“AT&T”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

AT&T began its history as Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a subsidiary of the Bell Telephone Company, founded by Alexander Graham Bell in 1880. The Bell Telephone Company evolved into American Telephone and Telegraph Company in 1885, which later rebranded as AT&T Corporation. The 1982 United States v. AT&T antitrust lawsuit resulted in the divestiture of AT&T Corporation's ("Ma Bell") subsidiaries or Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs, or "Baby Bells"), resulting in several independent companies including Southwestern Bell Corporation; the latter changed its name to SBC Communications Inc. in 1995. In 2005, SBC purchased its former parent AT&T Corporation and took on its branding, with the merged entity naming itself AT&T Inc. and using its iconic logo and stock-trading symbol. In 2006, AT&T Inc. acquired BellSouth, the last independent Baby Bell company, making their formerly joint venture Cingular Wireless (which had acquired AT&T Wireless in 2004) wholly owned and rebranding it as AT&T Mobility.

The current AT&T reconstitutes much of the former Bell System, and includes ten of the original 22 Bell Operating Companies along with the original long distance division.^[8]

History

Origin and growth (1885–1981)

AT&T can trace its origin back to the original Bell Telephone Company founded by Alexander Graham Bell after his patenting of the telephone.^[9] One of that company's subsidiaries was American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), established in 1885,^[10] which acquired the Bell Company on December 31, 1899, for legal reasons, leaving AT&T as the main company. AT&T established a network of subsidiaries in the United States and Canada that held a government-authorized phone service monopoly, formalized with the Kingsbury Commitment, throughout most of the twentieth century. This monopoly was known as the Bell System,^[11] and during this period, AT&T was also known by the nickname Ma Bell.^[12] For periods of time, the former AT&T was the world's largest phone company.

Breakup and reformation (1982–2004)

In 1982, U.S. regulators broke up the AT&T monopoly, requiring AT&T to divest its regional subsidiaries and turning them each into individual companies. These new companies were known as Regional Bell Operating Companies, or more informally, Baby Bells.^[13] AT&T continued to operate long distance services, but as a result of this breakup, faced competition from new competitors such as MCI and Sprint.

Southwestern Bell was one of the companies created by the breakup of AT&T Corp. The architect of divestiture for Southwestern Bell was Robert G. Pope. The company soon started a series of acquisitions. This includes the 1987 acquisition of Metromedia mobile business and the acquisition of several cable companies in the early 1990s. In the later half of the 1990s, the company acquired several other telecommunications companies, including some Baby Bells, while selling its cable business. During this time, the company changed its name to SBC Communications. By 1998, the company was in the top 15 of the Fortune 500, and by 1999 the company was part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (lasting through 2015).

Purchase of former parent and acquisitions (2005–2014)

In 2005, SBC purchased AT&T for $16 billion. After this purchase, SBC adopted the better-known AT&T name and brand, with the original AT&T Corp. still existing as the long-distance landline subsidiary of the merged company. The current AT&T claims the original AT&T Corp.'s history (dating to 1885) as its own, though its corporate structure only dates from 1983.^[14] It also retains SBC's pre-2005 stock price history, and all regulatory filings prior to 2005 are for Southwestern Bell/SBC, not AT&T Corp.

In September 2013, AT&T Inc. announced it would expand into Latin America through a collaboration with América Móvil.^[15] In December 2013, AT&T announced plans to sell its Connecticut wireline operations to Stamford-based Frontier Communications.^[16]

Recent developments (2014–present)

AT&T purchased the Mexican carrier Iusacell in late 2014,^[17] and two months later purchased the Mexican wireless business of NII Holdings,^[18] merging the two companies to create AT&T Mexico.

In July 2015, AT&T purchased DirecTV for $48.5 billion, or $67.1 billion including assumed debt,^[19] subject to certain conditions.^[20]^[21] AT&T subsequently announced plans to converge its existing U-verse home internet and IPTV brands with DirecTV, to create AT&T Entertainment.^[22]^[23]^[24]

In an effort to increase its media holdings,^[25]^[26]^[27] on October 22, 2016, AT&T announced a deal to buy Time Warner for $108.7 billion.^[28]^[29]^[30]

AT&T also owns approximately a 2% stake in Canadian-domiciled entertainment company Lionsgate.^[31]

On July 13, 2017, it was reported that AT&T would introduce a cloud-based DVR streaming service as part of its effort to create a unified platform across DirecTV and its DirecTV Now streaming service, with U-verse to be added soon.^[32]^[33]^[34] In October 2018, it was announced that the service Is set to launch in 2019^[35]^[36]

On September 12, 2017, it was reported that AT&T planned to launch a new cable TV-like service for delivery over-the-top over its own or a competitor's broadband network sometime next year.^[37]

On November 20, 2017, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim filed a lawsuit for the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division to block the merger with Time Warner, saying it "will harm competition, result in higher bills for consumers and less innovation."^[38]^[39] In order for AT&T to fully acquire Time Warner, the Department of Justice stated that the company must divest either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System.^[40]

On March 7, 2018, the company prepared to sell a minority stake of DirecTV Latin America through an IPO, creating a new holding company for those assets named Vrio Corp.^[43]^[44] However, on April 18, 2018, just a day before the public debut of Vrio, AT&T canceled the IPO due to market conditions.^[45]^[46]

On June 12, 2018, AT&T was given permission by U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon to go ahead with its $85 billion deal for Time Warner. The DOJ had attempted to stop the merger fearing it would harm competition.^[47] The merger closed two days after, becoming a wholly owned subsidiary and division of AT&T with a new name, WarnerMedia, announced the next day.^[48]

Three months after completing the acquisition, AT&T reorganized into four main units: Communications, including consumer and business wireline telephony, AT&T Mobility, and consumer entertainment video services; WarnerMedia, including Turner cable television networks, Warner Bros. film and television production, and HBO; AT&T Latin America, consisting of wireless service in Mexico and video in Latin America and the Caribbean under the Vrio brand; and Advertising and Analytics, since renamed Xandr.^[49]^[50]

AT&T Latin America

History

In 2017, AT&T announced a new AT&T International corporate division housing AT&T Mexico, DirecTV Latin America and their stakes of SKY Brazil and Sky Mexico.^[54]

In October 2016, AT&T announced a deal to acquire Time Warner worth $85.4 billion (including assumed Time Warner debt). The proposed deal would give AT&T significant holdings in the media industry; AT&T's competitor Comcast had previously acquired NBCUniversal in a similar bid to increase its media holdings, in concert with its ownership of television and internet providers. If approved by federal regulators, the merger would bring Time Warner's properties under the same umbrella as AT&T's telecommunication holdings, including satellite provider DirecTV.^[55]^[56]

By the end of July, the company announced that, effective August 1, a new structure was created before the acquisition would close. On September 15, 2017, Reuters reported, citing anonymous sources, that AT&T, the owner of DIRECTV's U.S. and Latin American divisions, had hired an advisor to consider offering AT&T Latin America on the public stock market. In November 2017, the U.S. Justice Department said it was moving to sue to block the AT&T-Time Warner merger.^[58] On November 20, 2017, the Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit over the acquisition; Makan Delrahim stated that the deal would "greatly harm American consumers". AT&T asserts that this suit is a "radical and inexplicable departure from decades of antitrust precedent".^[59] On December 22, 2017, the merger agreement deadline was extended to June 21, 2018.^[60] On April 19, 2018, the IPO was cancelled. On June 12, 2018, the AT&T-Time Warner merger was approved by a federal judge.^[61] Two days later, AT&T completed the acquisition of Time Warner, and a day later the company was renamed WarnerMedia.

On September 21, 2018, AT&T reclassified it four principal divisions which includes AT&T International which now have some assets moved out like the RSNs, an also merging Consumer Mobility, Technology and Business Mobility and renamed the company as AT&T Latin America.^[49]

Landline operating companies

Of the eight companies that were part of the Breakup of the Bell System, these five are a part of the current AT&T:^[62]

Chart of Baby Bells

Former operating companies

The following companies have become defunct or were sold under SBC/AT&T ownership:

Future of rural landlines

AT&T stated that it would declare the intentions for its rural landlines on November 7, 2012.^[65] AT&T had previously announced that it was considering a sale of its rural landlines, which are not wired for AT&T's U-verse service; however, it has also stated that it may keep the business after all.{{update-inline|date=March 2019}}

AT&T was not the first Baby Bell to sell off rural landlines. Ameritech sold some of its Wisconsin lines to CenturyTel in 1998; BellSouth sold some of its lines to MebTel in the 2000s; U S WEST sold many historically Bell landlines to Lynch Communications and Pacific Telecom in the 1990s; Verizon sold many of its New England lines to FairPoint in 2008 and its West Virginia operations to Frontier Communications in 2010.

On October 25, 2014, Frontier Communications took over control of the AT&T landline network in Connecticut after being approved by state utility regulators. The deal was worth about $2 billion, and included Frontier inheriting about 2,500 of AT&T's employees and many of AT&T's buildings.^[66]

Corporate structure

Facilities and regions

The company is headquartered at Whitacre Tower in downtown Dallas, Texas.^[5] On June 27, 2008, AT&T announced that it would move its corporate headquarters from downtown San Antonio to One AT&T Plaza in downtown Dallas.^[5]^[67] The company said that it moved to gain better access to its customers and operations throughout the world, and to the key technology partners, suppliers, innovation and human resources needed as it continues to grow, domestically and internationally.^[68] AT&T Inc. previously relocated its corporate headquarters to San Antonio from St. Louis, Missouri, in 1992, when it was then named Southwestern Bell Corporation. The company's Telecom Operations group, which serves residential and regional business customers in 22 U.S. states, remains in San Antonio.{{Citation needed|date=June 2009}} Atlanta, Georgia, continues to be the headquarters for AT&T Mobility, with significant offices in Redmond, Washington, the former home of AT&T Wireless. Bedminster, New Jersey, is the headquarters for the company's Global Business Services group and AT&T Labs. St. Louis continues as home to the company's Directory operations, AT&T Advertising Solutions.^[69]

AT&T offers also services in many locations throughout the Asia Pacific; its regional headquarters is located in Hong Kong.^[70] The company is also active in Mexico, and it was announced on November 7, 2014, that Mexican carrier Iusacell is being acquired by AT&T.^[17] The acquisition was approved in January 2015.{{citation needed|date=November 2016}}^[71]^[72] On April 30, 2015, AT&T acquired wireless operations Nextel Mexico from NII Holdings (now AT&T Mexico).^[73]

Corporate governance

Political involvement

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, {{as of|2018|lc=y}}, AT&T is the fifteenth-largest donor to United States political campaigns,^[76] and was the top American corporate donor in 2011,^[77] having contributed more than {{US$|47.7 million}} since 1990, 56% of which went to Republicans and 44% of which went to Democrats.^[78] As an example, in 2005, AT&T was among 53 entities that contributed the maximum of $250,000 to the second inauguration of President George W. Bush.^[79]^[80]^[81] Bill Leahy, representing AT&T, sits on the Private Enterprise Board of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).^[82] ALEC is a nonprofit organization of conservative state legislators and private sector representatives that drafts and shares model state-level legislation for distribution among state governments in the United States.^[83]^[84]^[85]

During the period of 1998 to 2010, the company expended {{US$|130 million}} on lobbying in the United States.^[77] A key political issue for AT&T has been the question of which businesses win the right to profit by providing broadband internet access in the United States.^[86] The company has also lobbied in support of several federal bills. AT&T supported the Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act of 2013 (H.R. 3675; 113th Congress), a bill that would make a number of changes to procedures that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) follows in its rulemaking processes.^[87] The FCC would have to act in a more transparent way as a result of this bill, forced to accept public input about regulations.^[88] AT&T's Executive Vice President of Federal Relations, Tim McKone, said that the bill's "much needed institutional reforms will help arm the agency with the tools to keep pace with the Internet speed of today's marketplace. It will also ensure that outmoded regulatory practices for today's competitive marketplace are properly placed in the dustbin of history."^[89]

In May 2018, reports emerged that AT&T made 12 monthly payments between January and December 2017 to Essential Consultants, a company set up by President Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen, totaling $600,000.^[90] Although initial reports on May 8 mentioned only four monthly payments totaling $200,000,^[91] documents obtained by The Washington Post on May 10 confirmed the figure of 12 payments, which had begun three days after the President was sworn into office.^[92]^[93] AT&T confirmed the report the same day.^[94] The report from The Washington Post, as well as additional reporting from Bloomberg, revealed the payments had been made for Cohen to "provide guidance" relating to the attempted $85 billion merger with Time Warner,^[92]^[93] to gain information on the Trump administration's planned tax reforms, as well as about potential changes to net neutrality policies under the new FCC.^[95] However, Chairman of the FCC Ajit Pai denied Cohen ever inquired about net neutrality on AT&T's behalf.^[94]^[96] A spokesperson for AT&T said that the company had been contacted by the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller regarding the payments, and had provided all the information requested in November and December 2017.^[97]^[98]

Historical financial performance

The financial performance of the company is reported to shareholders on an annual basis and a matter of public record. The unit (except where noted) is billions of US dollars. Where performance has been restated, the most recent statement of performance from an annual report is used.^[99]^[100]^[101]^[102]

Criticism and controversies

Hemisphere database

The company maintains a database of call detail records of all telephone calls that have passed through its network since 1987. AT&T employees work at High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area offices (operated by the Office of National Drug Control Policy) in Los Angeles, Atlanta, and Houston so data can be quickly turned over to law enforcement agencies. Records are requested via administrative subpoena, without the involvement of a court or grand jury.

Censorship

In September 2007, AT&T changed its legal policy to state that "AT&T may immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your Service,^[103] any Member ID, electronic mail address, IP address, Universal Resource Locator or domain name used by you, without notice for conduct that AT&T believes ... (c) tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries."^[104] By October 10, 2007, AT&T had altered the terms and conditions for its Internet service to explicitly support freedom of expression by its subscribers, after an outcry claiming the company had given itself the right to censor its subscribers' transmissions.^[105] Section 5.1 of AT&T's new terms of service now reads "AT&T respects freedom of expression and believes it is a foundation of our free society to express differing points of view. AT&T will not terminate, disconnect or suspend service because of the views you or we express on public policy matters, political issues or political campaigns."^[106]

Privacy controversy

In 2006, the Electronic Frontier Foundation lodged a class action lawsuit, Hepting v. AT&T, which alleged that AT&T had allowed agents of the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor phone and Internet communications of AT&T customers without warrants. If true, this would violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the First and Fourth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. AT&T has yet to confirm or deny that monitoring by the NSA is occurring. In April 2006, a retired former AT&T technician, Mark Klein, lodged an affidavit supporting this allegation.^[107]^[108] The Department of Justice has stated it will intervene in this lawsuit by means of State Secrets Privilege.^[109]

In July 2006, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California – in which the suit was filed – rejected a federal government motion to dismiss the case. The motion to dismiss, which invoked the State Secrets Privilege, had argued that any court review of the alleged partnership between the federal government and AT&T would harm national security. The case was immediately appealed to the Ninth Circuit. It was dismissed on June 3, 2009, citing retroactive legislation in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.{{Citation needed|date=March 2013}} ^[110]

In May 2006, USA Today reported that all international and domestic calling records had been handed over to the National Security Agency by AT&T, Verizon, SBC, and BellSouth for the purpose of creating a massive calling database.^[111] The portions of the new AT&T that had been part of SBC Communications before November 18, 2005, were not mentioned.

On June 21, 2006, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that AT&T had rewritten rules on its privacy policy. The policy, which took effect June 23, 2006, says that "AT&T – not customers – owns customers' confidential info and can use it 'to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.'"^[112]

On August 22, 2007, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell confirmed that AT&T was one of the telecommunications companies that assisted with the government's warrantless wire-tapping program on calls between foreign and domestic sources.^[113]

On November 8, 2007, Mark Klein, a former AT&T technician, told Keith Olbermann of MSNBC that all Internet traffic passing over AT&T lines was copied into a locked room at the company's San Francisco office – to which only employees with National Security Agency clearance had access.^[114]

AT&T keeps for five to seven years a record of who text messages whom and the date and time, but not the content of the messages.^[115]

AT&T has a one star privacy rating from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.^[116]

Intellectual property filtering

In January 2008, the company reported plans to begin filtering all Internet traffic which passes through its network for intellectual property violations.^[117] Commentators in the media have speculated that if this plan is implemented, it would lead to a mass exodus of subscribers leaving AT&T,^[118] although this is misleading as Internet traffic may go through the company's network anyway.^[117] Internet freedom proponents used these developments as justification for government-mandated network neutrality.

Discrimination against local Public-access television channels

AT&T is accused by community media groups of discriminating against local Public, educational, and government access (PEG) cable TV channels, by "impictions that will severely restrict the audience".^[119]

According to Barbara Popovic, Executive Director of the Chicago public-access service CAN-TV, the new AT&T U-verse system forces all Public-access television into a special menu system, denying normal functionality such as channel numbers, access to the standard program guide, and DVR recording.^[119] The Ratepayer Advocates division of the California Public Utilities Commission reported: "Instead of putting the stations on individual channels, AT&T has bundled community stations into a generic channel that can only be navigated through a complex and lengthy process."^[119]

Sue Buske (president of telecommunications consulting firm the Buske Group and a former head of the National Federation of Local Cable Programmers/Alliance for Community Media) argue that this is "an overall attack [...] on public access across the [United States], the place in the dial around cities and communities where people can make their own media in their own communities".^[119]

Information security

In June 2010, a hacker group known as Goatse Security discovered a vulnerability within AT&T that could allow anyone to uncover email addresses belonging to customers of AT&T 3G service for the Apple iPad.^[120] These email addresses could be accessed without a protective password.^[121] Using a script, Goatse Security collected thousands of email addresses from AT&T.^[120] Goatse Security informed AT&T about the security flaw through a third party.^[122] Goatse Security then disclosed around 114,000 of these emails to Gawker Media, which published an article about the security flaw and disclosure in Valleywag.^[120]^[122] Praetorian Security Group criticized the web application that Goatse Security exploited as "poorly designed".^[120]

In April 2015, AT&T was fined $25 million over data security breaches, marking the largest ever fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for breaking data privacy laws. The investigation revealed the theft of details of approximately 280,000 people from call centres in Mexico, Colombia and the Philippines.^[123]^[124]

Accusations of enabling fraud

In March 2012, the United States federal government announced a lawsuit against AT&T. The specific accusations state that AT&T "violated the False Claims Act by facilitating and seeking federal payment for IP Relay calls by international callers who were ineligible for the service and sought to use it for fraudulent purposes. The complaint alleges that, out of fears that fraudulent call volume would drop after the registration deadline, AT&T knowingly adopted a non-compliant registration system that did not verify whether the user was located within the United States. The complaint further contends that AT&T continued to employ this system even with the knowledge that it facilitated use of IP Relay by fraudulent foreign callers, which accounted for up to 95 percent of AT&T's call volume. The government's complaint alleges that AT&T improperly billed the TRS Fund for reimbursement of these calls and received millions of dollars in federal payments as a result."^[125]

Racism

On April 28, 2015, AT&T announced that it had fired Aaron Slator, President of Content and Advertising Sales, for sending racist text messages.^[126] Slator was also hit with a $100 million discrimination lawsuit, filed by African-American employee Knoyme King.^[127] The day before that, protesters arrived at AT&T's headquarters in Dallas and its satellite offices in Los Angeles as well as at the home of CEO Randall Stephenson to protest alleged systemic racial policies. According to accounts, the protesters are demanding AT&T begin working with 100% black-owned media companies.^[128]

Trademark violation

In June 2016, Citigroup sued AT&T for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition. The company had recently established a loyalty program under the brand AT&T Thanks, which Citigroup claims would cause consumer confusion as an infringement of its "ThankYou" and "Citi ThankYou" marks due to similar wording and visual design. Citi, which also provides a co-branded credit card for AT&T that links with its ThankYou rewards program, sought unspecified damages and the expungement of AT&T's trademark registration.^[129]^[130]

The suit was dismissed in August 2016, with a judge ruling that there was a low likelihood of confusion between the two marks because the companies fall within different industries, and that consumers who use loyalty programs would be able to "clearly take into account the attributes associated with the products they purchase" and, thus, be able to distinguish them.^[131]

Naming rights and sponsorships

Buildings

Venues

Sponsorships

Miscellaneous

See also

References

1. ^[https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000095012304012515/x67907e8vk.htm Form 8-K]. Securities and Exchange Commission. October 25, 2004. Accessed January 16, 2019.
2. ^[https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271709000050/ex3.htm Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AT&T Inc.] Securities and Exchange Commission. April 24, 2009. Accessed September 3, 2017.
3. ^https://investors.att.com/~/media/Files/A/ATT-IR/financial-reports/quarterly-earnings/2018/4q-2018/IB_4Q2018.pdf
4. ^{{cite web|title=AT&T Inc. 2018 Quarterly Report (10-Q) |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000119312518236782/d592180d10q.htm |publisher=U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |date=August 2, 2018 |accessdate=September 4, 2018}}
5. ^¹²Godinez, Victor and David McLemore. "AT&T moving headquarters to Dallas from San Antonio." The Dallas Morning News. Saturday June 28, 2008. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
6. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/tosv2.html?vid=&uuid=b9d053c0-160b-11e9-b191-6ff46d91229d&url=L25ld3MvYXJ0aWNsZXMvMjAxOC0wNi0xMy9nZXQtcmVhZHktZm9yLWJpZy1tZWRpYS10by1nZXQtYmlnZ2VyLWFmdGVyLWF0LWFtcC10LXMtdmljdG9yeQ==|title=Bloomberg - Are you a robot?|website=www.bloomberg.com}}
7. ^{{cite web|url=http://fortune.com/fortune500/list/|title=Fortune 500 Companies 2018: Who Made the List|website=Fortune|language=en-US|access-date=2018-11-09}}
8. ^{{cite book |last=Kleinfield |first=Sony |year=1981 |title=The biggest company on earth: a profile of AT&T |location=New York |publisher=Holt, Rinehart, and Winston |isbn=978-0-03-045326-7 |oclc=}}
9. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.corp.att.com/history/|title=Home{{!}} History{{!}} AT&T|website=www.corp.att.com|language=en|accessdate=March 3, 2017}}
10. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.corp.att.com/history/nethistory/milestones.html|title=History of the AT&T Network — Milestones in AT&T Network History{{!}} History{{!}} AT&T|website=www.corp.att.com|language=en|accessdate=April 21, 2017}}
11. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/01/us/bell-system-breakup-opens-era-of-great-expectations-and-great-concern.html|title=BELL SYSTEM BREAKUP OPENS ERA OF GREAT EXPECTATIONS AND GREAT CONCERN|last=Pollack|first=Andrew|date=January 1, 1984 |work=The New York Times|accessdate=May 24, 2017 |issn=0362-4331}}
12. ^{{cite web|url=http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/20/technology/att-merger-history/index.html|title=How AT&T got busted up and pieced back together|last=Pagliery|first=Jose|date=May 20, 2014 |website=CNNMoney|accessdate=May 24, 2017}}
13. ^{{Cite news|url=http://www.techpolicydaily.com/communications/lessons-att-break-30-years-later/|title=Lessons from the AT&T break up, 30 years later-CICTP|date=January 3, 2014|work=Tech Policy Daily|accessdate=April 21, 2017|language=en-US|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170422035122/http://www.techpolicydaily.com/communications/lessons-att-break-30-years-later/|archive-date=April 22, 2017|dead-url=yes|df=mdy-all}}
14. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/user/ATTTechChannel|title=AT&T Tech Channel|website=Youtube}}
15. ^{{cite news| url= https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/18/us-att-americamovil-idUSBRE98H02Z20130918| title= AT&T to expand in Latin America with America Movil deal| author=Sinead Carew| publisher=Reuters | date=September 18, 2013}}
16. ^{{cite news| url= http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=25160&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=37344| title= AT&T Announces Plans to Sell Connecticut Wireline Operations to Frontier Communications for $2.0 Billion| author= AT&T| publisher=AT&T | date=December 17, 2013}}
17. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.androidcentral.com/att-expand-north-american-coverage-area-mexico-carrier-iusacell-acquisition|title=AT&T to expand North American coverage area with Mexico carrier Iusacell acquisition|last=Nguyen|first=Chuong|website=Android Central|date=November 7, 2014|accessdate=January 1, 2016}}
18. ^{{cite web|website=Reuters|date=January 26, 2015|title=AT&T to buy NII Holdings' wireless business in Mexico|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/26/us-niiholdings-divestment-at-t-idUSKBN0KZ17820150126|accessdate=January 1, 2016}}
19. ^{{cite web|website=Reuters|date=January 26, 2015|title=AT&T Completes Acquisition of DirecTV|url=http://about.att.com/story/att_completes_acquisition_of_directv.html|accessdate=January 1, 2016}}
20. ^{{cite web|url=http://deadline.com/2015/07/att-directv-merger-fcc-approval-1201484821/|title=AT&T & DirecTV Merger Gets FCC Approval – With Conditions|website=Deadline Hollywood|date=July 24, 2015|accessdate=July 24, 2015}}
21. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/7/24/8876267/att-directv-merger-approved|title=FCC approves AT&T–DirecTV merger|website=The Verge|publisher=Vox Media|date=July 24, 2015|accessdate=July 24, 2015}}
22. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Plans-on-Killing-the-DirecTV-Name-Starting-in-January-135765|title=AT&T Plans on Killing the DirecTV Name Starting in January|last=Bode|first=Karl|website=DSL Reports|date=December 2, 2015|accessdate=December 2, 2015}}
23. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.multichannel.com/news/distribution/att-enters-next-phase-directv-branding/395664|title=AT&T Enters Next Phase in DirecTV Branding|last=Farrell|first=Mike|website=MultiChannel News|date=December 2, 2015|accessdate=December 3, 2015}}
24. ^{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2016/tv/news/att-directv-u-verse-earnings-1201761111/|title=AT&T Sees DirecTV, Broadband Subscriber Gains in Q1 as U-verse Fades|last=Littleton|first=Cynthia|website=Variety|date=April 26, 2016|accessdate=April 28, 2016}}
25. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-20/at-t-said-to-discuss-idea-of-takeover-in-time-warner-meetings|title=AT&T Discussed Idea of Takeover in Time Warner Meetings|last=Hammond|first=Ed|last2=Sherman|first2=Alex|last3=Moritz|first3=Scott|website=Bloomberg|date=October 20, 2016|accessdate=October 20, 2016}}
26. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/10/20/report-t-considering-buying-time-warner/92475270/|title=Report: AT&T considering buying Time Warner |last=Yu |first=Robert |website=USA Today |date=October 20, 2016|accessdate=October 20, 2016}}
27. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-is-in-advanced-talks-to-acquire-time-warner-1477061850 |title=AT&T Is in Advanced Talks to Acquire Time Warner |last=Hagey |first=Keach |last2=Sharma |first2=Amol |last3=Cimilluca |first3=Dana|website=The Wall Street Journal|date=October 21, 2016|accessdate=October 21, 2016}}
28. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/10/22/reports-t-agrees-buy-time-warner-more-than-80b/92589816/|title=AT&T agrees to buy Time Warner for more than $80B|last=Yu|first=Roger|website=USA Today|date=October 22, 2016|accessdate=October 22, 2016}}
29. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-reaches-deal-to-buy-time-warner-for-more-than-80-billion-1477157084|title=AT&T Reaches Deal to Buy Time Warner for $86 Billion |last=Gryta |first=Thomas |last2=Hagey|first2=Keach|last3=Cimilluca|first3=Dana|website=The Wall Street Journal|date=October 22, 2016|accessdate=October 22, 2016 |subscription=yes}}
30. ^{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2016/biz/news/att-time-warner-deal-1201897938/|title=AT&T Sets $85.4 Billion Time Warner Deal, CEOs Talk 'Unique' Potential of Combination|last=Littleton|first=Cynthia|website=Variety|date=October 22, 2016|accessdate=October 23, 2016}}
31. ^{{cite web |website=Deadline Hollywood |url=http://deadline.com/2016/09/starz-rate-cut-lionsgate-offers-stock-new-deals-att-1201824620/ |title=Starz Accepts Rate Cut as Lionsgate Offers Stock for New Deals with AT&T |accessdate=August 2, 2017|date=2016-09-22 }}
32. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2017/07/13/att-directv-now-next-gen/|title=AT&T's 'next-gen' TV platform rollout will start on DirecTV Now|last=Lawler|first=Richard|website=Engadget|date=July 13, 2017|accessdate=July 13, 2017}}
33. ^{{cite web|url=http://deadline.com/2017/07/att-offer-cloud-based-dvr-streaming-services-1202127918/|title=AT&T To Offer Cloud-Based DVR To Streaming Services |last=Lieberman|first=David|website=Deadline Hollywood|date=July 13, 2017|accessdate=July 13, 2017}}
34. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.fiercecable.com/cable/directv-now-to-finally-get-cloud-dvr-as-part-at-t-video-platform-rollout|title=DirecTV Now to finally get cloud DVR as part of AT&T video platform rollout |last=Frankel |first=Daniel |website=Fierce Cable |date=July 13, 2017|accessdate=July 13, 2017}}
35. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-streaming-video-service-is-set-to-launch-in-2019-1539195487|title=AT&T Streaming Video Service Is Set to Launch in 2019|last=FitzGerald|first=Drew|date=2018-10-10|work=Wall Street Journal|access-date=2018-10-11|last2=Flint|first2=Joe|language=en-US|issn=0099-9660}}
36. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17960524/att-warnermedia-hbo-plus-streaming-service-q4-2019-warner-bros|title=AT&T’s WarnerMedia is launching an ‘HBO plus’ streaming service in 2019|work=The Verge|access-date=2018-10-11}}
37. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.telecompetitor.com/att-ceo-bye-bye-directv-hello-att-ott-video/|title=AT&T CEO: Bye-Bye DirecTV, Hello AT&T OTT Video|last=Engebretson|first=Joan|website=Telecompetitor|date=September 12, 2017|accessdate=September 13, 2017}}
38. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/att-time-warner-merger-justice-department-antitrust/|title=Justice Department sues to block AT&T-Time Warner merger|website=CBS News|date=November 20, 2017|access-date=November 20, 2017}}
39. ^{{cite web|last=Fung|first=Brian|title=The Justice Department is suing AT&T to block its $85 billion bid for Time Warner|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/11/20/the-justice-department-just-sued-att-to-block-its-85-billion-bid-for-time-warner/|access-date=November 21, 2017|website=The Washington Post|date=November 21, 2017}}
40. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/8/16624844/att-time-warner-merger-cnn-turner-broadcasting-network-department-of-justice-divestment-sale|title=Is the AT&T merger with Time Warner being threatened because of a beef with CNN?|website=TheVerge.com|access-date=December 16, 2017|date=2017-11-08}}
41. ^{{cite web|title=World's 25 Biggest Telecom Companies In 2017|url=https://www.forbes.com/pictures/591b6ecf31358e03e559255f/2017-global-2000-telecom/|publisher=Forbes|accessdate=May 25, 2017}}
42. ^Leichtman Research Group, "Research Notes," First Quarter 2012, pg. 6, AT&T (#1) with 21,232,000 residential phone lines.
43. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180307005563/en/ATT-Announces-Filing-Registration-Statement-Potential-IPO|title=AT&T Inc. Announces Filing of a Registration Statement for Potential IPO of Minority Stake in DIRECTV Latin America|website=Business Wire|date=March 7, 2018|accessdate=March 14, 2018}}
44. ^{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/atts-directv-latin-america-ipo-spinoff-vrio-1202720505/|title=AT&T's DirecTV Latin America Unit Files for IPO as Prelude to Possible Spinoff|last=Spangler|first=Todd|website=Variety|date=March 7, 2018|accessdate=March 14, 2018}}
45. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/att-inc-statement-regarding-planned-vrio-corp-ipo-300632663.html|title=AT&T Inc. Statement Regarding Planned Vrio Corp. IPO|website=PR Newswire|date=April 18, 2018|accessdate=June 14, 2018}}
46. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/19/at-the-last-minute-att-withdraws-the-planned-ipo-of-its-vrio-unit.html|title=At the last minute, AT&T withdraws the planned IPO of its Vrio unit|website=CNBC|date=April 19, 2018|accessdate=June 14, 2018}}
47. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/att-time-warner-merger-approved-without-conditions-judge-rules-today-time-warner-stock-price-rises-in-after-hours-trading/|title=Judge approves AT&T-Time Warner merger without conditions|last=Ivanova|first=Irina|website=CBS News|date=June 12, 2018|accessdate=June 12, 2018}}
48. ^{{cite web|url=http://about.att.com/story/att_completes_acquisition_of_time_warner_inc.html|title=AT&T Completes Acquisition of Time Warner Inc|website=AT&T|date=June 15, 2018|accessdate=June 15, 2018}}
49. ^¹{{cite web|url=https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/us/atnt2/sec/sec-show.aspx?Type=html&FilingId=12972266&CIK=0000732717&Index=10000|title=SEC-Show|website=otp.tools.investis.com}}
50. ^{{cite web|url=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3392053-t-revises-segment-structure-time-warner-buy|title=AT&T revises segment structure on Time Warner buy|first=SA Editor Brandy|last=Betz|date=September 21, 2018|website=Seeking Alpha}}
51. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=528189 |title=AT&T Latin America LLC |last=Bloomberg |access-date=19 November 2018}}
52. ^{{cite web|url=https://about.att.com/pages/company_profile_latin_america|title=AT&T Latin America Profile|website=about.att.com}}
53. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180614006343/en/ATT-Completes-Acquisition-Time-Warner|title=AT&T Completes Acquisition of Time Warner Inc.|date=June 14, 2018|website=www.businesswire.com}}
54. ^{{Cite news|url=https://deadline.com/2018/06/att-completes-time-warner-acquisition-1202411103/|title=AT&T Completes $85B Acquisition Of Time Warner|last=Spangler|first=Todd|date=2018-06-14|work=Deadline|access-date=2018-11-19|language=en-US}}
55. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-is-in-advanced-talks-to-acquire-time-warner-1477061850 |title=AT&T Is in Advanced Talks to Acquire Time Warner |last=Hagey |first=Keach |last2=Sharma |first2=Amol |last3=Cimilluca |first3=Dana |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=October 21, 2016 |accessdate=October 21, 2016}}
56. ^{{cite web |url=https://variety.com/2016/biz/news/att-time-warner-deal-1201897938/ |title=AT&T Sets $85.4 Billion Time Warner Deal, CEOs Talks 'Unique' Potential of Combination |last=Littleton |first=Cynthia |work=Variety |date=October 22, 2016 |accessdate=October 23, 2016}}
57. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/10/22/reports-t-agrees-buy-time-warner-more-than-80b/92589816/|title=AT&T agrees to buy Time Warner for $85.4 billion|work=USA TODAY|access-date=2017-08-08|language=en}}
58. ^{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/business/dealbook/att-time-warner-merger.html |title=Justice Department Sues to Block AT&T-Time Warner Merger |last=Kang |first=Cecilia |date=November 20, 2017 |work=The New York Times |accessdate=December 11, 2017 |last2=Merced |first2=Michael J. de la |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}
59. ^{{Cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-20/at-t-is-said-to-face-u-s-antitrust-lawsuit-over-time-warner |title=AT&T Sued by U.S. Seeking to Block Merger With Time Warner |last=Foden |first=Sara |last2=McLaughlin |first2=David |last3=Moritz |first3=Scott |work=Bloomberg |date=November 20, 2017 |accessdate=November 20, 2017}}
60. ^{{cite news |url=https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/att-time-warner-extend-merger-agreement-june-21-trial-1202647896/ |title=AT&T, Time Warner Extend Merger Agreement Deadline as Trial Looms |last=Littleton |first=Cynthia |work=Variety |date=December 22, 2017 |accessdate=December 22, 2017}}
61. ^{{cite news |url=https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/att-time-warner-merger-approved-1202840369/ |title=AT&T-Time Warner Merger Approved |last=Johnson |first=Ted |work=Variety |date=June 12, 2018 |accessdate=June 12, 2018}}
62. ^{{cite web |title=Agreements Between SNET America, Inc. (SAI) DBA AT&T Long Distance East, and AT&T Telephone Companies |publisher=AT&T |url=http://www.att.com/gen/public-affairs?pid=8101 |accessdate=September 29, 2007 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20071011214558/http://att.com/gen/public-affairs?pid=8101 |archivedate = October 11, 2007}}
63. ^{{Cite news|url=http://articles.courant.com/2013-12-17/business/hc-haar-snet-att-frontier-merger-20131217_1_frontier-communications-connecticut-operations-wireline|title=Dan Haar column: AT&T Selling Connecticut Operations to Frontier|work=tribunedigital-thecourant|accessdate=June 8, 2017 |language=en}}
64. ^{{cite web|title=SNET To Buy Woodbury Telephone|url=http://articles.courant.com/1996-10-23/business/9610230018_1_snet-woodbury-s-president-woodbury-telephone|publisher=The Hartford Courant|accessdate=2018-03-09|author=Dan Haar|date=1996-10-23}}
65. ^{{cite web |last=Ausik |first=Paul |title=AT&T May Keep Rural Landline Business |url=http://247wallst.com/2012/09/19/att-may-keep-rural-landline-business/ |publisher=24/7 Wall St. |date=September 19, 2012 |accessdate=July 22, 2013}}
66. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.nhregister.com/business/20141024/frontier-takes-over-att-landline-service-saturday|title=Frontier takes over AT&T landline service Saturday|last=Turmelle|first=Luther|website=New Haven Register|date=October 24, 2014|accessdate=January 7, 2016}}
67. ^"Corporate Inquiries." AT&T. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
68. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/062808dnbusattmove.4515fb49.html |publisher=Dallas News |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080704013741/http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/062808dnbusattmove.4515fb49.html |archivedate=July 4, 2008 |title=AT&T moving headquarters to Dallas from San Antonio |date=June 27, 2008}}
69. ^AT&T – News Room (June 27, 2008). AT&T Corporate Headquarters to Move to Dallas. Press release. Retrieved June 27, 2008.
70. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.corp.att.com/ap/about/where/hk/ |title=Corp.att.com |publisher=Corp.att.com |accessdate=November 28, 2011}}
71. ^Roger Cheng, CNET. "[https://www.cnet.com/news/done-deal-at-t-closes-2-5-billion-purchase-of-mexicos-iusacell/ Done deal: AT&T closes $2.5 billion purchase of Mexico's Iusacell]." Jan 16, 2015. Retrieved Jan 4, 2018.
72. ^Phil Goldstein, FierceWireless. "[https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/at-t-closes-2-5b-deal-for-mexican-operator-iusacell AT&T closes $2.5B deal for Mexican operator Iusacell]." Jan 16, 2015. Retrieved Jan 4, 2018.
73. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.rcrwireless.com/20150430/carriers/att-bolsters-mexico-operations-with-closing-of-nextel-mexico-deal-tag2|title=AT&T bolsters Mexico operations with closing of Nextel Mexico deal|last=Meyer|first=Dan|website=RCR Wireless News|date=April 25, 2015|accessdate=October 24, 2016}}
74. ^¹{{cite web|url=https://investors.att.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors |title=Board of Directors |author=[https://investors.att.com/ AT&T Inc. Investor Relations] |access-date=March 19, 2019}}
75. ^{{cite web|url=https://investors.att.com/corporate-governance/leadership|title=Leadership|author=[https://investors.att.com/ AT&T Inc. Investor Relations] |access-date=March 19, 2019}}
76. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?order=A|title=Top All-Time Donors, 1989–2012|last=|first=|year=2018|website=OpenSecrets.org|publisher=Center for Responsive Politics|location=United States|accessdate=June 15, 2018}}
77. ^¹{{cite news |last=Kang |first=Cecelia |author2=Jia Lynn Yang |publication-date=December 9, 2011 |title=How AT&T fumbled its $39 billion bid to acquire T-Mobile |newspaper=The Washington Post |at=washingtonpost.com |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/how-atandt-lost-its-39-million-bid-to-acquire-t-mobile/2011/12/01/gIQAkTQ6hO_story.html |accessdate=December 9, 2011}}
78. ^{{cite web |year=2011 |title=AT&T Inc: Totals |website=OpenSecrets.org |publisher=Center for Responsive Politics |location=United States |url=http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals.php?cycle=2012&id=D000000076 |accessdate=December 9, 2011}}
79. ^{{cite news |first=Jim |last=Drinkard |title=Donors get good seats, great access this week |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-16-inauguration-donors_x.htm |work=USA Today |date=January 17, 2005 |accessdate=May 25, 2008}}
80. ^{{cite news |title=Financing the inauguration |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-16-inaugural-donors_x.htm |work=USA Today |date=January 16, 2005 |accessdate=May 25, 2008}}
81. ^{{cite news |title=Some question inaugural's multi-million price tag |agency=Associated Press |accessdate=May 25, 2008 |date=January 14, 2005 |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-14-price_x.htm |newspaper=USA Today}}
82. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.alec.org/about-alec/private-enterprise-board/ |title=Private Enterprise Board | ALEC – American Legislative Exchange Council |publisher=Alec.org |date= |accessdate=May 11, 2012 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511000739/http://www.alec.org/about-alec/private-enterprise-board/ |archivedate=May 11, 2012}}
83. ^{{cite news|title=Transportation Chief Attacks Congress on Safety|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/30/us/transportation-chief-attacks-congress-on-safety.html|work=The New York Times|date=August 30, 1987 |author=May, Clifford}}
84. ^{{cite news|url=http://fcir.org/2012/03/23/nras-behind-the-scenes-campaign-encouraged-stand-your-ground-adoption-across-the-country/|title=NRA's Behind-the-Scenes Campaign Encouraged 'Stand Your Ground' Adoption|date=March 23, 2013|publisher=Florida Center for Investigative Reporting|first=Howard|last=Goodman}}
85. ^{{cite news|url=http://kbia.org/post/right-work-bill-praised-and-blasted-house-committee-hearing|title='Right-to-work' bill praised and blasted in House committee hearing|publisher=KBIA|date=January 14, 2014|first=Marshall|last=Griffin}}
86. ^{{cite web|title=AT&T Inc |publisher=The Center For Responsive Politics |url=http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000076&Name=AT%26T+Inc |accessdate=September 29, 2007 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930035728/http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000076&Name=AT&T+Inc |archivedate=September 30, 2007 |deadurl=yes}}
87. ^{{cite web|title=H.R. 3675 - CBO|url=http://www.cbo.gov/publication/45057|publisher=Congressional Budget Office|accessdate=March 10, 2014}}
88. ^{{cite news|last=Kasperowicz|first=Pete|title=House votes for more transparency at the FCC|url=http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/votes/200503-house-votes-for-more-transparency-at-the-fcc|accessdate=March 12, 2014|newspaper=The Hill|date=March 11, 2014}}
89. ^{{cite web|last=McKone|first=Tim|title=AT&T Statement on Bipartisan Spectrum and FCC Reform Legislation|url=http://www.attpublicpolicy.com/fcc/att-statement-on-bipartisan-spectrum-and-fcc-reform-legislation/|publisher=AT&T Public Policy Blog|accessdate=March 12, 2014|date=December 11, 2013}}
90. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-daniels-at-t/att-payments-to-trump-lawyer-more-than-reported-source-idUSKBN1IA2KK|title=AT&T payments to Trump lawyer more than reported|last=Bartz|first=Diane|date=May 9, 2018|work=Reuters|access-date=May 10, 2018}}
91. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/08/att-confirms-it-paid-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-for-insights-on-administration.html|title=AT&T confirms it paid Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for 'insights' on administration|last=Mangan|first=Dan|date=May 8, 2018|work=CNBC|access-date=May 10, 2018|last2=Breuninger|first2=Kevin|last3=Ruggiero|first3=Ryan}}
92. ^¹{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cohens-600000-deal-with-atandt-specified-he-would-advise-on-time-warner-merger-internal-company-records-show/2018/05/10/cd541ae0-5468-11e8-a551-5b648abe29ef_story.html|title=Cohen's $600,000 deal with AT&T specified he would advise on Time Warner merger, internal company records show|last=Helderman|first=Rosalind S.|date=May 10, 2018|work=The Washington Post|access-date=May 11, 2018|last2=Fung|first2=Brian|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286|last3=Hamburger|first3=Tom}}
93. ^¹{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/10/att-reportedly-paid-michael-cohen-for-guidance-on-time-warner-deal.html|title=AT&T reportedly paid Michael Cohen for guidance on Time Warner deal|last=Wang|first=Christine|date=May 10, 2018|work=CNBC|access-date=May 11, 2018}}
94. ^¹{{Cite news|url=http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/10/media/att-michael-cohen/index.html|title=AT&T confirms it paid Michael Cohen for consulting on Time Warner deal|last=Gold|first=Hadas|date=May 10, 2018|work=CNNMoney|access-date=May 11, 2018}}
95. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-09/at-t-was-paying-trump-s-lawyer-as-administration-turned-into-foe|title=AT&T Was Paying Trump's Lawyer While White House Turned Into Foe|last=Turner|first=Nick|date=May 9, 2018|work=Bloomberg|access-date=May 22, 2018|last2=Moritz|first2=Scott}}
96. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/-no-cohen-inquiries-to-fcc-on-net-neutrality-on-at-t-s-behalf|title='No' Cohen Inquiries on Net Neutrality on AT&T's Behalf, FCC Chairman Says|last=Shields|first=Todd|date=May 10, 2018|work=Bloomberg|access-date=May 22, 2018}}
97. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/business/novartis-att-cohen-mueller.html|title=Novartis and AT&T Spoke to Mueller's Office About Payments to Michael Cohen|last=Thomas|first=Katie|date=May 9, 2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=May 10, 2018|last2=Kang|first2=Cecilia|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}
98. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/09/att-paid-trump-lawyer-cohen-up-to-6000000.html|title=AT&T says it was contacted by special counsel's office about Michael Cohen|last=Mangan|first=Dan|date=May 9, 2018|work=CNBC|access-date=May 10, 2018|last2=Ruggiero|first2=Ryan}}
99. ^{{cite web|title=Annual Report 2015|url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271716000147/ex13.htm|publisher=AT&T Inc.|accessdate=June 8, 2016 |language=en}}
100. ^{{cite web|title=Annual Report - 2014|url=http://www.att.com/Investor/ATT_Annual/2014/downloads/att_ar2014_annualreport.pdf|publisher=AT&T Inc.|accessdate=November 17, 2015 |language=en}}
101. ^{{cite web|title=SEC Filings — Form K-10 - 2005|url=http://services.corporate-ir.net/SEC/Document.Service?id=P3VybD1hSFIwY0RvdkwyRndhUzUwWlc1cmQybDZZWEprTG1OdmJTOWtiM2R1Ykc5aFpDNXdhSEEvWVdOMGFXOXVQVkJFUmlacGNHRm5aVDAwTURBd09ESTFKbk4xWW5OcFpEMDFOdz09JnR5cGU9MiZmbj1BVFRJbmMucGRm|date=March 1, 2006 |publisher=AT&T Inc|accessdate=November 18, 2015 |language=en}}
102. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/732717/000073271717000021/ex13.htm|title=Annual Report 2016|date=February 17, 2017 |accessdate =February 21, 2017|publisher=AT&T}}
103. ^{{cite web|last=Fisher |first=Ken |url=https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070930-att-threatens-to-disconnect-subscribers-who-are-critical-of-the-company.html |title=AT&T threatens to disconnect subscribers who criticize the company |publisher=Arstechnica.com |date=October 1, 2007 |accessdate=November 28, 2011}}
104. ^{{cite web |title=AT&T Legal Policy |publisher=AT&T |url=http://home.bellsouth.net/csbellsouth/s/s.dll?spage=cg/legal/att.htm&leg=tos |accessdate=September 29, 2007 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011020653/http://home.bellsouth.net/csbellsouth/s/s.dll?spage=cg%2Flegal%2Fatt.htm&leg=tos |archivedate=October 11, 2007 |deadurl=yes |df=mdy-all }}
105. ^{{cite web|author=Martin H. Bosworth |url=http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/10/att_tos.html |title=AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry |publisher=Consumeraffairs.com |accessdate=November 28, 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120102012925/http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/10/att_tos.html |archivedate=January 2, 2012}}
106. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.att.net/csbellsouth/s/s.dll?spage=cg/legal/att.htm&leg=tos |title=AT&T Legal Policy |publisher=Att.net |date=May 2, 2011 |accessdate=November 28, 2011}}
107. ^Nakashima, Ellen, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/07/AR2007110700006_pf.html "A Story of Surveillance"], Washington Post, November 7, 2007
108. ^{{cite news |last=Singel |first= Ryan |title=Whistle-Blower Outs NSA Spy Room |publisher=Wired |date=April 7, 2006 |url=https://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619 |accessdate=September 29, 2007}}
109. ^{{cite press release |title=Government Moves to Intervene in AT&T Surveillance Case |publisher=Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) |date=April 28, 2006 |url=https://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613 |accessdate=September 29, 2007 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929123042/http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613 |archivedate=September 29, 2007 |deadurl=yes |df=mdy-all }}
110. ^Arshad Mohammed, Washington Post. "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/20/AR2006072001792.html Judge Declines to Dismiss Lawsuit Against AT&T]." Jul 21, 2006. Retrieved Jan 4, 2018.
111. ^{{cite news |last=Cauley |first=Leslie |title=NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls |work=USA Today |date=May 11, 2006 |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm |accessdate=September 29, 2007}}
112. ^{{cite news|last=Lazarus |first=David |title=AT&T Rewrites Rules: Your Data Isn't Yours |work=San Francisco Chronicle |date=June 21, 2006 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/21/BUG9VJHB9C1.DTL&hw=at&sn=002&sc=870 |accessdate=September 29, 2007 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071112225858/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2006%2F06%2F21%2FBUG9VJHB9C1.DTL&hw=at&sn=002&sc=870 |archivedate=November 12, 2007 |deadurl=no}}
113. ^{{cite news |last=Shrader |first=Katherine |title=Spy Chief Reveals Classified Surveillance Details |agency=Associated Press |date=August 22, 2007 |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20396282/ |accessdate=September 29, 2007| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070913003015/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20396282/| archivedate=September 13, 2007 | deadurl=no}}
114. ^{{cite web |last=Olbermann |first=Keith |title=Whistleblower Saw AT&T Assist Bush Administration |publisher=MSNBC |date=November 8, 2007 |url=http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-US&brand=msnbc&vid=297abdd5-d0dc-4617-a6c9-c482fa316b59 |accessdate=November 10, 2007| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071110231322/http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-US&brand=msnbc&vid=297abdd5-d0dc-4617-a6c9-c482fa316b59| archivedate=November 10, 2007 | deadurl=no}}
115. ^{{cite news |title=Document Shows How Phone Cos. Treat Private Data |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=140931876 |quote=T-Mobile USA doesn't keep any information on Web browsing activity. Verizon, on the other hand, keeps some information for up to a year that can be used to ascertain if a particular phone visited a particular Web site. According to the sheet, Sprint Nextel Corp.'s Virgin Mobile brand keeps the text content of text messages for three months. Verizon keeps it for three to five days. None of the other carriers keep texts at all, but they keep records of who texted who for more than a year. The document says AT&T keeps for five to seven years a record of who text messages who —and when, but not the content of the messages. Virgin Mobile only keeps that data for two to three months. |agency=Associated Press |date=September 29, 2011 |accessdate=September 29, 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=September 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
116. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2017|title=Who Has Your Back? Government Data Requests 2017|date=2017-07-10}}
117. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/|title=Has AT&T Lost Its Mind? A baffling proposal to filter the Internet|first=Tim|last=Wu|date=January 16, 2008|publisher=Slate}}
118. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22829568/ |title=AT&T's Proposed Filtering Policy Is Bad News – Netiquette – MSNBC.com |publisher=MSNBC |date=January 25, 2008 |accessdate=November 28, 2011}}
119. ^¹²³(March 9, 2009) "AT&T Accused of Discriminating Against Local Public Access Channels, Deadline for Public Comment Expires Tonight", Democracy Now!. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
120. ^¹²³{{cite news |title='Brute force' script snatched iPad e-mail addresses |first=Gregg |last=Keizer |newspaper=Computerworld |date=June 10, 2010 |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177921/Brute_force_script_snatched_iPad_e_mail_addresses |accessdate=September 18, 2010}}
121. ^{{cite news |title=iPad e-mail hackers defend attack as 'ethical' |page=2 |first=Gregg |last=Keizer |newspaper=Computerworld |date=June 11, 2010 |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177991/iPad_e_mail_hackers_defend_attack_as_ethical_?taxonomyId=17&pageNumber=2 |accessdate=September 25, 2010}}
122. ^¹{{cite news |title=iPad e-mail hackers defend attack as 'ethical' |page=1 |first=Gregg |last=Keizer |newspaper=Computerworld |date=June 11, 2010 |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9177991/iPad_e_mail_hackers_defend_attack_as_ethical_ |accessdate=September 25, 2010}}
123. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-32232604|title=AT&T pays record $25m fine over customer data thefts|date=2015-04-09}}
124. ^{{cite web|url=https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/f-c-c-fines-att-25-million-for-privacy-breach/|title=F.C.C. Fines AT&T $25 Million for Privacy Breach|website=New York Times|date=2015-04-08}}
125. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/March/12-civ-357.html |title=Welcome to the United States Department of Justice |publisher=Justice.gov |date=March 22, 2012 |accessdate=May 11, 2012}}
126. ^{{cite web|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/att-fires-president-racist-text-100m-lawsuit-30658834|title=Technology and Science News — ABC News|author=ABC News|website=ABC News}}
127. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/28/aaron-slator-t-president-fired-over-racist-text-me/|title=Aaron Slator, AT&T president, fired over racist text messages|website=The Washingtion Times}}
128. ^{{cite web|url=http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1237563|title=Protesters Picket AT&T CEO's Dallas Estate|website=CNN iReport}}
129. ^{{cite web|title=Citigroup trademarks "THANKYOU" and sues AT&T for thanking clients|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/citigroup-trademarks-thankyou-and-sues-att-for-thanking-clients/|website=Ars Technica|accessdate=June 16, 2016}}
130. ^{{cite web|title=Citigroup Sues AT&T Over Right to Say 'Thanks' to Customers|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-10/citigroup-sues-at-t-over-right-to-say-thanks-to-customers|website=Bloomberg|accessdate=June 17, 2016}}
131. ^{{cite web|title=AT&T beats Citi challenge over saying 'thanks' to customers|url=https://nypost.com/2016/08/12/att-beats-citigroup-challenge-over-saying-thanks-to-customers/|website=The New York Post|accessdate=August 16, 2016}}
132. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.teamusa.org/pages/sponsors |title=Teamusa.org |publisher=Teamusa.org |accessdate=November 28, 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111205122946/http://www.teamusa.org/pages/sponsors |archivedate=December 5, 2011}}
133. ^{{cite web |url=http://ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/corp_relations/CorpRel/Corporate+Relationships/Corporate+Alliances/partners.html |title=NCAA.org |publisher=NCAA.org |date=December 14, 2007 |accessdate=November 28, 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110929220805/http://ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=%2Fcorp_relations%2FCorpRel%2FCorporate+Relationships%2FCorporate+Alliances%2Fpartners.html |archivedate=September 29, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}
134. ^{{cite web |title=AT&T and Infiniti Red Bull Racing – Speeding up Team Communications |url=http://about.att.com/newsroom/att_and_infiniti_red_bull_racing.html |department=AT&T Newsroom |publisher=AT&T|accessdate=May 27, 2016}}
135. ^{{cite news |title=AT&T Taking Esports Strategy to New Heights with Cloud9 Agreement |url=https://about.att.com/story/2019/cloud9.html |accessdate=March 26, 2019 |work=AT&T |date=March 5, 2019}}
136. ^{{cite news |last1=Fitch |first1=Adam |title=Cloud9 enters sponsorship deal with AT&T |url=https://esportsinsider.com/2019/03/cloud9-att-sponsorship/ |accessdate=March 26, 2019 |work=Esports Insider |date=March 5, 2019}}

History

Origin and growth (1885–1981)

Breakup and reformation (1982–2004)

Purchase of former parent and acquisitions (2005–2014)

Recent developments (2014–present)

AT&T Latin America

History

Landline operating companies

Chart of Baby Bells

Former operating companies

Future of rural landlines

Corporate structure

Facilities and regions

Corporate governance

Political involvement

Historical financial performance

Criticism and controversies

Hemisphere database

Censorship

Privacy controversy

Intellectual property filtering

Discrimination against local Public-access television channels

Information security

Accusations of enabling fraud

Racism

Trademark violation

Naming rights and sponsorships

Buildings

Venues

Sponsorships

Miscellaneous

See also

References

External links