| 词条 | Vadim Rogovin |
| 释义 |
Vadim Zakharovich Rogovin ({{lang-ru|Вади́м Заха́рович Рого́вин}}) (10 May 1937 in Moscow – 25 September 1998 in Moscow) was a Russian Marxist (Trotskyist[1]) historian and sociologist, Ph.D. in philosophy, Leading Researcher at the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the author of Was There An Alternative?, the 7-volume study of Stalin era between 1923 and 1940, with an emphasis on the Trotskyist opposition. He was considered the leading one among Trotskyist Soviet historians emerging after Perestroika.[2] In 1998 Vadim Rogovin died of cancer, survived by his wife, Galina Valiuzhenich.[1] Was There An Alternative?IntroductionIn the introduction to the first volume of the Was There An Alternative? series Rogovin explains his position and the purpose of this work as follows.[3] In the history of the Soviet Union a crucial question was to find out the reason for the emergence of the phenomenon of Stalinism. Rogovin writes there are basically two diametrically opposed approaches. The first one is that Stalinism with its terror was a logical, unavoidable evolution of Marxism-Leninism within Bolshevism from the Socialist revolution. Another approach is to consider that Stalinism was a historically accidental development and that there was an alternative movement within Bolshevism (Trotskyism), and the major function of Stalinist terror was to suppress this movement. Rogovin suggests that the first approach has become dominant in historical research for two major reasons. The first one is the coincidence of the goals in this respect of two major historical schools: of the official pro-Soviet school with the tradition of demonizing of Trotsky and Trotskyism and of the anti-Soviet, anti-Communist school, with its tradition of demonizing the whole Communist movement, for which purpose it was convenient to attribute the traits of Stalinism to Communism as a whole. The second reason is that with a few exceptions of émigrés, all Trotskyists were physically eliminated by Stalin so that there are virtually no memoirs, and nearly all documents of the Left Opposition were made inaccessible. Therefore the historical picture has become distorted in this area for both subjective and objective reasons. During Perestroika a large amount of memoirs of repressed people have become available. Unfortunately the memoirs of "true" Trotskyists (as opposed to the ones falsely accused of Trotskyism during Soviet repressions), are close to none, because all these real political opponents were physically eliminated. Fortunately the policy of glasnost had led to the opening of numerous archives, which make it possible to better trace the evolution towards Stalinism. Rogovin writes that the treatise did not consider the debunking of various misconceptions, in order not to unnecessarily disrupt the harmony of the exposition of the second alternative mentioned above: to demonstrate that Stalinism was not the only logical possibility of the evolution of the principles of Bolshevism. With the above purpose in mind, the major focus of the treatise was necessarily Trotskyism and the Left Opposition movement within Bolshevism. This focus gave rise to accusations of bias. For example, historian Yuri Felshtinsky recognized the value of his work, while expressing an opinion that ..Все эти книги, однако, проникнуты безудержной апологетикой Троцкого и проистекающим отсюда догматизмом ("All of these books, however, are imbued with rampant apologetics of Trotsky and with the dogmatism stemming from the former.").[4] In response to such criticism Mikhail Voeikov, Doctor of Economic Sciences and a Professor of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, writes [5]
Bibliography
Was There An Alternative? Series
References1. ^1 2 Rogovin'a obituary by David North 2. ^{{cite book|last=Thatcher|first=Ian D.|title=Trotsky|year=2003|publisher=Routledge|location=London|page=19}} 3. ^Note This section, unless otherwise referenced, is a summary of the introduction to the first volume of the series, Was There an Alternative? - Trotskyism: A Look Through the Years 4. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.felshtinsky.com/?p=195|title=Несколько слов о книгах Волкогонова Д., ответ читателю|author=Фельштинский Ю.|date=2010-08-30|publisher=felshtinsky.com|accessdate=2013-02-16|archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/6EkfFNueq?url=http://www.felshtinsky.com/?p=195|archivedate=2013-02-27|dead-url=yes|df=}} 5. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/05/rog-m15.html|title=Vadim Rogovin's contribution to Russian social sciences|author=Voeikov, Mikhail|date=1999-05-15|publisher=wsws.org|accessdate=2014-01-18}} 6. ^"Конец означает начало — 7-й том исследования Вадима Роговина", a presentation of Rogovin's Volume 7 External links
7 : Historians of Russia|Russian historians|Russian sociologists|Russian Trotskyists|1937 births|1998 deaths|Russian Marxist historians |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。