“Archibald v. Braverman”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

词条

Archibald v. Braverman

释义

References

Archibald v. Braverman, {{law report|275|Cal. App. 2d|253}} (1969), was a case decided by the California Court of Appeals that first ruled that visual perception of an accident was not a necessary prerequisite to recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the criteria enunciated in Dillon v. Legg. The holding in Archibald was later overruled by the 1989 case Thing v. La Chusa.^[1]^[2]

References

1. ^Sulaiman, Yohann. Torts and Emotional Distress. Knol.com
2. ^Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644, 668

随便看

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。