词条 | Syngman Rhee Line |
释义 |
title=Peace Line| hangul=평화선| hanja=平和線| rr=Pyeonghwaseon| mr=P’yŏnghwasŏn| }}{{Infobox Korean name| hangul=이승만 라인| hanja=李承晚線| rr=I Seungman Rain| mr=Yi Sŭngman Rain| }} The Syngman Rhee Line (Hanja:李承晩線, Hangul: 이승만 라인) refers to a marine boundary line established by South Korean President Syngman Rhee in his "Peace Line" (평화선, Hanja:平和線) declaration of January 18, 1952, establishing a wide area of maritime sovereignty, beyond internationally accepted territorial waters, around the entire Korean Peninsula.[1][2] This included placing the Liancourt Rocks (Dokdo/Takeshima) in Korean territory. BackgroundAfter the outbreak of the Korean War, General Douglas MacArthur declared a maritime security area surrounding the Korean peninsula, effectively barring entry of foreign shipping crafts. South Korea had demanded that the MacArthur line should continue to be enforced. On August 10, 1951, however, the United States sent Korean Ambassador Yang You Chan the Rusk documents, stating that the official policy of the United States was that the MacArthur line would be abolished by the Treaty of San Francisco. The treaty was signed on September 8 of the same year, about a month after the documents were sent, and was to come into effect on April 28, 1952. In response, the South Korean government declared the Syngman Rhee Line three months before this date, when the extinction of the MacArthur line and the return of sovereignty to Japan were meant to be established. Peace LineThe Proclamation asserted that the "Government of the Republic of Korea holds and exercises the national sovereignty" over the maritime area, suggesting the claim was for a wide extension of territorial waters. Representations over this issue were received from many other governments, and clarifications were made noting that the Proclamation stated it "does not interfere with the rights of free navigation on the high seas" so the Proclamation did not "mean extension of territorial waters into the high seas".[1] The "peace line", however covered even more of the high seas than the area delineated by General MacArthur.[3] It claimed an area averaging 60 nautical miles from the Korean coast.[4] It also became apparent that Rhee was no longer addressing the Korean security or the threat of communism because the declaration's main target was Japan. In initial statements, Rhee maintained that the purpose of the line was to protect Korea's marine resources around the Sea of Japan; therefore it banned non-Korean fishing boats from inside the territory, and Liancourt Rocks in particular. According to the Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East made in 1954, the U.S. government stressed that the one-sided declaration of the Syngman Rhee Line was illegal under international law. Outcome{{Multiple image|direction = vertical |width = 250 |image1 = Seizure of the Japanese ships by Korean Coast Guard.JPG |caption1 = Seizure of Japanese ships by the Korea Coast Guard (December 1953) |image2 = Demonstration against Syngman Rhee Line.JPG |caption2 = A Japanese demonstration against the line (September 15, 1953) }} The fishing boats - which were mostly Japanese - that violated the boundary line were seized by South Korea. This often transpired using the patrol boats provided by the United States.[3] Japanese records claim that such ships were often fired upon. The Japanese government protested the seizures and unilateral declaration strongly, but the abolition of the line had to wait even for the approval of the Japan-Korea Fishery Agreement in 1965. By the time an agreement was reached, 3929 Japanese people were arrested, of whom 44 were killed, and 328 Japanese ships were seized.[5]Japan also stopped importing South Korean products and prohibited its fishing gear manufacturers from exporting to South Korea. The Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea, signed on June 22, 1965, did not specifically address maritime issues.[4] ResolutionSolving the issue of the Syngman Rhee Line required many years.[6] Obstacles to its settlement included the fact that there were no formal diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea at the time, that normalization talks were complicated by various compensation claims, and the refusal of the United States to intervene on the issue, regarding it as bilateral. The conflict also became an issue of nationalism for Japan and South Korea so that, in the course of their negotiations during the postwar years, any semblance of compromise or concession amounted to treason in both countries.[7] The process took 14 years, five Japanese Prime Ministers, and three South Korean Presidents. The negotiations improved dramatically after Park Chung Hee (1961-1979) seized power in South Korea. At this point, the territorial dispute was no longer a primary issue due to an increasing pressure to improve bilateral relations, shifting the focus from the "peace line" to the diplomatic and economic affairs such as the fishery negotiations.[7] According to the demand of the South Korea Government, Japanese Government released 472 Korean criminals in Japan who had been imprisoned as a serious criminal or a habitual criminal and granted them the special permission of residence in exchange for the restoration of Japanese detainees. Korea refused an enforced repatriation to Korea of illegal immigrants, serious criminals and political offenses.[8] Timeline
See also{{wikisource|Presidential Proclamation of Sovereignty over Adjacent Seas}}
References1. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://contents.nahf.or.kr/item/item.do?levelId=kj.d_0007_0020_0050 |title=Letter re Syngman Rhee Line (including translated text of Presidential Proclamation of Sovereignty over Adjacent Seas) |author=T. T. Yynn |publisher=Northeast Asian History Foundation |work=Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Korea |date=28 September 1953 |accessdate=27 January 2018}} 2. ^{{cite web |url=http://dokdo-or-takeshima.blogspot.co.uk/2008/08/1952-january-syngman-rhee-line.html |title=1952 January: Syngman Rhee Line |publisher=Dokdo-or-Takeshima? |date=13 August 2008 |accessdate=27 January 2018}} 3. ^1 {{Cite book|title=Korea's Syngman Rhee: An Unauthorized Portrait|last=Allen|first=Richard|publisher=Charles E. Tuttle Company: Publishers|year=1960|isbn=9781462918096|location=Tokyo|pages=185}} 4. ^1 {{cite book|url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XNvmRaTOZ6gC|title=The Resolution of the Territorial Dispute Between Korea and Japan Over the Liancourt Rocks|author=Seokwoo Lee|work=International Boundaries Research Unit|publisher=Durham University|year=2002|isbn=9781897643518|page=5|accessdate=27 January 2018}} 5. ^{{cite journal | script-title=ja:論点整理 近代から現代へ | journal=フォトしまね | volume=161 | url=http://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/kochokoho/photo/161/06.html | language=Japanese | publisher=Shimane Prefectural Government | accessdate=2007-11-25 | year=2006 | deadurl=yes | archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928121556/http://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/kochokoho/photo/161/06.html | archivedate=2007-09-28 | df= }} 6. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/opinion/2017/12/198_103937.html |title=Shedding new light on Peace Line |last=Yong-hwan |first=Kim |newspaper=The Korea Times |date=1 February 2012 |accessdate=27 January 2018}} 7. ^1 {{Cite book|title=Island Disputes and Maritime Regime Building in East Asia: Between a Rock and a Hard Place|last=Koo|first=Min Gyo|publisher=Springer|year=2010|isbn=9780387896694|location=New York|pages=71}} 8. ^The 23rd Diet Standing Committee on Judicial Affairs minutes third Secretariat of the House of Representatives of Japan December 12, 1955. 9. ^FRUS 10. ^Possible Methods of Resolving Liancourt Rocks Dispute between Japan and ROK 11. ^Report of Van Fleet mission to the Far East 10 : Foreign relations of South Korea|Foreign relations of Japan|Japan–Korea relations|Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea|Disputed territories in Asia|Territorial disputes of Japan|Territorial disputes of South Korea|Anti-Korean sentiment in Japan|Liancourt Rocks|Japan–South Korea border |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。