词条 | Watergate Babies |
释义 |
Tom Downey of New York was the youngest among the "babies", aged 25 upon his election, the minimum age at which one may serve in the U.S. House of Representatives. Future Senator Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) was also elected to Congress in this election cycle. In November 1974, Democrats picked up 49 seats in the House and 5 in the Senate. This group greatly increased the strength of Northerners and liberals in the House Democratic Caucus. They teamed up with some more senior liberals to strike a blow against the seniority system and overthrew three committee chairmen whom they viewed as too conservative and/or too old to represent the Democratic Party in these prominent positions: William Poage, Wright Patman and F. Edward Hébert. Only one Watergate Baby is currently a member of the U.S. Congress: Senаtor Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1974. "Watergate Babies" can also apply to those Democrats elected to state or local office in 1974.[3][4] "Democrats made substantial state legislative gains in a large number of states in 1974, the Watergate election," the political scientist Malcolm Jewell wrote.[5] Numerous states passed sweeping ethics and public disclosure reforms in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal.[6][7] The Center for Public Integrity has compiled a state by state account of governmental political corruption watchdogs, many with roots in the post-Watergate era.[8] A prominent Watergate baby of 1974 who served as Governor of California for a second stint from 2011 to 2019 is Jerry Brown. "Watergate Babies" has also been used to apply to journalists who entered journalism because of their fascination with the Watergate scandal.[9] "Watergate," David Baumann wrote,[10] "also created a generation of journalists who were not willing to accept politicians at their word. If the journalists who helped uncover the scandal, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, could expose the crimes of a president, then certainly there were crooked politicians elsewhere. Those journalists believed in investigative reporting and became watchdogs who attempted to keep politicians honest.[11] LegacyIn 2018 Politico, along with some of the surviving Watergate Babies, reflected on their long-term impact. The magazine concluded that the reforms to the committee structure, and the increased transparency, they worked for had permanently changed Congress as an institution. However, those changes had, Politico argued, helped contribute to the later rise of the New Right and shaped the polarized political climate of the late 2010s.[11] The Watergate Babies often framed what had previously been policy goals—such as stronger consumer protection and environmental cleanup—as rights, a discursive tactic that Politico noted would later be adopted by conservatives. On the House floor, the new members' willingness to vote as a bloc forced votes on divisive issues that their more senior colleagues had long avoided, another tactic that conservatives successfully emulated. When House sessions later began to be broadcast on television in 1979, another reform the Babies had sought, a younger conservative, Newt Gingrich, began using after-hours "special orders" to attack Democrats, which drew to him the prestige and followers that eventually led to the 1994 Republican takeover of the House, with Gingrich becoming Speaker.[11] "We came here to take the Bastille," recalled George Miller, who remained in Congress until 2015, one of the last Watergate Babies to retire. "We destroyed the institution by turning the lights on."[11] References1. ^{{cite news|first=Dan|last=Balz|authorlink=|page=|newspaper=Washington Post|date=10 August 1980|title=Democrats: Off Track To Some|accessdate=6 March 2018|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/08/10/democrats-off-track-to-some/1b878bdf-2e6e-4b0d-8057-bf2e925d290e/}} 2. ^{{cite news|first=Joseph F.|last=Sullivan|authorlink=|page=46|newspaper=The New York Times|date=September 14, 1980|title=Maguire Faces Rerun Of Tight '78 Race|accessdate=July 5, 2012|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1980/09/14/archives/maguire-faces-rerun-of-tight-78-race-rhodes-visits-the-district.html|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222193459/http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30D1FFA3E5C17728DDDAD0994D1405B8084F1D3|archivedate=February 22, 2014|df=}} 3. ^{{cite news |first=Irene Jay |last=Liu |title=A 70's flashback at Capitol |date=December 14, 2009 |work=timesunion.com |url=https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/A-70s-flashback-at-capitol-555390.php }} 4. ^{{cite news |title=The last of the Watergate babies |date=April 2, 2007 |work=Democrat and Chronicle |url=http://blogs.democratandchronicle.com/political/?p=255 |accessdate=April 28, 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://archive.is/20130628235113/http://blogs.democratandchronicle.com/political/?p=255 |archivedate=June 28, 2013 }} 5. ^{{cite book |title=American State Political Parties and Elections |isbn=978-0256026627 |p=228 |year=1982 |first=Malcolm Edwin |last=Jewell }} 6. ^STATE GOVERNMENT, Volumes 65-66 (1992), page 35 7. ^{{cite book |first=Ronald J. |last=Hrenebar |first2=Clive G. |last2=Thomas |isbn=978-0-271-02576-6 |title=Interest Group Politics in the Northeastern States|page=369 }} 8. ^{{cite web |title=Watchdogs - Accountability: Waste, Fraud and Abuse |url=http://www.publicintegrity.org/accountability/waste-fraud-and-abuse/watchdogs |accessdate=April 29, 2013 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130506194319/http://www.publicintegrity.org/accountability/waste-fraud-and-abuse/watchdogs |archivedate=May 6, 2013 }} 9. ^{{cite news |first=Madison |last=Taylor |title=Confessions of a Watergate baby |work=Times-News |date=May 17, 2013 |url=http://www.thetimesnews.com/news/local-columnists/madison-taylor/confessions-of-a-watergate-baby-1.144812 }} 10. ^{{cite web |first=David |last=Baumann |title=The Legacy of Watergate |work=About.com US Politics |date=June 18, 2011 |url=http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2011/06/18/the-legacy-of-watergate.htm |accessdate=July 5, 2013 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513135200/http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2011/06/18/the-legacy-of-watergate.htm |archivedate=May 13, 2013 }} 11. ^1 2 3 {{cite news|last=Lawrence|first=John A.|title=How the 'Watergate Babies' Broke American Politics|url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/05/26/congress-broke-american-politics-218544|newspaper=Politico|date=May 26, 2018|accessdate=June 3, 2018}} External links
2 : Watergate scandal|1974 United States House of Representatives elections |
随便看 |
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。