请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc.
释义

  1. Background

  2. Judgment

  3. Significance

  4. See also

  5. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS, Inc.
|ArgueDate=January 15
|ArgueYear=1979
|DecideDate=April 17
|DecideYear=1979
|FullName=Broadcast Music, Inc., et al. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., et al.
|USVol=441
|USPage=1
|ParallelCitations=99 S. Ct. 1551; 60 L. Ed. 2d 1; 201 U.S.P.Q. 497
|Prior=CBS, Inc. v. Am. Soc'y of Composers, Authors & Publishers, 562 F.2d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/562/130/293462/ 130], 195 U.S.P.Q. 209 (2d Cir. 1977); cert. granted, {{ussc|439|817|1978|el=no}}.
|Subsequent=
|Holding=The issuance by ASCAP and BMI of blanket licenses does not constitute price-fixing per se unlawful under the antitrust laws.
|SCOTUS=1975–1981
|Majority=White
|JoinMajority=Burger, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
|Dissent=Stevens
|LawsApplied=
}}

Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 441 U.S. 1 (1979), was an important antitrust case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Background

The TV network CBS filed an antitrust suit against licensing agencies alleging that the system by which these agencies received fees for the issuance of blanket licenses to perform copyrighted musical compositions amounted to illegal price fixing.

The basic question in the case is "whether the issuance by ASCAP and BMI to CBS of blanket licenses to copyrighted musical compositions at fees negotiated by them is price fixing per se unlawful under the antitrust laws."

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that blanket licenses issued by ASCAP and BMI did not necessarily constitute price fixing. The judgment, delivered by White J, was unanimous in holding that such practice should instead be examined under the rule of reason to determine if it is unlawful. Stevens J agreed with the majority, but would not have remanded the case to the lower courts for rehearing. He would have held that the blanket license were a breach of s1 of the Sherman Act using the rule of reason.

{{expand section|date=April 2013}}

Significance

The case was part of the court's retreat from applying rigid per se rules in antitrust to a more permissive rule of reason.

See also

{{Slist rule of reason}}
  • US antitrust law
  • Westmoreland v. CBS (S.D.N.Y. 1982)
  • Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc. (11th Cir. 1999)

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System, {{Ussc|441|1|1979|el=no}}
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/441/1/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep441/usrep441001/usrep441001.pdf
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1978/77-1578{{SCOTUS-stub}}{{CBS}}

5 : 1979 in United States case law|United States antitrust case law|CBS Television Network|United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/11 9:58:01