| 词条 | Anastasoff v. United States |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Anastasoff v. United States | court = United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit |CourtSeal= |ArgueDate= |ArgueYear= |DecideDate=August 22, |DecideYear=2000 |FullName=Faye Anastasoff v. United States | citations =[https://openjurist.org/223/f3d/898 223 F.3d 898] (8th Cir. 2000) |Prior=Judge Catherine D. Perry, E.D. Mo., ruled in favor of the IRS. |Subsequent=Vacated as moot on rehearing en banc, [https://openjurist.org/235/f3d/1054 235 F.3d 1054] (8th Cir. 2000) |Holding= | judges = Richard S. Arnold, Gerald Heaney, Paul A. Magnuson (D. Minn.) |Majority= |JoinMajority= |Concurrence= |JoinConcurrence= |Dissent= |JoinDissent= |LawsApplied=Article Three of the United States Constitution }}Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000)[1], was a case decided by the U.S. Eighth Circuit on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. It is notable for being the only case to consider the "Anastasoff issue", that is whether Article Three of the United States Constitution requires a federal court to treat unpublished opinions as precedent.[2] The case was subsequently vacated as moot on rehearing en banc[3], due to the governments decision to pay the taxpayer's claim in full with interest at the statutory rate. In the final decision, the court opinion stated: {{cquote | The controversy over the status of unpublished opinions is, to be sure, of great interest and importance, but this sort of factor will not save a case from becoming moot. We sit to decide cases, not issues, and whether unpublished opinions have precedential effect no longer has any relevance for the decision of this tax-refund case.}}Before being overturned, the Anastasoff decision was cited by multiple courts that used unpublished opinions in their decisions, such as United States v. Goldman, No. 00-1276 of September 29, 2000, and United States v. Langmade, No. 00-2019 of December 29, 2000.[4] See also
References1. ^{{cite court |litigants=Anastasoff v. United States |vol=223 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=898 |pinpoint= |court=8th Cir. |date=2000 |url=https://openjurist.org/223/f3d/898 |accessdate=2017-09-13 |quote=}} {{US-case-law-stub}}2. ^{{citation|title=The Citation of Unpublished Opinions in the Federal Courts of Appeals |last=Schiltz |first=Patrick J. |url=http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/rules/Schiltz.pdf |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110510091630/http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/rules/Schiltz.pdf |archivedate=2011-05-10 }} 3. ^{{cite court |litigants=Anastasoff v. United States |vol=235 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=1054 |pinpoint= |court=8th Cir. |date=2000 |url=https://openjurist.org/235/f3d/1054 |accessdate=2017-09-13 |quote=}} 4. ^{{citation | title= Losing Cite: The Anastasoff Rule | first1= Mark | last1= Whitney | publisher= TheLaw.net Corporation | year= 2004 | url= http://www.nonpublication.com/lawnetanastasoff.htm }} 3 : United States Constitution Article Three case law|2000 in United States case law|United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit cases |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。