请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Armchair theorizing
释义

  1. Commentary and analysis

  2. See also

  3. Notes

  4. References

  5. External links

{{See|Thought experiment|Meta-analysis}}Armchair theorizing, armchair philosophizing, or armchair scholarship is an approach to providing new developments in a field that does not involve the collection of new information but, rather, a careful analysis or synthesis of existent scholarship, especially frivolously or superficially so.[1]

Commentary and analysis

Different disciplines place different weight on purely theoretical research. Some anthropologists argue that purely theoretical anthropological research is outdated and that ethnographic fieldwork should be a necessary part of anthropological research.[2] On the other hand, some commentators argue that economic theories are designed to explain and predict economic phenomena, which requires analysis and synthesis, and not necessarily collection, of data. Leland B. Yeager even argues that economists can legitimately extrapolate from their own personal observations to design new theories. In this sense, Yeager sees armchair theorizing as something better than the "mere sterile juggling of arbitrary assumptions" saying that "it can have a sound empirical basis."[3]

While armchair scholarship contrasts with the scientific method, which inherently involves the active investigation of the nature through data collection, armchair philosophers and theorizers can assist in formulating theories that explain observations; these theories can then be tested with further scientific investigation. While the methods of the armchair philosopher are different from those of the scientist, they can complement each other to produce new insights and discover necessary truths, whether they are empirical or theoretical.

See also

  • Logical truth
  • A priori and a posteriori

Notes

1. ^See, for example, {{Harvcoltxt|Nadel|1956|p=173}}, who defines armchair anthropology.
2. ^{{Harvcoltxt|Ingold|2007|p=82}}
3. ^Henry George and Austrian economics - History of Thought, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Dec, 2001 by Leland B. Yeager

References

  • {{citation

|last=Ingold
|first=Tim
|year=2007
|title=Anthropology is not ethnography
|journal=Proceedings of the British Academy
|volume=154
|pages=69–92
}}
  • {{citation

|last=Nadel
|first=S.F.
|year=1956
|title=Understanding primitive peoples
|journal=Oceania
|volume=26
|issue=3
|pages=159–173
}}

External links

  • Planning Theory, In Defense of Armchair Theorizing, Seymour J. Mandelbaum, {{doi|10.1177/1473095206064975}}
  • [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2490981 Discussion of On the Politics of Accounting Disclosure and Measurement: An Analysis of Economic Incentives, Dale Morse, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 19, Studies on Standardization of Accounting Practices: An Assessment of Alternative Institutional Arrangements (1981), pp. 36-42, ] {{doi|10.2307/2490981}}
{{econ-theory-stub}}

3 : Economic methodology|Philosophical methodology|Philosophical theories

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/22 22:24:14