请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Dixon v. Alabama
释义

  1. See also

  2. References

  3. Bibliography

  4. External links

{{italic title}}{{Infobox COA case
|Litigants=Dixon v. Alabama
|Court=United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
|CourtSeal=
|DecideDate=August 4
|DecideYear=1961
|FullName=St. John Dixon, et al. v. Alabama State Board of Education, et al.
|Docket=No. 18641
|Citations= 294 F.2d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/294/150/346079/ 150]
|Prior=Dixon v. Alabama, 186 F. Supp. [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/186/945/2374127/ 945] (M.D. Ala. 1960)
|Holding=That students at public institutions of higher education cannot be disciplined without due process, including notice of their alleged violations and an opportunity to be heard.
|Judges=Benjamin Franklin Cameron, Richard Rives, John Minor Wisdom
|PerCuriam=
|Majority=Rives
|JoinMajority=Wisdom
|Dissent=Cameron
|LawsApplied=14th Amendment to the United States Constitution
}}Dixon v. Alabama, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961) was a landmark 1961 U.S. federal court decision that spelled the end of the doctrine that colleges and universities could act in loco parentis to discipline or expel their students.[1] It has been called "the leading case on due process for students in public higher education".[2]

The case arose when Alabama State College, a then-segregated black college, expelled six students, including the named appellant, St. John Dixon, for unspecified reasons, but presumably because of their participation in demonstrations during the Civil Rights Movement. The college, acting in loco parentis, expelled them without a hearing. The case was appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which held that a public college could not expel students without at least minimal due process.[1]

The case was heard by a panel of John Minor Wisdom, Richard Rives, and Benjamin Franklin Cameron. Cameron dissented from the opinion of the court.

Thurgood Marshall, Fred Gray, Derrick Bell and Jack Greenberg were among the counsel for the appellants.[2][3]

See also

  • Tompkins v. Alabama State University

References

1. ^{{Harv|Hoover|2008|p=34}}
2. ^{{Harv|Smith|2008|p=484}}
3. ^{{cite web |url=http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/294/150/346079/ |title= St. John Dixon et al., Appellants, v. Alabama State Board of Education et al., Appellees|accessdate=2008-09-05 |work=Justia.com U.S. Court of Appeals Cases & Opinions |publisher=Justia |date=1961-08-04 }}

Bibliography

  • {{citation |last=Hoover |first=Eric |publication-date=2008-09-05 |title=‘Animal House’ at 30: O Bluto, Where Art Thou? |periodical=The Chronicle of Higher Education |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=1, 34–35 }}
  • {{Citation

| last = Smith
| first = Wilson
| last2 = Bender
| first2 = Thomas
| year = 2008
| title = American Higher Education Transformed, 1940–2005
| publisher = JHU Press
| pages = 521
| isbn = 978-0-8018-8671-3
}}

External links

  • JSTOR Constitutional Archives [https://www.jstor.org/pss/1338554 Dixon v. Alabama St. Board of Education]
  • Complete decision
{{Alabama State University}}{{US-case-law-stub}}{{MontgomeryAL-stub}}{{civil-rights-movement-stub}}

7 : United States substantive due process case law|United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit cases|1961 in United States case law|Legal history of Alabama|1961 in Alabama|Alabama State University|Civil rights movement case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/24 0:20:45