词条 | 2009 Venezuelan constitutional referendum | ||||||||||||
释义 |
The 2009 referendum was a vote in which the citizens of Venezuela approved Amendment No. 1 (Enmienda No. 1) of the Constitution of Venezuela; this abolished term limits for the offices of President, state governors, mayors and National Assembly deputies. The current constitution, enacted in 1999 by referendum, previously established a three-term limit for deputies and a two-term limit for the other offices. The proposed amendment was put to a referendum on 15 February 2009[1] and endorsed by 54% of the electorate, with approximately 70% of registered voters participating.[2] BackgroundA proposal for an important change in the main structure of the Constitution, that included abolishing presidential term limits among major social, economical and political changes was rejected in 2007 when university students led protests and played a critical role in the result;[3] President Hugo Chávez had said the reform was needed to implement his socialist program. Chávez conceded defeat by saying "for now, we couldn't" ("por ahora no pudimos"),[4][5] echoing the phrase he used after the failure of his February 1992 attempted coup d'état against the Carlos Andrés Pérez government.[6] On 30 November 2008, six days after regional elections, Hugo Chávez announced on television that he would be open to a new wave of discussion on the proposal for allowing the postulation without limits to presidential candidature.[7] The following day, his supporters started working towards a constitutional amendment for this goal.[8] Provisions of the amendmentThe full title of the law was Amendment No. 1 of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (Enmienda No. 1 de la Constitucion de Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela). It was approved by a majority of the members of the National Assembly. The United Socialist Party of Venezuela (Chávez's political party) states that the initiative was backed by more than six million people.[9] The amendment affects Articles 160, 162, 174, 192 and 230 of the constitution. They are amended as follows:[10]
Article 341 of the constitution, which governs amendments, states that "amendments shall be numbered consecutively and shall be published beneath the Constitution without altering the text of the latter". Therefore, the 2009 amendment has not altered the original text of the constitution. Rather, Amendment No.1 (including new texts for each of the five amended articles) is published below the original text as a codicil.[11] Referendum questionThe question elaborated by the National Electoral Council was:[12] {{quotation|Do you approve the amendment of articles 160, 162, 174, 192 and 230 of the Constitution of the Republic, as processed by the National Assembly, which increases the political rights of the people, with the purpose of allowing any citizen incumbent in an elected office, to be nominated as candidate for the same office, for the period of time established constitutionally, his or her possible re-election depending exclusively on popular vote?}}ResultsOpinion polls conducted on the measure in December 2008 varied widely, with results ranging from 32% approval (with 61% disapproval)[13] to 51% approval (with 39% disapproval).[14][15] The final results were as follows: {{Venezuelan constitutional referendum, 2009}}These figures were given in the second partial official bulletin, issued when canvassing reached a 98.81% of the votes. The trends are deemed to be irreversible.[16] Final results are awaited in the following days. Reaction{{Unbalanced section|date=August 2010}}OppositionThe initial reaction of the opposition to the referendum proposal was that it was illegal. Henry Ramos, secretary general of the opposition party Acción Democrática called the proposal " 'illegal and unconstitutional' because Article 345 says that 'A revised constitutional reform initiative may not be submitted during the same constitutional term of office of the National Assembly.' "[17] Chávez avoided this issue by declaring that the change to the constitution would be in the form of an amendment, instead of a constitutional reform. In addition, the constitutional amendment was re-defined to apply to all popular elected positions, not just to the president. Elenis Rodríguez Martínez, a leader of the opposition party Primero Justicia, stated that the proposed change constitutes a fundamental change to the constitution, and therefore cannot be voted as an amendment.[18] She stated that, "Under Article 340, 'the purpose of an amendment is to add to or modify one or more articles of the Constitution, without altering the fundamental structure of the same.' When the president says that he wants to delete some words from Article 230 of the Constitution, he is lying, because he really wants to remove an essential part of the text and in doing so he is altering its structure, as well as part of the provisions of Article 6, which reads that 'the government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is ... alternating' (...) This is a camouflaged reform."[18] However, the Constitutional Court ruled that such a change was within the scope of a constitutional amendment, and that such an amendment could be re-attempted each year.[19][20] The editors of Venezuelan publishing house Veneconomy argue that the 15 February date is too soon to comply with time-frames set forth by the suffrage law and related laws for the registration of voters newly-turned-18 and for the organization of polling stations.[21] Students again took a leading role in protests, as they did in the campaign against the 2007 referendum. On 16 January students blocked a Caracas highway, burned trees and taunted the police. After viewing video of the protests, Chávez gave the order: "Throw lots of (tear) gas at them, and take them prisoner for me. If you don't, I'm going to go after the authorities responsible."[3][22] Tensions rose in advance of the referendum, with a group of 40 armed men taking over the Caracas city hall, to which an opposition mayor had been elected in November, and declaring the building "recovered for the revolution". Tear gas was also thrown at the compound of the papal nuncio, who had granted asylum to an anti-Chávez student leader accused of sexual assault; and an anti-Chávez student leader's car was burned.[23] Opposition figures have accused Chávez of using all the resources of the government to support the Yes campaign, ranging from near-total support for the Yes campaign on state radio and television to placement of Yes campaign ads on official ministry websites. According to opposition figure Leopoldo López, "we aren’t competing against a political party, we’re competing against an entire state and all of the power it can wield".[24] The opposition also says that No campaign ads have had their approval delayed and scheduling manipulated by the National Electoral Council.[25] InternationalFollowing claims that US officials had met with Venezuelan opposition leaders in Puerto Rico (which the US denied),[26] Chávez accused U.S. President Barack Obama of meddling in the referendum, adding that "He's said I'm an obstacle for progress in Latin America... Therefore it must be removed, this obstacle, right?" Chávez also added that Obama was under pressure from the Pentagon to be tough on Venezuela by quoting: "He [Obama] knows that if he doesn't obey the orders of the empire, they'll probably kill him."[3] President of Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva backed Hugo Chávez's proposal of a possible re-election and asked why nobody criticized Colombian President Álvaro Uribe, who was also proposing the removal of Colombia's current two-term limit,[27] having already removed the previous one-term limit, a move that made possible his re-election in 2006.[28]International observersAround 100 international observers were accredited to observe the vote, but neither the Organization of American States nor the European Union had official observers in Venezuela.[29] Observers from Latin American nations, European Parliament members, and European academics said that the ballot had been free and fair.[2] The United States Department of State spokesman Noel Clay praised the "civic spirit" of the referendum. He added that it was important that elected officials in Venezuela focused on "governing democratically".[30] On 13 February 2009, the Venezuelan government expelled Luis Herrero, a Spanish member of the European Parliament (and member of the European People's Party), after he called Chávez a dictator and criticized Chávez's handling of the constitutional referendum. One of the parties in the opposition to Chávez had asked Herrero to observe the referendum.[31] In April 2009 NACLA reported that its observers had found that "the voting in Venezuela’s 2009 referendum was, overall, fair, transparent, and clean."[32] References1. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.radiomundial.com.ve/yvke/noticia.php?t=15526&imprimir=1 |title=Chávez autoriza acciones para introducir reelección presidencial a través de una enmienda |publisher=YVKE Mundial |date=20 November 2008 |accessdate=30 November 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717071536/http://www.radiomundial.com.ve/yvke/noticia.php?t=15526&imprimir=1 |archive-date=17 July 2011 |dead-url=yes |df=dmy-all }} 2. ^1 {{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7891856.stm |title=Venezuelan leader wins key reform |publisher=BBC News |date=16 February 2009 |accessdate=16 February 2009}} 3. ^1 2 {{cite news |last=Jones |first=Rachel |date=17 January 2009 |title=Chavez: Obama meddles in Venezuela term-limit vote |url=http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/chavez-obama-meddles-in-venezuela-term-limit-vote/article_51acfef2-e074-586d-b8d5-a24f31f219ba.html |newspaper= |agency=Associated Press |access-date=15 February 2009}} 4. ^Matthew Walter and Helen Murphy. [https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aSpYEZW_eEhM&refer=home Venezuelans Reject Chavez's Plans for Constitution (Update1).] Bloomberg, 3 December 2007. Retrieved 3 December 2007. 5. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.elpais.com/articulo/internacional/Venezuela/dice/Constitucion/Chavez/elpepuint/20071203elpepuint_1/Tes|title=Venezuela dice 'no' a la Constitución de Chávez|author=Peregil, F|date=3 December 2007|work=El País|accessdate=7 December 2007|language=es}} 6. ^{{cite web|author=Kofman, Jeffrey|url=http://www.abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=3945080&page=1|publisher=ABC Global News|title=Tension, Then Surprise, Chavez Loses Reform Vote|date=3 December 2007|accessdate=3 December 2007}} 7. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7757784.stm|title= Chavez announces re-election plan|last=Grant|first=Will|date=30 November 2008|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=14 February 2009}} 8. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=44934|title=Venezuela: Reviving the Debate on Presidential Reelection|last=Márquez|first=Humberto|date=1 December 2008|publisher=IPS|accessdate=14 February 2009}} 9. ^{{es icon}} 6.6 millones de firmas respaldan la propuesta de enmienda constitucional. Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (16 January 2009). Retrieved 20 January 2009. 10. ^{{es icon}} Entendiendo la pregunta de la Enmienda Constitucional. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090125092907/http://www.radiomundial.com.ve/yvke/noticia.php?17890 |date=25 January 2009 }} Gobierno Bolivariano de Venezuela: Mundial (19 January 2009). Retrieved 20 January 2009. 11. ^Full text of the Constitution of Venezuela with Amendment No. 1 (Spanish) 12. ^{{es icon}} convocado referendo aprobatorio de la Enmienda Constitucional para el 1 de Febrero. Gobierno Bolivariano de Venezuela: Consejo Nacional Electoral (16 January 2009). Retrieved 20 January 2009. 13. ^{{es icon}} {{Dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} 14. ^{{es icon}} Más de 51% aprobaría la enmienda Constitucional. Agencia Bolivariano de Noticias (3 January 2009). Retrieved 20 January 2009. (Original URL{{Dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}) 15. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/32749/venezuelans_would_support_charter_amendments |title=Venezuelans Would Support Charter Amendments: Angus Reid Global Monitor |publisher=Angus-reid.com |accessdate=16 February 2009}} 16. ^{{es icon}}Globovision.com - Amendment Approved 17. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=321963&CategoryId=10718|title=Venezuela's Chávez Pushes For Indefinite Rule Again|last=Morgan|first=Jeremy|author2=Russ Dallen |publisher=Latin American Herald Tribune|accessdate=14 February 2009}} 18. ^1 {{cite news|url=http://buscador.eluniversal.com/2008/12/11/en_pol_esp_opposition-party-ask_11A2165127.shtml|title=Opposition party asks top court to stop amendment on endless reelection|last=Alonso|first=Juan Francisco|author2=Translated by Gerardo Cárdenas |accessdate=15 February 2009}} 19. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.eluniversal.com/2009/02/04/pol_art_presidente-puede-pre_1255207.shtml|title=Presidente puede presentar enmiendas todos los años|last=Martínez|first=Eugenio G.|date=4 February 2009|work=El Universal|accessdate=14 February 2009|language=es}}; partial translation (4 February) 20. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.embavenez-us.org/factsheet/FS-Amend-F4-Eng.pdf |format=PDF |title=Fact Sheet: Constitutional Amendment in Venezuela |publisher=Embajada de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela en Estados Unidos |accessdate=14 February 2009}} 21. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.laht.com/article.asp?CategoryId=13303&ArticleId=323251|title=Veneconomy: Venezuela Chavez' Doubly Illegal and Unconstitutional Amendment|last=editors of Veneconomy|accessdate=14 February 2009}} 22. ^http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/01/18/news/LT-Venezuela-Referendum.php 23. ^Kraul, Chris (20 January 2009). "Tensions build in Venezuela as Chavez prepares for referendum." Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 20 January 2009. 24. ^Bloomberg, 11 February 2009, [https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aCpAy_lcxeiY&refer=latin_america Chavez Puts Venezuelan Government Behind Bid to Stay in Power] 25. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/francisco-toro/chavezs-all-out-push-to-b_b_164826.html |title=Francisco Toro: Chavez's All Out Push to be President for Life |publisher=Huffingtonpost.com |date=9 February 2009 |accessdate=16 February 2009}} 26. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=325470&CategoryId=10717 |title=Latin American Herald Tribune - U.S. Embassy Head Denies Plotting With Opposition in Venezuela |publisher=Laht.com |accessdate=16 February 2009}} 27. ^{{cite web|author=Luigino Bracci |url=http://www.radiomundial.com.ve/yvke/noticia.php?t=17884&highlight=enmienda |title=Lula respalda una futura reelección de Hugo Chávez :: YVKE Mundial |publisher=Radiomundial.com.ve |accessdate=16 February 2009}} 28. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=3255 |title=Third Term for Uribe Threatens Colombian Democracy |publisher=World Politics Review |date=5 February 2009 |accessdate=16 February 2009}} 29. ^{{cite news |url=https://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090215/ts_afp/venezuelaeuropediplomacyspain |title=Venezuela vote expected to be close |date=15 February 2009 |author=Sophie Nicholson |publisher=AFP}} 30. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7893907.stm|title=US welcomes Venezuela's term vote|publisher=BBC News|date=17 February 2009|accessdate=17 February 2009}} 31. ^{{cite news |last1=Nyberg |first1=Per |last2=Neill |first2=Morgan |last3=Penhaul |first3=Karl |date=14 February 2009 |title=Venezuela ousts EU politician for insulting Chavez |url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/02/14/venezuela.chavez.expelled.dictator/index.html |work=CNN| accessdate=27 May 2010}} 32. ^NACLA, 23 April 2009, [https://nacla.org/node/5741 Debrief: New Report on Venezuela's Re-Election Referendum] External links
Media
11 : 2009 elections in South America|2009 in Venezuela|2009 referendums|Constitutional amendments|Elections in Venezuela|Hugo Chávez|Referendums in Venezuela|Constitutions of Venezuela|Constitutional referendums|Reelection|Bolivarian Revolution |
||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。