请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito
释义 {{SCOTUS-justice-listframe
|firstname=Samuel
|lastname=Alito
|image=File:Justice Alito official.jpg
|term=2010
|tenurecount=sixth
|startdate=October 4, 2010
|enddate=October 1, 2011
|majority=7
|concurrence=6
|concurrencedissent=1
|dissent=6
|other=1
|benchcount=18
|relatingtoorders=3
|inchambers=0
|unanimous=0
|mostjoinedby=Roberts (12)
|leastjoinedby=Kagan (4)
|url-courtopinions=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/10
|url-relatingtoorders=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/relatingtoorders/10
|url-inchambers=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/in-chambers/10
|accessdate=October 2, 2011
|opinionstemplate=samuelalitoopinions
|courttemplate=SCOTUSterm2010-present
|entries={{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=01
| case=NASA v. Nelson
| type=majority
| volume=562
| page=134
| year=2011
| issues=background check of prospective federal employees {{*}} informational privacy {{*}} Privacy Act of 1974
| joined=Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
| otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=concurrence || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#NASA v. Nelson
| otheropinion2author=Thomas || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#NASA v. Nelson
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=02
| case=Staub v. Proctor Hospital
| type=concurrence
| volume=562
| page=411
| year=2011
| issues=Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 {{*}} influence of prior discrimination on subsequent decisionmaker
| joined=Thomas
| otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Staub v. Proctor Hospital
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=03
| case=Henderson v. Shinseki
| type=majority
| volume=562
| page=428
| year=2011
| issues=Veterans' Judicial Review Act {{*}} Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims {{*}} excusability of missing deadline for filing appeal
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=04
| case=Snyder v. Phelps
| type=dissent
| volume=562
| page=443
| year=2011
| issues=First Amendment {{*}} free speech {{*}} intentional infliction of emotional distress
| joined=
| otheropinion1author=Roberts || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts#Snyder v. Phelps
| otheropinion2author=Breyer || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Snyder v. Phelps
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=05
| case=Pepper v. United States
| type=concurrencedissent
| volume=562
| page=476
| year=2011
| issues=Federal Sentencing Guidelines {{*}} consideration of postsentencing rehabilitation
| joined=
| otheropinion1author=Sotomayor || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor#Pepper v. United States
| otheropinion2author=Breyer || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Pepper v. United States
| otheropinion3author=Thomas || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Pepper v. United States
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=06
| case=Wall v. Kholi
| type=majority
| volume=562
| page=545
| year=2011
| issues=Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 {{*}} tolling of habeas corpus statute of limitations {{*}} motion to reduce sentence as application for collateral review
| joined=Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan; Scalia (in part)
| otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=concurrence || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Wall v. Kholi
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=07
| case=Milner v. Department of Navy
| type=concurrence
| volume=562
| page=562
| year=2011
| issues=Freedom of Information Act {{*}} exemption for internal personnel rules
| joined=
| otheropinion1author=Kagan || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan#Milner v. Department of Navy
| otheropinion2author=Breyer || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Milner v. Department of Navy
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=08
| case1=Wong v. Smith
| type=dissent
| volume=562
| page=1021
| year=2010
| wikisource=Wong v. Smith/Dissent Alito
| issues=judicial commenting on evidence {{*}} judicial coercion of a jury verdict
| joined=Roberts, Scalia
| summary=Alito filed a dissent from the Court's denial of certiorari, where the lower court had granted habeas relief on the grounds that a judge's comments to a deadlocked jury about the evidence coerced them into returning a guilty verdict. Alito observed that the privilege of common law judges to comment on the evidence was centuries old, and no Supreme Court precedent had yet ruled on whether or when the exercise of that privilege constituted coercion. In Alito's view, therefore, the lower court's judgment was contrary to the requirement under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act that a state court judgment must be contrary to clearly established law in order to be set aside by a federal habeas court.
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=09
| case1=Harper v. Maverick Recording Co.
| type=dissent
| volume=562
| page=1080
| year=2010
| wikisource=Harper v. Maverick Recording Co./Dissent Alito
| issues=copyright infringement {{*}} statutory damages {{*}} innocent infringer defense {{*}} music downloading
| joined=
| summary=Alito filed a dissent from the Court's denial of certiorari, in a case involving a 16-year-old girl sued for illegally downloading music from the internet. The lower court had ruled the girl was ineligible for the "innocent infringer" defense, which would have reduced the statutory damages available, because it was foreclosed by {{usc|17|402(d)}}, which applies when the defendant had access to a "phonorecord" bearing a copyright notice. Alito noted that the statutory definition of "phonorecord" only applied to material objects, and so there was a "strong argument" that §402(d) did not apply to downloaded digital music files. Though there was not yet a circuit split on the issue, Alito believed certiorari was appropriate because the issue was important and unlikely to be presented to the courts of appeals in many cases.
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=10
| case1=Huber v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection
| type=other
| volume=562
| page=1302
| year=2011
| issues=Fourth Amendment {{*}} warrantless searches {{*}} wetlands protection
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Thomas
| summary=Alito filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari.
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=11
| case=Cullen v. Pinholster
| type=concurrence
| volume=563
| page=170
| year=2011
| issues=Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 {{*}} introduction of new evidence in habeas corpus proceedings {{*}} Sixth Amendment {{*}} ineffective assistance of counsel
| joined=
| otheropinion1author=Thomas || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Cullen v. Pinholster
| otheropinion2author=Breyer || otheropinion2type=concurrencedissent || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Cullen v. Pinholster
| otheropinion3author=Sotomayor || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor#Cullen v. Pinholster
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=12
| case=Kentucky v. King
| type=majority
| volume=563
| page=452
| year=2011
| issues=Fourth Amendment {{*}} exigent circumstances {{*}} police-created exigency
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
| otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=dissent || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#Kentucky v. King
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=13
| case=Brown v. Plata
| type=dissent
| volume=563
| page=493
| year=2011
| issues=Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 {{*}} Eighth Amendment {{*}} prison overcrowding
| joined=Roberts
| otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Brown v. Plata
| otheropinion2author=Scalia || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Brown v. Plata
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=14
| case=Fowler v. United States
| type=dissent
| volume=563
| page=668
| year=2011
| issues=federal witness tampering crime {{*}} likelihood victim was intending to communicate with federal officer
| joined=Ginsburg
| otheropinion1author=Breyer || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Fowler v. United States
| otheropinion2author=Scalia || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Fowler v. United States
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=15
| case=Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.
| type=majority
| volume=563
| page=754
| year=2011
| issues=patent law {{*}} induced infringement {{*}} willful blindness
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
| otheropinion1author=Kennedy || otheropinion1type=dissent || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=16
| case=Nevada Comm'n on Ethics v. Carrigan
| type=concurrence
| volume=564
| page=117
| year=2011
| issues=vote recusal of state legislator with conflict of interest {{*}} First Amendment {{*}} overbreadth doctrine
| joined=
| otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Nevada Comm'n on Ethics v. Carrigan
| otheropinion2author=Kennedy || otheropinion2type=concurrence || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy#Nevada Comm'n on Ethics v. Carrigan
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=17
| case=United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
| type=majority
| volume=564
| page=162
| year=2011
| issues=fiduciary exception to attorney–client privilege {{*}} general trust relationship between the United States and Indian tribes
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
| otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=concurrence || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
| otheropinion2author=Sotomayor || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor#United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=18
| case-article=Davis v. United States (2011)
| case-display=Davis v. United States
| type=majority
| volume=564
| page=229
| year=2011
| issues=Fourth Amendment {{*}} exclusionary rule {{*}} good faith reliance on binding appellate precedent
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Kagan
| otheropinion1author=Sotomayor || otheropinion1type=concurrence || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor#Davis v. United States
| otheropinion2author=Breyer || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Davis v. United States
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=19
| case=J. D. B. v. North Carolina
| type=dissent
| volume=564
| page=261
| year=2011
| issues=Fifth Amendment {{*}} Miranda warning {{*}} effect of minor's age on determining custodial status
| joined=Roberts, Scalia, Thomas
| otheropinion1author=Sotomayor || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor#J. D. B. v. North Carolina
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=20
| case=American Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut
| type=concurrence
| volume=564
| page=410
| year=2011
| issues=Clean Air Act {{*}} power plant carbon dioxide emissions standards {{*}} federal common law nuisance claims
| joined=Thomas
| otheropinion1author=Ginsburg || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg#American Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut
| summary=
}}{{SCOTUS-justice-listentry
| #=21
| case=Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
| type=concurrence
| volume=564
| page=786
| year=2011
| issues=First Amendment {{*}} freedom of speech {{*}} restriction on sale of violent video games to minors
| joined=Roberts
| otheropinion1author=Scalia || otheropinion1type=majority || otheropinion1link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia#Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
| otheropinion2author=Thomas || otheropinion2type=dissent || otheropinion2link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas#Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
| otheropinion3author=Breyer || otheropinion3type=dissent || otheropinion3link=2010 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer#Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
| summary=
}}
}}
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/11 11:33:50