“Transcription into Chinese characters”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

Transcription into Chinese is the use of traditional or simplified Chinese characters to phonetically transcribe the sound of terms and names of foreign words to the Chinese language. Transcription is distinct from translation into Chinese whereby the meaning of a foreign word is communicated in Chinese. Since, in mainland China and often in Taiwan, Hanyu Pinyin is now used to transcribe Chinese into a modified Latin alphabet and since English classes are now standard in most secondary schools, it is increasingly common to see foreign names and terms left in their original form in Chinese texts. However, for mass media and marketing within China and for non-European languages, particularly those of the Chinese minorities, transcription into characters remains very common.

Despite the importance of Cantonese and other southern coastal varieties of Chinese to foreign contact during the 19th century (as seen, for instance, in the number of Cantonese loanwords in English), the northern capital dialect has been formally sanctioned within the country for centuries. This status continued under the Republic, which retained the importance of the "National Language" ({{lang|zh|國語}}, Guóyǔ) despite moving its capital to Nanking, Chungking, and Taipei, none of which natively spoke it. Similarly, "Standard Chinese" ({{lang|zh|普通话}}, Pǔtōnghuà) has been mandatory for most media and education throughout the People's Republic of China since 1956.^[1]^[2] Except for a handful of traditional exceptions, modern transcription therefore uses the standardized Mandarin pronunciations exclusively.

Official standards

Modern Han Chinese consists of about 412 syllables^[3] in 5 tones, so homophones abound and most non Han words have multiple possible transcriptions. This is particularly true since Chinese is written as monosyllabic logograms, and consonant clusters foreign to Chinese must be broken into their constituent sounds (or omitted), despite being thought of as a single unit in their original language. Since there are so many characters to choose from when transcribing a word, a translator can manipulate the transcription to add additional meaning.

In the People's Republic of China, the process has been standardized by the Proper Names and Translation Service of the state-run Xinhua News Agency. Xinhua publishes an official reference guide, the Names of the World's Peoples: a Comprehensive Dictionary of Names in Roman-Chinese ({{Lang-zh|c=世界人名翻译大辞典|s=|t=|p=Shìjiè Rénmíng Fānyì Dà Cídiǎn|labels=no}}), which controls most transcription for official media and publication in mainland China. As the name implies, the work consists of a dictionary of common names. It also includes transcription tables for names and terms which are not included. The English table is reproduced below; those for a number of other languages are available at the Chinese Wikipedia.

The Basic Laws of the Hong Kong (article) and Macau (article) Special Administrative Regions provide that "Chinese" will be the official languages of those territories, in addition to English and Portuguese, respectively; leaving ambiguous the relative preference for Cantonese and Mandarin. In practice, transcriptions based on both Cantonese and Mandarin pronunciations have been used.

In Singapore, transcription standards are established by the Translation Standardisation Committee for the Chinese Media.

Increasingly, other countries are setting their own official standards for Chinese transcription and do not necessarily follow Xinhua's versions, just as Xinhua's version differs from Wade–Giles and other international standards. For example, the United States embassy in China recommends rendering "Obama" as {{Lang-zh|c=“欧巴马”|s=|t=|p=Ōubāmǎ|labels=no}}, while Xinhua uses {{Lang-zh|c=“奥巴马”|s=|t=|p=Àobāmǎ|labels=no}}.^[4]

History

Transcription of foreign terms may date to the earliest surviving written records in China, the Shang oracle bones. As the Huaxia spread from their initial settlements near the confluence of the Wei and Yellow rivers, they were surrounded on all sides by other peoples. The Chinese characters developed to describe them may have originally transcribed local names, such as the proposed connection between the original "Eastern Yi" people ({{lang|zh|東夷}}) and an Austroasiatic word for "sea".^[5] However, the tendency within China was to fit new groups into the existing structure, so that, for example, "Yi" eventually became a word for any "barbarian" and the name "Yue" ({{lang|zh|戉}} & {{lang|zh|越}}), originally applied to a people northwest of the Shang,^[6] was later applied to a people south of the Yangtze and then to many cultures as far south as Vietnam. Interaction with the states of Chu, Wu, and Yue during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods of the later Zhou brings the first certain evidence of transcription: most famously, the word jiāng ({{lang|zh|江}}), originally krong,^[7] derives from the Austroasiatic word for "river".^[8]

Besides proper names, a small number of loanwords also found their way into Chinese during the Han Dynasty after Zhang Qian's exploration of the Western Regions.^[9] The Western Han also saw Liu Xiang's transcription and translation of the "Song of the Yue Boatman" in his Garden of Stories. Some scholars have tried to use it to reconstruct an original version of the otherwise unrecorded language of the Yangtze's Yue people before their incorporation into the Han.^[10]

The expansion of Buddhism within China during the later Han and Three Kingdoms period required the transcription of a great many Sanskrit and Pali terms. According to the Song-era scholar Zhou Dunyi,^[11] the monk and translator Xuanzang (of Journey to the West fame) handed down guidelines of "Five Kinds of Words Not to Translate" ({{Lang-zh|c=|s=五种不翻|t=五種不翻|labels=|links=no}}). He directed that transcription should be used instead of translation when the words are:

These ancient transcription into Chinese characters provide clues to the reconstruction of Middle Chinese. In historical Chinese phonology, this information is called duiyin (t {{lang|zh|對音}}, s {{lang|zh|对音}}, lit. "corresponding sounds"); in Western Sinology, Baron Alexander von Staël-Holstein was the first to emphasize its importance in reconstructing the sounds of Middle Chinese. The transcriptions made during the Tang Dynasty are particularly valuable, as the then-popular Tantra sect required its mantras to be rendered very carefully into Chinese characters, since they were thought to lose their efficacy if their exact sounds were not properly uttered.

The History of Liao contains a list of Khitan words phonetically transcribed with Chinese characters. The History of Jin contains a list of Jurchen words phonetically transcribed with Chinese characters.^[12]^[13] In the History of Yuan, Mongol names were phonetically transcribed in Chinese characters.

In the Ming dynasty, the Chinese government's Bureau of Translators (四夷馆, Siyi Guan) and the Bureau of Interpreters (会同馆, Huitong Guan) published bilingual dictionaries/vocabularies of foreign languages like the Bureau of Translators' multilingual dictionary (华夷译语, Hua-Yi yiyu, 'Sino-Barbarian Dictionary'), using Chinese characters to phonetically transcribe the words of the foreign languages such as Jurchen, Korean, Japanese, Ryukyuan, Mongolian, Old Uyghur, Vietnamese, Cham, Dai, Thai, Burmese, Khmer, Persian, Tibetan, Malay, Javanese, Acehnese, and Sanskrit.

During the Qing dynasty some bilingual Chinese-Manchu dictionaries had the Manchu words phonetically transcribed with Chinese characters. The book 御製增訂清文鑑 ("Imperially-Published Revised and Enlarged mirror of Qing") in Manchu and Chinese, used both Manchu script to transcribe Chinese words and Chinese characters to transcribe Manchu words with fanqie.^[14]

As part of the promotion of Kaozheng studies in the philological field, Qianlong decided that the Chinese character transcriptions of names and words of the Khitan language in the History of Liao, the Jurchen language in the History of Jin, and the Mongolian language in the History of Yuan were not phonetically accurate and true to the original pronunciation. The histories were in fact hastily compiled and suffered from inaccurate and inconsistent phonetic transcriptions of the same names. He ordered the "Imperial Liao Jin Yuan Three Histories National Language Explanation" (欽定遼金元三史國語解 Qinding Liao Jin Yuan sanshi guoyujie^[15]^[16]^[17]) project to "correct" the Chinese character transcriptions by referring to the contemporaneous descendants of those languages. Qianlong identified the Solon language with the Khitan, the Manchu language with the Jurchen, and the Mongolian language with the Mongolian.^[18] Solon, Mongolian, and Manchu speakers were consulted with on the "correct" pronunciations of the names and words and their Chinese transcriptions were accordingly changed. However the Khitan language has now been found by modern linguists to be a Mongolic language and is unrelated to the Solon language. The project was part of the Siku Quanshu. Qianlong also promulgated a theory that the Daur people were descended from a Khitan clan, changing the Khitan clan name 大賀 dàhè, found in the History of Liao, to 達呼爾 dáhūěr. The Chinese transcription of the Manchu clan name Niohuru 鈕祜祿 (Niuhulu) was edited and inserted in place of the Jurchen clan name 女奚烈 (Nüxilie).^[19]

Marshall Broomhall commented that Though a great soldier and a great litterateur, K'ien-lung did not escape some serious errors. At one time he appointed a learned committee of Chinese, Manchus, Mongols, and Western Mohammedans to revise the foreign names of men and places which occur in the Yüan Records. So unscientific was this work that the K'ien-lung editions of the Liao, Kin, and Yüan histories are practically useless. The title Kalif rendered Ha-li-fu was changed by the Committee into Farkha and is explained as being "a village in Manchuria."^[23]

Transcriptions of English in Chinese characters were used in a book to learn English dating to 1860 in the reign of the Xianfeng Emperor.^[24] During the late 19th century, when Western ideas and products flooded China, transcriptions mushroomed. They include not only transcriptions of proper nouns but also those of common nouns for new products.^[25]^[26] The influence was particularly marked in dialects near the major ports, like Shanghainese. Many of these phonemic loans proved to be fads, however, and popular usage and linguistic reformers subsequently favored calques or neologisms in their place.

Sound and meaning

A transcription into Chinese characters can sometimes be a phono-semantic matching, i.e. it reflects both the sound and the meaning of the transcribed word. For example, "Modern Standard Chinese {{lang|zh-hans|声纳}} shēngnà "sonar", uses the characters 声 shēng "sound" and 纳 nà "receive, accept". 声 shēng is a phonetically imperfect rendering of the English initial syllable. Chinese has a large number of homo/heterotonal homophonous morphemes, which would have been much better phonetically (but not nearly as good semantically){{snd}} consider the syllable {{lang|zh-latn-pinyin|song}} (cf. 送 sòng ‘deliver, carry, give (as a present)’, 松 sōng ‘pine; loose, slack’, 耸 sǒng ‘tower; alarm, attract’ etc.), {{lang|zh-latn-pinyin|sou}} (cf. 搜 sōu ‘search’, 叟 sǒu ‘old man’, 馊 sōu ‘sour, spoiled’ and many others) or {{lang|zh-latn-pinyin|shou}} (cf. 收 shōu ‘receive, accept’, 受 shòu ‘receive, accept’, 手 shǒu ‘hand’, 首 shǒu ‘head’, 兽 shòu ‘beast’, 瘦 shòu ‘thin’ and so forth)."^[27]

Belarus (lit. "White Russia") is transcribed in Chinese as {{lang|zh|白俄罗斯}} (Bái'èluósī), with {{lang|zh|白}} (bái "white") and {{lang|zh-hans|俄罗斯}} (Èluósī, "Russia") preserving the meaning of the original name. Similarly, the common ending -va in Russian female surnames is usually transcribed as {{lang|zh|娃}} (wā), meaning "baby" or "girl", and the corresponding masculine suffix —[o]v is rendered as {{lang|zh|夫}} (fū), meaning "man". In literary translations, Utopia was famously transcribed by Yan Fu as {{lang|zh|烏托邦}} or {{lang|zh|乌托邦}} (Wūtuōbāng, "unfounded country") and Pantagruel was written as {{lang|zh|龐大固埃}} or {{lang|zh|庞大固埃}} (Pángdàgù'āi), from {{lang|zh|龐大}} or {{lang|zh|庞大}} ("gigantic") and {{lang|zh|固}} ("solid", "hefty"). More recently, one translation of World Wide Web is {{lang|zh|萬維網}} or {{lang|zh|万维网}} (Wànwéi Wǎng), meaning "myriad-dimensional net". Sometimes the transcription reflects chengyu or other Chinese sayings and idioms. For example, the Beatles are known in Mainland China as {{lang|zh|披頭士}} ({{lang|zh|披头士}}, Pītóushì), "the mop-headed", and in Taiwan and Hong Kong, {{lang|zh|披頭四}} ({{lang|zh|披头四}}, Pītóusì), "the mop-head four", reflecting the chengyu {{lang|zh|披頭散髮}} or {{lang|zh|披头散发}} (pītóu sànfǎ) concerning disheveled hair. They can also reflect subjective opinions or advertising. Esperanto, now known as "the international language" or literally "language of the world" ({{lang|zh|世界語}} or {{lang|zh|世界语}}, Shìjièyǔ), was first introduced to China as {{lang|zh|愛斯不難讀}} or {{lang|zh|爱斯不难读}} (Àisībùnándú), meaning "[We] love this [because it's] not difficult to read".

Given that a Chinese neologism can be a phono-semantic matching (i.e. in accordance with both the meaning and the sound of the foreign lexical item), an "innocent" transcription may be unwittingly interpreted as reflecting the meaning of the original. During the Qing Dynasty, some Chinese scholars were unhappy to find China was located on a continent called 亞細亞 (亚细亚 Yàxìyà), i.e. Asia, as 亞 means "secondary" and 細 "small", believing that the Europeans were deliberately belittling the East.^[28] The ancient Japanese, or the Wa people were upset by their name being represented by the character 倭 wō ("small, short, servile") by the Chinese, and replaced it with 和 hé ("peace, harmony").^[29] Modern Africans have accused the Chinese of racism, as "Africa" is written as 非洲 fēizhōu ("negative, wrong continent") in Chinese.^[30] Whether these accusations were justified is controversial.

Cultural differences and personal preference about negative meaning is subjective. However, some translations are generally held to be inappropriate and are usually not used in today’s transcriptions:

According to Ghil'ad Zuckermann, phono-semantic matching in Chinese is common in four semantic domains: brand names, computer jargon, technological terms and toponyms.^[31]

Some transcriptions are meant to have, or happen to have, positive connotations:

Foreign companies are able to choose representations of their names which serve advertising purposes:

Regional differences

Mainland China, Singapore and Malaysia use simplified characters in its transcriptions, while Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau typically use traditional characters. In addition, transcriptions used in Chinese speaking regions sometimes differ from official transcriptions. For example "Hawaii" ( 哈瓦伊） is rendered as 夏威夷 in most Chinese language media while New Zealand ({{lang|zh|新西兰}}) is transcribed by Taiwan media as 紐西蘭.

In general, mainland China tends to preserve the pronunciation of names deriving from their language of origin while Taiwan often transcribes them according to the English pronunciation. For example, the Russian President Vladimir Putin is known as Pǔjīng ({{lang|zh|普京}}) in mainland sources after the native Russian pronunciation {{IPA|[ˈputʲɪn]}}, whereas the name is rendered as Pǔdīng ({{lang|zh|普丁}}) in Taiwan. Hong Kong and Macau, meanwhile, formerly transcribed names using their Cantonese pronunciations, although that practice has become less common following their handovers. Chinese transcriptions are now frequently cribbed from the mainland, even if the local pronunciation then becomes more remote from the original. For example, Cantonese sources copy the mainland transcription {{lang|zh|普京}}, despite its local pronunciation being the rather infelicitous Póugīng.

Recently, a controversy arose in Hong Kong when protestors petitioned Nintendo to reverse its decision of converting the Hong Kong names of over 100 Pokémon into the mainland Chinese equivalents of their names, including its most famous character Pikachu. In the first half of 2016, Nintendo announced that it would change Pikachu's name from its original Cantonese name, Béikāchīu 比卡超, to Pèikāyāu in favor of fitting the Mandarin pronunciation, Píkǎqiū 皮卡丘, in the most recent series of Pokémon games, Pokémon Sun and Moon,^[34] in order to standardize marketing in the Greater China region.^[35]

Transcription table

The table below is the English-into-Chinese transcription table from Xinhua's Names of the World's Peoples. This table uses the International Phonetic Alphabet for English vowels (rows) and consonants (columns).

Pinyin version

Exceptions

Translating names

The characters now employed in standardized transcription are often deliberately meaningless, so that their phonetic use is apparent. Therefore, in many cases, the Chinese names non-Chinese people adopt for themselves are not those that are phonetically equivalent but are instead "adapted" from or "inspired" by (i.e., translations of) the original. See, for instance, the Chinese names of the Hong Kong governors.

New characters

Very rarely, characters are specially made for the transcribed terms. This was formerly more common: by adding the appropriate semantic radical, existing characters could be used to give a sense of the sound of the new word. {{lang|zh|江}}, for instance, was formed out of {{lang|zh|氵}} (the water radical) + {{lang|zh|工}}, which at the time had the sound value khong,^[7] to approximate the Yue name *Krong. Similarly, the addition of {{lang|zh|艹}} (the grass radical) produced {{lang|zh|茉莉}} (mòlì) to translate the Sanskrit name for jasmine ({{lang|sa-Latn|malli}}) and {{lang|zh|衣}} (clothes) was added to other characters to permit {{lang|zh|袈裟}} (jiāshā), the Chinese version of Sanskrit kasaya. Another such example is 乒乓 (pīngpāng) the Chinese word for ping pong, in which both characters are formed by removing a stroke from the similar sounding character 兵 (bīng), and at the same time, the two characters look like a net and a paddle. The most general radical for transcription is the mouth radical, which is used to transcribe not only certain foreign terms (such as {{lang|zh|咖啡}} (kāfēi, "coffee")), but also terms for which no Chinese characters exist in non-Mandarin varieties of Chinese (such as in Cantonese). Such phono-semantic compounds make up the majority of Chinese characters, but new ones coined to communicate foreign words only infrequently reach common use today. Notable exceptions are the Chinese characters for chemical elements, which mostly consist of combining pre-existing characters with the appropriate radicals, such as {{lang|zh|气}} for gases.

See also

Notes

References

Citations

1. ^Lam S.L., Agnes. Language Education in China: Policy and Experience from 1949, p. 39. Hong Kong Univ. Press (Hong Kong), 2005.
2. ^Guo Zhenzhi. Mapping Media in China: Region, Province, and Locality. "Dialects and Local Media: The Cases of Kunming and Yunnan TV", [https://books.google.com/books?id=INTUWgUpL3kC&pg=PA49 p. 49]. Accessed 6 November 2013.
3. ^{{Cite web|url=https://zh.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:%E6%B1%89%E8%AF%AD%E6%8B%BC%E9%9F%B3%E7%B4%A2%E5%BC%95|title=Chinese Wiktionary's pinyin index|last=|first=|date=|website=Zh.wiktionary.org|language=zh|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2018-12-05}}
4. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/china/2009/11/091114_us_obama_translation|title=“奥巴马”还是“欧巴马”？|website=BBC News|accessdate=11 February 2019}}
5. ^Schuessler, Axel. ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese, p. 563. University of Hawaii Press, 2007.
6. ^{{cite journal| title = Defining the Hundred Yue| first = William| last = Meacham| journal = Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association| volume = 15| year = 1996| pages = 93–100| url = http://ejournal.anu.edu.au/index.php/bippa/article/view/405/394| deadurl = yes| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20140228202613/http://ejournal.anu.edu.au/index.php/bippa/article/view/405/394| archivedate = 2014-02-28| df = }}
7. ^¹Baxter, Wm. H. & Sagart, Laurent. {{cite web |url= http://crlao.ehess.fr/docannexe.php?id=1207 |title= Baxter–Sagart Old Chinese Reconstruction |deadurl= yes |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20130927141238/http://crlao.ehess.fr/docannexe.php?id=1207 |archivedate= 2013-09-27 |df= }} {{small|(1.93 MB)}}, p. 56. 2011. Accessed 12 August 2013.
8. ^Brindley, Erica. "Barbarians or Not? Ethnicity and Changing Conceptions of the Ancient Yue (Viet) Peoples, ca. 400–50 {{smallcaps|BC}}", pp. 6 ff. Asia Major, Vol. 16, No. 1 (2003). Accessed 7 November 2013.
9. ^{{lang|zh|史有为}} [Shi Youwei]. {{lang|zh|《汉语外来词》}} ["Hànyǔ Wàiláicí", "Chinese Loanwords"]. Commercial Press (Beijing), 2000. {{zh icon}}
10. ^Zhengzhang Shangfang. "Decipherment of Yue-Ren-Ge (Song of the Yue Boatman)". Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, Vol. 20, pp. 159–168. 1991.
11. ^{{lang|zh|周敦頤}} [Zhou Dunyi]. ，《{{lang|zh|翻譯名義序}}》 ["Fānyì Míngyì Xù", "Preface to the 'Explanation of Buddhist terms'"]. Accessed 6 November 2013. {{zh icon}}
12. ^{{cite book|author1=Heming Yong|author2=Jing Peng|title=Chinese Lexicography : A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911: A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NYFBtTUZFxEC&pg=PA382#v=onepage&q&f=false|date=14 August 2008|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-156167-2|pages=382–383}}
13. ^{{cite book|author1=Heming Yong|author2=Jing Peng|title=Chinese Lexicography: A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DwYUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA382&lpg=PA382#v=onepage&q&f=false|date=14 August 2008|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-953982-6|pages=382–}}
14. ^{{cite book|title=Chinese Lexicography : A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911: A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911|issue=|first1=Heming|last1=Yong|first2=Jing|last2=Peng|editor-first=|editor-last=|edition=|year=2008|publisher=Oxford University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NYFBtTUZFxEC&pg=PA397|page=397|isbn=0191561673|accessdate=24 April 2014| ref=harv }}
15. ^{{cite book|title=Chinese History: A Manual|first=Endymion Porter|last=Wilkinson|others=|volume=Volume 52 of Harvard Yenching Institute Cambridge, Mass: Harvard-Yenching Institute monograph series |issue=Issue 52 of Harvard-Yenching Institute monograph series| ISSN =0073-084X|editor-first=|editor-last=|edition=illustrated, revised|date=|year=2000|publisher=Harvard Univ Asia Center|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ERnrQq0bsPYC&pg=PA864|page=864|isbn=0674002490|accessdate=24 April 2014| ref=harv }}
16. ^{{cite book|title=From Frontier Policy to Foreign Policy: The Question of India and the Transformation of Geopolitics in Qing China|first=Matthew|last=Mosca|others=|volume= |issue=|editor-first=|editor-last=|edition=|date=|year=2013|publisher=Stanford University Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zvmix_k1XDcC&pg=PA381|page=381|isbn=0804785384|accessdate=24 April 2014| ref=harv }}
17. ^{{cite book|author1=Heming Yong|author2=Jing Peng|title=Chinese Lexicography : A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911: A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NYFBtTUZFxEC&pg=PA383#v=onepage&q&f=false|date=14 August 2008|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-156167-2|pages=383–}}
18. ^{{cite journal |last= Crossley |first= Pamela Kyle |last2= Rawski |first2= Evelyn S. |date= Jun 1993 |title= A Profile of The Manchu Language in Ch'ing History |jstor= 2719468|journal= Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies |publisher= Harvard-Yenching Institute |volume= 53|issue= 1 |page=99 |doi= 10.2307/2719468 }}
19. ^{{cite book|title=Materials for a Genealogy of the Niohuru Clan: With Introductory Remarks on Manchu Onomastics|first=Hoong Teik|last=Toh|others=|volume=Volume 10 of Aetas Manjurica | ISSN =0931-282X|editor-first=|editor-last=|edition=|date=|year=2005|publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZSNMGosP0cAC&pg=PA37|page=37|isbn=3447051965|accessdate=24 April 2014| ref=harv }}
20. ^{{cite book|title=Notices of the Mediæval Geography and History of Central and Western Asia| first=E.|last=Bretschneider|volume=|year=1876|edition=|publisher=Trübner & Company|isbn=|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R98-AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA6 |pages=5–6 |accessdate=1 December 2014| ref = {{harvid||}} }}
21. ^{{cite book|title=Journal of the North-China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Volume 10 |chapter=ARTICLE IV. Notices of the Mediæval Geography and History of Central and Western Asia| first=E.|last=Bretschneider|others=Contributor Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. North-China Branch |volume=|year=1876|edition=|publisher=The Branch|isbn=|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C4hJAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA80 |pages=79–80|accessdate=1 December 2014| ref = {{harvid||}} }}
22. ^{{cite book|title=Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Volume 10|chapter=ARTICLE IV. Notices of the Mediæval Geography and History of Central and Western Asia| first=E.|last=Bretschneider|author2=Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. North China Branch, Shanghai|others=Contributor Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. North-China Branch |volume=|year=1876|edition=|publisher=Kelly & Walsh.|isbn=|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jOA5NxDIbfYC&pg=PA80 |pages=79–80|accessdate=1 December 2014| ref = {{harvid||}} }}
23. ^{{cite book|author=Marshall Broomhall|title=Islam in China: A Neglected Problem|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ObcNAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA93#v=onepage&q&f=false|year=1910|publisher=Morgan & Scott, Limited|pages=93–94}}
24. ^{{cite news |last= |first= |date=November 4, 2016 |title= Qing Dynasty textbook shows how people learned English |url=http://www.china.org.cn/china/2016-11/04/content_39632975.htm |newspaper=China Daily |location= |access-date= }}
25. ^{{cite journal|last1=Masini|first1=Federico|title=The Formation of Modern Chinese Lexicon and Its Evolution Toward a National Language: The Period from 1840 to 1898|journal=Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series|date=1 Jan 1993 |issue=6 |jstor=23887926 |at=§2.2.2}}
26. ^Lackner, Michael & al. New Terms for New Ideas: Western Knowledge and Lexical Change in Late Imperial China. Brill (Leiden), 2001.
27. ^P. 57 of Zuckermann, G. (2003), Language Contact and Lexical Enrichment in Israeli Hebrew, Palgrave Macmillan, {{ISBN|978-1-4039-3869-5}} / {{ISBN|1-4039-1723-X}}.
28. ^Qian Zhongshu 錢鍾書, Guan Zhui Bian (管錐編 "Limited Views"), Beijing: Chung Hwa Book Company, 1999[1979], vol.4, pp.1458-1462. Cf. Zhang Shaoqi 张绍麒, Hanyu Liusu Ciyuan Yanjiu (汉语流俗词源硏究 "A study of Chinese folk etymology"), Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe, 2000.
29. ^Cf. Michael Carr, "Wa 倭 Wa 和 Lexicography", International Journal of Lexicography, 1992, 5(1):1-30.
30. ^David Wright, Translating Science: The Transmission of Western Chemistry into Late Imperial China, 1840-1900, Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2000, p.212.
31. ^P. 59 of Zuckermann, G. (2003), Language Contact and Lexical Enrichment in Israeli Hebrew, Palgrave Macmillan, {{ISBN|978-1-4039-3869-5}} / {{ISBN|1-4039-1723-X}}.
32. ^{{Cite news|url=http://blogs.transparent.com/chinese/famous-companies-chinese-names/|title=Chinese Names for 50 Famous Foreign Companies|access-date=2016-11-14}}
33. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.tuicool.com/articles/yaeAZz2|title=The worst (and best) Chinese names for foreign tech companies - 推酷|website=Tuicool.com|access-date=2016-11-14}}
34. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36414978|title=Why the plan to rename Pikachu has made Hong Kong angry|date=2016-05-31|newspaper=BBC News|language=en-GB|access-date=2016-11-17}}
35. ^{{Cite web|url=http://en.rocketnews24.com/2016/05/31/pokemon-politics-proposed-pikachu-name-change-sparks-protests-in-hong-kong-%e3%80%90video%e3%80%91/|title=Pokémon politics: Proposed Pikachu name-change sparks protests in Hong Kong 【Video】|date=2016-05-31|website=En.rocketnews24.com|access-date=2016-11-20}}