请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Cresswell v Potter
释义

  1. Facts

  2. Judgment

  3. See also

  4. Notes

  5. References

  6. External links

{{Infobox court case
| name = Cresswell v Potter
| court = High Court
| image = BLW Royal Mail Logo.jpg
| date decided =
| full name =
| citations = [1978] 1 WLR 255
| judges =
| prior actions =
| subsequent actions =
| opinions = Megarry J
| transcripts =
| keywords = Exploitation
}}

Cresswell v Potter [1978] 1 WLR 255 is an English contract law case relating to exploitation of weakness allowing escape from a contract.

Facts

Ms Cresswell was a telephonist for the Post Office. She divorced from Mr Potter, and then contracted to convey him her interest in Slate Hall in return for release from mortgage liability. Two years later, Mr Potter sold the property for £3350, making a £1400 profit. Ms Cresswell successfully argued that she should get half because he had exploited her weaknesses so much as to vitiate her consent to the contract, and she was vulnerable to this because she was the modern equivalent to a "poor and ignorant" person (Fry v Lane).

Judgment

Megarry J said the first of the (non exhaustive) requirements from Fry v Lane is to be ‘poor and ignorant’, the second is whether the sale was at a considerable undervalue and the third is whether there was any independent advice. In more modern euphemisms, ‘poor and ignorant’ would be ‘member of the lower income group’ and ‘less highly educated’. Because Ms Cresswell was a van driver for a tobacconist and now a PO telephonist, and had slender means and was on legal aid, this was enough.

{{Cquote|Further, although no doubt it requires considerable alertness and skill to be a good telephonist, I think that a telephonist can properly be described as ‘ignorant’ in the context of property transactions in general and the execution of conveyancing documents in particular. I have seen and heard the plaintiff giving evidence, and I have reached the conclusion that she satisfies the requirements of the first head.}}

On the point of independent advice, he noted that on one side stood Mr Potter, his solicitor and the inquiry agent and on the other Ms Cresswell alone.

See also

{{Clist pressure}}
  • English contract law
  • Iniquitous pressure in English law
  • Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy [1975] QB 326
  • Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. 350 F.2d 445 (C.A. D.C. 1965)

Notes

References

External links

4 : English contract case law|High Court of Justice cases|1978 in case law|1978 in British law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/27 21:31:42