum coherence methods of electron transfer and cheap catalytic materials that operate under a variety of atmospheric conditions.^[119] Senior researchers in the field have made the public policy case for a Global Project on Artificial Photosynthesis to address critical energy security and environmental sustainability issues.^[120]

Environmental impacts

Unlike fossil fuel based technologies, solar power does not lead to any harmful emissions during operation, but the production of the panels leads to some amount of pollution.

Greenhouse gases

The life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of solar power are in the range of 22 to 46 gram (g) per kilowatt-hour (kWh) depending on if solar thermal or solar PV is being analyzed, respectively. With this potentially being decreased to 15 g/kWh in the future.^[121] For comparison (of weighted averages), a combined cycle gas-fired power plant emits some 400–599 g/kWh,^[138] an oil-fired power plant 893 g/kWh,^[138] a coal-fired power plant 915–994 g/kWh^[122] or with carbon capture and storage some 200 g/kWh, and a geothermal high-temp. power plant 91–122 g/kWh.^[123]

The life cycle emission intensity of hydro, wind and nuclear power are lower than solar's as of 2011 as published by the IPCC, and discussed in the article Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources. Similar to all energy sources were their total life cycle emissions primarily lay in the construction and transportation phase, the switch to low carbon power in the manufacturing and transportation of solar devices would further reduce carbon emissions. BP Solar owns two factories built by Solarex (one in Maryland, the other in Virginia) in which all of the energy used to manufacture solar panels is produced by solar panels. A 1-kilowatt system eliminates the burning of approximately 170 pounds of coal, 300 pounds of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere, and saves up to 105 gallons of water consumption monthly.^[124]

The US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), in harmonizing the disparate estimates of life-cycle GHG emissions for solar PV, found that the most critical parameter was the solar insolation of the site: GHG emissions factors for PV solar are inversely proportional to insolation.^[125] For a site with insolation of 1700 kWh/m2/year, typical of southern Europe, NREL researchers estimated GHG emissions of 45 g{{CO2}}e/kWh. Using the same assumptions, at Phoenix, USA, with insolation of 2400 kWh/m2/year, the GHG emissions factor would be reduced to 32 g of CO₂e/kWh.^[126]

The New Zealand Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment found that the solar PV would have little impact on the country's greenhouse gas emissions. The country already generates 80 percent of its electricity from renewable resources (primarily hydroelectricity and geothermal) and national electricity usage peaks on winter evenings whereas solar generation peaks on summer afternoons, meaning a large uptake of solar PV would end up displacing other renewable generators before fossil-fueled power plants.^[127]

Energy payback

The energy payback time (EPBT) of a power generating system is the time required to generate as much energy as is consumed during production and lifetime operation of the system. Due to improving production technologies the payback time has been decreasing constantly since the introduction of PV systems in the energy market.^[128]

In 2000 the energy payback time of PV systems was estimated as 8 to 11 years^[129] and in 2006 this was estimated to be 1.5 to 3.5 years for crystalline silicon PV systems^[121] and 1–1.5 years for thin film technologies (S. Europe).^[121] These figures fell to 0.75–3.5 years in 2013, with an average of about 2 years for crystalline silicon PV and CIS systems.^[130]

Another economic measure, closely related to the energy payback time, is the energy returned on energy invested (EROEI) or energy return on investment (EROI),^[131] which is the ratio of electricity generated divided by the energy required to build and maintain the equipment. (This is not the same as the economic return on investment (ROI), which varies according to local energy prices, subsidies available and metering techniques.) With expected lifetimes of 30 years,^[132] the EROEI of PV systems are in the range of 10 to 30, thus generating enough energy over their lifetimes to reproduce themselves many times (6–31 reproductions) depending on what type of material, balance of system (BOS), and the geographic location of the system.^[133]

Water use

Solar power includes plants with among the lowest water consumption per unit of electricity (photovoltaic), and also power plants with among the highest water consumption (concentrating solar power with wet-cooling systems).

Photovoltaic power plants use very little water for operations. Life-cycle water consumption for utility-scale operations is estimated to be 12 gallons per megawatt-hour for flat-panel PV solar. Only wind power, which consumes essentially no water during operations, has a lower water consumption intensity.^[134]

Concentrating solar power plants with wet-cooling systems, on the other hand, have the highest water-consumption intensities of any conventional type of electric power plant; only fossil-fuel plants with carbon-capture and storage may have higher water intensities.^[135] A 2013 study comparing various sources of electricity found that the median water consumption during operations of concentrating solar power plants with wet cooling was 810 ga/MWhr for power tower plants and 890 gal/MWhr for trough plants. This was higher than the operational water consumption (with cooling towers) for nuclear (720 gal/MWhr), coal (530 gal/MWhr), or natural gas (210).^[134] A 2011 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory came to similar conclusions: for power plants with cooling towers, water consumption during operations was 865 gal/MWhr for CSP trough, 786 gal/MWhr for CSP tower, 687 gal/MWhr for coal, 672 gal/MWhr for nuclear, and 198 gal/MWhr for natural gas.^[136] The Solar Energy Industries Association noted that the Nevada Solar One trough CSP plant consumes 850 gal/MWhr.^[137] The issue of water consumption is heightened because CSP plants are often located in arid environments where water is scarce.

In 2007, the US Congress directed the Department of Energy to report on ways to reduce water consumption by CSP. The subsequent report noted that dry cooling technology was available that, although more expensive to build and operate, could reduce water consumption by CSP by 91 to 95 percent. A hybrid wet/dry cooling system could reduce water consumption by 32 to 58 percent.^[138] A 2015 report by NREL noted that of the 24 operating CSP power plants in the US, 4 used dry cooling systems. The four dry-cooled systems were the three power plants at the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility near Barstow, California, and the Genesis Solar Energy Project in Riverside County, California. Of 15 CSP projects under construction or development in the US as of March 2015, 6 were wet systems, 7 were dry systems, 1 hybrid, and 1 unspecified.

Although many older thermoelectric power plants with once-through cooling or cooling ponds use more water than CSP, meaning that more water passes through their systems, most of the cooling water returns to the water body available for other uses, and they consume less water by evaporation. For instance, the median coal power plant in the US with once-through cooling uses 36,350 gal/MWhr, but only 250 gal/MWhr (less than one percent) is lost through evaporation.^[139] Since the 1970s, the majority of US power plants have used recirculating systems such as cooling towers rather than once-through systems.^[140]

Other issues

One issue that has often raised concerns is the use of cadmium (Cd), a toxic heavy metal that has the tendency to accumulate in ecological food chains. It is used as semiconductor component in CdTe solar cells and as buffer layer for certain CIGS cells in the form of CdS.^[141]

The amount of cadmium used in thin-film PV modules is relatively small (5–10 g/m²) and with proper recycling and emission control techniques in place the cadmium emissions from module production can be almost zero. Current PV technologies lead to cadmium emissions of 0.3–0.9 microgram/kWh over the whole life-cycle.^[121] Most of these emissions arise through the use of coal power for the manufacturing of the modules, and coal and lignite combustion leads to much higher emissions of cadmium. Life-cycle cadmium emissions from coal is 3.1 microgram/kWh, lignite 6.2, and natural gas 0.2 microgram/kWh.

In a life-cycle analysis it has been noted, that if electricity produced by photovoltaic panels were used to manufacture the modules instead of electricity from burning coal, cadmium emissions from coal power usage in the manufacturing process could be entirely eliminated.^[142]

In the case of crystalline silicon modules, the solder material, that joins together the copper strings of the cells, contains about 36 percent of lead (Pb). Moreover, the paste used for screen printing front and back contacts contains traces of Pb and sometimes Cd as well. It is estimated that about 1,000 metric tonnes of Pb have been used for 100 gigawatts of c-Si solar modules. However, there is no fundamental need for lead in the solder alloy.^[141]

Some media sources have reported that concentrated solar power plants have injured or killed large numbers of birds due to intense heat from the concentrated sunrays.^[143]^[144] This adverse effect does not apply to PV solar power plants, and some of the claims may have been overstated or exaggerated.^[145]

A 2014-published life-cycle analysis of land use for various sources of electricity concluded that the large-scale implementation of solar and wind potentially reduces pollution-related

environmental impacts. The study found that the land-use footprint, given in square meter-years per megawatt-hour (m²a/MWh), was lowest for wind, natural gas and rooftop PV, with 0.26, 0.49 and 0.59, respectively, and followed by utility-scale solar PV with 7.9. For CSP, the footprint was 9 and 14, using parabolic troughs and solar towers, respectively. The largest footprint had coal-fired power plants with 18 m²a/MWh.^[146]

Emerging technologies

Concentrator photovoltaics

In addition, most solar panels on spacecraft are also made of high efficient multi-junction photovoltaic cells to derive electricity from sunlight when operating in the inner Solar System.

Floatovoltaics

See also

References

1. ^{{cite web|title=Energy Sources: Solar|url=https://www.energy.gov/energysources/solar.htm|work=Department of Energy|accessdate=19 April 2011|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110414081047/http://www.energy.gov/energysources/solar.htm|archivedate=14 April 2011|df=dmy-all}}
2. ^[https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/renewable-energy/solar-energy.html BP Global: Solar energy]
3. ^https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-and-levelized-cost-of-storage-2018/
4. ^¹²Solar Cells and their Applications Second Edition, Lewis Fraas, Larry Partain, Wiley, 2010, {{ISBN|978-0-470-44633-1}}, Section10.2.
5. ^Perlin (1999), p. 147
6. ^Perlin (1999), pp. 18–20
7. ^{{cite journal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9CcDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA41 |title=Magic Plates, Tap Sun For Power|journal=Popular Science |date = June 1931|accessdate=19 April 2011|author1=Corporation|first1=Bonnier}}
8. ^Perlin (1999), p. 29
9. ^Perlin (1999), p. 29–30, 38
10. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.iea-pvps.org/index.php?id=92&eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=432 | title=Trends in Photovoltaic Applications Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2009, IEA-PVPS | accessdate=8 November 2011 | deadurl=no | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525165534/http://www.iea-pvps.org/index.php?id=92&eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=432 | archivedate=25 May 2017 | df=dmy-all }}
11. ^Martin and Goswami (2005), p. 45
12. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/07/solar-can-be-baseload-spanish-csp-plant-with-storage-produces-electricity-for-24-hours-straight|title=Spanish CSP Plant with Storage Produces Electricity for 24 Hours Straight|author=Stephen Lacey|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121012112224/http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/07/solar-can-be-baseload-spanish-csp-plant-with-storage-produces-electricity-for-24-hours-straight|archivedate=12 October 2012|df=dmy-all}}
13. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/Concentrated-Solar-Thermal-Power.pdf | title=Concentrated Solar Thermal Power – Now | accessdate=19 August 2008 | deadurl=no | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910052050/http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/Concentrated-Solar-Thermal-Power.pdf | archivedate=10 September 2008 | df=dmy-all }}
14. ^{{cite web |title = UNLV Solar Site |publisher = University of Las Vegas |url = http://www.solar.unlv.edu/projects/eldorado.php |accessdate = 2 July 2008 |deadurl = yes |archiveurl = https://archive.is/20060903112910/http://www.solar.unlv.edu/projects/eldorado.php |archivedate = 3 September 2006 |df = dmy-all}}
15. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/app/research/solar/clfr.html |title = Compact CLFR |publisher = Physics.usyd.edu.au |date = 12 June 2002 |accessdate = 19 April 2011 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20110412235037/http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/app/research/solar/clfr.html |archivedate = 12 April 2011 |df = dmy-all}}
16. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.ese.iitb.ac.in/activities/solarpower/ausra.pdf |title=Ausra compact CLFR introducing cost-saving solar rotation features |accessdate=19 April 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721150750/http://www.ese.iitb.ac.in/activities/solarpower/ausra.pdf |archivedate=21 July 2011 |df=dmy }}
17. ^{{cite web |title = An Assessment of Solar Energy Conversion Technologies and Research Opportunities |publisher = Stanford University – Global Climate Change & Energy Project |url = http://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/assessments/solar_assessment.pdf |accessdate = 2 July 2008 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080509182125/http://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/assessments/solar_assessment.pdf |archivedate = 9 May 2008 |df = dmy-all}}
18. ^¹²{{cite web |title=Concentrating Solar Power in 2001 – An IEA/SolarPACES Summary of Present Status and Future Prospects |publisher=International Energy Agency – SolarPACES |url=http://www.solarpaces.org/Library/docs/CSP_Brochure_2001.pdf |accessdate=2 July 2008 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910052052/http://www.solarpaces.org/Library/docs/CSP_Brochure_2001.pdf |archivedate=10 September 2008 |df=dmy }}
19. ^Phys.org A novel solar CPV/CSP hybrid system proposed {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150822040505/http://phys.org/news/2015-02-solar-cpvcsp-hybrid.html |date=22 August 2015 }}, 11 February 2015
20. ^{{cite web |title=What Is a Photovoltaic Diesel Hybrid System? |url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2014/01/what-is-a-photovoltaic-diesel-hybrid-system |author=Amanda Cain |website=RenewableEnergyWorld.com |date=22 January 2014}}
21. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://energy.gov/energysaver/articles/hybrid-wind-and-solar-electric-systems |title=Hybrid Wind and Solar Electric Systems |publisher=United States Department of Energy |date=2 July 2012 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150526061658/http://energy.gov/energysaver/articles/hybrid-wind-and-solar-electric-systems |archivedate=26 May 2015 |df=dmy-all }}
22. ^{{citation|title= Photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid systems: A general optimization methodology|last1 = Kraemer|first1 = D|last2 = Hu|first2 = L|last3 = Muto|first3 = A|last4 = Chen|first4 = X |last5 = Chen|first5 =G|last6 = Chiesa|first6 =M|journal = Applied Physics Letters|volume= 92|issue = 24|page= 243503|year=2008|doi = 10.1063/1.2947591|bibcode = 2008ApPhL..92x3503K}}
23. ^Find data and sources in articles Growth of photovoltaics and Concentrated solar power#Deployment around the world
24. ^{{cite news|url= http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-renewables-section.pdf#5|title= BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2015, Renewables section|publisher= BP|date= June 2015|accessdate= 7 July 2015|deadurl= no|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20150707233117/http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-renewables-section.pdf#5|archivedate= 7 July 2015|df= dmy-all}}
25. ^{{cite news|url= http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-electricity-section.pdf#2|title= BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2015, Electricity section|publisher= BP|date= June 2015|accessdate= 7 July 2015|deadurl= yes|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20150704145824/http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-electricity-section.pdf#2|archivedate= 4 July 2015|df= dmy-all}}
26. ^{{cite news|url= http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/excel/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-workbook.xlsx|title= BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2016 - data workbook|publisher= BP|date= June 2016|accessdate= 11 June 2016|deadurl= no|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20161202103642/http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/excel/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-workbook.xlsx|archivedate= 2 December 2016|df= dmy-all}}
27. ^https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-renewable-energy.pdf BP Global, solar energy: Renewable Energy 2017 in review
28. ^{{cite web|url=https://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/31/photovoltaic-dreaming-first-attempts-commercializing-pv/|title=Photovoltaic Dreaming 1875--1905: First Attempts At Commercializing PV - CleanTechnica|author=|date=|website=cleantechnica.com|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20170525170459/https://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/31/photovoltaic-dreaming-first-attempts-commercializing-pv/|archivedate=25 May 2017|df=dmy-all}}
29. ^Butti and Perlin (1981), p. 63, 77, 101
30. ^"The Solar Energy Book-Once More." Mother Earth News 31:16–17, Jan. 1975
31. ^Butti and Perlin (1981), p. 249
32. ^Yergin (1991), pp. 634, 653–673
33. ^{{cite web | title=Chronicle of Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft | publisher=Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft | url=http://www.fraunhofer.de/EN/company/profile/chronicle/1972-1982.jsp | accessdate=4 November 2007 | deadurl=no | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071212091650/http://www.fraunhofer.de/EN/company/profile/chronicle/1972-1982.jsp | archivedate=12 December 2007 | df=dmy-all }}
34. ^Solar: photovoltaic: Lighting Up The World retrieved 19 May 2009 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100813163816/http://www.solardev.com/SEIA-lightworld.php |date=13 August 2010 }}
35. ^¹{{Cite web|url=http://www.iea-pvps.org/fileadmin/dam/public/report/statistics/IEA-PVPS_-_A_Snapshot_of_Global_PV_-_1992-2016__1_.pdf|title=2016 Snapshot of Global Photovoltaic Markets|last=|first=|date=2017|website=International Energy Agency|access-date=|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170827050437/http://www.iea-pvps.org/fileadmin/dam/public/report/statistics/IEA-PVPS_-_A_Snapshot_of_Global_PV_-_1992-2016__1_.pdf|archivedate=27 August 2017|df=dmy-all}}
36. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.renewablesinternational.net/overview-of-installed-pv-in-2013/150/452/75985/|title=Photovoltaics: Overview of installed PV in 2013|publisher=Renewables International|date=14 January 2014|accessdate=23 June 2014|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140330022600/http://www.renewablesinternational.net/overview-of-installed-pv-in-2013/150/452/75985/|archivedate=30 March 2014|df=dmy-all}}
37. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.pv-tech.org/editors-blog/45754|title=Top-10 solar cell producers in 2016|first=Finlay|last=Colville|work=PV-Tech|date=30 January 2017|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202054912/http://www.pv-tech.org/editors-blog/45754|archivedate=2 February 2017|df=dmy-all}}
38. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Executive-Summary-The-New-Solar-System-1.pdf|title=The New Solar System - Executive Summary|last=Ball|first=Jeffrey |display-authors=etal |date=2017-03-21|website=Stanford University Law School, Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance|access-date=2017-06-27|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170420151310/https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Executive-Summary-The-New-Solar-System-1.pdf|archivedate=20 April 2017|df=dmy-all}}
39. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/Resources/GSR/2014/GSR2014_full%20report_low%20res.pdf |title=Renewables 2014: Global Status Report |author=REN21 | archiveurl= https://www.webcitation.org/6SKF06GAX?url=http://www.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/Resources/GSR/2014/GSR2014_full%20report_low%20res.pdf |archivedate=4 September 2014 |year=2014 |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}
40. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/pv_roadmap_foldout.pdf |title=Solar photovoltaic roadmap |publisher=International Energy Agency |date=2010 |accessdate=18 August 2014 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924042430/http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/pv_roadmap_foldout.pdf |archivedate=24 September 2015 |df=dmy-all }}
41. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/09/doe-closes-on-three-major-solar-projects |title=DOE Closes on Four Major Solar Projects |date=30 September 2011 |work=Renewable Energy World |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111111021243/http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/09/doe-closes-on-three-major-solar-projects |archivedate=11 November 2011 |df=dmy-all }}
42. ^{{Cite web|url=https://electrek.co/2018/01/29/10-really-cool-solar-power-installations/|title=10 really cool Solar Power installations in (and above) the world|access-date=30 January 2018}}
43. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.escn.com.cn/news/show-310093.html|title=宁夏在腾格里沙漠南缘建成全国最大沙漠光伏集成区 - 今日热点 - 中国储能网|website=www.escn.com.cn|access-date=2017-05-20}}
44. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.nrdc.org/experts/anjali-jaiswal/worlds-largest-solar-park-kurnool-india |title=The World's Largest Solar Park - Kurnool, India |accessdate=1 November 2017}}
45. ^{{Cite web|url=http://solar.ofweek.com/2017-02/ART-260009-8120-30106500.html|title=大同光伏领跑者验收：月均发电量超过1亿度 - OFweek太阳能光伏网|website=solar.ofweek.com|access-date=2017-05-20}}
46. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.escn.com.cn/news/show-400779.html|title=看山西大同示范基地如何领跑全国光伏行业 - 光伏电站 - 中国储能网|website=www.escn.com.cn|access-date=2017-05-20}}
47. ^{{Cite web|url=http://pv.energytrend.com/research/China_Top_Runner_Program_Improves_Mono_si_Products_Market_Share_to_25_percent.html|title=China's Top Runner Program Improves Mono-si Products' Market Share to 25%_EnergyTrend PV|website=pv.energytrend.com|language=english|access-date=2017-05-20}}
48. ^Denis Lenardic. Large-scale photovoltaic power plants ranking 1 - 50 PVresources.com, 2011.
49. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/m/powerchina/2014-01/02/content_17210451.htm|title=World's largest solar-hydro power station getting connected to the grid|author=李洋}}
50. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/archive-2013/2013/kw50/cpi-completes-massive-hybrid-solar-pvhydro-plant-in-western-china.html|title=KW50 - CPI completes massive hybrid solar PV/hydro plant in Western China - SolarServer|author=Author}}
51. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.hydropower.org/sites/default/files/publications-docs/Zhang-Jun-Huanghe-Hydropower-Development-Co-future-energy-mix-World-Hydropower-Congress.pdf|title=Joint Development Mode of Hydropower and New Energy|last=Jun|first=Zhang|date=May 2015|publisher=Upstream Huanghe Hydropower Development Co., Ltd.|accessdate=22 March 2016}}
52. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.esi-africa.com/features/global-hydropower-market-shows-promise-for-future/|title=Global hydropower market shows promise for future|date=10 March 2016|publisher=ESI-Africa.com|accessdate=22 March 2016}}
53. ^750MW Madhya Pradesh solar plant starts operations, to serve Delhi Metro, The New Indian Express, 6 July 2018
54. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/countrys-biggest-solar-park-at-the-heart-of-indias-clean-energy-push-1696271|title=Country's Biggest Solar Park In Rajasthan, At The Heart Of India's Clean Energy Push|work=NDTV.com|access-date=2017-06-06}}
55. ^http://m.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/adani-dedicates-to-nation-worlds-largest-solar-power-plant-in-tn/article9131623.ece
56. ^{{Cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Adani-Group-launches-worlds-largest-solar-power-plant-in-Tamil-Nadu/articleshow/54443678.cms|title=Adani Group launches world's largest solar power plant in Tamil Nadu - Times of India|access-date=2016-09-21}}
57. ^{{cite news | url=https://mercomindia.com/600mw-grid-sychronized-pavagada/|title=600 MW of Solar Projects Synchronized to the Grid at Karnataka’s Pavagada Park|accessdate=18 February 2018}}
58. ^{{cite news|last1=Reporter|first1=Staff|title=Pavagada solar park inaugurated|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/pavagada-solar-park-inaugurated/article22898627.ece|accessdate=2 March 2018|work=The Hindu|date=2 March 2018|language=en-IN}}
59. ^[https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2014/10/31/solar-star-project-japan-dg-demand-drive-sunpowers-q3/ Solar Star Project, Japan DG Demand Drive SunPower's Q3], Forbes, 10/31/2014
60. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mortenson.com/solar/projects/solar-star-i-and-ii|title=Solar}}
61. ^{{cite web|url=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=85403|title=Earth Observatory image, using EO-1 ALI data}}
62. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/12/billionaire-buffett-bets-on-solar-energy |title=Billionaire Buffett Bets on Solar Energy |author=Steve Leone |date=7 December 2011 |work=Renewable Energy World }}
63. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2014/01/03/2860930/california-valley-solar-farm.html|title=California Valley's Topaz Solar Farm now producing electricity|work=sanluisobispo}}
64. ^{{cite web |url=http://eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/57695 |title=Topaz Solar Farm, Monthly |work=Electricity Data Browser |author=Energy Information Administration |accessdate=October 9, 2013}}
65. ^What is peak demand? {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120811072202/http://www.energex.com.au/sustainability/sustainability-rewards-programs/what-is-peak-demand |date=11 August 2012 }}, Energex.com.au website.
66. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.abengoasolar.com/sites/solar/en/about_us/general/news/archive/2009/20090525_noticias.html|title=Abengoa Solar begins construction on Extremadura's second solar concentrating solar power plant|author=|date=|website=abengoasolar.com|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091204111056/http://www.abengoasolar.com/sites/solar/en/about_us/general/news/archive/2009/20090525_noticias.html|archivedate=4 December 2009|df=dmy-all}}
67. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.csp-world.com/news/20130930/001204/abengoa-closes-financing-and-begin-operation-solaben-1-6-csp-plants-spain|title=Abengoa closes financing and begin operation of Solaben 1 & 6 CSP plants in Spain|work=CSP-World|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016055216/http://www.csp-world.com/news/20130930/001204/abengoa-closes-financing-and-begin-operation-solaben-1-6-csp-plants-spain|archivedate=16 October 2013|df=dmy-all}}
68. ^{{cite web |publisher=European Photovoltaic Industry Association |url=http://www.epia.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Competing_Full_Report.pdf |title=Solar Photovoltaics Competing in the Energy Sector—On the road to competitiveness |page=18 |date=September 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130226222413/http://www.epia.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Competing_Full_Report.pdf |archivedate=26 February 2013 |df=dmy }}
69. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-solar-power-buffett-vs-musk/|title=Musk vs. Buffett: The Billionaire Battle to Own the Sun|work=Bloomberg.com|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216024255/https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-solar-power-buffett-vs-musk/|archivedate=16 February 2017|df=dmy-all}}
70. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-4-solar-power-stocks-will-leave-fossil-fuels-in-the-dust-2016-07-18?link=MW_popular%7Ctitle=These|title=These 4 solar-power stocks will leave fossil fuels in the dust|first=Garvin|last=Jabusch|date=|website=marketwatch.com|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170819230343/http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-4-solar-power-stocks-will-leave-fossil-fuels-in-the-dust-2016-07-18?link=MW_popular%7Ctitle=These|archivedate=19 August 2017|df=dmy-all}}
71. ^US EIA, Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2014 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151027231537/http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/electricity_generation.cfm |date=27 October 2015 }}, 17 April 2014.
72. ^Robert Glennon and Andrew M. Reeves, Solar Energy's Cloudy Future, 1 Ariz. J. Evtl. L. & Pol'y, 91, 106 (2010) available at {{cite web|url=http://ajelp.com/documents/GlennonFinal.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=11 August 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811064518/http://ajelp.com/documents/GlennonFinal.pdf |archivedate=11 August 2011 |df=dmy }}
73. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.pvinvestmentconference.org |title=3rd International Conference on Solar Photovoltaic Investments |publisher=Pvinvestmentconference.org |accessdate=19 April 2011 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090503114036/http://www.pvinvestmentconference.org/ |archivedate=3 May 2009 |df=dmy-all }}
74. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.gtmresearch.com/report/solar-power-services-how-ppas-are-changing-the-pv-value-chain | title=Solar Power Services: How PPAs are Changing the PV Value Chain | date=11 February 2008 | accessdate=21 May 2009 | deadurl=no | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090510082253/http://www.gtmresearch.com/report/solar-power-services-how-ppas-are-changing-the-pv-value-chain | archivedate=10 May 2009 | df=dmy-all }}
75. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/story/print?guid=F4031B1C-52B9-11E1-A6A2-002128040CF6 |title=China's visible solar power success |author=Mark Clifford |date=8 February 2012 |work=MarketWatch |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130801064435/http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/story/print?guid=F4031B1C-52B9-11E1-A6A2-002128040CF6 |archivedate=1 August 2013 |df=dmy-all }}
76. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/62558.pdf |title=Photovoltaic System Pricing Trends – Historical, Recent, and Near-Term Projections, 2014 Edition |publisher=NREL |page=4 |date=22 September 2014 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/6XOoaSCpl?url=http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/62558.pdf |archivedate=29 March 2015 |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}
77. ^GreenTechMedia.com Solar PV Pricing Continues to Fall During a Record-Breaking 2014 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525165540/https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/solar-pv-system-prices-continue-to-fall-during-a-record-breaking-2014 |date=25 May 2017 }}, 13 March 2015
78. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.photovoltaik-guide.de/pv-preisindex |title=Photovoltaik-Preisindex |trans-title=Solar PV price index |publisher=PhotovoltaikGuide |quote=Turnkey net-prices for a solar PV system of up to 100 kWp amounted to Euro 1,240 per kWp. |access-date=30 March 2015 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170710020014/http://www.photovoltaik-guide.de/pv-preisindex |archivedate=10 July 2017 |df=dmy-all }}
79. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.db.com/cr/en/docs/solar_report_full_length.pdf |title=Crossing the Chasm |publisher=Deutsche Bank Markets Research |date=27 February 2015 |page=9 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/6XSrEw1QL?url=https://www.db.com/cr/en/docs/solar_report_full_length.pdf |archivedate=1 April 2015 |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}
80. ^Going for grid parity {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608081013/http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=9013609&contentId=7005395 |date=8 June 2011 }} 2005 article
81. ^{{cite news | url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterdetwiler/2012/12/26/solar-grid-parity-comes-to-spain/ | title=Solar Grid Parity Comes to Spain | work=Forbes | first=Peter | last=Kelly-Detwiler | deadurl=no | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130102125458/http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterdetwiler/2012/12/26/solar-grid-parity-comes-to-spain/ | archivedate=2 January 2013 | df=dmy-all }}
82. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9019305&contentId=7035199|title=Gaining on the grid|publisher=BP|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608081020/http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9019305&contentId=7035199|archivedate=8 June 2011|df=dmy-all}}
83. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.bp.com/popupimage.do?img_path=liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/frontiers/STAGING/local_assets/images/fr19solar_parity570x417.jpg%20&alt_tag=Graphic%20about%20grid%20parity,%20when%20the%20cost%20of%20solar%20energy%20equals%20that%20of%20grid%20electricity |title=The Path to Grid Parity |publisher=BP |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029191313/http://www.bp.com/popupimage.do?img_path=liveassets%2Fbp_internet%2Fglobalbp%2Fglobalbp_uk_english%2Freports_and_publications%2Ffrontiers%2FSTAGING%2Flocal_assets%2Fimages%2Ffr19solar_parity570x417.jpg%20&alt_tag=Graphic%20about%20grid%20parity%2C%20when%20the%20cost%20of%20solar%20energy%20equals%20that%20of%20grid%20electricity |archivedate=29 October 2013 |df=dmy }}{{failed verification|date = June 2015}}
84. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSL1878986220071019|title=Solar power edges towards boom time|author=Reuters Editorial|date=19 October 2007|work=Reuters|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090722210645/http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSL1878986220071019|archivedate=22 July 2009|df=dmy-all}}
85. ^¹The True Cost of Solar Power retrieved 22 October 2008 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080908113041/http://www.photon-consulting.com/en/true_cost_2007/summary.htm |date=8 September 2008 }}
86. ^{{cite web |url=http://slideplayer.com/slide/7652063/25/images/3/Daytime+Cloud+Fraction+Coast+lines+evident.jpg |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2017-08-22 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822174443/http://slideplayer.com/slide/7652063/25/images/3/Daytime+Cloud+Fraction+Coast+lines+evident.jpg |archivedate=22 August 2017 |df=dmy-all }}
87. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.econet.org.uk/weather/sun.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2015-09-06 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923233148/http://www.econet.org.uk/weather/sun.html |archivedate=23 September 2015 |df=dmy-all }}
88. ^{{cite web |url=http://solarone.me/2016/07/27/living-in-the-sun-belt-the-solar-power-potential-for-the-middle-east/ |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2017-08-22 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826121314/http://solarone.me/2016/07/27/living-in-the-sun-belt-the-solar-power-potential-for-the-middle-east/ |archivedate=26 August 2017 |df=dmy-all }}
89. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.acgeospatial.co.uk/blog/the-cloudiest-place/|title=The cloudiest place|author=|date=|website=www.acgeospatial.co.uk|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822135308/http://www.acgeospatial.co.uk/blog/the-cloudiest-place/|archivedate=22 August 2017|df=dmy-all}}
90. ^{{cite web|url=https://medium.com/@anttilip/the-sunniest-place-on-earth-in-2016-b56b33172dfc|title=The sunniest place on Earth in 2016|first=Antti|last=Lipponen|date=7 January 2017|website=medium.com|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822135949/https://medium.com/@anttilip/the-sunniest-place-on-earth-in-2016-b56b33172dfc|archivedate=22 August 2017|df=dmy-all}}
91. ^{{cite web|url=https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Ahl2afL-jL0BdEVGU3dsbllfTzlxMEV0aTNqT0d5Nnc&output=html|title=Money saved by producing electricity from PV and Years for payback|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141228114744/https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Ahl2afL-jL0BdEVGU3dsbllfTzlxMEV0aTNqT0d5Nnc&output=html|archivedate=28 December 2014|df=dmy-all}}
92. ^¹²{{cite report |title=Trends in Photovoltaic Applications 2014 |publisher=IEA-PVPS |date=2014 |url=http://iea-pvps.org/fileadmin/dam/public/report/statistics/IEA_PVPS_Trends_2014_in_PV_Applications_-_lr.pdf |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525165925/http://iea-pvps.org/fileadmin/dam/public/report/statistics/IEA_PVPS_Trends_2014_in_PV_Applications_-_lr.pdf |archivedate=25 May 2017 |df=dmy-all }}
93. ^{{cite journal |last=Stetz |first=T |last2=Marten |first2=F |last3=Braun |first3=M |title=Improved Low Voltage Grid-Integration of Photovoltaic Systems in Germany |journal=IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy |date=2013 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=534–542 |doi=10.1109/TSTE.2012.2198925|bibcode=2013ITSE....4..534S }}
94. ^¹²³{{cite journal |last=Salpakari |first=Jyri |last2=Lund |first2=Peter |title=Optimal and rule-based control strategies for energy flexibility in buildings with PV |journal=Applied Energy |date=2016 |volume=161 |pages=425–436 |doi=10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.036}}
95. ^{{cite report |last=Fiztgerald |first=Garrett |last2=Mandel |first2=James |last3=Morris |first3=Jesse |last4=Touati |first4=Hervé |title=The Economics of Battery Energy Storage |publisher=Rocky Mountain Institute |date=2015 |url=http://www.rmi.org/Content/Files/RMI-TheEconomicsOfBatteryEnergyStorage-FullReport-FINAL.pdf |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20161130145345/http://www.rmi.org/Content/Files/RMI-TheEconomicsOfBatteryEnergyStorage-FullReport-FINAL.pdf |archivedate=30 November 2016 |df=dmy-all }}
96. ^Solar Rebate Program {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120725015516/http://www.austinenergy.com/Energy%20Efficiency/Programs/Rebates/Solar%20Rebates/index.htm |date=25 July 2012 }}
97. ^Net Metering {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121021172839/http://www.dsireusa.org/solar/solarpolicyguide/?id=17 |date=21 October 2012 }}
98. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/programs/net-metering-and-interconnection|title=Net Metering and Interconnection - NJ OCE Web Site|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120512060609/http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/programs/net-metering-and-interconnection|archivedate=12 May 2012|df=dmy-all}}
99. ^[https://www.cnbc.com/id/32551044/site/14081545 China Racing Ahead of America in the Drive to Go Solar]. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130706133417/http://www.cnbc.com/id/32551044/site/14081545 |date=6 July 2013 }}
100. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.solarbuzz.com/FastFactsGermany.htm|title=Power & Energy Technology - IHS Technology|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100102171748/http://solarbuzz.com/FastFactsGermany.htm|archivedate=2 January 2010|df=dmy-all}}
101. ^Approved — Feed-in tariff in Israel {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090603195611/http://eng.shirasol.co.il/Approved-Feed-in-tariff-in-Israel.htm |date=3 June 2009 }}.
102. ^[https://web.archive.org/web/20070208104905/http://www.oja-services.nl/iea-pvps/isr/22.htm]
103. ^Wright, matthew; Hearps, Patrick; et al. Australian Sustainable Energy: Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151124173114/http://media.bze.org.au/ZCA2020_Stationary_Energy_Report_v1.pdf |date=24 November 2015 }}, Energy Research Institute, University of Melbourne, October 2010, p. 33. Retrieved from BeyondZeroEmissions.org website.
104. ^Innovation in Concentrating Thermal Solar Power (CSP) {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924090041/http://www.renewableenergyfocus.com/view/3272/innovation-in-concentrating-thermal-solar-power-csp/ |date=24 September 2015 }}, RenewableEnergyFocus.com website.
105. ^{{cite web|url=http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2013/10/solana_10_facts_you_didnt_know.php|title=Solana: 10 Facts You Didn't Know About the Concentrated Solar Power Plant Near Gila Bend|author=Ray Stern|work=Phoenix New Times|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131011235507/http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2013/10/solana_10_facts_you_didnt_know.php|archivedate=11 October 2013|df=dmy-all}}
106. ^Carr (1976), p. 85
107. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/california-sun-solar-power-electricity-energy-prices-negative-renewables-green-climate-change-fossil-a7678086.html|title=California produced so much solar power, electricity prices just turned negative|author=|date=11 April 2017|website=independent.co.uk|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211175722/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/california-sun-solar-power-electricity-energy-prices-negative-renewables-green-climate-change-fossil-a7678086.html|archivedate=11 December 2017|df=dmy-all}}
108. ^{{cite web|url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/3-reasons-hawaii-put-the-brakes-on-solar-and-why-the-same-won-t-happen-in-your-state/|title=3 Reasons Hawaii Put the Brakes on Solar--and Why the Same Won't Happen in Your State|first=Robert|last=Fares|date=|website=scientificamerican.com|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920121552/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/3-reasons-hawaii-put-the-brakes-on-solar-and-why-the-same-won-t-happen-in-your-state/|archivedate=20 September 2016|df=dmy-all}}
109. ^{{cite web |title=Pumped Hydro Storage |publisher=Electricity Storage Association |url=http://www.electricitystorage.org/tech/technologies_technologies_pumpedhydro.htm |accessdate=31 July 2008 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080621052054/http://www.electricitystorage.org/tech/technologies_technologies_pumpedhydro.htm |archivedate=21 June 2008 |df=dmy }}
110. ^{{cite web |title = Advantages of Using Molten Salt |publisher = Sandia National Laboratory |url = http://www.sandia.gov/Renewable_Energy/solarthermal/NSTTF/salt.htm |accessdate = 29 September 2007 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20110605094349/http://www.sandia.gov/Renewable_Energy/solarthermal/NSTTF/salt.htm |archivedate = 5 June 2011 |df = dmy-all}}
111. ^{{cite web |title=PV Systems and Net Metering |publisher=Department of Energy |url=http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/net_metering.html |accessdate=31 July 2008 |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20080704062311/http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/net_metering.html |archivedate=4 July 2008}}
112. ^Aishwarya S. Mundada, Yuenyong Nilsiam, Joshua M. Pearce. [https://www.academia.edu/26379506/A_Review_of_Technical_Requirements_for_Plug-and-Play_Solar_Photovoltaic_Microinverter_Systems_in_the_United_States A review of technical requirements for plug-and-play solar photovoltaic micro-inverter systems in the United States] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180430130147/http://www.academia.edu/26379506/A_Review_of_Technical_Requirements_for_Plug-and-Play_Solar_Photovoltaic_Microinverter_Systems_in_the_United_States |date=30 April 2018 }}. Solar Energy 135, (2016), pp. 455–470. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.06.002
113. ^Platzer, M.D., 2012. US solar photovoltaic manufacturing: Industry trends, global competition, federal support. Washington, DC: Congressional Research service.
114. ^{{cite web |publisher=ETH Zürich, Harvard University |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264239770 |title=The Economic Viability of Battery Storage for Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems - A Review and a Simulation Model |author1=Joern Hoppmann |author2=Jonas Volland |author3=Tobias S. Schmidt |author4=Volker H. Hoffmann |date=July 2014 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150403122002/http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264239770_The_Economic_Viability_of_Battery_Storage_for_Residential_Solar_Photovoltaic_Systems_-_A_Review_and_a_Simulation_Model |archivedate=3 April 2015 |df=dmy-all }}
115. ^FORBES, Justin Gerdes, [https://www.forbes.com/sites/justingerdes/2013/07/18/solar-energy-storage-about-to-take-off-in-germany-and-california/ Solar Energy Storage About To Take Off In Germany and California] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170729205924/https://www.forbes.com/sites/justingerdes/2013/07/18/solar-energy-storage-about-to-take-off-in-germany-and-california/ |date=29 July 2017 }}, 18 July 2013
116. ^{{cite news |work=Associated Press |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tesla-launches-powerwall-home-battery-with-aim-to-revolutionize-energy-consumption-1.3056587 |title=Tesla launches Powerwall home battery with aim to revolutionize energy consumption |date=1 May 2015 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150607013500/http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tesla-launches-powerwall-home-battery-with-aim-to-revolutionize-energy-consumption-1.3056587 |archivedate=7 June 2015 |df=dmy-all }}
117. ^{{cite web|url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aee9/8815cc874423e67af5fd9bf8eac612b56ea6.pdf|title=Seasonal Energy Storage in a Renewable Energy System|author=|date=|website=semanticscholar.org|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525170317/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aee9/8815cc874423e67af5fd9bf8eac612b56ea6.pdf|archivedate=25 May 2017|df=dmy-all}}
118. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.solarserver.de/solarmagazin/anlagejanuar2008_e.html |title = The Combined Power Plant: the first stage in providing 100% power from renewable energy |date = January 2008 |accessdate = 10 October 2008 |publisher = SolarServer |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20081014054221/http://www.solarserver.de/solarmagazin/anlagejanuar2008_e.html |archivedate = 14 October 2008 |df = dmy-all}}
119. ^Collings AF, Critchley C. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Lx_idhgCyL8C Artificial Photosynthesis. From Basic Biology to Industrial Application]. Wiley-VCH. Weinheim (2005) p. x {{ISBN|3-527-31090-8}} {{DOI|10.1002/3527606742}}.
120. ^{{citation|title=Energy and environment policy case for a global project on artificial photosynthesis|url=http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/ee/c3ee00063j|journal=Energy & Environmental Science|volume=6|issue=3|pages=695–698|year=2013|last1=Faunce|first1=T. A.|last2=Lubitz|first2=W.|last3=Rutherford|first3=A. W. (Bill)|last4=MacFarlane|first4=D.|last5=Moore|first5=G. F.|last6=Yang|first6=P.|last7=Nocera|first7=D. G|last8=Moore|first8=Tom A|last9=Gregory|first9=Duncan H|last10=Fukuzumi|first10=Shunichi|last11=Yoon|first11=Kyung B.|last12=Armstrong|first12=F. A.|last13=Wasielewski|first13=M. R.|last14=Styring|first14=S.|doi=10.1039/C3EE00063J|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130816015954/http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/ee/c3ee00063j|archivedate=16 August 2013|df=dmy-all}}
121. ^¹²³Alsema, E.A.; Wild – Scholten, M.J. de; Fthenakis, V.M. Environmental impacts of PV electricity generation – a critical comparison of energy supply options {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120306134616/http://www.ecn.nl/publicaties/default.aspx?nr=ECN-RX--06-016 |date=6 March 2012 }} ECN, September 2006; 7p. Presented at the 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Dresden, Germany, 4–8 September 2006.
122. ^{{Cite news |last = Lund |first = John W. |date = June 2007 |title = Characteristics, Development and utilization of geothermal resources |periodical = Geo-Heat Centre Quarterly Bulletin |publication-place = Klamath Falls, Oregon |publisher = Oregon Institute of Technology |volume = 28 |issue = 2 |pages = 1–9 |url = http://geoheat.oit.edu/bulletin/bull28-2/art1.pdf |issn = 0276-1084 |accessdate = 16 April 2009 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20100617215822/http://geoheat.oit.edu/bulletin/bull28-2/art1.pdf |archivedate = 17 June 2010 |df = dmy-all}}
123. ^¹²{{cite journal |first1 = Ingvar B. |last1 = Fridleifsson |first2 = Ruggero |last2 = Bertani |first3 = Ernst |last3 = Huenges |first4 = John W. |last4 = Lund |first5 = Arni |last5 = Ragnarsson |first6 = Ladislaus |last6 = Rybach |date = 11 February 2008 |title = The possible role and contribution of geothermal energy to the mitigation of climate change |conference = IPCC Scoping Meeting on Renewable Energy Sources |editor = O. Hohmeyer and T. Trittin |location = Luebeck, Germany |pages = 59–80 |url = http://iga.igg.cnr.it/documenti/IGA/Fridleifsson_et_al_IPCC_Geothermal_paper_2008.pdf |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110722030340/http://iga.igg.cnr.it/documenti/IGA/Fridleifsson_et_al_IPCC_Geothermal_paper_2008.pdf |archive-date = 22 July 2011 |accessdate = 6 April 2009 |deadurl = yes |df = dmy}}
124. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.portablesolarpanels-forsale.com/solar-energy-facts|title=Portable Solar Panels|work=Portable Solar Panels for Sale|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120726034440/http://www.portablesolarpanels-forsale.com/solar-energy-facts/|archivedate=26 July 2012|df=dmy-all}}
125. ^NREL, Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Generation {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150328212706/http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/57187.pdf |date=28 March 2015 }}, NREL/FS-6A20-57187, Jan 2013.
126. ^David D. Hsu and others, [https://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/pdf/225_Hsu_etal_c-SI_PV%20LCA%20Harmonization.pdf Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Electricity Generation: Systematic Review and Harmonization] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304112827/https://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/pdf/225_Hsu_etal_c-SI_PV%20LCA%20Harmonization.pdf |date=4 March 2016 }}, 2011.
127. ^{{cite news |url= http://www.pce.parliament.nz/our-work/news-insights/electric-cars-not-solar-panels-says-environment-commissioner |title= Electric cars not solar panels, says Environment Commissioner |publisher= Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment |date= 22 March 2016 |accessdate= 23 March 2016 |deadurl= no |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20160403033039/http://www.pce.parliament.nz/our-work/news-insights/electric-cars-not-solar-panels-says-environment-commissioner |archivedate= 3 April 2016 |df= dmy-all }}
128. ^{{cite web |title=Photovoltaics Report |url=http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/downloads-englisch/pdf-files-englisch/photovoltaics-report-slides.pdf |publisher=Fraunhofer ISE |pages=28–32 |accessdate=31 August 2014 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/6SFRTUaBS?url=http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/downloads-englisch/pdf-files-englisch/photovoltaics-report-slides.pdf |archivedate=31 August 2014 |date=28 July 2014 |deadurl=no |df=dmy }}
129. ^Andrew Blakers and Klaus Weber, "The Energy Intensity of Photovoltaic Systems" {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120717213134/http://www.ecotopia.com/apollo2/pvepbtoz.htm |date=17 July 2012 }}, Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Australian National University, 2000.
130. ^Jinqing Peng, Lin Lu, Hongxing Yang, Review on lifecycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 19, (2013), 255–274, Fig. 5, {{DOI|10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035}}.
131. ^C. Reich-Weiser, D. Dornfeld, and S. Horne. Environmental assessment and metrics for solar: Case study of solfocus solar concentrator systems {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406021740/http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bt786nf |date=6 April 2013 }}. UC Berkeley: Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability, 8 May 2008.
132. ^Service Lifetime Prediction for Encapsulated Photovoltaic Cells/Minimodules {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304073224/http://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/fy97/22572.pdf |date=4 March 2016 }}, A.W. Czanderna and G.J. Jorgensen, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
133. ^Joshua Pearce and Andrew Lau, "Net Energy Analysis For Sustainable Energy Production From Silicon Based Solar Cells" {{webarchive|url=http://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/20110915040100/http://alpha.chem.umb.edu/chemistry/ch471/evans%20files/Net_Energy%20solar%20cells.pdf |date=15 September 2011 }}, Proceedings of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Solar 2002: Sunrise on the Reliable Energy Economy, editor R. Campbell-Howe, 2002.
134. ^¹Meldrum and others, "Life cycle water use for electricity generation: a review and harmonization of literature estimates," Environmental Research Letters, 2013, v.8.
135. ^Nathan Bracken and others, Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A50-61376, March 2015, p.10.
136. ^John Macknick and others, A Review of Operational Water Consumption and Withdrawal Factors for Electricity Generating Technologies {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150406000614/http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50900.pdf |date=6 April 2015 }}, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-50900.
137. ^Utility-Scale Solar Power: Responsible Water Resource Management, Solar Energy Industries Association, 18 March 2010.
138. ^[https://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/csp_water_study.pdf Concentrating Solar Power Commercial Application Study] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171226021735/https://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/csp_water_study.pdf |date=26 December 2017 }}, US Department of Energy, 20 Feb. 2008.
139. ^John Macknick and others, [https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50900.pdf A Review of Operational Water Consumption and Withdrawal Factors for Electricity Generating Technologies] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809222054/http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50900.pdf |date=9 August 2017 }}, NREL, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-50900.
140. ^[https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=14971 Many newer power plants have cooling systems that Reuse Water] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171226020936/https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=14971 |date=26 December 2017 }}, US EIA, 11 Feb. 2014.
141. ^¹{{cite web |last1=Werner |first1=Jürgen H. |title=Toxic Substances In Photovoltaic Modules |url=http://www.postfreemarket.net/pdf/japan1.pdf |website=postfreemarket.net |publisher=Institute of Photovoltaics, University of Stuttgart, Germany - The 21st International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference 2011 Fukuoka, Japan |accessdate=23 September 2014 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/6So1l9Oko?url=http://www.postfreemarket.net/pdf/japan1.pdf |archivedate=23 September 2014 |page=2 |date=2 November 2011 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy }}
142. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/pdf/art_166.pdf|title=CdTe PV: Real and Perceived EHS Risks|author=|date=|website=bnl.gov|accessdate=30 April 2018|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170627012102/https://www.bnl.gov/pv/files/pdf/art_166.pdf|archivedate=27 June 2017|df=dmy-all}}
143. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/calif-solar-power-plants-scorching-birds-in-midair/ |title=Solar plant's downside? Birds igniting in midair |publisher=CBS News |date=18 August 2014 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140819082723/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/calif-solar-power-plants-scorching-birds-in-midair/ |archivedate=19 August 2014 |df=dmy-all }}
144. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/188328-californias-new-solar-power-plant-is-actually-a-death-ray-thats-incinerating-birds-mid-flight |title=California's new solar power plant is actually a death ray that's incinerating birds mid-flight |publisher=ExtremeTech.com |date=20 August 2014 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141019003407/http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/188328-californias-new-solar-power-plant-is-actually-a-death-ray-thats-incinerating-birds-mid-flight |archivedate=19 October 2014 |df=dmy-all }}
145. ^{{cite web |author=Jake Richardson |date=22 August 2014 |url=http://cleantechnica.com/2014/08/22/bird-deaths-solar-plant-exaggerated-media-sources/ |title=Bird Deaths From Solar Plant Exaggerated By Some Media Sources |publisher=Cleantechnica.com}}
146. ^Hertwich and others, "Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies" {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151123154831/http://www.pnas.org/content/112/20/6277.full.pdf |date=23 November 2015 }}, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 19 May 2015, v.112 n.20.
147. ^MSU-CSET Participation Archive with notation in the Murray Ledger & Times
148. ^{{cite web |last = Layton |first = Julia |url = http://science.howstuffworks.com/luminescent-solar-concentrator1.htm |title = What is a luminescent solar concentrator? |publisher = Science.howstuffworks.com |date = 5 November 2008 |accessdate = 19 April 2011 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20100310165608/http://science.howstuffworks.com/luminescent-solar-concentrator1.htm |archivedate = 10 March 2010 |df = dmy-all}}
149. ^{{cite web |publisher=SolarServer.com |url=http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/archive-2014/2014/kw36/kyocera-partners-announce-construction-of-the-worlds-largest-floating-solar-pv-plant-in-hyogo-prefecture-japan.html |title=Kyocera, partners announce construction of the world's largest floating solar PV Plant in Hyogo prefecture, Japan |date=4 September 2014 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924104333/http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/archive-2014/2014/kw36/kyocera-partners-announce-construction-of-the-worlds-largest-floating-solar-pv-plant-in-hyogo-prefecture-japan.html |archivedate=24 September 2015 |df=dmy-all }}
150. ^{{cite web |publisher=EnergyWorld.com |url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/11/running-out-of-precious-land-floating-solar-pv-systems-may-be-a-solution |title=Running Out of Precious Land? Floating Solar PV Systems May Be a Solution |date=7 November 2013 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141226015351/http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/11/running-out-of-precious-land-floating-solar-pv-systems-may-be-a-solution |archivedate=26 December 2014 |df=dmy-all }}
151. ^{{cite web |publisher=SolarServer.com |url=http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/current/2015/kw03/vikram-solar-commissions-indias-first-floating-pv-plant.html |title=Vikram Solar commissions India's first floating PV plant |date=13 January 2015 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150302015428/http://www.solarserver.com/solar-magazine/solar-news/current/2015/kw03/vikram-solar-commissions-indias-first-floating-pv-plant.html |archivedate=2 March 2015 |df=dmy }}
152. ^{{cite web |url=http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/21/sunflower-floating-solar-power-plant-korea/ |title=Sunflower Floating Solar Power Plant In Korea |publisher=CleanTechnica |date=21 December 2014 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160515091859/http://cleantechnica.com/2014/12/21/sunflower%2Dfloating%2Dsolar%2Dpower%2Dplant%2Dkorea/ |archivedate=15 May 2016 |df=dmy-all }}
153. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2011/08/15/napa-winery-pioneers-solar-floatovoltaics/ |title=Napa Winery Pioneers Solar Floatovoltaics |publisher=Forbes |date=18 April 2012 |accessdate=31 May 2013 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120101065224/http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2011/08/15/napa-winery-pioneers-solar-floatovoltaics/ |archivedate=1 January 2012 |df=dmy-all }}
154. ^{{cite web|url=https://electrek.co/2017/01/29/a-look-at-a-chinese-fishery-with-a-giant-integrated-solar-array-feeding-a-world-hungry-for-clean-energy/|title=A look at a Chinese fishery with a giant integrated solar array – feeding a world hungry for clean energy|date=29 January 2017|work=Electrek|accessdate=29 January 2017|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170129200002/https://electrek.co/2017/01/29/a-look-at-a-chinese-fishery-with-a-giant-integrated-solar-array-feeding-a-world-hungry-for-clean-energy/|archivedate=29 January 2017|df=dmy-all}}