请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Geneva Protocol
释义

  1. Negotiation history

  2. Violations

  3. Historical assessment

  4. Subsequent interpretation of the protocol

  5. State parties

     Reservations 

  6. Non-signatory states

  7. Chemical weapons prohibitions

  8. Notes

  9. References

  10. External links

{{other uses}}{{redirect-distinguish|Geneva Protocols|Geneva Conventions}}{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2012}}{{Infobox Treaty
|name = Geneva Protocol
|long_name = Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare
|image =
|image_width =
|caption =Countries part of the Geneva Protocol
|type =
|date_drafted = 17 June 1925[1]
|date_signed = 17 June 1925[1]
|location_signed = Geneva[1]
|date_sealed =
|date_effective = 8 February 1928[1]
|condition_effective = Ratification by 65 states[1]
|date_expiration =
|signatories = 38[1]
|parties = 140[7]
|depositor = Government of France[2]
|language =
|languages =
|wikisource =Geneva Protocol to Hague Convention
}}

The Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, usually called the Geneva Protocol, is a treaty prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in international armed conflicts. It was signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925 and entered into force on 8 February 1928. It was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on 7 September 1929.[3] The Geneva Protocol is a protocol to the Convention for the Supervision of the International Trade in Arms and Ammunition and in Implements of War signed on the same date, and followed the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

It prohibits the use of "asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices" and "bacteriological methods of warfare". This is now understood to be a general prohibition on chemical weapons and biological weapons, but has nothing to say about production, storage or transfer. Later treaties did cover these aspects — the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).

A number of countries submitted reservations when becoming parties to the Geneva Protocol, declaring that they only regarded the non-use obligations as applying to other parties and that these obligations would cease to apply if the prohibited weapons were used against them.

The main elements of the protocol are now considered by many to be part of customary international law.

Negotiation history

In the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the use of dangerous chemical agents were outlawed. In spite of this, the First World War saw large-scale chemical warfare. France used tear gas in 1914, but the first large-scale successful deployment of chemical weapons was by the German Empire in Ypres, Belgium in 1915, when chlorine gas was released as part of a German attack at the Battle of Gravenstafel. Following this, a chemical arms race began, with the United Kingdom, Russia, Austria-Hungary, the United States, and Italy joining France and Germany in the use of chemical weapons. This resulted in the development of a range of horrific chemicals affecting lungs, skin, or eyes. Some were intended to be lethal on the battlefield, like hydrogen cyanide, and efficient methods of deploying agents were invented. At least 124,000 tons were produced during the war. In 1918, about one grenade out of three was filled with dangerous chemical agents. Around 1.3 million casualties of the conflict were attributed to the use of gas and the psychological effect on troops may have had a much greater effect.[4] As protective equipment developed, the technology to destroy such equipment also became a part of the arms race. The use of deadly poison gas was not only limited to combatants in the front but also civilians as nearby civilian towns were at risk from winds blowing the poison gases through. Civilians living in towns rarely had any warning systems about the dangers of poison gas as well as not having access to effective gas masks. The use of chemical weapons employed by both sides had inflicted an estimated 100,000-260,000 civilian casualties during the conflict. Tens of thousands of more (along with military personnel) died from scarring of the lungs, skin damage, and cerebral damage in the years after the conflict ended. In the year 1920 alone, over 40,000 civilians and 20,000 military personnel died from the chemical weapons effects.[4][5]

The Treaty of Versailles included some provisions that banned Germany from either manufacturing or importing chemical weapons. Similar treaties banned the First Austrian Republic, the Kingdom of Bulgaria, and the Kingdom of Hungary from chemical weapons, all belonging to the losing side, the Central powers. Russian bolsheviks and Britain continued the use of chemical weapons in the Russian Civil War and possibly in the Middle East in 1920.

Three years after World War I, the Allies wanted to reaffirm the Treaty of Versailles, and in 1922 the United States introduced the Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare at the Washington Naval Conference.[6] Four of the war victors, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan, gave consent for ratification, but it failed to enter into force as the French Third Republic objected to the submarine provisions of the treaty.[6]

At the 1925 Geneva Conference for the Supervision of the International Traffic in Arms the French suggested a protocol for non-use of poisonous gases. The Second Polish Republic suggested the addition of bacteriological weapons.[7] It was signed on 17 June.[16]

Violations

Several countries have deployed or prepared chemical weapons in spite of the treaty. Spain and France did so in the Rif War before the treaty came into effect in 1928, Japan used chemical weapons against Taiwan in 1930 during the Wushe Massacre, Italy used mustard gas against Abyssinia in 1935 and Japan used chemical weapons against China from 1938 to 1941.

In the Second World War, the U.S., the UK, and Germany prepared the resources to deploy chemical weapons, stockpiling tons of them, but refrained from their use due to the balance of terror: the probability of horrific retaliation. There was an accidental release of mustard gas in Bari, Italy causing many deaths when a U.S. ship carrying CW ammunition was sunk in the harbor during an air raid. After the war, thousands of tons of shells and containers with tabun, sarin and other chemical weapons were disposed of at sea by the Allies.

Early in the Cold War, the UK collaborated with the U.S. in the development of chemical weapons. The Soviet Union also had the facilities to produce chemical weapons but their development was kept secret.

During the 1980–88 Iran–Iraq War and the 1991 uprisings in Iraq, Europe gave and funded Saddam Hussein's use of several different chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin, and VX, against Iran and against Iraqi civilians in instances such as the Halabja chemical attack.

Both the Syrian government and opposition forces accused each other of using chemical weapons in 2013 in Ghouta and Khan al-Assal during the Syrian civil war, though as any such use would be within Syria's own borders, rather than in warfare between state parties to the protocol, the legal situation is less certain.[17] A 2013 United Nations report confirmed the use of sarin, but did not investigate which side used chemical weapons.[8] In 2014, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons confirmed the use of chlorine gas in the Syrian villages of Talmanes, Al Tamanah and Kafr Zeta, but did not say which side used the gas.[9]

Historical assessment

Eric Croddy, assessing the Protocol in 2005, took the view that the historic record showed it had been largely ineffectual. Specifically it did not prohibit:[10]

  • use against not-ratifying parties
  • retaliation using such weapons, so effectively making it a no-first-use agreement
  • use within a state’s own borders in a civil conflict
  • research and development of such weapons, or stockpiling them

Despite the U.S. having been a proponent of the protocol, the U.S. military and American Chemical Society lobbied against it, causing the U.S. Senate not to ratify the protocol until 1975.[10][22]

Subsequent interpretation of the protocol

In 1966, United Nations General Assembly resolution 2162B called for, without any dissent, all states to strictly observe the protocol. In 1969, United Nations General Assembly resolution 2603 (XXIV) declared that the prohibition on use of chemical and biological weapons in international armed conflicts, as embodied in the protocol (though restated in a more general form), were generally recognized rules of international law.[11] Following this, there was discussion of whether the main elements of the protocol now form part of customary international law, and now this is widely accepted to be the case.[22][12]

There have been differing interpretations over whether the protocol covers the use of harassing agents, such as adamsite and tear gas, and defoliants and herbicides, such as Agent Orange, in warfare.[22][13] The 1977 Environmental Modification Convention prohibits the military use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects. Many states do not regard this as a complete ban on the use of herbicides in warfare, but it does require case-by-case consideration.[14] The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention effectively banned riot control agents from being used as a method of warfare, though still permitting it for riot control.[15]

In recent times, the protocol has been interpreted to cover internal conflicts as well international ones. In 1995, an appellate chamber in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia stated that "there had undisputedly emerged a general consensus in the international community on the principle that the use of chemical weapons is also prohibited in internal armed conflicts." In 2005, the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded that customary international law includes a ban on the use of chemical weapons in internal as well as international conflicts.[16]

State parties

To become party to the Protocol, states must deposit an instrument with the government of France (the depositary power). Thirty-eight states originally signed the Protocol. France was the first signatory to ratify the Protocol on 10 May 1926. El Salvador, the final signatory to ratify the Protocol, did so on 26 February 2008. As of November 2015, 140 states have ratified, acceded to, or succeeded to the Protocol,[17] most recently Colombia on 24 November 2015.

Reservations

A number of countries submitted reservations when becoming parties to the Geneva Protocol, declaring that they only regarded the non-use obligations as applying with respect to other parties to the Protocol and/or that these obligations would cease to apply with respect to any state, or its allies, which used the prohibited weapons. Several Arab states also declared that their ratification did not constitute recognition of, or diplomatic relations with, Israel, or that the provision of the Protocol were not binding with respect to Israel. Generally, reservations not only modify treaty provisions for the reserving party, but also symmetrically modify the provisions for previously ratifying parties in dealing with the reserving party.[22]{{rp|394}} Subsequently, numerous states have withdrawn their reservations, including the former Czechoslovakia in 1990 prior to its dissolution.[18]

According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." While some states have explicitly either retained or renounced their reservations inherited on succession, states which have not clarified their position on their inherited reservations are listed as "implicit" reservations.

Party[2][17][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]Signed[28]DepositedReservations[2][29][20][21][30][31][32][33][34]Notes
Afghanistan}}9 December 1986}}—
Albania}}20 December 1989}}—
Algeria}}27 January 1992}}
[35]
[36]		[37]
Angola}}8 November 1990}}
[35]
[36]		[38]
Antigua and Barbuda}}1 January 1989}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Argentina}}12 May 1969}}—
Australia}}24 May 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1986.[39]
Austria}}17 June 1925}}9 May 1928}}—
Bahrain}}9 December 1988}}
[35]
[36]
[40]		[41]
Bangladesh}}20 May 1989}}
[35]
[36]		[42]
Barbados}}16 July 1976}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrew the reservations made by the United Kingdom on succession.[43]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Belgium}}17 June 1925}}4 December 1928}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1997.[44]
Benin}}9 December 1986}}—
Bhutan}}19 February 1979}}—
Bolivia}}14 January 1985}}—
Brazil}}17 June 1925}}28 August 1970}}—
Bulgaria}}17 June 1925}}7 March 1934}}
[35]
[36]		 Withdrawn in 1991.[45]
Burkina Faso}}3 March 1971}}—Ratified as the Republic of Upper Volta.
Cambodia}}15 March 1983}}[36]The Protocol was ratified by the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea in exile in 1983. 13 states (including the depositary France) objected to their ratification, and considered it legally invalid. In 1993, the Kingdom of Cambodia stated in a note verbale that it considered itself bound by the provisions of the Protocol.[46]
Cameroon}}20 July 1989}}—
Canada}}17 June 1925}}6 May 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1991 as regards bacteriological agents, and completely withdrawn in 1999.[47]
Cape Verde}}15 October 1991}}—
Central African Republic}}31 July 1970}}—
Chile}}17 June 1925}}2 July 1935}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1991.[48]
China}}13 July 1952}}
[36]Made on succession.[91]
 The People's Republic of China succeeded from the Republic of China, which had acceded on 24 August 1929.[49]
Colombia}}24 November 2015}}—
Costa Rica}}13 February 2009}}—
Côte d'Ivoire}}27 July 1970}}—
Croatia}}18 December 2006}}—
Cuba}}24 June 1966}}—
Cyprus}}12 December 1966}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Czech Republic}}17 September 1993}}
[36]Withdrawn prior to succession.
Succeeded from Czechoslovakia.
Denmark}}17 June 1925}}5 May 1930}}—
Dominican Republic}}8 December 1970}}—
Ecuador}}16 September 1970}}—
Egypt}}17 June 1925}}6 December 1928}}—
El Salvador}}17 June 1925}}26 February 2008}}—
Equatorial Guinea}}20 May 1989}}—
Estonia}}17 June 1925}}28 August 1931}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1999.[50]
Ethiopia}}17 June 1925}}7 October 1935}}—
Fiji}}21 March 1973}}
[35]
[36]		Retained the United Kingdom's reservations on succession.[51]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Finland}}17 June 1925}}26 June 1929}}—
France}}17 June 1925}}10 May 1926}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1996.[52]
Gambia}}5 November 1966}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Germany}}17 June 1925}}25 April 1929}}—
Ghana}}3 May 1967}}—
Greece}}17 June 1925}}30 May 1931}}—
Grenada}}20 May 1989}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Guatemala}}3 May 1983}}—
Guinea-Bissau}}20 May 1989}}—
Holy See}}18 October 1966}}—
Hungary}}11 October 1952}}—
Iceland}}2 November 1967}}—
India}}17 June 1925}}9 April 1930}}
[35]
[36]		[53]
Indonesia}}21 January 1971}}
[112]Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the Netherlands.
Iran}}5 November 1929}}—
Iraq}}8 September 1931}}
[35]
[36]		[54]
Ireland}}29 August 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1972.[55]
Israel}}20 February 1969}}
[35]
[36]		[56]
Italy}}17 June 1925}}3 April 1928}}—
Jamaica}}28 July 1970}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Japan}}17 June 1925}}21 May 1970}}—
Jordan}}20 January 1977}}
[35]
[36]
[40]		[57]
Kenya}}6 July 1970}}—
North Korea|name=Korea, Democratic People's Republic of}}4 January 1989}}
[36][58]
South Korea|name=Korea, Republic of}}4 January 1989}}
[35]
[36]		Reservation 2 withdrawn in 2002 as regards biological agents covered by the BWC.
Kuwait}}15 December 1971}}
[40]
[59]		[60]
Laos}}20 May 1989}}—
Latvia}}17 June 1925}}3 June 1931}}—
Lebanon}}17 April 1969}}—
Lesotho}}10 March 1972}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Liberia}}17 June 1927}}—
Libya}}29 December 1971}}
[35]
[36]
[40]		[61]
Liechtenstein}}6 September 1991}}—
Lithuania}}17 June 1925}}15 June 1933}}—
Luxembourg}}17 June 1925}}1 September 1936}}—
Macedonia}}20 August 2015}}—
Madagascar}}2 August 1967}}—
Malawi}}14 September 1970}}—
Malaysia}}10 December 1970}}—
Maldives}}27 December 1966}}—
Malta}}15 October 1970}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Mauritius}}8 January 1971}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Mexico}}28 May 1932}}—
Moldova}}4 November 2010}}—
Monaco}}6 January 1967}}—
Mongolia}}6 December 1968}}
[36]Withdrawn in 1990.[62]
Morocco}}13 October 1970}}—
Nepal}}9 May 1969}}—
Netherlands}}17 June 1925}}31 October 1930}}
[63]Withdrawn in 1995.[64]
New Zealand}}24 May 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1989.[65]
Nicaragua}}17 June 1925}}5 October 1990}}—
Niger}}5 April 1967}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from France.
Nigeria}}15 October 1968}}
[35]
[36]		[66]
Norway}}17 June 1925}}27 July 1932}}—
Pakistan}}15 April 1960}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from India.
Panama}}4 December 1970}}—
Papua New Guinea}}2 September 1980}}
[35]
[36]		Retained Australia's reservations on succession.[67]
Succeeded from Australia.
Paraguay}}22 October 1933}}—
Peru}}13 August 1985}}—
Philippines}}8 June 1973}}—
Poland}}17 June 1925}}4 February 1929}}—
Portugal}}17 June 1925}}1 July 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Reservation 2 withdrawn in 2003, and reservation 1 withdrawn in 2014.
Qatar}}18 October 1976}}—
Romania}}17 June 1925}}23 August 1929}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1991.[68]
Russia}}5 April 1928}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 2001.[69]
Ratified as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Rwanda}}11 May 1964}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from Belgium.
Saint Kitts and Nevis}}15 November 1989}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Saint Lucia}}21 December 1988}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}}24 March 1999}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Saudi Arabia}}27 January 1971}}—
Senegal}}15 June 1977}}—
Serbia}}3 June 2006}}
[36]Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note} Serbia's Parliament voted to withdraw their reservation in May 2009[70] and the withdrawal was announced in 2010, but the depositary has not been notified.[71]
Although the FR Yugoslavia claimed to be the continuator state of the SFR of Yugoslavia, the United Nations General Assembly did not accept this and forced them to reapply for membership.|group=Note}} which had ratified the treaty as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.
Sierra Leone}}20 March 1967}}—
Slovakia}}22 September 1993}}{{#tag:ref|Listed as 28 October 1997 by the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs.[72]|group=Note}}
[36]Withdrawn prior to succession.
Succeeded from Czechoslovakia.
Slovenia}}8 April 2008}}—
Solomon Islands}}1 June 1981}}
[35]
[36]		Retained the United Kingdom's reservations on succession.[73]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
South Africa}}24 May 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1996.[74]
Spain}}17 June 1925}}22 August 1929}}
[35]
[36]		Withdrawn in 1992.[75]
Sri Lanka}}20 January 1954}}—Ratified as the Dominion of Ceylon.
Sudan}}17 December 1980}}—
Swaziland}}23 July 1991}}—
Sweden}}17 June 1925}}25 April 1930}}—
Switzerland}}17 June 1925}}12 July 1932}}—
Syria}}17 December 1968}}
[40][76]
Tanzania}}22 April 1963}}—Ratified as the Republic of Tanganyika.
Thailand}}17 June 1925}}6 June 1931}}Some sources list two reservations by Thailand, but neither the instrument of accession,[2] nor the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs list,[77] makes any mention of a reservation.|group=Note}}Ratified as Siam.
Togo}}5 April 1971}}—
Tonga}}19 July 1971}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Trinidad and Tobago}}30 November 1970}}
[35]
[36]		Implicit on succession.{{#tag:refgroup=Note}
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Tunisia}}12 July 1967}}—
Turkey}}17 June 1925}}5 October 1929}}—
Uganda}}24 May 1965}}—
Ukraine}}7 August 2003}}
[35]
[36]		According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations.|name=implicit|group=Note}}
Succeeded from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
United Kingdom}}17 June 1925}}9 April 1930}}
[35]
[36]		Reservation 2 withdrawn in 1991 as regards biological agents covered by the BWC, and reservations completely withdrawn in 2002.[78]
United States of America}}17 June 1925}}10 April 1975}}
[63][79]
Uruguay}}17 June 1925}}12 April 1977}}—
Venezuela}}17 June 1925}}8 February 1928}}—
Vietnam}}15 December 1980}}
[35]
[36]		[80]
Yemen}}17 March 1971}}
[40]According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, states may make a reservation when "signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty".|group=Note}}
Ratified as the Yemen Arab Republic. Also ratified by the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen on 20 October 1986, prior to Yemeni unification in 1990.[81]
{{legend|#6495ED|Parties with withdrawn reservations}}{{legend|#EEEE00|Parties with implicit reservations}}{{legend|orange|Parties with unwithdrawn reservations limiting the applicability of provisions of the Protocol}}
Reservations
1. ^Chemical Weapons Convention, Article 21.
2. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 {{cite web|url=http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/traites/affichetraite.do?accord=TRA19250001|title=Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques, fait à Genève le 17 juin 1925|accessdate=23 July 2013|publisher=Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of France|language=French|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202071155/http://www.doc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/BASIS/pacte/webext/multidep/DDW?W%3D+ORDER+BY+DATOP%2FAscend%26M%3D18%26K%3D19250001%26R%3DY%26U%3D1|archivedate=2 December 2008|deadurl=yes|df=dmy-all}}
3. ^League of Nations Treaty Series, [https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/Volume%2094/v94.pdf vol. 94, pp. 66-74].
4. ^1 {{cite book |title=Handbook of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents, Second Edition |author=D. Hank Ellison |date=24 August 2007 |pages=567–570 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=0-8493-1434-8}}
5. ^{{cite book |title=War Made New: Weapons, Warriors, and the Making of the Modern World |author=Max Boot |date=16 August 2007 |pages=245–250 |publisher=Gotham |isbn=1-5924-0315-8}}
6. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/270 |title=Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare. Washington, 6 February 1922 |publisher=International Committee of the Red Cross |year=2012 |accessdate=30 April 2013}}
7. ^The Geneva Protocol
8. ^[https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/16/us-syria-crisis-un-idUSBRE98F0ED20130916# U.N. confirms sarin used in Syria attack; U.S., UK, France blame Assad]
9. ^[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/11088205/Syria-chemical-weapons-watchdog-confirms-Telegraph-analysis-of-chlorine-gas-attacks-on-civilians.html Syria chemical weapons: watchdog confirms Telegraph analysis of chlorine gas attacks on civilians]
10. ^1 2 {{cite book |pages=140–142 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZzlNgS70OHAC |title=Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, Volume 1 |author=Eric A. Croddy, James J. Wirtz |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2005 |isbn=978-1851094905 |accessdate=28 April 2013}}
11. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGARsn/1969/110.pdf |title=2603 (XXIV). Question of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons |publisher=United Nations General Assembly |date=16 December 1969 |accessdate=24 August 2013 |quote=use in international armed conflicts of: (a) Any chemical agents of warfare - chemical substances, whether gaseous, liquid or solid - which might be employed because of their direct toxic effects on man, animals or plants; (b) Any biological agents of warfare - living organisms, whatever their nature, or infective material derived from them - which are intended to cause disease or death in man, animals or plants, and which depend for their effects on their ability to multiply in the person, animal or plant attacked.}}
12. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.vertic.org/pages/posts/the-1925-geneva-protocol-goes-digital-298.php |title=The 1925 Geneva Protocol goes digital |author=Angela Woodward |publisher=VERTIC |date=17 May 2012 |accessdate=26 August 2013}}
13. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.state.gov/t/isn/4784.htm |title=Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol) |publisher=U.S. Department of State |date=25 September 2002 |accessdate=24 August 2013}}
14. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule76 |title=Practice Relating to Rule 76. Herbicides |publisher=International Committee of the Red Cross |year=2013 |accessdate=24 August 2013}}
15. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_cha_chapter24_rule75 |title=Practice Relating to Rule 75. Riot Control Agents |publisher=International Committee of the Red Cross |year=2013 |accessdate=24 August 2013}}
16. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.vertic.org/pages/posts/syria-international-law-and-the-use-of-chemical-weapons-345.php |title=Syria: international law and the use of chemical weapons |author=Scott Spence and Meghan Brown |publisher=VERTIC |date=8 August 2012 |accessdate=26 August 2013}}
17. ^1 2 {{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/1925|title=Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs|accessdate=24 July 2013}}
18. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/czechrepublic/suc/paris|title=Czech Republic: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=2014-07-26|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
19. ^{{citeweb|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/fr/dfae/politique-exterieure/droit-international-public/traites-internationaux/banque-donnees-traites-internationaux/detailansicht-staatsvertrag.ggst0_51.contract19250020.html?_charset_=UTF-8|title=Le traité international en detail|accessdate=2018-05-21|publisher=Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland}}
20. ^1 {{cite web|url=https://www.state.gov/t/isn/4784.htm|title=Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United States Department of State}}
21. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp?xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesParties&xp_treatySelected=280 |title=Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Geneva, 17 June 1925 |publisher=International Committee of the Red Cross |accessdate=31 July 2013}}
22. ^{{cite web|url=http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/acda/treaties/geneva7.txt|title=States parties to the Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare, Done at Geneva 17 June 1925|publisher=University of Illinois at Chicago|accessdate=5 August 2013}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=http://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280167ca8|title=Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare|publisher=United Nations Treaty Series|accessdate=5 August 2013}}
24. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/geneva/text/geneva1.htm|title=Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare|publisher=Federation of American Scientists|accessdate=5 August 2013}}
25. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19250020/index.html|title=Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques|date=2013-08-15|accessdate=2014-07-13|publisher=Government of Switzerland}}
26. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/official-compilation/2005/1209.pdf|title=Protocole du 17 juin 1925 concernant la prohibition d’emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques|year=2004|accessdate=2014-07-13|publisher=Government of Switzerland}}
27. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19250020/201308150000/0.515.105.pdf|title=Protocole concernant la prohibition d’emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques|date=2013-08-15|accessdate=2014-07-13|publisher=Government of Switzerland}}
28. ^{{cite journal|url=http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/Volume%2094/v94.pdf|journal=League of Nations Treaty Series - Publication of Treaties and International Engagements registered with the Secretariat of the League of Nations|volume=XCIV|year=1929|issue=1,2,3 and 4|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=League of Nations|title=No. 2138 - Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Signed at Geneva, 17 June 1925.|pages=65–74}}
29. ^1 2 3 4 {{cite journal|url=http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf |title=Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree |last=Bunn |first=George |journal=Wisconsin Law Review |volume=1969 |issue=2 |pages=375–420 |year=1969 |accessdate=5 August 2013 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf |archivedate=2 July 2014 |df=dmy }}
30. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.bwc2011.info/BB2011-by-doc/1/GP-Res.pdf|title=Seventh BWC Review Conference Briefing Book|year=2011|publisher=Biological Weapons Convention|accessdate=17 November 2014}}
31. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.sipri.org/contents/expcon/cbwarfare/cbw_research_doc/cbw_historical/cbw-hist-geneva-parties.html|archiveurl=http://archives.sipri.org/contents/expcon/cbwarfare/cbw_research_doc/cbw_historical/cbw-hist-geneva-parties.html|archivedate=2009|title=High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Protocol|publisher=SIPRI|accessdate=5 August 2013}}
32. ^{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k5FqSAX9HyMC|title=The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions, and Other Documents|last1=Schindler|first1=Dietrich|last2=Toman|first2=Jiří|year=1988|accessdate=5 August 2013|publisher=Brill Publishers|pages=115–127}}
33. ^{{cite web|url= http://www.bwc2011.info/BB2011-by-doc/1/GP-Res.pdf|title=Geneva Protocol reservations|accessdate=5 August 2013|publisher=Biological Weapons Convention Review Conference}}
34. ^{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V3vdfv6y-q8C|editor1-last=Papanicolopulu|editor1-first=Irini|editor2-last=Scovazzi|editor2-first=Tullio|year=2006|title=Quale diritto nei conflitti armati?|accessdate=5 August 2013|publisher=Giuffrè Editore|pages=231–237|language=Italian}}
35. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
36. ^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
37. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/algeria/acc/paris|title=Algeria: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=27 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
38. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/angola/acc/paris|title=Angola: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=27 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
39. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/australia/acc/paris|title=Australia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=20 September 2014|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
40. ^1 2 3 4 5 Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel.
41. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/bahrain/acc/paris|title=Bahrain: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=27 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
42. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/bangladesh/acc/paris|title=Bangladesh: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=27 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
43. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/barbados/suc/paris|title=Barbados: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=27 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
44. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/belgium/rat/paris|title=Belgium: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=27 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
45. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/bulgaria/rat/paris|title=Bulgaria: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
46. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/cambodia/acc/paris|title=Cambodia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
47. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/canada/rat/paris|title=Canada: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
48. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/chile/rat/paris|title=Chile: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
49. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/china/suc/paris|title=China: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
50. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/estonia/rat/paris|title=Estonia: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
51. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/fiji/suc/paris|title=Fiji: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
52. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/france/rat/paris|title=France: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
53. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/india/rat/paris|title=India: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
54. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/iraq/acc/paris|title=Iraq: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
55. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/ireland/acc/paris|title=Ireland: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
56. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/israel/acc/paris|title=Israel: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
57. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/jordan/acc/paris|title=Jordan: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
58. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/democraticpeoplesrepublicofkorea/acc/paris|title=Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=29 August 2017|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
59. ^Ceases to be binding in the case of a violation.
60. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/kuwait/acc/paris|title=Kuwait: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
61. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/libya/acc/paris|title=Libya: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
62. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/mongolia/acc/paris|title=Mongolia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
63. ^1 2 Ceases to be binding as to the use of chemical weapons in regards to any enemy state which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
64. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/netherlands/rat/paris|title=Netherlands: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=28 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
65. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/newzealand/acc/paris|title=New Zealand: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=29 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
66. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/nigeria/acc/paris|title=Nigeria: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=29 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
67. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/papuanewguinea/suc/paris|title=Papua New Guinea: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
68. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/romania/rat/paris|title=Romania: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
69. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/russianfederation/rat/paris|title=Russian Federation: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
70. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.opbw.org/rev_cons/7rc/BWC_CONF.VII_Press_111205_E.pdf|title=Seventh Review Conference of Biological Weapons Convention|date=5 December 2011|accessdate=10 November 2013}}
71. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/key7rev/article_VIII.pdf|title=Article VII: Geneva Protocol Obligations and the BTWC|last1=Sims|first1=Nicholas|last2=Pearson|first2=Graham|last3=Woodward|first3=Angela|accessdate=10 August 2013}}
72. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/slovakia/suc/paris|title=Slovakia: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
73. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/solomonislands/suc/paris|title=Solomon Islands: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
74. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/southafrica/acc/paris|title=South Africa: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
75. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/spain/rat/paris|title=Spain: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
76. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/syrianarabrepublic/acc/paris|title=Syrian Arab Republic: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
77. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/thailand/rat/paris|title=Thailand: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
78. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/unitedkingdomofgreatbritainandnorthernireland/rat/paris|title=United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Ratification of 1925 Geneva|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
79. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/unitedstatesofamerica/rat/paris|title=United States of America: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
80. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/vietnam/acc/paris|title=Viet Nam: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
81. ^{{cite web|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/yemen/acc/paris|title=Yemen: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol|accessdate=31 July 2013|publisher=United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs}}
82. ^{{citeweb|url=https://akipress.com/news:617607|title=Kyrgyzstan joins Geneva Protocol prohibiting use of chemical and biological weapons in international armed conflicts|date=2019-03-25|accessdate=2019-03-30|publisher=AKIpress news agency}}
83. ^{{citeweb|url=https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/palestinians/int-l-treaties-abbas-seeks-to-join-to-protest-jerusalem-move-1.5629959|title=The Full List: The International Treaties Abbas Seeks to Join to Protest Trump's Jerusalem Move|date=2017-12-29|accessdate=2018-01-16|publisher=Haaretz}}
Notes
{{reflist|group=Note}}

Non-signatory states

The remaining UN member states and UN observers that have not acceded or succeeded to the Protocol are:

{{col-begin}}{{col-4}}
  • {{flag|Andorra}}
  • {{flag|Armenia}}
  • {{flag|Azerbaijan}}
  • {{flag|Bahamas}}
  • {{flag|Belarus}}
  • {{flag|Belize}}
  • {{flag|Bosnia}}
  • {{flag|Botswana}}
  • {{flag|Brunei}}
  • {{flag|Burundi}}
  • {{flag|Chad}}
  • {{flag|Comoros}}
  • {{flag|Democratic Republic of the Congo}}
  • {{flag|Republic of the Congo}}
{{col-4}}
  • {{flag|Djibouti}}
  • {{flag|Dominica}}
  • {{flag|Eritrea}}
  • {{flag|Gabon}}
  • {{flag|Georgia}}
  • {{flag|Guinea}}
  • {{flag|Guyana}}
  • {{flag|Haiti}}
  • {{flag|Honduras}}
  • {{flag|Kazakhstan}}
  • {{flag|Kiribati}}
  • {{flag|Kyrgyzstan}}{{efn|In March 2019, Kyrgyzstan's president signed an agreement to acceed to the protocol.[82]}}
  • {{flag|Mali}}
{{col-4}}
  • {{flag|Marshall Islands}}
  • {{flag|Mauritania}}
  • {{flag|Federated States of Micronesia}}
  • {{flag|Montenegro}}
  • {{flag|Mozambique}}
  • {{flag|Myanmar}}
  • {{flag|Namibia}}
  • {{flag|Nauru}}
  • {{flag|Oman}}
  • {{flag|Palau}}
  • {{flag|Palestine}}{{efn|In December 2017, Palestine announced that it would acceed to the protocol.[83]}}
  • {{flag|Samoa}}
  • {{flag|San Marino}}
  • {{flag|São Tomé and Príncipe}}
{{col-4}}
  • {{flag|Seychelles}}
  • {{flag|Singapore}}
  • {{flag|Somalia}}
  • {{flag|South Sudan}}
  • {{flag|Suriname}}
  • {{flag|Tajikistan}}
  • {{flag|Timor-Leste}}
  • {{flag|Turkmenistan}}
  • {{flag|Tuvalu}}
  • {{flag|United Arab Emirates}}
  • {{flag|Uzbekistan}}
  • {{flag|Vanuatu}}
  • {{flag|Zambia}}
  • {{flag|Zimbabwe}}
{{col-end}}

Chemical weapons prohibitions

YearNameEffect
1675Strasbourg AgreementThe first international agreement limiting the use of chemical weapons, in this case, poison bullets.
1874Brussels Convention on the Law and Customs of WarProhibited the employment of poison or poisoned weapons (Never entered into force.)
18991st Peace Conference at the HagueEuropean Nations agreed to abstain from "the use of projectiles the object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases."
19072nd Peace Conference at the HagueThe Conference added the use of poison or poisoned weapons.
1919Treaty of VersaillesProhibited poison gas in Germany.
1922Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in WarfareFailed because France objected to clauses relating to submarine warfare.
1925Geneva ProtocolProhibited the "use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices" and "bacteriological methods".
1972Biological and Toxins Weapons ConventionNo verification mechanism, negotiations for a protocol to make up this lack halted by USA in 2001.
1993Chemical Weapons ConventionComprehensive bans on development, production, stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapons, with destruction timelines.
1998Rome Statute of the International Criminal CourtMakes it a war crime to employ chemical weapons in international conflicts. (2010 amendment extends prohibition to internal conflicts.)

Notes

{{notelist}}

References

{{Reflist}}

External links

{{wikisource|Geneva Protocol to Hague Convention}}
  • The text of the protocol
  • Weapons of War: Poison Gas
  • {{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dJEpNNKMEXgC |title=Chemical warfare: a study in restraints |author=Frederic Joseph Brown |publisher=Transaction Publishers |year=2005 |isbn=1-4128-0495-7 |pages=98–110 |chapter=Chapter 3: The Evolution of Policy 1922-1939 / Geneva Gas Protocol}}

155 : Biological warfare|Chemical warfare|Chemical weapons demilitarization|Arms control treaties|Human rights instruments|Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907|Treaties concluded in 1925|Treaties entered into force in 1928|Treaties of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan|Treaties of the People's Socialist Republic of Albania|Treaties of Algeria|Treaties of the People's Republic of Angola|Treaties of Antigua and Barbuda|Treaties of Argentina|Treaties of Australia|Treaties of the First Austrian Republic|Treaties of Bahrain|Treaties of Bangladesh|Treaties of Barbados|Treaties of Belgium|Treaties of the People's Republic of Benin|Treaties of Bhutan|Treaties of Bolivia|Treaties of the Brazilian military government|Treaties of the Kingdom of Bulgaria|Treaties of Burkina Faso|Treaties of the People's Republic of Kampuchea|Treaties of Cameroon|Treaties of Canada|Treaties of Cape Verde|Treaties of the Central African Republic|Treaties of Chile|Treaties of the Republic of China (1912–49)|Treaties of Costa Rica|Treaties of Ivory Coast|Treaties of Croatia|Treaties of Cuba|Treaties of Cyprus|Treaties of the Czech Republic|Treaties of Czechoslovakia|Treaties of Denmark|Treaties of the Dominican Republic|Treaties of Ecuador|Treaties of the Kingdom of Egypt|Treaties of El Salvador|Treaties of Equatorial Guinea|Treaties of Estonia|Treaties of the Ethiopian Empire|Treaties of Fiji|Treaties of Finland|Treaties of the French Third Republic|Treaties of the Gambia|Treaties of the Weimar Republic|Treaties of Ghana|Treaties of the Kingdom of Greece|Treaties of Grenada|Treaties of Guatemala|Treaties of Guinea-Bissau|Treaties of the Holy See|Treaties of the Hungarian People's Republic|Treaties of Iceland|Treaties of British India|Treaties of Indonesia|Treaties of the Pahlavi dynasty|Treaties of Mandatory Iraq|Treaties of Ireland|Treaties of Israel|Treaties of the Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946)|Treaties of Jamaica|Treaties of Japan|Treaties of Jordan|Treaties of Kenya|Treaties of North Korea|Treaties of South Korea|Treaties of Kuwait|Treaties of Laos|Treaties of Latvia|Treaties of Lebanon|Treaties of Lesotho|Treaties of Liberia|Treaties of the Libyan Arab Republic|Treaties of Liechtenstein|Treaties of Lithuania|Treaties of Luxembourg|Treaties of Madagascar|Treaties of Malawi|Treaties of Malaysia|Treaties of the Maldives|Treaties of Malta|Treaties of Mauritius|Treaties of Mexico|Treaties of Moldova|Treaties of Monaco|Treaties of Mongolia|Treaties of Morocco|Treaties of Nepal|Treaties of the Netherlands|Treaties of New Zealand|Treaties of Nicaragua|Treaties of Niger|Treaties of Nigeria|Treaties of Norway|Treaties of Pakistan|Treaties of Panama|Treaties of Papua New Guinea|Treaties of Paraguay|Treaties of Peru|Treaties of the Philippines|Treaties of the Second Polish Republic|Treaties of the Estado Novo (Portugal)|Treaties of Qatar|Treaties of the Kingdom of Romania|Treaties of Russia|Treaties of Rwanda|Treaties of Saint Kitts and Nevis|Treaties of Saint Lucia|Treaties of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines|Treaties of Saudi Arabia|Treaties of Senegal|Treaties of Serbia|Treaties of Sierra Leone|Treaties of Singapore|Treaties of Slovakia|Treaties of Slovenia|Treaties of the Solomon Islands|Treaties of the Union of South Africa|Treaties of the Soviet Union|Treaties of Spain under the Restoration|Treaties of the Dominion of Ceylon|Treaties of the Democratic Republic of the Sudan|Treaties of Eswatini|Treaties of Sweden|Treaties of Switzerland|Treaties of Syria|Treaties of Tanzania|Treaties of Thailand|Treaties of Togo|Treaties of Tonga|Treaties of Trinidad and Tobago|Treaties of Tunisia|Treaties of Turkey|Treaties of Uganda|Treaties of Ukraine|Treaties of the United Kingdom|Treaties of the United States|Treaties of Uruguay|Treaties of Venezuela|Treaties of Vietnam|Treaties of the Yemen Arab Republic|Treaties of South Yemen|Treaties extended to Curaçao and Dependencies|Treaties extended to Greenland|Treaties extended to the Faroe Islands|Treaties extended to the Dutch East Indies|Treaties extended to Surinam (Dutch colony)
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/16 7:59:34