1. History

2. GRAS designation and listing

3. Code of Regulations

4. Intended use

5. Failure to qualify

6. See also

7. References

8. Further reading

9. External links

Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) is a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designation that a chemical or substance added to food is considered safe by experts, and so is exempted from the usual Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) food additive tolerance requirements.^[1] The concept of food additives being "generally recognized as safe" was first described in the Food Additives Amendment of 1958, and all additives introduced after this time had to be evaluated by new standards.

History

On January 1, 1958, the FDA established the Food Additives Amendment of 1958, with a list of 700 food substances that were exempt from the then new requirement that manufacturers test food additives before putting them on the market.^[2] On August 31, 1960, William W. Goodrich, assistant general counsel of the FDA, addressed the annual meeting (16 Bus. Law. 107 -1960-1961) of the FFDCA. The purpose of the meeting was the forthcoming March 6, 1961, effective date of the enforcement provisions of the "Food Additives Amendment of 1958", referred to as GRAS.^[3]

GRAS designation and listing

A GRAS determination can be self-affirmed or the FDA can be notified of a determination of GRAS by qualified non-governmental experts:

1. Self-affirmed. The manufacturer of this chemical or substance had performed all necessary research, including the formation of an expert panel to review safety concerns, and is prepared to use these findings to defend its product's GRAS status.
2. FDA Response to GRAS notification.^&91;4&93; The manufacturer has performed all the aforementioned due diligence, and submitted a GRAS notification to inform the Food & Drug Administration of a determination that the use of a substance is GRAS. Following evaluation the FDA provides three possible responses: 1. FDA does not question the basis for the notifier's GRAS determination,^&91;4&93; 2. the notification does not provide a sufficient basis for GRAS determination, or 3. the FDA has, at the notifier's request, ceased to evaluate the GRAS notice.

For substances used in food prior to January 1, 1958, a grandfather clause allows experience based on common use in food to be used in asserting they are safe under the conditions of their intended use.

The FDA can also explicitly withdraw the GRAS classification, as it did for trans fat in 2015.^[5]

Code of Regulations

The Code of Federal Regulations, Revised {{as of|2010|April|1|lc=y|df=US}},^[6] includes (CFR) title 21 170.30(b) that provides general recognition of safety through scientific procedures requires the same quantity and quality of scientific evidence as is required to obtain approval of the substance as a food additive^[7] and ordinarily is based upon published studies, which may be corroborated by unpublished studies and other data and information.

Intended use

The substance must be shown to be "generally recognized" as safe under the conditions of its intended use. The proponent of the exemption has the burden of providing rigorous scientific evidence that use of the substance in an edible consumer product is "generally recognized" as safe.^[4] To establish GRAS, the proponent – usually a food manufacturer, ingredient supplier, or manufacturer of dietary supplements – must show that there is a consensus of expert opinion that the substance is safe for its intended use.^[4]

Failure to qualify

When a use of a substance does not qualify for the GRAS exemption, that use of the substance is subject to the premarket approval mandated by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. In such circumstances, the FDA can take enforcement action to stop distribution of the food substance and foods containing it on the grounds that such foods are or contain an unlawful food additive.^[8]

See also

• Food and Drug Administration
• Generally recognized as safe and effective
• Life Sciences Research Office
• Novel food
• Substantial equivalence

References

Further reading

• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1993). Everything Added to Food in the United States. Boca Raton, Florida: C.K. Smoley (c/o CRC Press, Inc.).

External links

• FDA's online database of "Everything Added to Food in the United States" (EAFUS): A Food Additive Database
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20050829123300/http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/grasguid.html More information from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)].

• Cycling at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Men's Madison
• Cycling at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Men's points race
• Cycling at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's cross-country
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympic Games - Road Race Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympic Games - Road Race Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympic Games - Time Trial Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympic Games - Time Trial Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympic Games - Women's road time trial
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - 200m Sprint Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - 200m Sprint Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Cross Country Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Individual Pursuit Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Individual Pursuit Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Keirin Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Madison Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Men's time trial
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Points Race Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Road Race Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Road Race Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Team Pursuit Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Team Sprint Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Time Trial Men
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Time Trial Women
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Women's pursuit
• Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Women's time trial