请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 Cyprus v Turkey
释义

  1. Judgment

  2. Separate opinions

  3. References

  4. External links

{{italic title}}{{EngvarB|date=August 2014}}{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2014}}

Cyprus v. Turkey (2001) (No. 25781/94) is a case raised by Cyprus against Turkey in 1994 and decided on merits by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in 2001. It concerns the situation existing in northern Cyprus after 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus and the De facto separation of the Mediterranean island.

Judgment

On the accountability, the Court held, by sixteen votes to one, referring to its Loizidou v. Turkey judgment, that the facts complained of fell within the jurisdiction of Turkey and therefore entailed Turkey's responsibility.

On the merits, the Court held with differing divisions of votes (in most cases either unanimously or by 16 votes to 1):

  • that there had been 14 violations of the European Convention on Human Rights by Turkey:
    • Violations of Articles 3 and 5 concerning Greek-Cypriot missing persons and their relatives;
    • Violations of Articles 8, 13 and P1-1 concerning home and property of displaced Greek-Cypriots;
    • Violations of Articles 3, 8, 9, 10, 13, P1-1 and P1-2 concerning living conditions of Greek Cypriots in Karpas region of northern Cyprus;
    • Violation of Article 6, concerning rights of Turkish Cypriots living in northern Cyprus;
  • that there had been no violation concerning part of complaints, including all those raised under Articles 4, 11 and 14, and
  • that it was not necessary to consider some complaints, including those under Article P1-3.

Deciding on possible awarding compensation was postponed and the judgment on this issue was adopted on 12 May 2014, ordering Turkey to pay 90,000,000 euros to Cyprus.[1]

Separate opinions

Judges Palm (Sweden), Costa (France), Jungwiert (Czech Republic), Pantiru (Moldova), Levits (Latvia), Kovler (Russia), Fuad (Turkey) and Marcus-Helmons (Cyprus) expressed partly dissenting opinions to the judgment on the merits.

15 judges have expressed five concurring or dissenting opinions on the judgment on just satisfaction.

References

1. ^  judgement on compensation (2014)

External links

  • Press release
  • Judgment on the merits of the case (2001)

20 : 2001 in case law|Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights|Cyprus dispute|European Court of Human Rights cases decided by the Grand Chamber|European Court of Human Rights interstate cases|European Court of Human Rights cases involving Cyprus|European Court of Human Rights cases involving Turkey|Cyprus–Turkey relations
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/14 0:52:56