词条 | C. Christine Fair |
释义 |
Carol Christine Fair (born 1968) is an American political scientist. She is currently an associate professor in the Security Studies Program within the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Her work is primarily focused on counter-terrorism and South Asian topics. Academic careerFair received her Ph.D. from the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilization at the University of Chicago in 2004.[1] Prior to that she received a masters of arts and bachelor of science from the same university.[2] Fair is a Provost's Distinguished Associate Professor[3] in the Peace and Security Studies Program (SSP) within Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service.[4][5] Prior to this, Fair served as a senior political scientist with the RAND Corporation, political officer with the UN Assistance Mission to Afghanistan and as a senior research associate with the United States Institute of Peace. She specializes in political and military affairs in South Asia.[6] She has served as a Senior Fellow at West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center, a Senior Resident Fellow at the Institute of Defense Studies and Analyses (New Delhi) and took a Reagan–Fascell Democracy Fellowship in the spring of 2017.[3] She has as authored, co-authored and co-edited several books, including Pakistan's Enduring Challenges (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015), Policing Insurgencies: Cops as Counterinsurgents (Oxford University Press, 2014);Political Islam and Governance in Bangladesh (Routledge, 2010); Treading on Hallowed Ground: Counterinsurgency Operations in Sacred Spaces (Oxford University Press, 2008); The Madrassah Challenge: Militancy and Religious Education in Pakistan (USIP, 2008), and The Cuisines of the Axis of Evil and Other Irritating States (Globe Pequot, 2008), among others. Her current book project is Lashkar-e-Taiba: In its Own Words.[7] ViewsFair has published several articles defending the use of drone strikes in Pakistan and has been critical of analyses by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other humanitarian organizations, arguing that drone strikes are accurate, have reduced casualties, have targeted Taliban leadership and are popular among some Pakistanis.[8] Academic controversiesFair's work and viewpoints have been the subject of prominent criticism.[9] Her pro-drone stance has been denounced, and called "surprisingly weak" by Brookings Institution senior fellow Shadi Hamid.[9] Journalist Glenn Greenwald dismissed Fair's arguments as "rank propaganda", arguing there are "enormous amounts of evidence" showing drones are counterproductive, pointing to mass civilian casualties and independent studies.[10] In 2010, Fair denied the notion that drones caused any civilian deaths, alleging Pakistani media reports were responsible for creating this perception.[11] Jeremy Scahill wrote that Fair's statement was "simply false" and contradicted by New America's detailed study on drone casualties.[11] Fair later said that casualties are caused by the UAVs, but maintains they are the most effective tool for fighting terrorism.[12] Writing for The Atlantic, Conor Friedersdorf challenged Fair's co-authored narrative that the U.S. could legitimize support in Pakistan for its drone program using 'education' and 'public diplomacy'; he called it an "example of interventionist hubris and naivete" built upon flawed interpretation of public opinion data.[13] An article in the Middle East Research and Information Project called the work "some of the most propagandistic writing in support of President Barack Obama’s targeted kill lists to date."[14] It censured the view that Pakistanis needed to be informed by the U.S. what is "good for them" as fraught with imperialist condescension; or the assumption that the Urdu press was less informed than the English press – because the latter was sometimes less critical of the U.S.[14] Fair's journalistic sources have been questioned for their credibility[15] and she has been accused of having a conflict of interest due to her past work with U.S. government think tanks, as well as the CIA.[9] In 2011 and 2012, she received funding from the U.S. embassy in Islamabad to conduct a survey on public opinion concerning militancy. However, Fair states most of the grants went to a survey firm and that it had no influence on her research.[9] Pakistani media analysts have dismissed Fair's views as hawkish rhetoric, riddled with factual inaccuracies, lack of objectivity, and being selectively biased.[15][16][17][18] She has also been rebuked{{by who|date=March 2019}} for comments on social media perceived as provocative, such as suggesting burning down Pakistan's embassy in Afghanistan or asking India to "squash Pakistan militarily, diplomatically, politically and economically."{{fact|date=March 2019}} She has been accused of double standards, partisanship towards India, and has been criticized for her contacts with dissident leaders from Balochistan, a link which they claim "raises serious questions if her interest in Pakistan is merely academic."[17] Personal controversiesIn January 2017, Fair was involved in a Twitter dispute with Asra Q. Nomani. In response to Nomani's tweet that as a Muslim, she voted for President Trump, Fair tweeted that she had "written [Nomani] off as a human being" and that Nomani had "pimped herself out to all media outlets." Nomani responded by filing a complaint with Georgetown University, Fair's employer, alleging discrimination and harassment.[19] In May 2017, Fair began an altercation with white nationalist Richard B. Spencer at a gym in Alexandria, Virginia. While the two were working out, Fair approached Spencer and accused him of being a Nazi, along with a number of other accusations, leading a third gym patron to intervene on behalf of him. This incident resulted in Spencer's membership being terminated by the manager of the gym.[20] In January 2018, Fair was involved in an incident at Frankfurt Airport. When her bag was flagged for possibly containing explosives, it was searched and German Federal Police instructed Fair that she would have to dispose of a liquid deodorant or transfer it to her checked bag. German police stated that Fair was uncooperative, as she accused them of sexism and of being Nazis and thugs, and directed expletives at them. Fair was charged with slander under Germany's defamation law. She subsequently published an article on HuffPost partially rejecting the police account of the incident.[21] In the midst of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination hearings in September 2018, Fair tweeted that Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were "entitled white men justifying a serial rapists' arrogated entitlement" and that they "deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps." She made additional comments expressing support for post-mortem castration and corpse desecration of the senators.[22] At least one student expressed the fear that Fair's comments would cause students who hold opposing views to feel threatened. Georgetown University responded by saying that her expressions did not violate the university's policies.[23] The university later responded by moving up her scheduled international research leave.[24] Works
References1. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Fair|title=Carol Christine Fair|last=|first=|date=|website=ResearchGate|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161121121035/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Fair|archive-date=November 1, 2016|dead-url=no|access-date=September 30, 2018}} 2. ^{{Cite web|url=https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-profile?netid=ccf33%2F|title=Carol C Fair|last=|first=|date=|website=Georgetown University|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923055005/https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-profile?netid=ccf33%2F|archive-date=September 23, 2018|dead-url=no|access-date=September 30, 2018}} 3. ^1 {{Cite web|url=https://provost.georgetown.edu/2016-2017-distinguished-associate-professors|title=2016-2017 Distinguished Associate Professors|website=provost.georgetown.edu|language=en|access-date=2017-11-15}} 4. ^{{cite web |title=C. Christine Fair |url=http://explore.georgetown.edu/people/ccf33/ |website=Georgetown University academic directory |accessdate=27 June 2016}} 5. ^{{cite news |last1=C. Christine |first1=Fair |title=For Now, Drones Are the Best Option |url=https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/09/25/do-drone-attacks-do-more-harm-than-good/for-now-drones-are-the-best-option |accessdate=28 June 2016|publisher=New York Times|date=25 September 2009}} 6. ^[https://global.oup.com/academic/product/fighting-to-the-end-9780199892709?cc=gb&lang=en Author information], Oxford University Press, retrieved 6 September 2016. 7. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.christinefair.net/html_pages/home.html|title=C. Christine Fair|last=Fair|first=C. Christine|website=www.christinefair.net|language=en|access-date=2017-11-15}} 8. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/06/ethical-and-methodological-issues-in-assessing-drones-civilian-impacts-in-pakistan/|title=Ethical and methodological issues in assessing drones’ civilian impacts in Pakistan|last=Fair|first=C. Christine|date=2014-10-06|work=Washington Post|access-date=2017-11-15|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286}} 9. ^1 2 3 {{Cite web |last=Norton |first=Ben |date=4 November 2015 |title=Not playing fair: How Christine Fair, defender of U.S. drone program in Pakistan, twists the facts — and may have conflicts of her own |url=http://www.salon.com/2015/11/04/i_am_a_rambo_bch_meet_the_drone_defender_who_hates_neo_cons_attacks_glenn_greenwald_and_may_have_conflicts_of_her_own/ |website=Salon |accessdate=4 November 2015 }} 10. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2015/10/drone-strikes-create-terrorists-kill-151023152321140.html|title=Do drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill?|work=Al Jazeera|date=23 October 2015|accessdate=6 September 2016}} 11. ^1 {{cite news|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/georgetown-professor-drones-are-not-killing-innocent-civilians-pakistan/|title=Georgetown Professor: ‘Drones Are Not Killing Innocent Civilians’ in Pakistan|work=The Nation|date=10 May 2010|accessdate=6 September 2016|first=Jeremy|last=Scahill}} 12. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/world/asia/12drones.html?_r=0|title=C.I.A. Is Disputed on Civilian Toll in Drone Strikes|work=New York Times|date=11 August 2011|accessdate=6 September 2016|first=Scott|last=Shane}} 13. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/yes-pakistanis-really-do-hate-americas-killer-drones/272468|title=Yes, Pakistanis Really Do Hate America's Killer Drones|work=The Atlantic|date=24 January 2013|accessdate=6 September 2016|first=Conor|last=Friedersdorf}} 14. ^1 {{cite web|url=http://www.merip.org/drones-us-propaganda-imperial-hubris|title=Drones, US Propaganda and Imperial Hubris|work=Middle East Research and Information Project|first=Sarah|last=Waheed|date=25 January 2013|accessdate=6 September 2016}} 15. ^1 {{cite news|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/06/2011613931606455.html|title=The magical realism of body counts|work=Al Jazeera|date=14 June 2011|accessdate=6 September 2016|first=Muhammad Idrees|last=Ahmad}} 16. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/729946/an-unfair-comment|title=An unFair comment|work=Dawn|first=Murtaza|last=Haider|date=27 June 2012|accessdate=6 September 2016}} 17. ^1 {{cite news|url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/96617-US-professors-anti-Pak-agenda|title=US professor’s anti-Pak agenda?|work=The News|date=7 February 2016|accessdate=6 September 2016}} 18. ^{{cite book|title=Prejudice Dominates Christine Discourse|work=Islamabad Policy Research Institute|first=Khalid|last=Chandio|date=6 May 2015}} 19. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/01/06/muslim-woman-who-voted-for-trump-asks-georgetown-to-intervene-over-professors-hateful-vulgar-messages/|title=Muslim woman who voted for Trump asks Georgetown to intervene over professor’s ‘hateful, vulgar’ messages|last=Moyer|first=Justin Wm.|date=6 January 2017|newspaper=Washington Post|access-date=5 February 2018}} 20. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/richard_spencer_gym_professor.html#incart_most-comments|title=Professor confronts white nationalist at the gym - which terminates his membership|last=|first=|date=May 21, 2017|work=Nola.com|access-date=September 30, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180306000842/https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/richard_spencer_gym_professor.html|archive-date=March 6, 2018|dead-url=no}} 21. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article196872084.html|title=U.S. professor sued for calling a German cop a Nazi claims ‘extraordinary corruption’|last=Londberg|first=Max|date=January 26, 2018|work=The Kansas City Star|access-date=September 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180215043305/https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article196872084.html|archive-date=February 15, 2018|dead-url=no}} 22. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11369|title=Georgetown prof: White GOP senators in Kavanaugh hearing 'deserve miserable deaths'|last=Marone|first=Abigail|date=September 30, 2018|work=Campus Reform|access-date=September 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930234421/https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11369|archive-date=September 30, 2018|dead-url=no}} 23. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetown-professor-says-white-gop-senators-deserve-miserable-deaths-after-kavanaugh-hearing|title=Georgetown professor says white GOP senators ‘deserve miserable deaths’ after Kavanaugh hearing|last=Parke|first=Caleb|date=October 1, 2018|work=Fox News|access-date=October 1, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181001191120/https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetown-professor-says-white-gop-senators-deserve-miserable-deaths-after-kavanaugh-hearing|archive-date=October 1, 2018|dead-url=no}} 24. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/10/08/professor-who-tweeted-about-castrating-corpses-gop-senators-no-longer-teaching|title=Professor Who Tweeted About 'Castrating the Corpses' of GOP Senators No Longer Teaching|last=Flaherty|first=Colleen|date=October 8, 2018|work=Inside Higher Ed|access-date=March 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215082408/https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/10/08/professor-who-tweeted-about-castrating-corpses-gop-senators-no-longer-teaching|archive-date=February 15, 2019|dead-url=no}} 25. ^{{citation |last=Adeney |first=Katherine |title=Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army’s Way of War by C. Christine Fair (Book Review) |journal=Political Studies Review |volume=13 |year=2015 |pp=623–624}} 26. ^{{citation |last=Shaikh |first=Farzana |title=Fighting to the end: the Pakistan army’s way of war, by C. Christine Fair (Book review) |journal=International Affairs |volume=91 |number=3 |year=2015 |pp=665–667}} 27. ^{{citation |last=Ghorpade |first=Yashodhan |title=C. Christine Fair and Shaun Gregory (Eds). Pakistan in National and Regional Change: State and Society in Flux (Book Review) |journal=Journal of South Asian Development |volume=9 |number=1 |pp=91–97 |year=2014 |DOI=10.1177/0973174113520586}} 28. ^{{citation |first=Kemal |last=Argon |title=Reviewed Work: Fortifying Pakistan: The Role of U.S. Internal Security Assistance by C. Christine Fair, Peter Chalk |journal=International Journal on World Peace |volume=25 |number=3 |date=September 2008 |pp=120–123 |JSTOR=20752852}} 29. ^{{citation |first=Hasan-Askari |last=Rizvi |title=Fortifying Pakistan: The Role of U.S. Internal Security Assistance, by C. Christine Fair and Peter Chalk (eds) (BOok review) |journal=Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management |volume=16 |number=3 |date=September 2008 |pp=169–170 |DOI=10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00546.x}} 30. ^{{citation |first=Teresita C. |last=Schaffer |title=Book Reviews: South Asia |journal=Survival |volume=50 |number=5 |date=October 2008 |pp=195–215 |DOI=10.1080/00396330802456536}} External links
14 : 1969 births|Living people|American political scientists|Georgetown University faculty|American scholars of Pakistan studies|Analysts of India-Pakistan conflict|Women political scientists|American political writers|Women political writers|21st-century American women writers|American cookbook writers|Women cookbook writers|American women non-fiction writers|21st-century American non-fiction writers |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。